When was President Trump convicted to cause impeachment?

[IM2]

Yea the conviction they speak of is in the senate, not a court of law.

That's what makes impeachment a political move, not a legal one. However, once a REAL impeachment is voted on, that gives the minority party the right to subpoena witnesses which libtards do NOT want to happen.

And who is Trump going to subpoena that we who oppose him are afraid of? The president of Ukraine?
I know-Peter Strzok. Or maybe William Barr. Pompeo? Brennan? Clapper? Comey? Clinton? Hunter Biden? Holder? Lynch? Obama?

 

[Uncensored2008]

"The only way we can defeat Trump in 2020 is to impeach him" - Elijah Cummings.

and after he said that they killed him....the plot deepens.

Someone saying that could be Epsteined indeed - the Clinton mob doesn't like loose lips....

 

[IM2]

"The only way we can defeat Trump in 2020 is to impeach him" - Elijah Cummings.

and after he said that they killed him....the plot deepens.

Someone saying that could be Epsteined indeed - the Clinton mob doesn't like loose lips....

Cumming was in poor health and had been so for years.

Drop the dumb shit.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Impeachment is equivalent to indictment in a criminal legal process.

The House is the prosecutor.

The House lawyer chosen will be the prosecutor in the Senate impeachment Trial, the President has his own Defense lawyers.

The senators are the Jury.

The chief justice is the presiding judge.

Due process is given, once the House votes to indict, impeach, and it goes to trial.

Just like in a criminal case... once officially charged with crimes, the defendant gets discovery, and gets to call defence witnesses and all that due process...

We ain't there yet, they are still investigating.

Yes but the simple question is:
What treasonous act has President Trump been convicted?
What bribery act has President Trump been convicted?
What other high crimes and misdemeanors acts has President Trump been convicted?

The Constitution is clear:
The requirements to impeach a president are found in Article II, Section IV of the Constitution.
"It states that the President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and
conviction of, treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

A) There has been NO impeachment because
B) There has been NO conviction, because
there have been NO Treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors even made about President Trump!

HE HASN'T BEEN CONVICTED BECAUSE IN ORDER TO CONVICT HIM HE WOULD FIRST HAVE TO BE IMPEACHED. HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU HAVE TO BE TOLD?

The Constitution is clear: "shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction for Treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors"

I'm simply asking WHAT
1) TREASON?? Zero
2) Bribery??? Zero
3) Other high crimes and misdemeanors" Zero

There has been NOTHING proving President Trump has done any of the above!

So again... WHAT are the reasons for impeachment? Nothing!

This isn't an impeachment, despite what the little Goebbels of the fascist media say. The Soviet Star Chamber of Adam Stalin-Schitt is 100% political. It is intended to alter and influence the 2020 election. Schitt and the Stalinists are running a taxpayer funded smear campaign. They have no intention of drafting articles of impeachment. This is just the democrats using the federal government to rig an election, once again.

The dims will be swept from the house over this. Regardless of proclamations from corrupt Obama judges.

That's correct, it is an impeachment inquiry, to gather evidence and facts on whether to impeach and the articles of impeachment if they choose. It could be just a Censure instead once the investigating part is complete and turned over to the judiciary committee.

Bullshit, it is a taxpayer funded smear campaign intended to influence and alter the 2020 election.

Nazi Piloshiti and Adam Stalin-Schitt should face criminal charges for racketeering and election tampering.

 

[Faun]

Yea the conviction they speak of is in the senate, not a court of law.

That's what makes impeachment a political move, not a legal one. However, once a REAL impeachment is voted on, that gives the minority party the right to subpoena witnesses which libtards do NOT want to happen.

No, that doesn't give the minority party subpoena power. Thanks to rule changes by Republicans in 2015, the minority party can only have subpoena power if the majority party chair gives it to them.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Just because you don’t like the POTUS, doesn’t mean he should be impeached.

If you don’t think Brennan lied to the FBI and the FBI slurped it up, you probably also don’t think that the Clinton Foundation was operated as a pay for play organization.

