When did an “NDA” start being referred to as “HUSH MONEY”

What happened to “consenting adults”?

The left always told us it’s no one’s business what consenting adults do.

Now suddenly they are trying to jail a man for…..what again exactly?
No one has stated the issue yet!
 
If going forward the left wing pharma paid media refers to all NDAs as HUSH MONEY, I am fine with the change. Just stay consistent cult.
 
“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.

NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.

Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?


Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?
.

Because the lying left media think "hush money" will scare more right wingers that "NDA" ever could.

.
 
“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.

NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.

Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?


Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?
What Trump did was not an NDA. If it was a legal agreement trumps lawyer would never have gone to prison. Stop looking for excuses.
 
What Trump did was not an NDA. If it was a legal agreement trumps lawyer would never have gone to prison. Stop looking for excuses.
More plain pure diarrhea crap
Your if and buts about prison Isn’t even related. They are not trying him for the payment which is legal and done thousands of times. Media coined the term hush money and witch hunters had to sink to the level of trying to declare the money as campaign funds.
 
“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.
NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.
Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?
Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?
Most NDA do not involve the exchange of $$. Most NDAs are executed because one or both sides are revealing information they deem confidential (e.g., a new product design) and they don't want the other side to tell anyone about it.

In Trump's case, he was paying the extortionist to keep her mount shut.

Neither are illegal.

I don't have any problem with the colloquial term Hush Money.
 
“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.

NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.

Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?


Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?
I hold multiple clearances and have signed dozens of NDAs over the years.

NDA cannot be legally enforced if they're used to conceal actual crimes.

When one uses or tries to enforce an NDA via cash payments and financial threats in order to conceal illegal activity the public calls the transaction "hush money."

The courts simply invalidate the NDA.
 
Is a NDA null and void if you are put under oath? Could you invoke the 5th.
The NDA is only invalidated if a court rules it so.

Unless the NDA is covering criminal activity there's no need to say anything beyond "NDA"
If the court invalidates the NDA one can be compelled to testify and doing so will not violate the NDA.
At that point one may claim 5th amendment protection but only if the releasing the information incriminates that person. You may not claim the 5th to cover for someone else.
 
It's not campaign spending, how can it be a violation?
It was considered an "in kind" contribution. Remember, this was part of the Mueller investigation. They were trying to find a crime to hang on Trump. They came up with the campaign finance violation, and Cohen pled guilty to it (no doubt under a lot of duress).

Cohen arranged (through the National Enquirer) to pay Daniels and McDougal for the rights to their stories. The payments were made and the NDA's were executed by the National Enquirer, who then resold the rights to Cohen (to reimburse the Enquirer).

The ostensible reason was to protect the reputation of Trump, so it was treated as a campaign contribution by the Mueller investigation in order to qualify as a "crime".

After the election was over, Trump reimbursed Cohen with the monthly payments that are the subject of Bragg's case.

Trump's campaign didn't pay Cohen, and never expensed the payments as campaign costs. The payments were made by the Trump Organization, and classified as legal expenses.

The NDA's were between the National Enquirer and Daniels and McDougal. Trump's name was not on them and he never signed them.

The rest of the charges against Cohen were for tax fraud and false statements to banks, on unrelated matters concerning taxi medallions and mortgages that Cohen was involved in.

So the entirety of Bragg's case is the way the payments to Cohen were recorded on the Trump Organization's books. Those are at the worst case misdemeanors, and only if they were made with intent to defraud someone...

All the rest of it is just hyperbole.
 
Is a NDA null and void if you are put under oath?


Yes, if subpoenaed to testify, you cannot refuse to answer based on an NDA,

Could you invoke the 5th.

Based on an NDA? No.

You can claim the 5th only if the testimony would result in self incrimination of a crime. But you can do that with or without an NDA.

WW
 
Since he was running for office at the time, any monies he tendered Anywhere were to help his chances . Therefore, any such money was campaign money
Lib Lunacy 101
 

Forum List

Back
Top