Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would foster care be a better environment? It makes zero sense. Do you even realize how much that would cost the government each year? Way more than the cost of food stamps. Your fascist idea is both impractical and financially irresponsible.I totally agree. These children should be taken away from mothers who obviously can't afford to raise them properly. Why is it that liberals are not on the side of children being raised up in better environments instead of generational poverty that never ends?
Because they want never ending causes but zero solutionsI totally agree. These children should be taken away from mothers who obviously can't afford to raise them properly. Why is it that liberals are not on the side of children being raised up in better environments instead of generational poverty that never ends?
why do you oppose woek requirements though?I’m simply asking you to not whine about a program that is a drop in the bucket in the national budget. I don’t mind my taxes goes to such programs.
When Republicans complain about single moms of color – that’s the issue.Single moms having kids they can’t afford is an easy target. It makes a right winger feel superior by shitting on such a woman. It makes it easy to rail against the idea of food stamps altogether. Such a person judging feels superior because they aren’t on food stamps and have a full time job in comparison. Somebody should probably tell them that it is very common for anyone to have a full time job and not be on food stamps lol. Such people judging aren’t as special as they like to think they are. Food stamps is not the epidemic that republicans like to think it is. They simply pretend that it is because it makes them feel less insecure about themselves. The truth is that few actual able bodied adults are even on food stamps. The ones that are have dependents.
But sure, such irresponsible women do exist.
We can all agree: an impoverished woman should not have kids and she made a mistake when she had one. Okay sure. However, the kid still…. exists. What should we do with that kid? Should the kid suffer because of the mom’s mistakes? Probably not, right? Government assistance is required either way.
New USDA Report Provides Picture of Who Participates in SNAP - Food Research & Action Center
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has been issuing a series of annual reports on the demographic and economic characteristics of households and individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The latest report, covering fiscal year 2019, was released at...frac.org
“SNAP targets those in greatest need. Among those participating in the program, most are children, elderly persons, or individuals with a disability. In fact, 86 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households that include a child, elderly person, or person with disabilities. In addition, about 92 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households with income at or below the federal poverty line.”
They couldn't care less.Single moms having kids they can’t afford is an easy target. It makes a right winger feel superior by shitting on such a woman. It makes it easy to rail against the idea of food stamps altogether. Such a person judging feels superior because they aren’t on food stamps and have a full time job in comparison. Somebody should probably tell them that it is very common for anyone to have a full time job and not be on food stamps lol. Such people judging aren’t as special as they like to think they are. Food stamps is not the epidemic that republicans like to think it is. They simply pretend that it is because it makes them feel less insecure about themselves. The truth is that few actual able bodied adults are even on food stamps. The ones that are have dependents.
But sure, such irresponsible women do exist.
We can all agree: an impoverished woman should not have kids and she made a mistake when she had one. Okay sure. However, the kid still…. exists. What should we do with that kid? Should the kid suffer because of the mom’s mistakes? Probably not, right? Government assistance is required either way.
New USDA Report Provides Picture of Who Participates in SNAP - Food Research & Action Center
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has been issuing a series of annual reports on the demographic and economic characteristics of households and individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The latest report, covering fiscal year 2019, was released at...
“SNAP targets those in greatest need. Among those participating in the program, most are children, elderly persons, or individuals with a disability. In fact, 86 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households that include a child, elderly person, or person with disabilities. In addition, about 92 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households with income at or below the federal poverty line.”
if you support the dems then you do. They voted against it, even threatening to it fund the Dept of Ag over itWho says I didn’t? Most adults on food stamps have jobs. Of course the idea is not practical for those who are on disability.
Hmmmmm... because they don't want to pay for the food stamps to prop-up somebody else's mistake?When republicans complain about single moms getting food stamps, why don’t they consider the well-being of the child?
check out the 2018 farm bill dramaLink?
Rights come with responsibilities. Yes? The folks on the Left want gun owners to be responsible. But, not mother's and father's.Single moms having kids they can’t afford is an easy target. It makes a right winger feel superior by shitting on such a woman. It makes it easy to rail against the idea of food stamps altogether. Such a person judging feels superior because they aren’t on food stamps and have a full time job in comparison. Somebody should probably tell them that it is very common for anyone to have a full time job and not be on food stamps lol. Such people judging aren’t as special as they like to think they are. Food stamps is not the epidemic that republicans like to think it is. They simply pretend that it is because it makes them feel less insecure about themselves. The truth is that few actual able bodied adults are even on food stamps. The ones that are have dependents.
But sure, such irresponsible women do exist.
We can all agree: an impoverished woman should not have kids and she made a mistake when she had one. Okay sure. However, the kid still…. exists. What should we do with that kid? Should the kid suffer because of the mom’s mistakes? Probably not, right? Government assistance is required either way.
