GWV5903
Gold Member
The rabid right wing are quick to toss their blesses, beloved and sacred Constitution out the door whenever the word "terrorism" is thrown into the mix.
That explains why I have been so supportive of the PATRIOT Act and the NDAA.
Wait a minute...
"Hang him/them."
"Kill them."
"Put them in military tribunals."
"No Miranda rights."
"Throw the book at them."
Every resource they can think of, financial and otherwise, must be used and spent to stop it although it's occurance is in the decimals of percentage.
Are you aware that, if we treated Tsatinov as an enemy combatant, he would not be subject to the death penalty? Yet, under the charge brought by the Obama administration, he is.
My guess is you will miss the point here.
Other than the obvious fact that terrorism is a crime, the simple fact is that gun control is aimed at preventing crime, which is impossible, while the criminal justice system is focused on punishing criminals.
How are we awash in crime when crime rates have been dropping for decades?
The major difference I see is that you refuse to admit one of those is related to religious extremism.
What's more terrifying than massacring our little children?
If you really think that massacring children is the most terrifying thing possible why do you oppose letting people charged with the responsibility of those children be prepared to defend them?
Seriously...what's the difference?
You tell me.
That's the problem, he can't...
It does not compute for Marc...
That's why he started this thread...