Where did the left dig this psycho up?

Pogo said:
The point stands untouched.
Except For You
Who Thinks You Have A Point To Make ??

The subject is running for a Congressional seat in New York, which has zero connection to Cleveland or to Idaho. Check back tomorrow, and it still won't.
Yet Here You Are
10pgs Later
Still Irrelevantly Ranting
About How Irrelevant It All Is To You

OK, Great....Got It
Better Now ??

BTW, The Subject Of The Thread
For Everyone Except You Is:

Socialist Candidates Openly Running As Democrats

What's Irrelevant Is Where They Are
Or, Your Point....
All right, WAY damn funnier than I put it. LOL

Meh --- far as I can see he's just whining that he can't touch my point.

That being (again) the simple observation that here's a whole lot of wags from Cleveland and Texas and Idaho melting down like the wicked witch of the west about a Congressional candidate who has zero to do with their own districts.

WHY that's interesting is because it says much about their power trips to control what other people are doing with their own choices. Other people who are nowhere remotely near them and who have no more representation than they have for themselves. That, the power trip, is what I'm observing here.

And they have no answer for it. Just whiny gainsaying about "you have no point", because "they have no counterpoint".

:itsok:

Question: how many other Dem candidates get the attention this girl has been getting? You don't see us talking about any other ones, do you?

She is transcending because she's a Socialist and she looks good to some guys. It's no different if somebody from the KKK defeated a long-term Republican in a primary for a congressional seat. Or are you trying to say you would follow your own advice and never mind him because he's running for a seat a thousand miles away from where you live?

Don't be such a hypocrite.

I can't very well practice "hypocrisy" on the basis of some strawman you just made up, now can I?

I have my own rep to elect. Other people's reps are none of my business, just as mine ain't theirs.
Not rocket surgery.

Again, what I find revealing is how y'all wags from 500, 1000, 2500 miles away want to decide what other people are doing with their own local reps. It says a lot.

Trying to decide? And just how are we doing that? When somebody sticks out like a sore thumb, it doesn't matter what district they are running for, a public figure is everybody's business. That's why she's getting national coverage instead of just local coverage. How can you not understand that?
 
Except For You
Who Thinks You Have A Point To Make ??

Yet Here You Are
10pgs Later
Still Irrelevantly Ranting
About How Irrelevant It All Is To You

OK, Great....Got It
Better Now ??

BTW, The Subject Of The Thread
For Everyone Except You Is:

Socialist Candidates Openly Running As Democrats

What's Irrelevant Is Where They Are
Or, Your Point....
All right, WAY damn funnier than I put it. LOL

Meh --- far as I can see he's just whining that he can't touch my point.

That being (again) the simple observation that here's a whole lot of wags from Cleveland and Texas and Idaho melting down like the wicked witch of the west about a Congressional candidate who has zero to do with their own districts.

WHY that's interesting is because it says much about their power trips to control what other people are doing with their own choices. Other people who are nowhere remotely near them and who have no more representation than they have for themselves. That, the power trip, is what I'm observing here.

And they have no answer for it. Just whiny gainsaying about "you have no point", because "they have no counterpoint".

:itsok:

Question: how many other Dem candidates get the attention this girl has been getting? You don't see us talking about any other ones, do you?

She is transcending because she's a Socialist and she looks good to some guys. It's no different if somebody from the KKK defeated a long-term Republican in a primary for a congressional seat. Or are you trying to say you would follow your own advice and never mind him because he's running for a seat a thousand miles away from where you live?

Don't be such a hypocrite.

I can't very well practice "hypocrisy" on the basis of some strawman you just made up, now can I?

I have my own rep to elect. Other people's reps are none of my business, just as mine ain't theirs.
Not rocket surgery.

Again, what I find revealing is how y'all wags from 500, 1000, 2500 miles away want to decide what other people are doing with their own local reps. It says a lot.

Trying to decide? And just how are we doing that? When somebody sticks out like a sore thumb, it doesn't matter what district they are running for, a public figure is everybody's business. That's why she's getting national coverage instead of just local coverage. How can you not understand that?

Tell us again how many votes you get in Cleveland for a representative in Queens.
 
All right, WAY damn funnier than I put it. LOL

Meh --- far as I can see he's just whining that he can't touch my point.

That being (again) the simple observation that here's a whole lot of wags from Cleveland and Texas and Idaho melting down like the wicked witch of the west about a Congressional candidate who has zero to do with their own districts.

WHY that's interesting is because it says much about their power trips to control what other people are doing with their own choices. Other people who are nowhere remotely near them and who have no more representation than they have for themselves. That, the power trip, is what I'm observing here.

