What’s the Difference Between Progressives and the KKK?

[HappyJoy]

Who was he referring to? The Unite the Right march was organized by white supremacists.

It was organized by white supremacist but much of their publicity was dishonest about what the rally was about ie focusing almost solely on the historical statues in question, while not explicitly stating that there was to be white supremacists speakers and events, such as the tiki torch march.


Many, if not most of the people who showed up, were not white supremacists and were not there to support white supremacy.


That at this late date, you have not heard this, is quite the condemnation of your chosen sources of news.


RW implicitly admitted that he knew this because when he was called on it, instead of denying what I said about what Trump said, he attacked Trump's sincerity.


He did not state what Trump said, and then express his doubts, he misquoted what Trump said, in order to give the impression that Trump was talking about people that Rightwinger knew very well that Trump was NOT talking about.

They communicated who the speakers were

The evening before the rally they were out with their tiki torches, it was widely broadcasted before the official racist rally even began.

Who was attending and who organized it was no secret. The fact is, the right doesn't care who they associate with as long as they agree with them.

David Duke even tweeted his approval.

They will not what?

Some very fine people my ass.

1. Those speakers have very little name recognition. Other than richard spencer I don't know any of them.

2. I didn't hear of the tiki torch march until after the death the next day. Most people don't care about the antics of the few white supremacists in the nation.

3. Your own post shows Duke's tweet getting retweeted TWO HUNDRED AND FIVE TIMES. That you present it as "evidence" that everyone must have known who was behind the rally, actually proves that your claim is obviously false.

How come over a dozen white nationalist groups showed up? Where were all these other protesters? When they saw these obvious racists with their uniforms would they have stuck around? Why is it the Charlottesville police department knew these hate groups were going to be there and nobody else?

Who marches along with racists and is not a racist? Where are they?

I mean other than people like this guy trolling the klan like thisl (different conservative rally)

At a certain point, you look around and say......these are not the people I want to associate with

That is what good people do

Right?

"Some good people" should either leave or join the other side.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Hell there are plenty. Strom Thurmond was a Democrat that became a Republican, Jesse Helms was a Democrat that became a Republican, Jeff Sessions, Trent Lott. Remember this change took place during the 70s.

Jesse Helms



In domestic affairs, Helms promoted industrial development in the South, seeking low taxes and few labor unions so as to attract northern and international corporations to relocate to North Carolina.

Jesse Helms was a straight up racist.

What does that have to do with him delivering manufacturing jobs?


.

Yea nobody minds him being a racist because he might be manufacturing jobs for white folks.

You are the one posting racist, you can't figure out the younger generation started voting republican for manufacturing jobs and they delivered?

I am from NC and manufacturing jobs started coming to the state long before Helms hit the scene.

 

[Correll]

"Jews will not replace us", "Blood and soil". It's like apple pie and baseball with those fucks that showed up.

Some of them are good people

He specifically stated, twice, that he was not referring to those people.



SO, why you lie about that?

Who was he referring to? The Unite the Right march was organized by white supremacists.

It was organized by white supremacist but much of their publicity was dishonest about what the rally was about ie focusing almost solely on the historical statues in question, while not explicitly stating that there was to be white supremacists speakers and events, such as the tiki torch march.


Many, if not most of the people who showed up, were not white supremacists and were not there to support white supremacy.


That at this late date, you have not heard this, is quite the condemnation of your chosen sources of news.


RW implicitly admitted that he knew this because when he was called on it, instead of denying what I said about what Trump said, he attacked Trump's sincerity.


He did not state what Trump said, and then express his doubts, he misquoted what Trump said, in order to give the impression that Trump was talking about people that Rightwinger knew very well that Trump was NOT talking about.

Our President played the usual Trumpian game when called on his support of racists

He tries to take neither side.....just like he does with Putin, Kim Jong Un and Prince Salaman

You already admitted that he did not "support the racists" when you attacked the sincerity of his condemnation on them.


YOu don't to accuse him of not being sincere in his condemnation, AND claim that he supported them in the same thread.


THat is twice in one day you have been stone cold busted lying. You are getting more and more sloppy.

 

[Correll]

He specifically stated, twice, that he was not referring to those people.



SO, why you lie about that?

Who was he referring to? The Unite the Right march was organized by white supremacists.

It was organized by white supremacist but much of their publicity was dishonest about what the rally was about ie focusing almost solely on the historical statues in question, while not explicitly stating that there was to be white supremacists speakers and events, such as the tiki torch march.


