What's the difference between Communism and Obama Democrats??

[Dorkazoid_Jones]

I don't see much difference, except the current administration can't seize property openly. If they could, they would. In fact, by stating that the rich should "pay their fair share" when they already are paying most of the taxes, that would indicate trying to eliminate the upper class. Isn't that what Marx wanted? Didn't Marx also want to destroy religion? Isn't that what the Democratic Party is doing by trying to remove any religious symbols from public areas? Didn't Marx look at the wealthy with antipathy and don't Dems look at the 1% as evil?? Didn't Marx believe that one's world view depends on one's class, and don't Dems see the world as a relativist place where there is no universal truths, only perspectives??

What does fair share mean anyway? If we are talking about fair share, shouldn't ugly people get their fair share of dating attractive people? Shouldn't short people get their fair share of playing in the NBA? Oh wait, we already have some sort of convoluted version of that called Affirmative Action and Diversity. Achievement and merit are less important than "fair share."

Marx would probably like Obama a lot. Really sad...

 

[AmericanFirst]

None!

 

[Moonglow]

so now the 1% are middle class.
You are very short on any details but I am guessing you don't know what true communism really is.

 

[Dorkazoid_Jones]

so now the 1% are middle class.
You are very short on any details but I am guessing you don't know what true communism really is.

The one percent are the one percent. What's wrong with being in the one percent?? By the way, Marx is a very simple minded person. He believes everyone should have the same stuff. Wow how Brilliant. How often does he refer to basically anything but money? Kind of like Democrats...

 

[The2ndAmendment]

I would basically delete the OP, and rewrite it very simply (as below):

"What is the difference between Communism and Obama Democrats?"

Let them answer for themselves, don't feed them anything. This forces them to define Communism, instead of you.

 

[Vox]

The difference is dems want, but can't( yet). commies in the remained countries can, but on the most part don't want anymore, because it does not work

 

[rdean]

The Democratic Party, being a coalition of groups, including blacks, whites, browns, gay, straight, educated, uneducated, religious, atheist and every group in between, typifies what it means to be a democracy.

Republicans, being 90% white, are much closer to the Nazi Party. Their racist beliefs and naked hatred for minorities only underscores that perception. Their zany and damaging policies don't do anything to change that perception.

 

[boedicca]

so now the 1% are middle class.
You are very short on any details but I am guessing you don't know what true communism really is.

The low end of the 1% are upper middle class. They have far more in common with the middle class than they do with the multi-billionaires at the top of the 1%.

 

[Cowman]

Communism is probably the difference.

That ever cross your mind?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

The Democratic Party, being a coalition of groups, including blacks, whites, browns, gay, straight, educated, uneducated, religious, atheist and every group in between, typifies what it means to be a democracy.

Republicans, being 90% white, are much closer to the Nazi Party. Their racist beliefs and naked hatred for minorities only underscores that perception. Their zany and damaging policies don't do anything to change that perception.

You are correct.

Except you avoided the issue altogether. The Republican party is Fascist, embracing the values and methods of Adolf Hitler. This is already common knowledge, and is only denied by Republicans themselves.

However, we are discussing Communism, not Fascism. The Democrat party is Communist, embracing values and methods of Joseph Stalin. This is also common knowledge, and is only denied by Democrats themselves.

The only thing both parties have yet to do, is to round up and exterminate/genocide the dissidents. Most likely, since the far-right and the far-left both have common goals of enslaving the American people and establishing a corporate oligarchy, they will exempt each other from the Extermination Process, and only genocide/democide Libertarians/Tea Partiers/Occupy Wall Streeters/Muslims/etc.

They'll probably call it the "Final Solution to Terrorism." And everyone will buy it, because they'll probably force us to fight for our lives by that point, allowing them to label us as terrorists.

 

[bripat9643]

Communism is probably the difference.

That ever cross your mind?

Can you explain what communists believe that Democrats don't believe?

 

[Old Rocks]

so now the 1% are middle class.
You are very short on any details but I am guessing you don't know what true communism really is.

The low end of the 1% are upper middle class. They have far more in common with the middle class than they do with the multi-billionaires at the top of the 1%.

Bullshit. Here is the reality;

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMhvYeQPOcE]Wealth Distribution in the USA - SHOCKING! - YouTube[/ame]

 

[francoHFW]

The richest actually pay 17%, the middle class 24%, the poorest 12%, and Romney 9% in ALL taxes anf fees. Payroll taxes are now more than federal income taxes, which is what Pub dupe morons are talking about.

The diff between Dems and commies is COMMUNISM, you stupid fekking MORON. Change the channel, and parties, dumbazz hater chump of the greedy idiot rich...LOL

 

[Geaux4it]

I don't see much difference, except the current administration can't seize property openly. If they could, they would. In fact, by stating that the rich should "pay their fair share" when they already are paying most of the taxes, that would indicate trying to eliminate the upper class. Isn't that what Marx wanted? Didn't Marx also want to destroy religion? Isn't that what the Democratic Party is doing by trying to remove any religious symbols from public areas? Didn't Marx look at the wealthy with antipathy and don't Dems look at the 1% as evil?? Didn't Marx believe that one's world view depends on one's class, and don't Dems see the world as a relativist place where there is no universal truths, only perspectives??

What does fair share mean anyway? If we are talking about fair share, shouldn't ugly people get their fair share of dating attractive people? Shouldn't short people get their fair share of playing in the NBA? Oh wait, we already have some sort of convoluted version of that called Affirmative Action and Diversity. Achievement and merit are less important than "fair share."

Marx would probably like Obama a lot. Really sad...

To answer your question- I think the communist are smarter than these malmutes aka Obama supporters.