And they have no answer for it. Just whiny gainsaying about "you have no point", because "they have no counterpoint".

:itsok:

Question: how many other Dem candidates get the attention this girl has been getting? You don't see us talking about any other ones, do you?

She is transcending because she's a Socialist and she looks good to some guys. It's no different if somebody from the KKK defeated a long-term Republican in a primary for a congressional seat. Or are you trying to say you would follow your own advice and never mind him because he's running for a seat a thousand miles away from where you live?

Don't be such a hypocrite.

I can't very well practice "hypocrisy" on the basis of some strawman you just made up, now can I?

I have my own rep to elect. Other people's reps are none of my business, just as mine ain't theirs.
Not rocket surgery.

Again, what I find revealing is how y'all wags from 500, 1000, 2500 miles away want to decide what other people are doing with their own local reps. It says a lot.

Trying to decide? And just how are we doing that? When somebody sticks out like a sore thumb, it doesn't matter what district they are running for, a public figure is everybody's business. That's why she's getting national coverage instead of just local coverage. How can you not understand that?

Tell us again how many votes you get in Cleveland for a representative in Queens.

None, now what's your point to the question?
 
Meh --- far as I can see he's just whining that he can't touch my point.

That being (again) the simple observation that here's a whole lot of wags from Cleveland and Texas and Idaho melting down like the wicked witch of the west about a Congressional candidate who has zero to do with their own districts.

WHY that's interesting is because it says much about their power trips to control what other people are doing with their own choices. Other people who are nowhere remotely near them and who have no more representation than they have for themselves. That, the power trip, is what I'm observing here.

And they have no answer for it. Just whiny gainsaying about "you have no point", because "they have no counterpoint".

:itsok:

Question: how many other Dem candidates get the attention this girl has been getting? You don't see us talking about any other ones, do you?

She is transcending because she's a Socialist and she looks good to some guys. It's no different if somebody from the KKK defeated a long-term Republican in a primary for a congressional seat. Or are you trying to say you would follow your own advice and never mind him because he's running for a seat a thousand miles away from where you live?

Don't be such a hypocrite.

I can't very well practice "hypocrisy" on the basis of some strawman you just made up, now can I?

I have my own rep to elect. Other people's reps are none of my business, just as mine ain't theirs.
Not rocket surgery.

Again, what I find revealing is how y'all wags from 500, 1000, 2500 miles away want to decide what other people are doing with their own local reps. It says a lot.

Trying to decide? And just how are we doing that? When somebody sticks out like a sore thumb, it doesn't matter what district they are running for, a public figure is everybody's business. That's why she's getting national coverage instead of just local coverage. How can you not understand that?

Tell us again how many votes you get in Cleveland for a representative in Queens.

None, now what's your point to the question?

Scroll up. You know, tell me how a district specifically in a specific area in New York becomes "everybody's business".

I could post the same thing all over yet again but what's the point if you're just gonna Pee Wee Herman it.
 
Question: how many other Dem candidates get the attention this girl has been getting? You don't see us talking about any other ones, do you?

She is transcending because she's a Socialist and she looks good to some guys. It's no different if somebody from the KKK defeated a long-term Republican in a primary for a congressional seat. Or are you trying to say you would follow your own advice and never mind him because he's running for a seat a thousand miles away from where you live?

Don't be such a hypocrite.

I can't very well practice "hypocrisy" on the basis of some strawman you just made up, now can I?

I have my own rep to elect. Other people's reps are none of my business, just as mine ain't theirs.
Not rocket surgery.

Again, what I find revealing is how y'all wags from 500, 1000, 2500 miles away want to decide what other people are doing with their own local reps. It says a lot.

Trying to decide? And just how are we doing that? When somebody sticks out like a sore thumb, it doesn't matter what district they are running for, a public figure is everybody's business. That's why she's getting national coverage instead of just local coverage. How can you not understand that?

Tell us again how many votes you get in Cleveland for a representative in Queens.

None, now what's your point to the question?

Scroll up. You know, tell me how a district specifically in a specific area in New York becomes "everybody's business".

I could post the same thing all over yet again but what's the point if you're just gonna Pee Wee Herman it.

That's the last thing I'm doing.

You have this false impression that congressional elections or candidate concepts are no business but those who are in that persons district. Wrong. You don't have to be a constituent to discuss politics of the country simply because you don't vote on that particular representative.

Again, how many topics were started here by leftists about Roy Moore? I can think of about a dozen of them. Mitch McConnell is a Senator from Kentucky. Yet the left was in an uproar when it was said he wanted to make DumBama a one-term President. Why was that a discussion for everybody? Shouldn't that have been a discussion only of people from that state?