Many, if not most of the people who showed up, were not white supremacists and were not there to support white supremacy.


That at this late date, you have not heard this, is quite the condemnation of your chosen sources of news.


RW implicitly admitted that he knew this because when he was called on it, instead of denying what I said about what Trump said, he attacked Trump's sincerity.


He did not state what Trump said, and then express his doubts, he misquoted what Trump said, in order to give the impression that Trump was talking about people that Rightwinger knew very well that Trump was NOT talking about.

Our President played the usual Trumpian game when called on his support of racists

He tries to take neither side.....just like he does with Putin, Kim Jong Un and Prince Salaman

Obungles: "If I had a son..."

Sit your stupid ass down clown

Travon Martin was murdered by a vigilante

Even SmellyIrishAss knows it

Martin was witnessed sitting on top of Zimmerman, beating him, "MMA style".


Your denial of facts you have been informed of many times, is another lie. Third time busted today.

 

[Correll]

Because as the South changed from poor and rural, to urban and middle class, the poor rural dems were eventually outvoted by the growing middle class whites.


I've posted links discussing this historical fact many times on this site. Do you want it again?

Yes give it too me again, because it sounds like bullshit.

From that right wing rag, the New York Times.

The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’



"Everyone knows that race has long played a decisive role in Southern electoral politics. From the end of Reconstruction until the beginning of the civil rights era, the story goes, the national Democratic Party made room for segregationist members — and as a result dominated the South. But in the 50s and 60s, Democrats embraced the civil rights movement, costing them the white Southern vote. Meanwhile, the Republican Party successfully wooed disaffected white racists with a “Southern strategy” that championed “states’ rights.”

It’s an easy story to believe, but this year two political scientists called it into question. In their book “The End of Southern Exceptionalism,” Richard Johnston of the University of Pennsylvania and Byron Shafer of the University of Wisconsin argue that the shift in the South from Democratic to Republican was overwhelmingly a question not of race but of economic growth. In the postwar era, they note, the South transformed itself from a backward region to an engine of the national economy, giving rise to a sizable new wealthy suburban class. This class, not surprisingly, began to vote for the party that best represented its economic interests: the G.O.P. Working-class whites, however — and here’s the surprise — even those in areas with large black populations, stayed loyal to the Democrats. (This was true until the 90s, when the nation as a whole turned rightward in Congressional voting.)

The two scholars support their claim with an extensive survey of election returns and voter surveys. To give just one example: in the 50s, among Southerners in the low-income tercile, 43 percent voted for Republican Presidential candidates, while in the high-income tercile, 53 percent voted Republican; by the 80s, those figures were 51 percent and 77 percent, respectively. Wealthy Southerners shifted rightward in droves but poorer ones didn’t.

To be sure, Shafer says, many whites in the South aggressively opposed liberal Democrats on race issues. “But when folks went to the polling booths,” he says, “they didn’t shoot off their own toes. They voted by their economic preferences, not racial preferences.” Shafer says these results should give liberals hope. “If Southern politics is about class and not race,” he says, “then they can get it back.” "


Bolding added.

How the South Became Republican: It’s About Race

1. You failed to address the points made in my post, completely.

2. NOthing in your linked article, actually supports your claim. It makes a lot of accusations but without any supporting arguments or, god forbid, evidence.

I grew up in the South from the back in of Jim Crow until today, so I don't really need anyone to tell me what has happened in the South. I watched if from first hand experience.

Hard historical voting records trump personal observations.


The Southern Strategy is a myth.

 

[Correll]

It was organized by white supremacist but much of their publicity was dishonest about what the rally was about ie focusing almost solely on the historical statues in question, while not explicitly stating that there was to be white supremacists speakers and events, such as the tiki torch march.


Many, if not most of the people who showed up, were not white supremacists and were not there to support white supremacy.


That at this late date, you have not heard this, is quite the condemnation of your chosen sources of news.


RW implicitly admitted that he knew this because when he was called on it, instead of denying what I said about what Trump said, he attacked Trump's sincerity.


He did not state what Trump said, and then express his doubts, he misquoted what Trump said, in order to give the impression that Trump was talking about people that Rightwinger knew very well that Trump was NOT talking about.

Our President played the usual Trumpian game when called on his support of racists

He tries to take neither side.....just like he does with Putin, Kim Jong Un and Prince Salaman

Obungles: "If I had a son..."

