Carl in Michigan
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 56,914
- 41,837
- 3,615
Interesting debate. He puts it all in perspective.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But even so after such a miracle, Mick Jagger still has more wrinkles on his face than the average Joe's nut sack..
Like...who would believe the Rolling Stones were created by a random act of nature?
Translation: "I cannot refute what he says"If you know nothing else about Hovind, know this: the guy is a fucking loon. His Creationism theory is laughable, other creationists have distanced themselves from him, and his lack of understanding and education in regard to the history of religion and scientific method and theory make any discussion or debate with him pointless.
I think you missed the point. He was refuting the he belief that the universe can come into being without a Creator. The big bang is where "science" has led us WITHOUT A CREATOR.That was interesting. My questions for Mr Hovind would be "Why is the Big Bang Theory mutually exclusive from God and Creationism? Why do you assume there has been only one beginning? Why do think that since God makes the physical rules of the Universe he also makes rules like "you must love me or I will damn your soul to hell for eternity"? That seems to be a bit of a leap.
Translation: "I cannot refute what he says"If you know nothing else about Hovind, know this: the guy is a fucking loon. His Creationism theory is laughable, other creationists have distanced themselves from him, and his lack of understanding and education in regard to the history of religion and scientific method and theory make any discussion or debate with him pointless.
and so your opinion had no value. You're whole post reveals your inability to form judgements without being spoon fed by your tard masters.I didn't watch what he said, nor would I. I have read about Hovind, I have read Hovind. He is a fucking loon, and so is anyone who buys into his interpretation of... anything
That was interesting. My questions for Mr Hovind would be "Why is the Big Bang Theory mutually exclusive from God and Creationism? Why do you assume there has been only one beginning? Why do think that since God makes the physical rules of the Universe he also makes rules like "you must love me or I will damn your soul to hell for eternity"? That seems to be a bit of a leap.
and so your opinion had no value. You're whole post reveals your inability to form judgements without being spoon fed by your tard masters.I didn't watch what he said, nor would I. I have read about Hovind, I have read Hovind. He is a fucking loon, and so is anyone who buys into his interpretation of... anything
That was interesting. My questions for Mr Hovind would be "Why is the Big Bang Theory mutually exclusive from God and Creationism? Why do you assume there has been only one beginning? Why do think that since God makes the physical rules of the Universe he also makes rules like "you must love me or I will damn your soul to hell for eternity"? That seems to be a bit of a leap.
I believe in the concept that the universe came into being by a Creator. I also believe it is possible God chose to create this iteration of OUR universe with a big ol BOOM. That science believes the big ol BOOM happened all by itself is what they choose to believe.I think you missed the point. He was refuting the he belief that the universe can come into being without a Creator. The big bang is where "science" has led us WITHOUT A CREATOR.That was interesting. My questions for Mr Hovind would be "Why is the Big Bang Theory mutually exclusive from God and Creationism? Why do you assume there has been only one beginning? Why do think that since God makes the physical rules of the Universe he also makes rules like "you must love me or I will damn your soul to hell for eternity"? That seems to be a bit of a leap.
Translation: "I cannot refute what he says"