When did an “NDA” start being referred to as “HUSH MONEY”

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.

NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.

Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?

11 Celebrities Who Make Potential Lovers Sign an NDA

Being a celebrity is tough. Not only are you constantly being hounded by the press and having everything you do picked apart by tabloid journalists, but there’s a very real possibility that everyone you meet is trying to sell a story about you to the paparazzi. Good luck trying to keep an...

www.ranker.com

Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?

The media started using the term hush money as soon as the White House told them to. It really is that simple.
Changing words and phrases works on the leftist dupes every time.

 

[WEATHER53]

The media started using the term hush money as soon as the White House told them to. It really is that simple.
Changing words and phrases works on the leftist dupes every time.

Completely correct
Then they had to try to go to the second and third level since it’s his money to give they crafted make pretend “campaign finances”

 

[IDIOCRACY]

That shit don't fly with the Clinton's. Why pay when suicide is a cheaper option.

 

[Independentthinker]

“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.

NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.

Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?

11 Celebrities Who Make Potential Lovers Sign an NDA

Being a celebrity is tough. Not only are you constantly being hounded by the press and having everything you do picked apart by tabloid journalists, but there’s a very real possibility that everyone you meet is trying to sell a story about you to the paparazzi. Good luck trying to keep an...

www.ranker.com

Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?

The bottom line is, Trump is actually being charged with election interference for paying hush money to a porn star so that he could win the 2016 election. Funny thing is, in 2020 Biden found out he had classified documents in his possession just before the election and he and his people purposely kept it quiet because HE wanted to influence the 2020 election so Biden is also guilty of election interference. But only one is charged while the other is not.

 

[otto105]

“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.

NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.

Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?

11 Celebrities Who Make Potential Lovers Sign an NDA

Being a celebrity is tough. Not only are you constantly being hounded by the press and having everything you do picked apart by tabloid journalists, but there’s a very real possibility that everyone you meet is trying to sell a story about you to the paparazzi. Good luck trying to keep an...

www.ranker.com

Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?

Because they didn’t break campaign finance laws.


Idiot

 

[ThisIsMe]

It is a contract through which the parties agree not to disclose any information covered by the agreement. An NDA creates a confidential relationship between the parties, typically to protect any type of confidential and proprietary information or trade secrets. As such, an NDA protects non-public business information. Like all contracts, they cannot be enforced if the contracted activities are illegal.
NDA
wiki

The nda was signed to keep her from talking about an affair…which is not illegal

 

[WorldWatcher]

The nda was signed to keep her from talking about an affair…which is not illegal

FPOTUS#45 isn't charged for having an NDA.

WW

 

[dudmuck]

“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.

NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.

Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?

11 Celebrities Who Make Potential Lovers Sign an NDA

Being a celebrity is tough. Not only are you constantly being hounded by the press and having everything you do picked apart by tabloid journalists, but there’s a very real possibility that everyone you meet is trying to sell a story about you to the paparazzi. Good luck trying to keep an...

www.ranker.com

Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?

Did you forget why Michael Cohen went to jail?

 

[ColonelAngus]

#2137 - Michelle Dowd — The Joe Rogan Experience — Overcast

overcast.fm

This woman escaped a death cult. You Bidenistas should watch or listen.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Did you forget why Michael Cohen went to jail?

5 counts of tax fraud.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Did you forget why Michael Cohen went to jail?

5 counts of tax fraud.

• five counts of tax evasion,
• one count of making false statements to a financial institution,
• one count of willfully causing an unlawful corporate contribution, and
• one count of making an excessive campaign contribution at the request of a candidate (Trump) for the "principal purpose of influencing [the] election"

WW

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

• five counts of tax evasion,
• one count of making false statements to a financial institution,
• one count of willfully causing an unlawful corporate contribution, and
• one count of making an excessive campaign contribution at the request of a candidate (Trump) for the "principal purpose of influencing [the] election"

WW

7 real charges and a fake one.

 

[ThisIsMe]

He

FPOTUS#45 isn't charged for having an NDA.

WW

wasn’t charged for paying hush money either. He was charged for falsifying business records (misdemeanor) to cover up an underlying crime (campaign finance violations (federal jurisdiction)).

