When the nightmare that is Trumpery is over..........

[berg80]

He wants a witch-hunt set up, because the ones the Dems already did failed.

Depends on what you mean by failed. Did the Mueller investigation uncover impeachable offenses? Unequivocally, yes. Did the House inquiry reveal Trump was guilty of the impeachable charges against him? Unequivocally, yes.
But Mueller was not permitted to indict Trump due to the OLC guidelines and Senate Repubs cowardly refused to consider new evidence (Bolton) and voted to acquit despite a few of them admitting the House mangers proved their case.

 

[Billiejeens]

You going to charge the Hussein who did the same thing, “putting kids in cages”?

I suppose it was inevitable that one of you Trumpletards use that false analogy. While Obama was in office the sudden influx of people, especially kids, on the southern border caused the system to be temporarily overwhelmed. Hence, the pictures of kids being held in cages that have circulated.
This as opposed to it happening while the Bigot-in-Chief was prez by design........a result of the zero tolerance policy.

Did Obama Administration Build Cages That House Immigrant Children?

While under scrutiny for treatment of migrants, the Trump administration has been shifting blame to its predecessor.

www.snopes.com

Why you folks think you can get away with perpetuating the lie you told by taking the matter out of context is beyond me since I'm fairly sure you knew you were lying when you told it.

You pieces of shit are something else.

The sudden influx was due to the boy President telling criminal aliens to come and overwhelm the system.

Then pieces of shit like you say, you can't blame that boy -

 

[Billiejeens]

He wants a witch-hunt set up, because the ones the Dems already did failed.

Depends on what you mean by failed. Did the Mueller investigation uncover impeachable offenses? Unequivocally, yes. Did the House inquiry reveal Trump was guilty of the impeachable charges against him? Unequivocally, yes.
But Mueller was not permitted to indict Trump due to the OLC guidelines and Senate Repubs cowardly refused to consider new evidence (Bolton) and voted to acquit despite a few of them admitting the House mangers proved their case.

Factually False
Top to Bottom

 

[theHawk]

He wants a witch-hunt set up, because the ones the Dems already did failed.

Depends on what you mean by failed. Did the Mueller investigation uncover impeachable offenses? Unequivocally, yes. Did the House inquiry reveal Trump was guilty of the impeachable charges against him? Unequivocally, yes.
But Mueller was not permitted to indict Trump due to the OLC guidelines and Senate Repubs cowardly refused to consider new evidence (Bolton) and voted to acquit despite a few of them admitting the House mangers proved their case.

Mueller found diddly squat for “collusion” charges. Try again.

 

[berg80]

The thing about this..................

Emails show Trump admin had 'no way to link' separated kids to parents

"What you are requesting," said a top ICE official, "is not something that we are going to be able to complete in a rapid fashion."

www.nbcnews.com

..........is, most Trumpleheads consider the inhumane treatment of immigrants to be perfectly acceptable.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

the country would benefit from a Nuremburg type proceeding. Not because the admin participated in war crimes. (Though with respect to charges the Nazis faced for crimes against humanity, the caging and forced separation of immigrant children deserves consideration.)

It's because the Nuremburg trials were not only about bringing people to justice. It was about returning the country to a sense of normalcy. This exercise would be about restoring the rule of law and identifying how we went so far astray during the reign of the Orange Messiah.

We need to more fully understand how we allowed ourselves to get to a point where the DOJ enforced a completely different standard of justice for friends of the prez. Which is not to say our legal system is without flaws. The rich, powerful, and connected have always had an advantage over ordinary citizens. But the cases of Flynn and Stone are the first overt instances of demonstrable, blatant, preferential treatment of criminals based on their relationship with the President. Criminals who committed offenses against the people of the US.

Ordinarily, the breathtaking abuses conducted by the DOJ could be remedied by Billy the Bagman's removal. But Senate Repubs complicity in allowing his behavior to go unchecked is a matter or record. Their fear of facing the wrath of The Following in upcoming elections precludes any thought of Barr being held accountable. Thus, the need for a cleansing event to restore the people's faith in government after the Trumpette's are out of power.

The previous admin would need to be hagued since they were continually breaking laws, starting endless wars, spying illegally.