So odd their donations fell so much once she lost the election. I guess all disease and famine on earth have been eradicated? Or is it because they can’t sell political favors.

There is no evidence of anything you say.

Liar.

There is overwhelming proof that KGB John Brennan lied to Congress. And you are really lying about the Clinton bribery scandal?

What a fool.

{
1. Clinton ally aided the wife of an FBI agent who was investigating Mrs. Clinton’s email server


The political organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe gave nearly $500,000 to the 2015 election campaign of the wife of an official at the FBI who helped oversee the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email server, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday. All in all, aid directly under Mr. McAuliffe’s control or directly influenced by him, donated more than a third of all the campaign funds the FBI official’s wife fundraised, the Journal sad.

2. King of Morocco agreed to donate $12 million to Clinton Foundation and host a Clinton Global Initiative summit only if Mrs. Clinton attended a 2015 meeting

Hillary Clinton] will be in Morocco hosting CGI on May 5-7, 2015,” Huma Abedin, a top Hillary Clinton aide, wrote in a November 2014 email wrote to several other advisers, including campaign chairman John Podesta, which was released by WikiLeaks. “Her presence was a condition for the Moroccans to proceed so there is no going back on this.”

In January 2015, Abedin followed up with another email explaining in more detail why the future Democratic nominee couldn’t simply back out of the event in Morocco: “Just to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc was not part of it, meeting was a non-starter. CGI also wasn’t pushing for a meeting in Morocco and it wasn’t their first choice. This was HRC’s idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx. $12 million both for the endowment and to the support the meeting. It will break a lot of china to back out now when we had so many opportunities to do it in the past few months.

Mrs. Clinton was ultimately convinced by her team the optics of the meeting wouldn’t look good so close to her presidential launch, so it was canceled.

3. Bill Clinton gets $1 million birthday present from Qatar for 5 minute meeting request

Clinton Foundation said to numerous aides, including Doug Brand, according to an email released by WikiLeaks. “Qatar would welcome our suggestions for investments in Haiti — particularly on education and health. They have allocated most of their $20 million but are happy to consider projects we suggest. I’m collecting input from CF Haiti team.”

4. “Friends of Bill” (FOB) rewarded at State Department after 2010 Haiti earthquake

The State Department gave special attention to Bill Clinton’s friends after the Haiti earthquake. While Mrs. Clinton’s State Department sent on emails from Friends Of Bill (FOB) to senior officials coordinating the U.S. response to the Haiti earthquake, offers of aid from people that did not have connections to the Clintons were cast aside.

5. Crown Prince of Bahrain (a “good friend” of the Clinton Foundation) sought special access to Secretary Clinton

A June 23, 2009, email exposed by Judicial Watch, from Doug Band to Ms. Abedin noted that the Crown Prince of Bahrain (a “good friend of ours”) was asking to see Mrs. Clinton. The Crown Prince had contributed between $50,000 and $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation and spent $32 million on a scholarship fund launched through CGI. Ms. Abedin responded that the prince had sought a meeting through “normal” channels but had been turned down. Less than 48 hours after Mr. Band had asked her, Ms. Abedin said “we have reached out through official channels,” and meeting would commence.

6. Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. Gave Clinton Foundation Donors Weapons Deals

“Under Clinton’s leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation, according to an International Business Times analysis of State Department and foundation data,” reports IBT. “That figure—derived from the three full fiscal years of Clinton’s term as Secretary of State (from October 2010 to September 2012)—represented nearly double the value of American arms sales made to the those countries and approved by the State Department during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.”}
The Clintons’ top 10 pay-to-play scandals

 

[ColonelAngus]

Just because you don’t like the POTUS, doesn’t mean he should be impeached.

If you don’t think Brennan lied to the FBI and the FBI slurped it up, you probably also don’t think that the Clinton Foundation was operated as a pay for play organization.

So odd their donations fell so much once she lost the election. I guess all disease and famine on earth have been eradicated? Or is it because they can’t sell political favors.

There is no evidence of anything you say.

Liar.