Sit your stupid ass down clown

Travon Martin was murdered by a vigilante

Even SmellyIrishAss knows it

A jury said otherwise......steeeerike two!!!!! Clownshoes.

Poor winger getting crushed like a feeble progtard

Jury was unable to prove murder
Never proved innocence

Zimmerman was scum then, remains scum today

Stalked and murdered a fine young man

Juries don't prove shit. That is the job of prosecutors.


Juries judge whether the prosecutor was able to make the case.

I will not call you a lair on this one. Your incompetence rings true this time.

 

[Correll]

He specifically stated, twice, that he was not referring to those people.



SO, why you lie about that?

Who was he referring to? The Unite the Right march was organized by white supremacists.

It was organized by white supremacist but much of their publicity was dishonest about what the rally was about ie focusing almost solely on the historical statues in question, while not explicitly stating that there was to be white supremacists speakers and events, such as the tiki torch march.


Many, if not most of the people who showed up, were not white supremacists and were not there to support white supremacy.


That at this late date, you have not heard this, is quite the condemnation of your chosen sources of news.


RW implicitly admitted that he knew this because when he was called on it, instead of denying what I said about what Trump said, he attacked Trump's sincerity.


He did not state what Trump said, and then express his doubts, he misquoted what Trump said, in order to give the impression that Trump was talking about people that Rightwinger knew very well that Trump was NOT talking about.

They communicated who the speakers were

The evening before the rally they were out with their tiki torches, it was widely broadcasted before the official racist rally even began.

Who was attending and who organized it was no secret. The fact is, the right doesn't care who they associate with as long as they agree with them.

David Duke even tweeted his approval.

They will not what?

Some very fine people my ass.

1. Those speakers have very little name recognition. Other than richard spencer I don't know any of them.

2. I didn't hear of the tiki torch march until after the death the next day. Most people don't care about the antics of the few white supremacists in the nation.

3. Your own post shows Duke's tweet getting retweeted TWO HUNDRED AND FIVE TIMES. That you present it as "evidence" that everyone must have known who was behind the rally, actually proves that your claim is obviously false.

How come over a dozen white nationalist groups showed up? Where were all these other protesters? When they saw these obvious racists with their uniforms would they have stuck around? Why is it the Charlottesville police department knew these hate groups were going to be there and nobody else?

Who marches along with racists and is not a racist? Where are they?

I mean other than people like this guy trolling the klan like thisl (different conservative rally)

1. Because more honest publicity was done though the white supremacy networks. Obviously.

2. NOt sure of the situation, nor how obvious the racists were to the people there for Historical statues.

3. It is the job of the police to know who was coming. That they did better on gathering information than regular civilians, is not surprising. YOu do agree with that, don't you?

 

[Correll]

Who was he referring to? The Unite the Right march was organized by white supremacists.

It was organized by white supremacist but much of their publicity was dishonest about what the rally was about ie focusing almost solely on the historical statues in question, while not explicitly stating that there was to be white supremacists speakers and events, such as the tiki torch march.


Many, if not most of the people who showed up, were not white supremacists and were not there to support white supremacy.


That at this late date, you have not heard this, is quite the condemnation of your chosen sources of news.


RW implicitly admitted that he knew this because when he was called on it, instead of denying what I said about what Trump said, he attacked Trump's sincerity.


He did not state what Trump said, and then express his doubts, he misquoted what Trump said, in order to give the impression that Trump was talking about people that Rightwinger knew very well that Trump was NOT talking about.

They communicated who the speakers were

The evening before the rally they were out with their tiki torches, it was widely broadcasted before the official racist rally even began.

Who was attending and who organized it was no secret. The fact is, the right doesn't care who they associate with as long as they agree with them.

David Duke even tweeted his approval.

They will not what?

Some very fine people my ass.

1. Those speakers have very little name recognition. Other than richard spencer I don't know any of them.

2. I didn't hear of the tiki torch march until after the death the next day. Most people don't care about the antics of the few white supremacists in the nation.

3. Your own post shows Duke's tweet getting retweeted TWO HUNDRED AND FIVE TIMES. That you present it as "evidence" that everyone must have known who was behind the rally, actually proves that your claim is obviously false.

How come over a dozen white nationalist groups showed up? Where were all these other protesters? When they saw these obvious racists with their uniforms would they have stuck around? Why is it the Charlottesville police department knew these hate groups were going to be there and nobody else?