What endless wars did they start?

What specific laws did they break and what indictments were brought fort in your almost 4 years of control?

Illegally spying on incoming admins, arab spring, Syria, expanding ME wars.

You are just giving opinion.

Given you lot have had control over the government for almost 4 years, show me the indictments.

The US did not start Arab Spring nor tbe Syrian War, so that is lie.

Iraq and Aghanistan were already ongoing.

Thats not opinion. Those events happened and O was in charge and expanded the wars in the ME. Those are facts.

 

[berg80]

Mueller found diddly squat for “collusion” charges. Try again.

If you read this whole article putting aside the propaganda you've been conditioned to accept you will find ample evidence of what can be loosely defined as collusion.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”

Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.

www.justsecurity.org

While these things don't exceed the high bar for establishing a criminal conspiracy they are nonetheless abhorrent to every patriotic American who rejects the idea of soliciting help in an election from a foreign adversary.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The thing about this..................

Emails show Trump admin had 'no way to link' separated kids to parents

"What you are requesting," said a top ICE official, "is not something that we are going to be able to complete in a rapid fashion."

www.nbcnews.com

..........is, most Trumpleheads consider the inhumane treatment of immigrants to be perfectly acceptable.

Only because you seem to think it is inhumane.

The fact that these people drag kids across the desert (with a fair mortality rate) is never mentioned.

We care for them after they get here.

Fuck you.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Mueller found diddly squat for “collusion” charges. Try again.

If you read this whole article putting aside the propaganda you've been conditioned to accept you will find ample evidence of what can be loosely defined as collusion.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”

Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.

www.justsecurity.org

While these things don't exceed the high bar for establishing a criminal conspiracy they are nonetheless abhorrent to every patriotic American who rejects the idea of soliciting help in an election from a foreign adversary.

Don't make me laugh.

What is abhorrent is that you somehow consider yourself a patriot.

Just Security ??? Really.

Why not just quote DailyKOS.

 

[berg80]

"In a dissent, Judge Robert Wilkins said it appeared to be the first time his court had compelled a lower court judge to rule in a particular way without giving the judge a “reasonable opportunity to issue its own ruling.”

“It is a great irony that, in finding the District Court to have exceeded its jurisdiction, this Court so grievously oversteps its own,” wrote Wilkins, an appointee of former President Barack Obama."

Appeals court orders dismissal of Michael Flynn prosecution

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan had declined to immediately dismiss the case, seeking instead to evaluate on his own the Justice Department’s unusual dismissal request.

www.nbc29.com

 

[Harry Dresden]

the country would benefit from a Nuremburg type proceeding. Not because the admin participated in war crimes. (Though with respect to charges the Nazis faced for crimes against humanity, the caging and forced separation of immigrant children deserves consideration.)

It's because the Nuremburg trials were not only about bringing people to justice. It was about returning the country to a sense of normalcy. This exercise would be about restoring the rule of law and identifying how we went so far astray during the reign of the Orange Messiah.

We need to more fully understand how we allowed ourselves to get to a point where the DOJ enforced a completely different standard of justice for friends of the prez. Which is not to say our legal system is without flaws. The rich, powerful, and connected have always had an advantage over ordinary citizens. But the cases of Flynn and Stone are the first overt instances of demonstrable, blatant, preferential treatment of criminals based on their relationship with the President. Criminals who committed offenses against the people of the US.

Ordinarily, the breathtaking abuses conducted by the DOJ could be remedied by Billy the Bagman's removal. But Senate Repubs complicity in allowing his behavior to go unchecked is a matter or record. Their fear of facing the wrath of The Following in upcoming elections precludes any thought of Barr being held accountable. Thus, the need for a cleansing event to restore the people's faith in government after the Trumpette's are out of power.

Something will have to be done to regain the public's faith in our system.

Get republicans out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it.

Today's republicans are the most irresponsible and criminal party I've ever seen in my life.

People need to be prosecuted and sent to prison for their crimes.

barr needs to be disbarred, investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

We have to stop allowing presidents and their criminal cohorts escape prosecution and prison.

here dana let me say something you are not allowed to say.... Get republicans AND democrats out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it......

