Easy. A case of soda costs $9.....so all you'd need it to put 10 cases in your cart.Can you get $92 worth of soda in one cart?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Easy. A case of soda costs $9.....so all you'd need it to put 10 cases in your cart.Can you get $92 worth of soda in one cart?
Wow. I've never bought a case of soda in my life.Easy. A case of soda costs $9.....so all you'd need it to put 10 cases in your cart.
I've done it for parties. Course if you're on welfare you shouldn't be throwing parties and sticking it to the taxpayers.Wow. I've never bought a case of soda in my life.
nobody rails against them…we do however think they should be looking for work.Single moms having kids they can’t afford is an easy target. It makes a right winger feel superior by shitting on such a woman. It makes it easy to rail against the idea of food stamps altogether. Such a person judging feels superior because they aren’t on food stamps and have a full time job in comparison. Somebody should probably tell them that it is very common for anyone to have a full time job and not be on food stamps lol. Such people judging aren’t as special as they like to think they are. Food stamps is not the epidemic that republicans like to think it is. They simply pretend that it is because it makes them feel less insecure about themselves. The truth is that few actual able bodied adults are even on food stamps. The ones that are have dependents.
But sure, such irresponsible women do exist.
We can all agree: an impoverished woman should not have kids and she made a mistake when she had one. Okay sure. However, the kid still…. exists. What should we do with that kid? Should the kid suffer because of the mom’s mistakes? Probably not, right? Government assistance is required either way.
New USDA Report Provides Picture of Who Participates in SNAP - Food Research & Action Center
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has been issuing a series of annual reports on the demographic and economic characteristics of households and individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The latest report, covering fiscal year 2019, was released at...frac.org
“SNAP targets those in greatest need. Among those participating in the program, most are children, elderly persons, or individuals with a disability. In fact, 86 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households that include a child, elderly person, or person with disabilities. In addition, about 92 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households with income at or below the federal poverty line.”
Leftist Democrats are unprincipled, immoral, unaccountable, poor decision making degenerate lowlifes…180 degrees the opposite of conservatives.Single moms having kids they can’t afford is an easy target. It makes a right winger feel superior by shitting on such a woman. It makes it easy to rail against the idea of food stamps altogether. Such a person judging feels superior because they aren’t on food stamps and have a full time job in comparison. Somebody should probably tell them that it is very common for anyone to have a full time job and not be on food stamps lol. Such people judging aren’t as special as they like to think they are. Food stamps is not the epidemic that republicans like to think it is. They simply pretend that it is because it makes them feel less insecure about themselves. The truth is that few actual able bodied adults are even on food stamps. The ones that are have dependents.
But sure, such irresponsible women do exist.
We can all agree: an impoverished woman should not have kids and she made a mistake when she had one. Okay sure. However, the kid still…. exists. What should we do with that kid? Should the kid suffer because of the mom’s mistakes? Probably not, right? Government assistance is required either way.
New USDA Report Provides Picture of Who Participates in SNAP - Food Research & Action Center
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has been issuing a series of annual reports on the demographic and economic characteristics of households and individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The latest report, covering fiscal year 2019, was released at...frac.org
“SNAP targets those in greatest need. Among those participating in the program, most are children, elderly persons, or individuals with a disability. In fact, 86 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households that include a child, elderly person, or person with disabilities. In addition, about 92 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households with income at or below the federal poverty line.”
Single moms having kids they can’t afford is an easy target. It makes a right winger feel superior by shitting on such a woman. It makes it easy to rail against the idea of food stamps altogether. Such a person judging feels superior because they aren’t on food stamps and have a full time job in comparison. Somebody should probably tell them that it is very common for anyone to have a full time job and not be on food stamps lol. Such people judging aren’t as special as they like to think they are. Food stamps is not the epidemic that republicans like to think it is. They simply pretend that it is because it makes them feel less insecure about themselves. The truth is that few actual able bodied adults are even on food stamps. The ones that are have dependents.
But sure, such irresponsible women do exist.
We can all agree: an impoverished woman should not have kids and she made a mistake when she had one. Okay sure. However, the kid still…. exists.
Are you completely incapable of evaluating misleading statistics?Single moms having kids they can’t afford is an easy target. It makes a right winger feel superior by shitting on such a woman. It makes it easy to rail against the idea of food stamps altogether. Such a person judging feels superior because they aren’t on food stamps and have a full time job in comparison. Somebody should probably tell them that it is very common for anyone to have a full time job and not be on food stamps lol. Such people judging aren’t as special as they like to think they are. Food stamps is not the epidemic that republicans like to think it is. They simply pretend that it is because it makes them feel less insecure about themselves. The truth is that few actual able bodied adults are even on food stamps. The ones that are have dependents.
But sure, such irresponsible women do exist.
We can all agree: an impoverished woman should not have kids and she made a mistake when she had one. Okay sure. However, the kid still…. exists. What should we do with that kid? Should the kid suffer because of the mom’s mistakes? Probably not, right? Government assistance is required either way.
New USDA Report Provides Picture of Who Participates in SNAP - Food Research & Action Center
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has been issuing a series of annual reports on the demographic and economic characteristics of households and individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The latest report, covering fiscal year 2019, was released at...frac.org
“SNAP targets those in greatest need. Among those participating in the program, most are children, elderly persons, or individuals with a disability. In fact, 86 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households that include a child, elderly person, or person with disabilities. In addition, about 92 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households with income at or below the federal poverty line.”
Grudging admission? It’s simply obvious. Why would anyone say it’s okay for women to have kids she can’t afford? That’s simply not the point of OP. The point of OP is that regardless of how irresponsible the woman is, the child still needs support.Note the difference between the amount of time spent talking shit on conservatives, vs the...grudging admission that "impoverished women" should not have kids.
This shows where Billy000 is really coming from.
Since when?Because they can't get an abortion.
To support the child, the child must be removed from the mother instead of rewarding the woman for having the child.Grudging admission? It’s simply obvious. Why would anyone say it’s okay for women to have kids she can’t afford? That’s simply not the point of OP. The point of OP is that regardless of how irresponsible the woman is, the child still needs support.
Just tripped and fell on a stiff penis? That's your position?By accident.
Yes, most are just stupid. Something that can't be fixed.The vast majority of people who are poor do have a mental disability.
"Don't feed the pigeons".They just spend their whole life sucking at the food stamp tit.
And do what with child? Foster care? Do you realize how expensive that would be in comparison to food stamps. It’s a ridiculous, impractical idea.To support the child, the child must be removed from the mother instead of rewarding the woman for having the child.
Well, I stand corrected. My husband did buy Cokes for barbeques and oyster roasts, but never so many. There was always beer, wine and sweet tea. We never served soda at small dinner parties.I've done it for parties. Course if you're on welfare you shouldn't be throwing parties and sticking it to the taxpayers.
You should be doing what you can to get a job.
So taxpayers are now "lord of the manor", regardless of how they may be struggling with inflation-Joe's economy, and the folks on the dole are "peasants"? I need my peasants to do some weekly yard work in exchange for their free food.The Lord of the Manor was responsible for insuring the Peasants got fed,
Better to leave the child with the "irresponsible" mother? Do you give a rat's ass about the child?And do what with child? Foster care? Do you realize how expensive that would be in comparison to food stamps. It’s a ridiculous, impractical idea.
So taxpayers are now "lord of the manor", regardless of how they may be struggling with inflation-Joe's economy, and the folks on the dole are "peasants"? I need my peasants to do some weekly yard work in exchange for their free food.