What's the difference between Communism and Obama Democrats??

[editec]

I don't see much difference, except the current administration can't seize property openly. If they could, they would. In fact, by stating that the rich should "pay their fair share" when they already are paying most of the taxes, that would indicate trying to eliminate the upper class. Isn't that what Marx wanted? Didn't Marx also want to destroy religion? Isn't that what the Democratic Party is doing by trying to remove any religious symbols from public areas? Didn't Marx look at the wealthy with antipathy and don't Dems look at the 1% as evil?? Didn't Marx believe that one's world view depends on one's class, and don't Dems see the world as a relativist place where there is no universal truths, only perspectives??

What does fair share mean anyway? If we are talking about fair share, shouldn't ugly people get their fair share of dating attractive people? Shouldn't short people get their fair share of playing in the NBA? Oh wait, we already have some sort of convoluted version of that called Affirmative Action and Diversity. Achievement and merit are less important than "fair share."

Marx would probably like Obama a lot. Really sad...

yawn.

 

[JakeStarkey]

double yawn

 

[tubig]

No one said communism was great in this thread, or even half way mediocre.

What no one has done has shown how the Democrats are somehow crypto-commies. Or anymore, for that matter, of how Republicanism is somehow fascism.

Here's your proof, Fakey:

Communist Party Sues Democrats For Stealing Its Platform | U. S. Politics

Communist Party Sues Democrats For Stealing Its Platform

In a surprise move, the CPUSA (Communist Party USA) has announced a lawsuit against the Democratic Party and its leadership for the alleged theft of intellectual property. The plaintiffs claim that the entire so-called “new” Democratic agenda is, in fact, the product of a decades-long, painstaking campaign by CPUSA theorists, agitators, and underground subversive cells – which makes it the intellectual property of the Communist Party USA, protected by American copyright laws. “They stole our entire platform, rebranded it ‘progressive’, and claimed it as their own,” declared a CPUSA spokesperson at a press conference in San Francisco. “And we communists say, not so fast! Not in this country anyway, where we still have property rights and the rule of law, thank God! Actually, let me rephrase that…”

What a hoot! Next thing you know Republicans will claim that "liberty and freedom" is right wing intellectual property. Careful fellas. Next thing you know the Brits will claim that "proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" is British intellectual property because British common law pre-existed the Constitution of the US? Romans and Greeks might claim democracy as intellectually theirs? San Francisco beware - Bonnie Prince Charlie was a butt bandit well before Harvey Milk. How could he not be what with all the bitterly cold nights and Highland sheep?

 

[JakeStarkey]

bripat is one of the stupidest of the anarcho-whatevers on the Board.

Absolutely clueless.

 

[bripat9643]

No one said communism was great in this thread, or even half way mediocre.

What no one has done has shown how the Democrats are somehow crypto-commies. Or anymore, for that matter, of how Republicanism is somehow fascism.

Here's your proof, Fakey:

Communist Party Sues Democrats For Stealing Its Platform | U. S. Politics

Communist Party Sues Democrats For Stealing Its Platform

In a surprise move, the CPUSA (Communist Party USA) has announced a lawsuit against the Democratic Party and its leadership for the alleged theft of intellectual property. The plaintiffs claim that the entire so-called “new” Democratic agenda is, in fact, the product of a decades-long, painstaking campaign by CPUSA theorists, agitators, and underground subversive cells – which makes it the intellectual property of the Communist Party USA, protected by American copyright laws. “They stole our entire platform, rebranded it ‘progressive’, and claimed it as their own,” declared a CPUSA spokesperson at a press conference in San Francisco. “And we communists say, not so fast! Not in this country anyway, where we still have property rights and the rule of law, thank God! Actually, let me rephrase that…”

What a hoot! Next thing you know Republicans will claim that "liberty and freedom" is right wing intellectual property. Careful fellas. Next thing you know the Brits will claim that "proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" is British intellectual property because British common law pre-existed the Constitution of the US? Romans and Greeks might claim democracy as intellectually theirs? San Francisco beware - Bonnie Prince Charlie was a butt bandit well before Harvey Milk. How could he not be what with all the bitterly cold nights and Highland sheep?

You obviously don't get it. The Democrat Party platform and the Communist Party platform are virtually identical. That's why the Communists are suing. Of course, is purely a propaganda ploy, but it highlights an essential fact: both parties have the exact same goals.

 

[bripat9643]

bripat is one of the stupidest of the anarcho-whatevers on the Board.

Absolutely clueless.

Fakey, you are pure comedy gold.

 

[Politico]

What's the difference between Communism and Obama Democrats??

The Constitution.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The more bripat et al post here, the more wacko their thinking becomes.

 

[bripat9643]

What's the difference between Communism and Obama Democrats??

The Constitution.

Nope. Both despise the Constitution.

 

[bripat9643]

The more bripat et al post here, the more wacko their thinking becomes.