So anarchy.

no you get people that put the country over their fucking useless party...

You don't understand Government or Politics, at all.

anyone who thinks the party is more important than the country sure as hell dont have a clue as to what govt should be...

I do
I live in the real world.
In your made up world - who runs the Government?

well at least you admit to being just another useless die hard party person.....you people are the main reason this country is getting so fucked up...

Don't puss out now.
Who runs the Government in Harry's world?

who do you think?.....the people im bad mouthing, your fucking useless parties....answer a question for me now.....do you agree with the 2 parties mantras...."if you dont like what i like,if you dont agree with me....fuck you".....you agree with that billy?....

Dang, this is not that hard.

I'm asking who fills the role of the party politicians running Government that we have now, if it is not current politicians.
You have declined, so far, to offer an alternative plan.

You may say we outlaw all political parties and labels.
Okay -
So we elect a congress (and other bodies) full of people who have said things that we agree with.
They get together and run the government.
How long do you think it takes for like minded people to find each other ( after all the voters found them) and band together and begin voting together to push their ideas and block the ideas that they don't agree with?

That's is what you what yes?
People that you can lobby that support your ideas?

i answered the question you asked me.....how come you avoided answering what i asked you?....and my alternative plan is to get rid of anyone who has spent a lifetime in office and whoC

the country would benefit from a Nuremburg type proceeding. Not because the admin participated in war crimes. (Though with respect to charges the Nazis faced for crimes against humanity, the caging and forced separation of immigrant children deserves consideration.)

It's because the Nuremburg trials were not only about bringing people to justice. It was about returning the country to a sense of normalcy. This exercise would be about restoring the rule of law and identifying how we went so far astray during the reign of the Orange Messiah.

We need to more fully understand how we allowed ourselves to get to a point where the DOJ enforced a completely different standard of justice for friends of the prez. Which is not to say our legal system is without flaws. The rich, powerful, and connected have always had an advantage over ordinary citizens. But the cases of Flynn and Stone are the first overt instances of demonstrable, blatant, preferential treatment of criminals based on their relationship with the President. Criminals who committed offenses against the people of the US.

Ordinarily, the breathtaking abuses conducted by the DOJ could be remedied by Billy the Bagman's removal. But Senate Repubs complicity in allowing his behavior to go unchecked is a matter or record. Their fear of facing the wrath of The Following in upcoming elections precludes any thought of Barr being held accountable. Thus, the need for a cleansing event to restore the people's faith in government after the Trumpette's are out of power.

Something will have to be done to regain the public's faith in our system.

Get republicans out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it.

Today's republicans are the most irresponsible and criminal party I've ever seen in my life.

People need to be prosecuted and sent to prison for their crimes.

barr needs to be disbarred, investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

We have to stop allowing presidents and their criminal cohorts escape prosecution and prison.

here dana let me say something you are not allowed to say.... Get republicans AND democrats out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it......

So anarchy.

no you get people that put the country over their fucking useless party...

You don't understand Government or Politics, at all.

anyone who thinks the party is more important than the country sure as hell dont have a clue as to what govt should be...

I do
I live in the real world.
In your made up world - who runs the Government?

well at least you admit to being just another useless die hard party person.....you people are the main reason this country is getting so fucked up...

Don't puss out now.
Who runs the Government in Harry's world?

who do you think?.....the people im bad mouthing, your fucking useless parties....answer a question for me now.....do you agree with the 2 parties mantras...."if you dont like what i like,if you dont agree with me....fuck you".....you agree with that billy?....

Dang, this is not that hard.

I'm asking who fills the role of the party politicians running Government that we have now, if it is not current politicians.
You have declined, so far, to offer an alternative plan.

You may say we outlaw all political parties and labels.
Okay -
So we elect a congress (and other bodies) full of people who have said things that we agree with.
They get together and run the government.
How long do you think it takes for like minded people to find each other ( after all the voters found them) and band together and begin voting together to push their ideas and block the ideas that they don't agree with?

