You would need to dig up a definition of "persons" out of the U.S. Code to answer your own question, rather than pull something out of your wazoo.Abortion is fundamentally driven by modern promiscuity and irresponsible sex habits of teens, unwed mothers, liberated single party girls, and their frat boy associates.
Abortion is governed by bad SCOTUS law which mandates all states to follow a permissive standard of law.
In accordance with a literal reading of the U.S. Constitution abortion is relegated to the States to decide what limitations and procedures they want to follow in their states.
The foolish b!tch who was Roe in Roe V. Wade recently died. It would have been better for the U.S.A. had she never been born. She repudiated all the positions in her law suit that went to the SCOTUS and became an emotional fallacy argument that the Burger Court swallowed in a moment of Judiciary activism.
A good reason for having an abortion is due to rape or incest (which is also rape), or an abnormally deformed fetus.
In the case of a stupid teenager I would favor abortion too, since the single mother status is likely to destroy the child-mother's life, and also be detrimental to the baby as well.
I don't have a problem with infanticide for deformed babies either. There is essentially no difference. Better to start over. And then if it keeps happening get sterilized and then adopt instead.
That's the whole argument for and against abortion.
The people of any given state should be empowered to decide how they want to deal with abortion and to what extent they want to allow it and what regulations to put upon it.
What about the part of the Constitution that says "all persons" are entitled to the EQUAL protections of our laws?
Does that not include persons (esp. children) with deformities?