What's the upside to accepting a US President threatening Blackmail

Gerrymandering?

No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?

Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.

The system set up for a possible situation where electors would vote their consciences versus the vote, but make no mistake about it, DJT did not win THAT way

Why the deflection?
If you take both trumps and Hildasbeasts votes away in crazy Cali... Trump won the popular vote in the rest of the country. We can't have crazy Cali determining the direction of this country.
Gerrymandering is a strawman
WHAT? California is not a state? It doesn't deserve a vote? Are you sure you're alright?
The rest of the country voted for Trump, in the popular vote. We can't have crazy Cali determines the direction of this country.
But then again it really does not matter, you must not realize the electoral college determines who is president. LOL
WHY NOT? They live in this country. I am perfectly well aware of the electoral college. I was replying to whatever poster said California shouldn't be allowed to vote!
The California major influence on elections could be solved by letting the state separate into Northern and Southern California. That was the Conservative, less populated section would not be dragged into liberal madness every election. :p

LOL- what an idiot.

Conservatives in California are not north /south- there are Conservatives in the far north- and in Orange County.

The real divide is Urban/Rural, East/west.

But sorry Cons- California is no more likely to divide than Texas is likely to secede.
 

Forum List

Back
Top