That's is what you what yes?
People that you can lobby that support your ideas?

i answered the question you asked me.....how come you avoided answering what i asked you?....and my alternative plan is to get rid of anyone who has spent a lifetime in office and who only sees what is good for their fucking party and not the country....

who only sees what is good for their fucking party and not the country....

Is there a formula that you have that we are going to use?
Who gets to decide?
What if something benefits the country as a whole while simultaneously helping the group or party that they are affiliated with?
The people of the country are fairly well divided on what would help the country. - diametrically opposed one might say.
So it is possible to ascertain what does help the country?

you still avoided answering what i asked you?....why is that?....could it be because you are one of those die hard party people?....

state your question

oh here we go....are you the new dean?...he would do that too....just keep on avoiding it and then...."what was the question?".....you are in this thread go back and read it instead of playing the clueless one....

I answered the question that I think that you asked.
It's an opportunity dude, don't wuss out.

you think you did?....yea talk about wussing out.....deans replacement has arrived....

 

[Billiejeens]

the country would benefit from a Nuremburg type proceeding. Not because the admin participated in war crimes. (Though with respect to charges the Nazis faced for crimes against humanity, the caging and forced separation of immigrant children deserves consideration.)

It's because the Nuremburg trials were not only about bringing people to justice. It was about returning the country to a sense of normalcy. This exercise would be about restoring the rule of law and identifying how we went so far astray during the reign of the Orange Messiah.

We need to more fully understand how we allowed ourselves to get to a point where the DOJ enforced a completely different standard of justice for friends of the prez. Which is not to say our legal system is without flaws. The rich, powerful, and connected have always had an advantage over ordinary citizens. But the cases of Flynn and Stone are the first overt instances of demonstrable, blatant, preferential treatment of criminals based on their relationship with the President. Criminals who committed offenses against the people of the US.

Ordinarily, the breathtaking abuses conducted by the DOJ could be remedied by Billy the Bagman's removal. But Senate Repubs complicity in allowing his behavior to go unchecked is a matter or record. Their fear of facing the wrath of The Following in upcoming elections precludes any thought of Barr being held accountable. Thus, the need for a cleansing event to restore the people's faith in government after the Trumpette's are out of power.

Something will have to be done to regain the public's faith in our system.

Get republicans out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it.

Today's republicans are the most irresponsible and criminal party I've ever seen in my life.

People need to be prosecuted and sent to prison for their crimes.

barr needs to be disbarred, investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

We have to stop allowing presidents and their criminal cohorts escape prosecution and prison.

here dana let me say something you are not allowed to say.... Get republicans AND democrats out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it......

So anarchy.

no you get people that put the country over their fucking useless party...

You don't understand Government or Politics, at all.

anyone who thinks the party is more important than the country sure as hell dont have a clue as to what govt should be...

I do
I live in the real world.
In your made up world - who runs the Government?

well at least you admit to being just another useless die hard party person.....you people are the main reason this country is getting so fucked up...

Don't puss out now.
Who runs the Government in Harry's world?

who do you think?.....the people im bad mouthing, your fucking useless parties....answer a question for me now.....do you agree with the 2 parties mantras...."if you dont like what i like,if you dont agree with me....fuck you".....you agree with that billy?....

Dang, this is not that hard.

I'm asking who fills the role of the party politicians running Government that we have now, if it is not current politicians.
You have declined, so far, to offer an alternative plan.

You may say we outlaw all political parties and labels.
Okay -
So we elect a congress (and other bodies) full of people who have said things that we agree with.
They get together and run the government.
How long do you think it takes for like minded people to find each other ( after all the voters found them) and band together and begin voting together to push their ideas and block the ideas that they don't agree with?

That's is what you what yes?
People that you can lobby that support your ideas?

i answered the question you asked me.....how come you avoided answering what i asked you?....and my alternative plan is to get rid of anyone who has spent a lifetime in office and whoC

the country would benefit from a Nuremburg type proceeding. Not because the admin participated in war crimes. (Though with respect to charges the Nazis faced for crimes against humanity, the caging and forced separation of immigrant children deserves consideration.)

It's because the Nuremburg trials were not only about bringing people to justice. It was about returning the country to a sense of normalcy. This exercise would be about restoring the rule of law and identifying how we went so far astray during the reign of the Orange Messiah.