There is overwhelming proof that KGB John Brennan lied to Congress. And you are really lying about the Clinton bribery scandal?

What a fool.

{
1. Clinton ally aided the wife of an FBI agent who was investigating Mrs. Clinton’s email server


The political organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe gave nearly $500,000 to the 2015 election campaign of the wife of an official at the FBI who helped oversee the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email server, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday. All in all, aid directly under Mr. McAuliffe’s control or directly influenced by him, donated more than a third of all the campaign funds the FBI official’s wife fundraised, the Journal sad.

2. King of Morocco agreed to donate $12 million to Clinton Foundation and host a Clinton Global Initiative summit only if Mrs. Clinton attended a 2015 meeting

Hillary Clinton] will be in Morocco hosting CGI on May 5-7, 2015,” Huma Abedin, a top Hillary Clinton aide, wrote in a November 2014 email wrote to several other advisers, including campaign chairman John Podesta, which was released by WikiLeaks. “Her presence was a condition for the Moroccans to proceed so there is no going back on this.”

In January 2015, Abedin followed up with another email explaining in more detail why the future Democratic nominee couldn’t simply back out of the event in Morocco: “Just to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc was not part of it, meeting was a non-starter. CGI also wasn’t pushing for a meeting in Morocco and it wasn’t their first choice. This was HRC’s idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx. $12 million both for the endowment and to the support the meeting. It will break a lot of china to back out now when we had so many opportunities to do it in the past few months.

Mrs. Clinton was ultimately convinced by her team the optics of the meeting wouldn’t look good so close to her presidential launch, so it was canceled.

3. Bill Clinton gets $1 million birthday present from Qatar for 5 minute meeting request

Clinton Foundation said to numerous aides, including Doug Brand, according to an email released by WikiLeaks. “Qatar would welcome our suggestions for investments in Haiti — particularly on education and health. They have allocated most of their $20 million but are happy to consider projects we suggest. I’m collecting input from CF Haiti team.”

4. “Friends of Bill” (FOB) rewarded at State Department after 2010 Haiti earthquake

The State Department gave special attention to Bill Clinton’s friends after the Haiti earthquake. While Mrs. Clinton’s State Department sent on emails from Friends Of Bill (FOB) to senior officials coordinating the U.S. response to the Haiti earthquake, offers of aid from people that did not have connections to the Clintons were cast aside.

5. Crown Prince of Bahrain (a “good friend” of the Clinton Foundation) sought special access to Secretary Clinton

A June 23, 2009, email exposed by Judicial Watch, from Doug Band to Ms. Abedin noted that the Crown Prince of Bahrain (a “good friend of ours”) was asking to see Mrs. Clinton. The Crown Prince had contributed between $50,000 and $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation and spent $32 million on a scholarship fund launched through CGI. Ms. Abedin responded that the prince had sought a meeting through “normal” channels but had been turned down. Less than 48 hours after Mr. Band had asked her, Ms. Abedin said “we have reached out through official channels,” and meeting would commence.

6. Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. Gave Clinton Foundation Donors Weapons Deals

“Under Clinton’s leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation, according to an International Business Times analysis of State Department and foundation data,” reports IBT. “That figure—derived from the three full fiscal years of Clinton’s term as Secretary of State (from October 2010 to September 2012)—represented nearly double the value of American arms sales made to the those countries and approved by the State Department during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.”}
The Clintons’ top 10 pay-to-play scandals

Come on man.....that’s not evidence!

And that poster will never address what you posted and they will never incorporate the facts into their bullshit narrative.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The requirements to impeach a president are found in Article II, Section IV of the Constitution. It states that the President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors..

What treasonous act has President Trump been convicted?
What bribery act has President Trump been convicted?
What other high crimes and misdemeanors acts has President Trump been convicted?

Would someone please tell me when President Trump was convicted?

Does it say anything in there about which hand the POTUS wipes his ass with?

Because I recall that was an issue for you with O'bama.

Hypocrisy much?

You really have a scatological fetish don't you? Do you sit on the toilet and play with your pooh?

Maybe you should answer that question, Shorty, since YOU actually made a thread out of it.