Every Congress critter has an impact on the entire country because they vote on issues like taxes and laws. It doesn't matter where they are from or who elected them. It's open for discussion because those Congress people just don't make decisions for the people that elected them.
 
I can't very well practice "hypocrisy" on the basis of some strawman you just made up, now can I?

I have my own rep to elect. Other people's reps are none of my business, just as mine ain't theirs.
Not rocket surgery.

Again, what I find revealing is how y'all wags from 500, 1000, 2500 miles away want to decide what other people are doing with their own local reps. It says a lot.

Trying to decide? And just how are we doing that? When somebody sticks out like a sore thumb, it doesn't matter what district they are running for, a public figure is everybody's business. That's why she's getting national coverage instead of just local coverage. How can you not understand that?

Tell us again how many votes you get in Cleveland for a representative in Queens.

None, now what's your point to the question?

Scroll up. You know, tell me how a district specifically in a specific area in New York becomes "everybody's business".

I could post the same thing all over yet again but what's the point if you're just gonna Pee Wee Herman it.

That's the last thing I'm doing.

You have this false impression that congressional elections or candidate concepts are no business but those who are in that persons district. Wrong. You don't have to be a constituent to discuss politics of the country simply because you don't vote on that particular representative.

Again, how many topics were started here by leftists about Roy Moore? I can think of about a dozen of them. Mitch McConnell is a Senator from Kentucky. Yet the left was in an uproar when it was said he wanted to make DumBama a one-term President. Why was that a discussion for everybody? Shouldn't that have been a discussion only of people from that state?

Every Congress critter has an impact on the entire country because they vote on issues like taxes and laws. It doesn't matter where they are from or who elected them. It's open for discussion because those

Congress people just don't make decisions for the people that elected them.

I well remember the Roy Moore daze. As I said incessantly throughout those threads, it was up to the people of Alabama, not me or anybody else outside that state. Same thing. Nor have I ever attempted to tell the people of Kentucky who their senator should be. Or anywhere else I don't live.

Summa y'all don't seem to get the concept of representation.
 
Trying to decide? And just how are we doing that? When somebody sticks out like a sore thumb, it doesn't matter what district they are running for, a public figure is everybody's business. That's why she's getting national coverage instead of just local coverage. How can you not understand that?

Tell us again how many votes you get in Cleveland for a representative in Queens.

None, now what's your point to the question?

Scroll up. You know, tell me how a district specifically in a specific area in New York becomes "everybody's business".

I could post the same thing all over yet again but what's the point if you're just gonna Pee Wee Herman it.

That's the last thing I'm doing.

You have this false impression that congressional elections or candidate concepts are no business but those who are in that persons district. Wrong. You don't have to be a constituent to discuss politics of the country simply because you don't vote on that particular representative.

Again, how many topics were started here by leftists about Roy Moore? I can think of about a dozen of them. Mitch McConnell is a Senator from Kentucky. Yet the left was in an uproar when it was said he wanted to make DumBama a one-term President. Why was that a discussion for everybody? Shouldn't that have been a discussion only of people from that state?

Every Congress critter has an impact on the entire country because they vote on issues like taxes and laws. It doesn't matter where they are from or who elected them. It's open for discussion because those

Congress people just don't make decisions for the people that elected them.

I well remember the Roy Moore daze. As I said incessantly throughout those threads, it was up to the people of Alabama, not me or anybody else outside that state. Same thing. Nor have I ever attempted to tell the people of Kentucky who their senator should be. Or anywhere else I don't live.

Summa y'all don't seem to get the concept of representation.

Is that what you think this discussion is about, who people in New York should vote on? Hardly. The discussion Is about her outrageous comments and political stance. It’s no different than any other discussion about other politicians across the country. Maybe that’s why you’re confused.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Tell us again how many votes you get in Cleveland for a representative in Queens.

None, now what's your point to the question?

Scroll up. You know, tell me how a district specifically in a specific area in New York becomes "everybody's business".

I could post the same thing all over yet again but what's the point if you're just gonna Pee Wee Herman it.

That's the last thing I'm doing.

You have this false impression that congressional elections or candidate concepts are no business but those who are in that persons district. Wrong. You don't have to be a constituent to discuss politics of the country simply because you don't vote on that particular representative.

Again, how many topics were started here by leftists about Roy Moore? I can think of about a dozen of them. Mitch McConnell is a Senator from Kentucky. Yet the left was in an uproar when it was said he wanted to make DumBama a one-term President. Why was that a discussion for everybody? Shouldn't that have been a discussion only of people from that state?