We need to more fully understand how we allowed ourselves to get to a point where the DOJ enforced a completely different standard of justice for friends of the prez. Which is not to say our legal system is without flaws. The rich, powerful, and connected have always had an advantage over ordinary citizens. But the cases of Flynn and Stone are the first overt instances of demonstrable, blatant, preferential treatment of criminals based on their relationship with the President. Criminals who committed offenses against the people of the US.

Ordinarily, the breathtaking abuses conducted by the DOJ could be remedied by Billy the Bagman's removal. But Senate Repubs complicity in allowing his behavior to go unchecked is a matter or record. Their fear of facing the wrath of The Following in upcoming elections precludes any thought of Barr being held accountable. Thus, the need for a cleansing event to restore the people's faith in government after the Trumpette's are out of power.

Something will have to be done to regain the public's faith in our system.

Get republicans out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it.

Today's republicans are the most irresponsible and criminal party I've ever seen in my life.

People need to be prosecuted and sent to prison for their crimes.

barr needs to be disbarred, investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

We have to stop allowing presidents and their criminal cohorts escape prosecution and prison.

here dana let me say something you are not allowed to say.... Get republicans AND democrats out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it......

So anarchy.

no you get people that put the country over their fucking useless party...

You don't understand Government or Politics, at all.

anyone who thinks the party is more important than the country sure as hell dont have a clue as to what govt should be...

I do
I live in the real world.
In your made up world - who runs the Government?

well at least you admit to being just another useless die hard party person.....you people are the main reason this country is getting so fucked up...

Don't puss out now.
Who runs the Government in Harry's world?

who do you think?.....the people im bad mouthing, your fucking useless parties....answer a question for me now.....do you agree with the 2 parties mantras...."if you dont like what i like,if you dont agree with me....fuck you".....you agree with that billy?....

Dang, this is not that hard.

I'm asking who fills the role of the party politicians running Government that we have now, if it is not current politicians.
You have declined, so far, to offer an alternative plan.

You may say we outlaw all political parties and labels.
Okay -
So we elect a congress (and other bodies) full of people who have said things that we agree with.
They get together and run the government.
How long do you think it takes for like minded people to find each other ( after all the voters found them) and band together and begin voting together to push their ideas and block the ideas that they don't agree with?

That's is what you what yes?
People that you can lobby that support your ideas?

i answered the question you asked me.....how come you avoided answering what i asked you?....and my alternative plan is to get rid of anyone who has spent a lifetime in office and who only sees what is good for their fucking party and not the country....

who only sees what is good for their fucking party and not the country....

Is there a formula that you have that we are going to use?
Who gets to decide?
What if something benefits the country as a whole while simultaneously helping the group or party that they are affiliated with?
The people of the country are fairly well divided on what would help the country. - diametrically opposed one might say.
So it is possible to ascertain what does help the country?

you still avoided answering what i asked you?....why is that?....could it be because you are one of those die hard party people?....

state your question

oh here we go....are you the new dean?...he would do that too....just keep on avoiding it and then...."what was the question?".....you are in this thread go back and read it instead of playing the clueless one....

I answered the question that I think that you asked.
It's an opportunity dude, don't wuss out.

you think you did?....yea talk about wussing out.....deans replacement has arrived....

Why don't you just ask your question ?
I have been here awhile Faggot fuck - did this dean person scare you this badly also?

 

[Harry Dresden]

the country would benefit from a Nuremburg type proceeding. Not because the admin participated in war crimes. (Though with respect to charges the Nazis faced for crimes against humanity, the caging and forced separation of immigrant children deserves consideration.)

It's because the Nuremburg trials were not only about bringing people to justice. It was about returning the country to a sense of normalcy. This exercise would be about restoring the rule of law and identifying how we went so far astray during the reign of the Orange Messiah.

We need to more fully understand how we allowed ourselves to get to a point where the DOJ enforced a completely different standard of justice for friends of the prez. Which is not to say our legal system is without flaws. The rich, powerful, and connected have always had an advantage over ordinary citizens. But the cases of Flynn and Stone are the first overt instances of demonstrable, blatant, preferential treatment of criminals based on their relationship with the President. Criminals who committed offenses against the people of the US.

