Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does it matter? What I mean is, those doing the criticizing believe it is reasonable and those who support the President do not.
Why not ask the inverse? When Democrats who hold office praise the President, how often do you think the praise is earned? How often is the praise simply to toe the party line? How fair is this praise to Obama's words and policies?
Rarely will we be seeing any sort of bipartisan agreement, now or in the future. The last time was September 12, 2001...
....reasonable criticism? How often is the criticism unreasonable and politically motivated? In other words, how fair are these Republicans to Obama's words and policies?
25% of the time? Half the time? All the time?
....reasonable criticism? How often is the criticism unreasonable and politically motivated? In other words, how fair are these Republicans to Obama's words and policies?
25% of the time? Half the time? All the time?
They decided they would be against Obama at all costs long before his 2008 election.
They decided they would be against Obama at all costs long before his 2008 election.
Couldn't it just as easily be said, however, that Democrats have decided to be against Congressional Republicans, even if their complaints have been legitimate?
They decided they would be against Obama at all costs long before his 2008 election.
Couldn't it just as easily be said, however, that Democrats have decided to be against Congressional Republicans, even if their complaints have been legitimate?
Maybe in the house. But they're not in power there. In the Senate I don't think so.
Couldn't it just as easily be said, however, that Democrats have decided to be against Congressional Republicans, even if their complaints have been legitimate?
Maybe in the house. But they're not in power there. In the Senate I don't think so.
Well I'm thinking more broadly, like even Democrats, or liberals in general I guess, on this board. They seem as unwilling to give credit to Congressional Republicans as Republicans, or conservatives in general, are to give any to Obama.
....reasonable criticism? How often is the criticism unreasonable and politically motivated? In other words, how fair are these Republicans to Obama's words and policies?
25% of the time? Half the time? All the time?
The issue isnt criticism per se, but its fundamental idiocy, often parroting rightist blogs, AM radio, and Fox.
If conservatives and republicans want to be taken seriously about their criticism, then make it substantive, relevant, and offer your own solutions to problems, dont just criticize.
The issue isnt criticism per se, but its fundamental idiocy, often parroting rightist blogs, AM radio, and Fox.
If conservatives and republicans want to be taken seriously about their criticism, then make it substantive, relevant, and offer your own solutions to problems, dont just criticize.
Of course the past 12 years of Bush bashing was all based in rational arguements and an ethical approach to criticizm, not just vitriol and opposition to policies that moonbats have yet to actually reverse.
Maybe in the house. But they're not in power there. In the Senate I don't think so.
Well I'm thinking more broadly, like even Democrats, or liberals in general I guess, on this board. They seem as unwilling to give credit to Congressional Republicans as Republicans, or conservatives in general, are to give any to Obama.
Well I'll be the first to admit that both parties partake in partisan nonsense. But Republicans are notorious for going out of their way to invent reasons to demonize Democrats. Lewinsky, Benghazi, the birthers...
The issue isnt criticism per se, but its fundamental idiocy, often parroting rightist blogs, AM radio, and Fox.
If conservatives and republicans want to be taken seriously about their criticism, then make it substantive, relevant, and offer your own solutions to problems, dont just criticize.
Of course the past 12 years of Bush bashing was all based in rational arguements and an ethical approach to criticizm, not just vitriol and opposition to policies that moonbats have yet to actually reverse.
Hmm Iraq and Haliburton vs. Lewinsky and Benghazi...
....reasonable criticism? How often is the criticism unreasonable and politically motivated? In other words, how fair are these Republicans to Obama's words and policies?
25% of the time? Half the time? All the time?