Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 36,471
- 24,043
- 1,845
This is from a website run by lawyers. In the case of the article I used the material was taken directly from the Mueller report to substantiate their conclusions using legal analysis. Something you'd know if you had read the report.Let me guess -
That is from a Blog written by someone who has opinions that are as crazy as yours?
"The key question is how Robert Mueller and his team assessed the three elements “common to most of the relevant statutes” relating to obstruction of justice: an obstructive act, a nexus between the act and an official proceeding, and corrupt intent. As Mueller describes, the special counsel’s office “gathered evidence … relevant to the elements of those crimes and analyzed them within an elements framework—while refraining from reaching ultimate conclusions about whether crimes were committed,” because of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC)’s guidelines against the indictment of a sitting president."
Any time you'd like to begin your refutation of the examples of obstruction listed in the article please do. Otherwise, what you write is nothing more than a pile of opinionated horseshit.
Describes your post perfectly -
what you write is nothing more than a pile of opinionated horseshit.