Ordinarily, the breathtaking abuses conducted by the DOJ could be remedied by Billy the Bagman's removal. But Senate Repubs complicity in allowing his behavior to go unchecked is a matter or record. Their fear of facing the wrath of The Following in upcoming elections precludes any thought of Barr being held accountable. Thus, the need for a cleansing event to restore the people's faith in government after the Trumpette's are out of power.

Something will have to be done to regain the public's faith in our system.

Get republicans out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it.

Today's republicans are the most irresponsible and criminal party I've ever seen in my life.

People need to be prosecuted and sent to prison for their crimes.

barr needs to be disbarred, investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

We have to stop allowing presidents and their criminal cohorts escape prosecution and prison.

here dana let me say something you are not allowed to say.... Get republicans AND democrats out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it......

So anarchy.

no you get people that put the country over their fucking useless party...

You don't understand Government or Politics, at all.

anyone who thinks the party is more important than the country sure as hell dont have a clue as to what govt should be...

I do
I live in the real world.
In your made up world - who runs the Government?

well at least you admit to being just another useless die hard party person.....you people are the main reason this country is getting so fucked up...

Don't puss out now.
Who runs the Government in Harry's world?

who do you think?.....the people im bad mouthing, your fucking useless parties....answer a question for me now.....do you agree with the 2 parties mantras...."if you dont like what i like,if you dont agree with me....fuck you".....you agree with that billy?....

Dang, this is not that hard.

I'm asking who fills the role of the party politicians running Government that we have now, if it is not current politicians.
You have declined, so far, to offer an alternative plan.

You may say we outlaw all political parties and labels.
Okay -
So we elect a congress (and other bodies) full of people who have said things that we agree with.
They get together and run the government.
How long do you think it takes for like minded people to find each other ( after all the voters found them) and band together and begin voting together to push their ideas and block the ideas that they don't agree with?

That's is what you what yes?
People that you can lobby that support your ideas?

i answered the question you asked me.....how come you avoided answering what i asked you?....and my alternative plan is to get rid of anyone who has spent a lifetime in office and whoC

the country would benefit from a Nuremburg type proceeding. Not because the admin participated in war crimes. (Though with respect to charges the Nazis faced for crimes against humanity, the caging and forced separation of immigrant children deserves consideration.)

It's because the Nuremburg trials were not only about bringing people to justice. It was about returning the country to a sense of normalcy. This exercise would be about restoring the rule of law and identifying how we went so far astray during the reign of the Orange Messiah.

We need to more fully understand how we allowed ourselves to get to a point where the DOJ enforced a completely different standard of justice for friends of the prez. Which is not to say our legal system is without flaws. The rich, powerful, and connected have always had an advantage over ordinary citizens. But the cases of Flynn and Stone are the first overt instances of demonstrable, blatant, preferential treatment of criminals based on their relationship with the President. Criminals who committed offenses against the people of the US.

Ordinarily, the breathtaking abuses conducted by the DOJ could be remedied by Billy the Bagman's removal. But Senate Repubs complicity in allowing his behavior to go unchecked is a matter or record. Their fear of facing the wrath of The Following in upcoming elections precludes any thought of Barr being held accountable. Thus, the need for a cleansing event to restore the people's faith in government after the Trumpette's are out of power.

Something will have to be done to regain the public's faith in our system.

Get republicans out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it.

Today's republicans are the most irresponsible and criminal party I've ever seen in my life.

People need to be prosecuted and sent to prison for their crimes.

barr needs to be disbarred, investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

We have to stop allowing presidents and their criminal cohorts escape prosecution and prison.

here dana let me say something you are not allowed to say.... Get republicans AND democrats out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it......

So anarchy.

no you get people that put the country over their fucking useless party...

You don't understand Government or Politics, at all.

anyone who thinks the party is more important than the country sure as hell dont have a clue as to what govt should be...

I do
I live in the real world.
In your made up world - who runs the Government?

well at least you admit to being just another useless die hard party person.....you people are the main reason this country is getting so fucked up...