Whelp --- that told us what your standards are.

Hey look everyone, it's Sluggo, the gay dude with a low two digit IQ who teaches underwater basket weaving at the local community college...

So retard, how many impeachment inquiries of the past involve Soviet Star Chambers in the basement of the Capitol building?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Yea the conviction they speak of is in the senate, not a court of law.

That's what makes impeachment a political move, not a legal one. However, once a REAL impeachment is voted on, that gives the minority party the right to subpoena witnesses which libtards do NOT want to happen.

And who is Trump going to subpoena that we who oppose him are afraid of? The president of Ukraine?
I know-Peter Strzok. Or maybe William Barr. Pompeo? Brennan? Clapper? Comey? Clinton? Hunter Biden? Holder? Lynch? Obama?

/——-/ The President doesn’t subpoena anyone you dumb bell.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Yea the conviction they speak of is in the senate, not a court of law.

That's what makes impeachment a political move, not a legal one. However, once a REAL impeachment is voted on, that gives the minority party the right to subpoena witnesses which libtards do NOT want to happen.

Who can they call as witnesses to defend president Trump' s illegal actions in the Ukraine?

And why not simply ask for these witnesses to be brought in now, if they are relevant?

Joe and Hunter Biden for beginners, and because right now they don't have subpoena power THAT'S THE WHOLE FUCKING DEAL.

Please quote the law that states a president is not allowed to request help from a foreign gov't in possible corrupt dealings with a former vice president WHILE he was in office.

Thanks in advance.

There does not have to be a specific law. Trump's demand was the corruption. There was no corruption with any former vice President.

So you're saying he can break a law without it being a law?

Why do you just admit you hate Trump and will make shit up and do anything to get him out of office?

 

[Uncensored2008]

"The only way we can defeat Trump in 2020 is to impeach him" - Elijah Cummings.

and after he said that they killed him....the plot deepens.

Someone saying that could be Epsteined indeed - the Clinton mob doesn't like loose lips....

Cumming was in poor health and had been so for years.

Drop the dumb shit.

Cummings lived a hard life, booze and drugs. That takes a toll. Did his party buddy Marion Barry ever die?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

"The only way we can defeat Trump in 2020 is to impeach him" - Elijah Cummings.

and after he said that they killed him....the plot deepens.

Someone saying that could be Epsteined indeed - the Clinton mob doesn't like loose lips....

Cumming was in poor health and had been so for years.

Drop the dumb shit.

Cummings lived a hard life, booze and drugs. That takes a toll. Did his party buddy Marion Barry ever die?

Tell that to Mick Jagger! 76 and going strong!

 

[Uncensored2008]

"The only way we can defeat Trump in 2020 is to impeach him" - Elijah Cummings.

and after he said that they killed him....the plot deepens.

Someone saying that could be Epsteined indeed - the Clinton mob doesn't like loose lips....

Cumming was in poor health and had been so for years.

Drop the dumb shit.

Cummings lived a hard life, booze and drugs. That takes a toll. Did his party buddy Marion Barry ever die?

Tell that to Mick Jagger! 76 and going strong!

Might be the difference between heroin and cocaine? Barry and Cummings were caught in the 1980's using crack, that has to be bad on the heart. Cummings had a valve replacement a couple of years back. I'd say the two are related.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Yea the conviction they speak of is in the senate, not a court of law.

That's what makes impeachment a political move, not a legal one. However, once a REAL impeachment is voted on, that gives the minority party the right to subpoena witnesses which libtards do NOT want to happen.

No, that doesn't give the minority party subpoena power. Thanks to rule changes by Republicans in 2015, the minority party can only have subpoena power if the majority party chair gives it to them.

Wrong. No rules were changed regarding subpoena power. Stop lying.

What Powers Does a Formal Impeachment Inquiry Give the House?

The president has a whole host of rights given to him by congress in the event of an impeachment hearing:

https://www.congress.gov/105/crpt/hrpt795/CRPT-105hrpt795.pdf

A lot of information on how this process is handled:

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45769.pdf

 

[Cellblock2429]

"The only way we can defeat Trump in 2020 is to impeach him" - Elijah Cummings.

and after he said that they killed him....the plot deepens.