The one thing we can say about your thinking, Fakey, is that it would seem utterly conventional in Nazi Germany of the 1930s.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Says the hater of American democracy, of the American Constitution, of the best country in the world.

You are a wack, Comrade bripat. Is what it is.

 

[JakeStarkey]

What's the difference between Communism and Obama Democrats??

The Constitution.

Nope. Both despise the Constitution.

Nope. Communists and you despise the Constitution.

 

[Roadrunner]

Obama Democrats and their workshy constituents will be the first the real commies shoot.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Obama Democrats and their workshy constituents will be the first the real commies shoot.

And the mainstream Republicans.

The commies know you will work happily for them, Roadrunner, so you are safe for a bit.

 

[peach174]

The Progressives (aka) liberals of both parities embrace the isms of government control over the citizens.
By that I mean they have a combination of Communism, Socialism and Marxism.
Communists and Socialists are anti Capitalists.
The Democrats political ideology has the same speech as Communists.
Communism & Socialism says that Capitalists exploit the worker to get rich themselves and that profits are evil.
This is absolutely false.
When Capitalists prosper the whole country prospers.
Capitalists who make a profit use that money to open more businesses and to higher more employees.
More Mom and Pop shops do much better under the Capitalist ideology than under the Socialist or Communists ideology that government does it better.
Big Government is exactly why the Mom and Pop shops are going away. They can't afford the big Government interferences or the over the top regulations.
Big Companies can afford it, so there goes the small businesses.

Socialism and Communism ideology thinks the Government solves the social, economic and environmental problems, rather than the people themselves.
When the Government becomes responsible (the parent of individuals) rather than the individuals , you lose your freedom.

Our Government needs to get out of running our Schools, our Social programs, the alternative energy systems and our Health Care.
These things are done better by the private sector.

Did you know that Fredric Engels and Karl Marx were the ones who put ism in Capitalism?
That was so that they could confuse the people and put big government idelogy like Communism, Socialism and Marxism on an even playing filed with Capitalists.

Capitalists believe in free markets , smaller more manageable Government and that the people have the right to manage their own money and businesses.
When ever our Government has embraced this ideology we have prospered greatly as a Nation.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Sigh.

 

[AmericanFirst]

The richest actually pay 17%, the middle class 24%, the poorest 12%, and Romney 9% in ALL taxes anf fees. Payroll taxes are now more than federal income taxes, which is what Pub dupe morons are talking about.

The diff between Dems and commies is COMMUNISM, you stupid fekking MORON. Change the channel, and parties, dumbazz hater chump of the greedy idiot rich...LOL

You are a stupid socialist puke. SHUT UP! DIMWITS ARE COMMIES.

 

[tubig]

Here's your proof, Fakey:

Communist Party Sues Democrats For Stealing Its Platform | U. S. Politics

What a hoot! Next thing you know Republicans will claim that "liberty and freedom" is right wing intellectual property. Careful fellas. Next thing you know the Brits will claim that "proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" is British intellectual property because British common law pre-existed the Constitution of the US? Romans and Greeks might claim democracy as intellectually theirs? San Francisco beware - Bonnie Prince Charlie was a butt bandit well before Harvey Milk. How could he not be what with all the bitterly cold nights and Highland sheep?

You obviously don't get it. The Democrat Party platform and the Communist Party platform are virtually identical. That's why the Communists are suing. Of course, is purely a propaganda ploy, but it highlights an essential fact: both parties have the exact same goals.

That sounds like simplistic and partisan name calling. Even on innocuous points where there may be coincidences, the same coincidences can be found between Republicans and Nazis - ie their love of the military. The basic communist premise is the ownership by government of all industry. The leaders of the Democratic Party are mostly millionaire owners of private assets. Can you show where Democratic leaders want to have their private US industry nationalized?

 

[bripat9643]

What a hoot! Next thing you know Republicans will claim that "liberty and freedom" is right wing intellectual property. Careful fellas. Next thing you know the Brits will claim that "proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" is British intellectual property because British common law pre-existed the Constitution of the US? Romans and Greeks might claim democracy as intellectually theirs? San Francisco beware - Bonnie Prince Charlie was a butt bandit well before Harvey Milk. How could he not be what with all the bitterly cold nights and Highland sheep?

You obviously don't get it. The Democrat Party platform and the Communist Party platform are virtually identical. That's why the Communists are suing. Of course, is purely a propaganda ploy, but it highlights an essential fact: both parties have the exact same goals.

That sounds like simplistic and partisan name calling. Even on innocuous points where there may be coincidences, the same coincidences can be found between Republicans and Nazis - ie their love of the military. The basic communist premise is the ownership by government of all industry. The leaders of the Democratic Party are mostly millionaire owners of private assets. Can you show where Democratic leaders want to have their private US industry nationalized?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niJAkR_6tKQ]Maxine Waters Wants To "Socialize" Oil Companies - YouTube[/ame]

 

[JakeStarkey]

Tubig clearly demonstrates the reactionaries' simplistic and hateful mind set.