Don't puss out now.
Who runs the Government in Harry's world?

who do you think?.....the people im bad mouthing, your fucking useless parties....answer a question for me now.....do you agree with the 2 parties mantras...."if you dont like what i like,if you dont agree with me....fuck you".....you agree with that billy?....

Dang, this is not that hard.

I'm asking who fills the role of the party politicians running Government that we have now, if it is not current politicians.
You have declined, so far, to offer an alternative plan.

You may say we outlaw all political parties and labels.
Okay -
So we elect a congress (and other bodies) full of people who have said things that we agree with.
They get together and run the government.
How long do you think it takes for like minded people to find each other ( after all the voters found them) and band together and begin voting together to push their ideas and block the ideas that they don't agree with?

That's is what you what yes?
People that you can lobby that support your ideas?

i answered the question you asked me.....how come you avoided answering what i asked you?....and my alternative plan is to get rid of anyone who has spent a lifetime in office and who only sees what is good for their fucking party and not the country....

who only sees what is good for their fucking party and not the country....

Is there a formula that you have that we are going to use?
Who gets to decide?
What if something benefits the country as a whole while simultaneously helping the group or party that they are affiliated with?
The people of the country are fairly well divided on what would help the country. - diametrically opposed one might say.
So it is possible to ascertain what does help the country?

you still avoided answering what i asked you?....why is that?....could it be because you are one of those die hard party people?....

state your question

oh here we go....are you the new dean?...he would do that too....just keep on avoiding it and then...."what was the question?".....you are in this thread go back and read it instead of playing the clueless one....

I answered the question that I think that you asked.
It's an opportunity dude, don't wuss out.

you think you did?....yea talk about wussing out.....deans replacement has arrived....

Why don't you just ask your question ?
I have been here awhile Faggot fuck - did this dean person scare you this badly also?

here comes the names....why dont you go back and read the dam question instead of doing the dean dance....

 

[CowboyTed]

Libs, face the fact that Obama started the kids in cages program.

Are you really bothered by kids in cages or is it simply a political issue?

Your disingenuous is glaringly obvious.

Trump was the one who separated families...

No, Obama did not have family separation policy

President Donald Trump, in an interview with the Spanish-language TV network Telemundo, adamantly claimed that the separ

www.politifact.com

What Trump did was disgraceful, taking toddlers away from their parents and putting them in cages on there own...
A fucking warm place in hell is reserved for people who do that...

So you are calling Snopes liars.

You won’t be the first.

Just to be clear, when Snopes says Obama did something bad, you don’t believe them. However, if they say it about Trump, you do?

Seems odd to me.

Please show me the fact checker that says I am wrong...

Trump was the one who separated families.

US border: Who decided to separate families?

After criticism of the policy, Donald Trump blamed its introduction on President Obama and the Democrats.

www.bbc.com

There was very young children toddlers seperated .

Attorneys: Texas border facility is neglecting migrant kids

EL PASO, Texas (AP) — A 2-year-old boy locked in detention wants to be held all the time. A few girls, ages 10 to 15, say they've been doing their best to feed and soothe the clingy toddler who was handed to them by a guard days ago.

apnews.com

So where are the lies? Come on now....
This is your problem you don't know the facts you just make them up...

Maybe illegal aliens shouldn’t being their toddlers with them when committing a felony?

So what? Does that ok in your mind, to punish kids who had no say in the matter?

The kids aren’t being punished. They are separated from the human traffickers that tried to smuggle them in. Many are not their parents, they could be kidnapped, sexually abused, etc. You want to keep kids locked in a jail with such people? That is sick.

An investigation has to be conducted to determine if it really is a parent that was with the child. Of course we don’t have the resources to do that quickly for so many. Thanks to Dems and their “defund the border patrol” policy.

Invent a story to fit the narrative... Where is the proof...

This was a line of bullshit they tried to use...

 

[CowboyTed]

He wants a witch-hunt set up, because the ones the Dems already did failed.