Who marches along with racists and is not a racist? Where are they?

I mean other than people like this guy trolling the klan like thisl (different conservative rally)

At a certain point, you look around and say......these are not the people I want to associate with

That is what good people do

Like you lefties do with ANtifa?

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Hmmm, most KKK consider themselves to be right wing, conservatives.

The progressives will your black ass in slavery and you are too ignorant to get out. You deserve it.

No I think the Progressive have their eye on someone in the area of Brown skin this time It seem they all have a few working for them back home.

 

[MaryL]

Progressives? You mean those white self hating schlemiel chumps? Liberal SJW that hate everything about Caucasians, Anglos and think that posing as a anti white hater gets you special status? I am starting to see that liberal democrats are like a cult or a hate group, perhaps they need to be scrutinized for their behavior?

 

[MAGAman]

White Supremacists think they are superior & want only to have white people.

That's why about 80% of Planned Parenthood Abortuaries are within walking distance of a Black guetto.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Yes give it too me again, because it sounds like bullshit.

From that right wing rag, the New York Times.

The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’



"Everyone knows that race has long played a decisive role in Southern electoral politics. From the end of Reconstruction until the beginning of the civil rights era, the story goes, the national Democratic Party made room for segregationist members — and as a result dominated the South. But in the 50s and 60s, Democrats embraced the civil rights movement, costing them the white Southern vote. Meanwhile, the Republican Party successfully wooed disaffected white racists with a “Southern strategy” that championed “states’ rights.”

It’s an easy story to believe, but this year two political scientists called it into question. In their book “The End of Southern Exceptionalism,” Richard Johnston of the University of Pennsylvania and Byron Shafer of the University of Wisconsin argue that the shift in the South from Democratic to Republican was overwhelmingly a question not of race but of economic growth. In the postwar era, they note, the South transformed itself from a backward region to an engine of the national economy, giving rise to a sizable new wealthy suburban class. This class, not surprisingly, began to vote for the party that best represented its economic interests: the G.O.P. Working-class whites, however — and here’s the surprise — even those in areas with large black populations, stayed loyal to the Democrats. (This was true until the 90s, when the nation as a whole turned rightward in Congressional voting.)

The two scholars support their claim with an extensive survey of election returns and voter surveys. To give just one example: in the 50s, among Southerners in the low-income tercile, 43 percent voted for Republican Presidential candidates, while in the high-income tercile, 53 percent voted Republican; by the 80s, those figures were 51 percent and 77 percent, respectively. Wealthy Southerners shifted rightward in droves but poorer ones didn’t.

To be sure, Shafer says, many whites in the South aggressively opposed liberal Democrats on race issues. “But when folks went to the polling booths,” he says, “they didn’t shoot off their own toes. They voted by their economic preferences, not racial preferences.” Shafer says these results should give liberals hope. “If Southern politics is about class and not race,” he says, “then they can get it back.” "


Bolding added.

How the South Became Republican: It’s About Race

1. You failed to address the points made in my post, completely.

2. NOthing in your linked article, actually supports your claim. It makes a lot of accusations but without any supporting arguments or, god forbid, evidence.

I grew up in the South from the back in of Jim Crow until today, so I don't really need anyone to tell me what has happened in the South. I watched if from first hand experience.

Hard historical voting records trump personal observations.


The Southern Strategy is a myth.

You're right, because it has never changed. The only thing that has changed is instead of being Democrats they are now Republicans.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Who was he referring to? The Unite the Right march was organized by white supremacists.

It was organized by white supremacist but much of their publicity was dishonest about what the rally was about ie focusing almost solely on the historical statues in question, while not explicitly stating that there was to be white supremacists speakers and events, such as the tiki torch march.


Many, if not most of the people who showed up, were not white supremacists and were not there to support white supremacy.


That at this late date, you have not heard this, is quite the condemnation of your chosen sources of news.


RW implicitly admitted that he knew this because when he was called on it, instead of denying what I said about what Trump said, he attacked Trump's sincerity.


He did not state what Trump said, and then express his doubts, he misquoted what Trump said, in order to give the impression that Trump was talking about people that Rightwinger knew very well that Trump was NOT talking about.

Our President played the usual Trumpian game when called on his support of racists

He tries to take neither side.....just like he does with Putin, Kim Jong Un and Prince Salaman

Obungles: "If I had a son..."