Bragg is literally using a federal crime to float his misdemeanor into a felony.

 

[para bellum]

Bragg is literally using a federal crime to float his misdemeanor into a felony.

The problem (if that's what Bragg is really going to argue) is that Trump did not commit the campaign finance violation. It was Cohen who made the "excessive contribution".

Bragg cannot charge Trump with a Federal crime, and Trump was never charged with anything in the Cohen case.

Also since Trump repaid Cohen from his own funds, it would be arguing that Trump violated campaign laws by making an excessive contribution to his own campaign, which is nonsensical. And he had to do it with fraudulent intent, which is also nonsensical, as a person cannot defraud himself.

The whole thing is a house of cards...

 

[OKTexas]

“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.

NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.

Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?

11 Celebrities Who Make Potential Lovers Sign an NDA

Being a celebrity is tough. Not only are you constantly being hounded by the press and having everything you do picked apart by tabloid journalists, but there’s a very real possibility that everyone you meet is trying to sell a story about you to the paparazzi. Good luck trying to keep an...

www.ranker.com

Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?

When did an “NDA” start being referred to as “HUSH MONEY”​

Simple, when the MSM decided it had better propaganda value, you can bet they poll tested the shit out of it.

.

 

[ThisIsMe]

The problem (if that's what Bragg is really going to argue) is that Trump did not commit the campaign finance violation. It was Cohen who made the "excessive contribution".

Bragg cannot charge Trump with a Federal crime, and Trump was never charged with anything in the Cohen case.

Also since Trump repaid Cohen from his own funds, it would be arguing that Trump violated campaign laws by making an excessive contribution to his own campaign, which is nonsensical. And he had to do it with fraudulent intent, which is also nonsensical, as a person cannot defraud himself.

The whole thing is a house of cards...

Never underestimate the depths to which democrats will sink to in order to secure a victory..

As Eric holder said…



When they go low, we kick them…

I’ve no doubt that trump will be disqualified from the presidency, because that is the entire goal of this. 4 indictments, 91 felony counts. There’s just little chance that he will escape all 91 counts. Sure, he may beat this case on appeal, but considering these trials are happening in cities that are unfriendly to republicans, will Trump be able to get overturns on every charge? That’s a tall order right there

This is why I said, the repubs had better wake up and make sure they have another candidate waiting in the wings, for if Trump ends up not being able to win the appeals battle. How many cases does Trump have waiting for him? 4? They are going to drag this out all through the campaign season, in order to keep him off the campaign trail all year, and hoping that they can get a conviction toward the end, too late for anyone else to step in and run in his place, so Biden can run unopposed.

The Republican Party better have someone ready to step in, or get on the same page for a write in candidate. If they don’t do this, Biden will win and the repubs will have nobody to blame for not being prepared.

 

[para bellum]

I’ve no doubt that trump will be disqualified from the presidency, because that is the entire goal of this.

Bragg's case does not disqualify Trump even if he is found guilty. Trump will appeal, and that will take a couple years to wind through the courts.

The others don't look like they will even make it to trial before November.

Trump will be on the ballot. The more the dems go after him, the better he does in the polls, I guess we'll have to wait and see how it pans out.

This case is a real dog though- they will really need 12 serious TDS jurors to get a conviction on this one...

 

[ThisIsMe]

Bragg's case does not disqualify Trump even if he is found guilty. Trump will appeal, and that will take a couple years to wind through the courts.

The others don't look like they will even make it to trial before November.

Trump will be on the ballot. The more the dems go after him, the better he does in the polls, I guess we'll have to wait and see how it pans out.

This case is a real dog though- they will really need 12 serious TDS jurors to get a conviction on this one...

Maybe you’re right. I just see the multi pronged attack, and see it for what it really is, which is stacking the cases to try to win through sheer numbers.

 

[para bellum]

Maybe you’re right. I just see the multi pronged attack, and see it for what it really is, which is stacking the cases to try to win through sheer numbers.

Of course. They are pulling out all the stops to keep him off the ballot.

It's not as easy as they thought it would be, lol.

 

[Nostra]

And here we go. Another MAGAtard.

You tapped out early.

No game?