New USDA Report Provides Picture of Who Participates in SNAP - Food Research & Action Center
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has been issuing a series of annual reports on the demographic and economic characteristics of households and individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The latest report, covering fiscal year 2019, was released at...
“SNAP targets those in greatest need. Among those participating in the program, most are children, elderly persons, or individuals with a disability. In fact, 86 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households that include a child, elderly person, or person with disabilities. In addition, about 92 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households with income at or below the federal poverty line.”
Your post is ten times longer than it had to be. And, sadly, it's filled to the brim with worthless bullshit.First of all, preposterous. The first Governments in history understood that the Government has a responsibility towards the people it governs. Those Governments that did not fulfill that responsibility were overthrown, or destroyed. Pre Christian Roman citizens had money provided to provide for basic sustenance. The word Succor is found as early as the 13th Century, to provide relief and assistance.
The Lord of the Manor was responsible for insuring the Peasants got fed, Greek City States insured the people were fed. As far back as you wish to go, and Governments saw to the needs of their people, at least the ones that lasted longer than the first bad harvest.
Now why do the Governments do that? Simple. It is a lot cheaper to do that, than fend off a Revolution of starving desperate people. See the French Revolution for a more modern example.
So if we go with your plan, then the Military and the Police will spend half their time trying to protect those with, from those without. It is how Communist Revolutions get started. Starving people don’t give a damn who provides them the food the must have, or the political ramifications of their choices, they just want to eat. See the Chinese Revolution if you doubt me. The so called Peasants who are far removed from the cities, who today live as their ancestors did at the time of the revolution, don’t care. All they want is their rice bowl filled at the end of the day. The rest is irrelevant.
Those people start starving, and they’ll not just sit there and starve to death, they’ll get desperate, and they’ll demand food, and then they’ll take it.
Hell, it is one of the tools the Military uses to break down and get candidates to quit advanced training. Rangers, SEAL’s, Green Berets, even Delta. All of them suffer starvation as part of their training, because it is a lot harder to motivate yourself to do some difficult task, when your belly is empty. In my day, people who went to Ranger School, and these were fit people without much body fat, came back twenty pounds lighter, because they were existing on fewer calories than they needed to sustain life.
Starvation is one of the techniques used for breaking a prisoner of war, and making him willing to talk.
But take any jail or prison. Those with bad food, or not enough food, suffer far more riots and assaults on staff than those who provide better food. I love how the Conservatives who are all about supporting the cops and such, are the same ones demanding that the cops be placed in the most dangerous situation possible.
So providing food is a recognized moral duty of any Government in History. Providing food is beyond any religious beliefs, and spans the globe. It predates many religions of today in fact. Historically, failure to do so has caused the fall of Governments.
And before you scoff and say you have guns. You may have guns. But how many are you willing to slaughter to keep from providing basic sustenance? And if you lose, what happens then? We could ask the Royals of France. We could ask a lot of people. If they had not been executed by the crowds.
BUT many blacks are leaving the democrat plantation. Lots of men are seeing the value of marriage and family. Same with hispanics. Moving to the right. Left didn't see that one coming.
We will welcome them into the flock of good behavior and productivity and you will be livid.If blacks & other minorities move to the right we can assume you MAGA retards will get off their back, right mouth breather?
clipper said:If blacks & other minorities move to the right we can assume you MAGA retards will get off their back, right mouth breather?
I am not stupid. I am not smart. My IQ is average. Stupid means low IQ.Yes, most are just stupid. Something that can't be fixed.
Single moms having kids they can’t afford is an easy target. It makes a right winger feel superior by shitting on such a woman. It makes it easy to rail against the idea of food stamps altogether. Such a person judging feels superior because they aren’t on food stamps and have a full time job in comparison. Somebody should probably tell them that it is very common for anyone to have a full time job and not be on food stamps lol. Such people judging aren’t as special as they like to think they are. Food stamps is not the epidemic that republicans like to think it is. They simply pretend that it is because it makes them feel less insecure about themselves. The truth is that few actual able bodied adults are even on food stamps. The ones that are have dependents.
But sure, such irresponsible women do exist.
We can all agree: an impoverished woman should not have kids and she made a mistake when she had one. Okay sure. However, the kid still…. exists. What should we do with that kid? Should the kid suffer because of the mom’s mistakes? Probably not, right? Government assistance is required either way.
New USDA Report Provides Picture of Who Participates in SNAP - Food Research & Action Center
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has been issuing a series of annual reports on the demographic and economic characteristics of households and individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The latest report, covering fiscal year 2019, was released at...
“SNAP targets those in greatest need. Among those participating in the program, most are children, elderly persons, or individuals with a disability. In fact, 86 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households that include a child, elderly person, or person with disabilities. In addition, about 92 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households with income at or below the federal poverty line.”