Sit your stupid ass down clown

Travon Martin was murdered by a vigilante

Even SmellyIrishAss knows it

Martin was witnessed sitting on top of Zimmerman, beating him, "MMA style".

Yea MMA style, funny how all of that just came into play perfectly.

Your denial of facts you have been informed of many times, is another lie. Third time busted today.

The fact is that a coward with a gun got away with killing a black teenager.

 

[rightwinger]

Some of them are good people

He specifically stated, twice, that he was not referring to those people.



SO, why you lie about that?

Who was he referring to? The Unite the Right march was organized by white supremacists.

It was organized by white supremacist but much of their publicity was dishonest about what the rally was about ie focusing almost solely on the historical statues in question, while not explicitly stating that there was to be white supremacists speakers and events, such as the tiki torch march.


Many, if not most of the people who showed up, were not white supremacists and were not there to support white supremacy.


That at this late date, you have not heard this, is quite the condemnation of your chosen sources of news.


RW implicitly admitted that he knew this because when he was called on it, instead of denying what I said about what Trump said, he attacked Trump's sincerity.


He did not state what Trump said, and then express his doubts, he misquoted what Trump said, in order to give the impression that Trump was talking about people that Rightwinger knew very well that Trump was NOT talking about.

Our President played the usual Trumpian game when called on his support of racists

He tries to take neither side.....just like he does with Putin, Kim Jong Un and Prince Salaman

You already admitted that he did not "support the racists" when you attacked the sincerity of his condemnation on them.


YOu don't to accuse him of not being sincere in his condemnation, AND claim that he supported them in the same thread.


THat is twice in one day you have been stone cold busted lying. You are getting more and more sloppy.

Our President supports the KKK

Just like you Klan Boy

 

[rightwinger]

White Supremacists think they are superior & want only to have white people.

That's why about 80% of Planned Parenthood Abortuaries are within walking distance of a Black guetto.

Link

 

[rightwinger]

Who was he referring to? The Unite the Right march was organized by white supremacists.

It was organized by white supremacist but much of their publicity was dishonest about what the rally was about ie focusing almost solely on the historical statues in question, while not explicitly stating that there was to be white supremacists speakers and events, such as the tiki torch march.


Many, if not most of the people who showed up, were not white supremacists and were not there to support white supremacy.


That at this late date, you have not heard this, is quite the condemnation of your chosen sources of news.


RW implicitly admitted that he knew this because when he was called on it, instead of denying what I said about what Trump said, he attacked Trump's sincerity.


He did not state what Trump said, and then express his doubts, he misquoted what Trump said, in order to give the impression that Trump was talking about people that Rightwinger knew very well that Trump was NOT talking about.

Our President played the usual Trumpian game when called on his support of racists

He tries to take neither side.....just like he does with Putin, Kim Jong Un and Prince Salaman

Obungles: "If I had a son..."

Sit your stupid ass down clown

Travon Martin was murdered by a vigilante

Even SmellyIrishAss knows it

Martin was witnessed sitting on top of Zimmerman, beating him, "MMA style".


Your denial of facts you have been informed of many times, is another lie. Third time busted today.

He was fighting for his life against an armed man who was stalking him

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Hmmm, most KKK consider themselves to be right wing, conservatives.

The progressives will your black ass in slavery and you are too ignorant to get out. You deserve it.

No I think the Progressive have their eye on someone in the area of Brown skin this time It seem they all have a few working for them back home.

……..and conservatives don't. Just ask Trump how many he has on the payroll. Legal and illegal.

 

[Correll]

From that right wing rag, the New York Times.

The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’



"Everyone knows that race has long played a decisive role in Southern electoral politics. From the end of Reconstruction until the beginning of the civil rights era, the story goes, the national Democratic Party made room for segregationist members — and as a result dominated the South. But in the 50s and 60s, Democrats embraced the civil rights movement, costing them the white Southern vote. Meanwhile, the Republican Party successfully wooed disaffected white racists with a “Southern strategy” that championed “states’ rights.”

It’s an easy story to believe, but this year two political scientists called it into question. In their book “The End of Southern Exceptionalism,” Richard Johnston of the University of Pennsylvania and Byron Shafer of the University of Wisconsin argue that the shift in the South from Democratic to Republican was overwhelmingly a question not of race but of economic growth. In the postwar era, they note, the South transformed itself from a backward region to an engine of the national economy, giving rise to a sizable new wealthy suburban class. This class, not surprisingly, began to vote for the party that best represented its economic interests: the G.O.P. Working-class whites, however — and here’s the surprise — even those in areas with large black populations, stayed loyal to the Democrats. (This was true until the 90s, when the nation as a whole turned rightward in Congressional voting.)