Depends on what you mean by failed. Did the Mueller investigation uncover impeachable offenses? Unequivocally, yes. Did the House inquiry reveal Trump was guilty of the impeachable charges against him? Unequivocally, yes.
But Mueller was not permitted to indict Trump due to the OLC guidelines and Senate Repubs cowardly refused to consider new evidence (Bolton) and voted to acquit despite a few of them admitting the House mangers proved their case.

Factually False
Top to Bottom

How about you actually prove him false....

 

[jc456]

the country would benefit from a Nuremburg type proceeding. Not because the admin participated in war crimes. (Though with respect to charges the Nazis faced for crimes against humanity, the caging and forced separation of immigrant children deserves consideration.)

It's because the Nuremburg trials were not only about bringing people to justice. It was about returning the country to a sense of normalcy. This exercise would be about restoring the rule of law and identifying how we went so far astray during the reign of the Orange Messiah.

We need to more fully understand how we allowed ourselves to get to a point where the DOJ enforced a completely different standard of justice for friends of the prez. Which is not to say our legal system is without flaws. The rich, powerful, and connected have always had an advantage over ordinary citizens. But the cases of Flynn and Stone are the first overt instances of demonstrable, blatant, preferential treatment of criminals based on their relationship with the President. Criminals who committed offenses against the people of the US.

Ordinarily, the breathtaking abuses conducted by the DOJ could be remedied by Billy the Bagman's removal. But Senate Repubs complicity in allowing his behavior to go unchecked is a matter or record. Their fear of facing the wrath of The Following in upcoming elections precludes any thought of Barr being held accountable. Thus, the need for a cleansing event to restore the people's faith in government after the Trumpette's are out of power.

Something will have to be done to regain the public's faith in our system.

Get republicans out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it.

Today's republicans are the most irresponsible and criminal party I've ever seen in my life.

People need to be prosecuted and sent to prison for their crimes.

barr needs to be disbarred, investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

We have to stop allowing presidents and their criminal cohorts escape prosecution and prison.

here dana let me say something you are not allowed to say.... Get republicans AND democrats out of any position of power and make sure they don't regain that power until they have proven they can be responsible with it......

kkker projecting you are.

there you go again.....what does KKKer mean in your world?....

so now you don't know what the kkk is? wow. keep practicing.

what does the clan have to do with what i said dumbass?...im sure your reasoning will be comical.....

You’re affiliated with them.

 

[Billiejeens]

He wants a witch-hunt set up, because the ones the Dems already did failed.

Depends on what you mean by failed. Did the Mueller investigation uncover impeachable offenses? Unequivocally, yes. Did the House inquiry reveal Trump was guilty of the impeachable charges against him? Unequivocally, yes.
But Mueller was not permitted to indict Trump due to the OLC guidelines and Senate Repubs cowardly refused to consider new evidence (Bolton) and voted to acquit despite a few of them admitting the House mangers proved their case.

Factually False
Top to Bottom

How about you actually prove him false....

Well - Robert Mueller Proved him false.

Per Robert Mueller his investigation did not uncover impeachable offenses.
The House Inquiry and Impeachment did not find any impeachable offenses.
Robert Mueller made an impromptu press statement that clarified that OLC guidelines were not a factor in his findings.
It is correct that the jury made up of the Senate did not vote to call witnesses - which makes sense since juries do not call witnesses.

He made the statements - is there a reason that you did not ask him to prove what he claimed?

 

[TheParser]

when its over we will just move into a new nightmare called "bidenism".....

Exactly!

Just imagine a mentally frail President Biden being "guided" by his woke VP and by his woke Cabinet and by Nancy "kneeling" Pelosi (who will be begging to keep the Speakership).

It sends shudders down one's spine!

 

[berg80]

The Hussein called for the civil war in Libya, actively supporting terrorists there. As well as Egypt(thankfully that failed), and of course Syria, where he actively supported terrorist groups to overthrow a leader and nation that never attacked us.

He then spied on the Donald, which is currently under investigation.

I'm just wondering, would you like to try to substantiate the lies you told in that post?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Hanging Nazis became an obsession after Nuremburg. Is that what Marxist lefties have in mind for republicans? God help this Country if the current crop of democrats ever get control.

Seriously, if they keep this up, the left will regret it. We WILL fight back if they dont back off. They've done enough damage for a lifetime