Hitler had support to you know

-Geaux

 

[rdean]

The Democratic Party, being a coalition of groups, including blacks, whites, browns, gay, straight, educated, uneducated, religious, atheist and every group in between, typifies what it means to be a democracy.

Republicans, being 90% white, are much closer to the Nazi Party. Their racist beliefs and naked hatred for minorities only underscores that perception. Their zany and damaging policies don't do anything to change that perception.

You are correct.

Except you avoided the issue altogether. The Republican party is Fascist, embracing the values and methods of Adolf Hitler. This is already common knowledge, and is only denied by Republicans themselves.

However, we are discussing Communism, not Fascism. The Democrat party is Communist, embracing values and methods of Joseph Stalin. This is also common knowledge, and is only denied by Democrats themselves.

The only thing both parties have yet to do, is to round up and exterminate/genocide the dissidents. Most likely, since the far-right and the far-left both have common goals of enslaving the American people and establishing a corporate oligarchy, they will exempt each other from the Extermination Process, and only genocide/democide Libertarians/Tea Partiers/Occupy Wall Streeters/Muslims/etc.

They'll probably call it the "Final Solution to Terrorism." And everyone will buy it, because they'll probably force us to fight for our lives by that point, allowing them to label us as terrorists.

That doesn't even make sense. Republicans certainly want to enslave America. Either a plutocracy with business in charge or a theocracy like the one they installed in Iraq, but Christian. And either one with white people running everything.

The fact that the Democratic Party is a coalition, a collection of groups, makes it impossible for them to want to enslave all Americans. They could never agree to who would be in charge. I'm embarrassed to have to point out something so obvious.

 

[hortysir]

What's the difference between Communism and Obama Democrats??

One is an ideology the other is a group of people.




Great choice for a username, BTW

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Wealth Distribution in the USA - SHOCKING! - YouTube

You are correct, that is reality, and it certainly reflects that we live in an economically controlled society (by a very small elite), and is also a poor reflection on this nation, which is dominated by Keynesian and Marxist economic policies. What you see there is NOT the free market, which only existed in the United States between the years of 1840 to 1913.

However, in order to ensure that you understand those graphs, which of these do you think is the proper distribution of wealth in a FREE market.

y = sqrt(x)

or
y = x

y=x^2
or

or y = x^n

 

[The2ndAmendment]

The Democratic Party, being a coalition of groups, including blacks, whites, browns, gay, straight, educated, uneducated, religious, atheist and every group in between, typifies what it means to be a democracy.

Republicans, being 90% white, are much closer to the Nazi Party. Their racist beliefs and naked hatred for minorities only underscores that perception. Their zany and damaging policies don't do anything to change that perception.

You are correct.

Except you avoided the issue altogether. The Republican party is Fascist, embracing the values and methods of Adolf Hitler. This is already common knowledge, and is only denied by Republicans themselves.

However, we are discussing Communism, not Fascism. The Democrat party is Communist, embracing values and methods of Joseph Stalin. This is also common knowledge, and is only denied by Democrats themselves.

The only thing both parties have yet to do, is to round up and exterminate/genocide the dissidents. Most likely, since the far-right and the far-left both have common goals of enslaving the American people and establishing a corporate oligarchy, they will exempt each other from the Extermination Process, and only genocide/democide Libertarians/Tea Partiers/Occupy Wall Streeters/Muslims/etc.

They'll probably call it the "Final Solution to Terrorism." And everyone will buy it, because they'll probably force us to fight for our lives by that point, allowing them to label us as terrorists.

That doesn't even make sense. Republicans certainly want to enslave America. Either a plutocracy with business in charge or a theocracy like the one they installed in Iraq, but Christian. And either one with white people running everything.

The fact that the Democratic Party is a coalition, a collection of groups, makes it impossible for them to want to enslave all Americans. They could never agree to who would be in charge. I'm embarrassed to have to point out something so obvious.

For the record, before I make this statement, I am Jewish, and most Jews are opposed to Zionists, who are Satanic usurpers of our religion:

Very rich, white, Zionists, are already ruling everything in both parties.

If you listen closely to this, it is mostly true, yes I am supporting most of what Reverend Wright is saying here (and what he says about Obama is mostly true during his CHILDHOOD)

 

[JakeStarkey]

Marx would probably like Obama a lot. Really sad...

What a stupid OP. No examples, no comparisons, no critical thinking ~ typical reactionary emoting and knee jerking.

 

[BlindBoo]

I don't see much difference, except the current administration can't seize property openly. If they could, they would. In fact, by stating that the rich should "pay their fair share" when they already are paying most of the taxes, that would indicate trying to eliminate the upper class. Isn't that what Marx wanted? Didn't Marx also want to destroy religion? Isn't that what the Democratic Party is doing by trying to remove any religious symbols from public areas? Didn't Marx look at the wealthy with antipathy and don't Dems look at the 1% as evil?? Didn't Marx believe that one's world view depends on one's class, and don't Dems see the world as a relativist place where there is no universal truths, only perspectives??

What does fair share mean anyway? If we are talking about fair share, shouldn't ugly people get their fair share of dating attractive people? Shouldn't short people get their fair share of playing in the NBA? Oh wait, we already have some sort of convoluted version of that called Affirmative Action and Diversity. Achievement and merit are less important than "fair share."

Marx would probably like Obama a lot. Really sad...

By "pay their fair share" it was obvious that they wanted a return the 3% tax cut made during the Bush years, from 36% to the 39% tax rate. And taxing Capital Gains on investment income as ordinary income. Nothing about eliminating the 1%. Claiming the Democrats want to eliminate them is pure hyperbole. As is the rest of your post......