The two scholars support their claim with an extensive survey of election returns and voter surveys. To give just one example: in the 50s, among Southerners in the low-income tercile, 43 percent voted for Republican Presidential candidates, while in the high-income tercile, 53 percent voted Republican; by the 80s, those figures were 51 percent and 77 percent, respectively. Wealthy Southerners shifted rightward in droves but poorer ones didn’t.

To be sure, Shafer says, many whites in the South aggressively opposed liberal Democrats on race issues. “But when folks went to the polling booths,” he says, “they didn’t shoot off their own toes. They voted by their economic preferences, not racial preferences.” Shafer says these results should give liberals hope. “If Southern politics is about class and not race,” he says, “then they can get it back.” "


Bolding added.

How the South Became Republican: It’s About Race

1. You failed to address the points made in my post, completely.

2. NOthing in your linked article, actually supports your claim. It makes a lot of accusations but without any supporting arguments or, god forbid, evidence.

I grew up in the South from the back in of Jim Crow until today, so I don't really need anyone to tell me what has happened in the South. I watched if from first hand experience.

Hard historical voting records trump personal observations.


The Southern Strategy is a myth.

You're right, because it has never changed. The only thing that has changed is instead of being Democrats they are now Republicans.

Except that EVERYTHING has changed.

 

[Correll]

It was organized by white supremacist but much of their publicity was dishonest about what the rally was about ie focusing almost solely on the historical statues in question, while not explicitly stating that there was to be white supremacists speakers and events, such as the tiki torch march.


Many, if not most of the people who showed up, were not white supremacists and were not there to support white supremacy.


That at this late date, you have not heard this, is quite the condemnation of your chosen sources of news.


RW implicitly admitted that he knew this because when he was called on it, instead of denying what I said about what Trump said, he attacked Trump's sincerity.


He did not state what Trump said, and then express his doubts, he misquoted what Trump said, in order to give the impression that Trump was talking about people that Rightwinger knew very well that Trump was NOT talking about.

Our President played the usual Trumpian game when called on his support of racists

He tries to take neither side.....just like he does with Putin, Kim Jong Un and Prince Salaman

Obungles: "If I had a son..."

Sit your stupid ass down clown

Travon Martin was murdered by a vigilante

Even SmellyIrishAss knows it

Martin was witnessed sitting on top of Zimmerman, beating him, "MMA style".

Yea MMA style, funny how all of that just came into play perfectly.

Your denial of facts you have been informed of many times, is another lie. Third time busted today.

The fact is that a coward with a gun got away with killing a black teenager.

1. An eyewitness looked out his window and saw Martin beating the shit out of Zimmerman. What about that is "funny" to you?

2. Self defense, is not getting away with anything.

 

[Correll]

He specifically stated, twice, that he was not referring to those people.



SO, why you lie about that?

Who was he referring to? The Unite the Right march was organized by white supremacists.

It was organized by white supremacist but much of their publicity was dishonest about what the rally was about ie focusing almost solely on the historical statues in question, while not explicitly stating that there was to be white supremacists speakers and events, such as the tiki torch march.


Many, if not most of the people who showed up, were not white supremacists and were not there to support white supremacy.


That at this late date, you have not heard this, is quite the condemnation of your chosen sources of news.


RW implicitly admitted that he knew this because when he was called on it, instead of denying what I said about what Trump said, he attacked Trump's sincerity.


He did not state what Trump said, and then express his doubts, he misquoted what Trump said, in order to give the impression that Trump was talking about people that Rightwinger knew very well that Trump was NOT talking about.

Our President played the usual Trumpian game when called on his support of racists

He tries to take neither side.....just like he does with Putin, Kim Jong Un and Prince Salaman

You already admitted that he did not "support the racists" when you attacked the sincerity of his condemnation on them.


YOu don't to accuse him of not being sincere in his condemnation, AND claim that he supported them in the same thread.


THat is twice in one day you have been stone cold busted lying. You are getting more and more sloppy.

Our President supports the KKK

Just like you Klan Boy

Says the man busted lying today, three times.


Do you realize that if you have to lie to attack me, and/or Trump, that that means that on some level, you know that you are on the wrong side?