Someone saying that could be Epsteined indeed - the Clinton mob doesn't like loose lips....

Cumming was in poor health and had been so for years.

Drop the dumb shit.

/——/ Cummings knew where the missing Federal money is hidden

 

[ColonelAngus]

Cummings went fast after Trump embarrassed him.

 

[ColonelAngus]

It’s absolutely fascinating to me that American citizens would prefer a corrupt intelligence apparatus just because their person lost an election.

 

[Faun]

Yea the conviction they speak of is in the senate, not a court of law.

That's what makes impeachment a political move, not a legal one. However, once a REAL impeachment is voted on, that gives the minority party the right to subpoena witnesses which libtards do NOT want to happen.

Who can they call as witnesses to defend president Trump' s illegal actions in the Ukraine?

And why not simply ask for these witnesses to be brought in now, if they are relevant?

Joe and Hunter Biden for beginners, and because right now they don't have subpoena power THAT'S THE WHOLE FUCKING DEAL.

Please quote the law that states a president is not allowed to request help from a foreign gov't in possible corrupt dealings with a former vice president WHILE he was in office.

Thanks in advance.

There does not have to be a specific law. Trump's demand was the corruption. There was no corruption with any former vice President.

So you're saying he can break a law without it being a law?

Why do you just admit you hate Trump and will make shit up and do anything to get him out of office?

Here's the law..

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

​

 

[Faun]

Yea the conviction they speak of is in the senate, not a court of law.

That's what makes impeachment a political move, not a legal one. However, once a REAL impeachment is voted on, that gives the minority party the right to subpoena witnesses which libtards do NOT want to happen.

No, that doesn't give the minority party subpoena power. Thanks to rule changes by Republicans in 2015, the minority party can only have subpoena power if the majority party chair gives it to them.

Wrong. No rules were changed regarding subpoena power. Stop lying.

What Powers Does a Formal Impeachment Inquiry Give the House?

The president has a whole host of rights given to him by congress in the event of an impeachment hearing:

https://www.congress.gov/105/crpt/hrpt795/CRPT-105hrpt795.pdf

"Wrong. No rules were changed regarding subpoena power. Stop lying."

Dumbfuck. I'm not lying simply because you're too stupid to understand your own links.

Your own links show the majority party controls who has subpoena power in the House and that the minority party only gets it when the majority chair gives it to them.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Yea the conviction they speak of is in the senate, not a court of law.

That's what makes impeachment a political move, not a legal one. However, once a REAL impeachment is voted on, that gives the minority party the right to subpoena witnesses which libtards do NOT want to happen.

Who can they call as witnesses to defend president Trump' s illegal actions in the Ukraine?

And why not simply ask for these witnesses to be brought in now, if they are relevant?

Joe and Hunter Biden for beginners, and because right now they don't have subpoena power THAT'S THE WHOLE FUCKING DEAL.

Please quote the law that states a president is not allowed to request help from a foreign gov't in possible corrupt dealings with a former vice president WHILE he was in office.

Thanks in advance.

There does not have to be a specific law. Trump's demand was the corruption. There was no corruption with any former vice President.

So you're saying he can break a law without it being a law?

Why do you just admit you hate Trump and will make shit up and do anything to get him out of office?

Here's the law..

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Ok you have to prove the elements of the law. Just quoting some law doesn't mean he violated it.

Prove that Trump made a donation or received anything of value. Hunter Biden already admitted he wouldn't have gotten the job had his dad not been vice pres and Biden admitted on tape for getting the prosecutor involved in his sons company fired. Asking to have this investigated does not fit the narrative of your quoted law. Had Trump treated Biden like he had been treated and told the guy "Find something on BIden I can use for my campaign" then I would say yea thats wrong but he was referencing a well known corrupt dealing with Bidens son WHILE Biden was VP.

Trump was elected to protect the American people, that involves protections from corrupt overseas operations. Which Hunter was involved in.