Every Congress critter has an impact on the entire country because they vote on issues like taxes and laws. It doesn't matter where they are from or who elected them. It's open for discussion because those

Congress people just don't make decisions for the people that elected them.

I well remember the Roy Moore daze. As I said incessantly throughout those threads, it was up to the people of Alabama, not me or anybody else outside that state. Same thing. Nor have I ever attempted to tell the people of Kentucky who their senator should be. Or anywhere else I don't live.

Summa y'all don't seem to get the concept of representation.

Is that what you think this discussion is about, who people in New York should vote on? Hardly. The discussion Is about her outrageous comments and political stance. It’s no different than any other discussion about other politicians across the country. Maybe that’s why you’re confused.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Exactly. And those comments and stances are relevant to the district in Queens where she's running. If she were running for a district in Cleveland... or Idaho.... but she's not.

Is she.

Every district has its own viewpoints and sensibilities and values. Those of a district in Tampa ain't going to match up with those in St George Utah. And vice versa. Nor can they be expected to. So again, how this subject's comments and stances are judged, is up to the values of the residents of Queens in exactly the same way the local officials of Tashkent or Rio de Janeiro or Sri Lanka are up to theirs.

Anybody anywhere can have an opinion on that of course. It's just instructive how all these wags want to push around the local decisions in places nowhere remotely near them.
 
None, now what's your point to the question?

Scroll up. You know, tell me how a district specifically in a specific area in New York becomes "everybody's business".

I could post the same thing all over yet again but what's the point if you're just gonna Pee Wee Herman it.

That's the last thing I'm doing.

You have this false impression that congressional elections or candidate concepts are no business but those who are in that persons district. Wrong. You don't have to be a constituent to discuss politics of the country simply because you don't vote on that particular representative.

Again, how many topics were started here by leftists about Roy Moore? I can think of about a dozen of them. Mitch McConnell is a Senator from Kentucky. Yet the left was in an uproar when it was said he wanted to make DumBama a one-term President. Why was that a discussion for everybody? Shouldn't that have been a discussion only of people from that state?

Every Congress critter has an impact on the entire country because they vote on issues like taxes and laws. It doesn't matter where they are from or who elected them. It's open for discussion because those

Congress people just don't make decisions for the people that elected them.

I well remember the Roy Moore daze. As I said incessantly throughout those threads, it was up to the people of Alabama, not me or anybody else outside that state. Same thing. Nor have I ever attempted to tell the people of Kentucky who their senator should be. Or anywhere else I don't live.

Summa y'all don't seem to get the concept of representation.

Is that what you think this discussion is about, who people in New York should vote on? Hardly. The discussion Is about her outrageous comments and political stance. It’s no different than any other discussion about other politicians across the country. Maybe that’s why you’re confused.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Exactly. And those comments and stances are relevant to the district in Queens where she's running. If she were running for a district in Cleveland... or Idaho.... but she's not.

Is she.

Every district has its own viewpoints and sensibilities and values. Those of a district in Tampa ain't going to match up with those in St George Utah. And vice versa. Nor can they be expected to. So again, how this subject's comments and stances are judged, is up to the values of the residents of Queens in exactly the same way the local officials of Tashkent or Rio de Janeiro or Sri Lanka are up to theirs.

Anybody anywhere can have an opinion on that of course. It's just instructive how all these wags want to push around the local decisions in places nowhere remotely near them.

A congress person is part of our Federal Government. You do understand that, don't you? She's not running for state rep, state AG, Governor, she's running for the United States Congress. Now if she ran for any of those other jobs, what her decisions would be would have no effect on me here in Cleveland.

But that's not so in the US Congress. What she would be voting on as a congress person may very will have an impact on me here in Cleveland. So of course it's a concern for everybody outside of Queens.
 
Scroll up. You know, tell me how a district specifically in a specific area in New York becomes "everybody's business".

I could post the same thing all over yet again but what's the point if you're just gonna Pee Wee Herman it.

That's the last thing I'm doing.

You have this false impression that congressional elections or candidate concepts are no business but those who are in that persons district. Wrong. You don't have to be a constituent to discuss politics of the country simply because you don't vote on that particular representative.

Again, how many topics were started here by leftists about Roy Moore? I can think of about a dozen of them. Mitch McConnell is a Senator from Kentucky. Yet the left was in an uproar when it was said he wanted to make DumBama a one-term President. Why was that a discussion for everybody? Shouldn't that have been a discussion only of people from that state?

Every Congress critter has an impact on the entire country because they vote on issues like taxes and laws. It doesn't matter where they are from or who elected them. It's open for discussion because those

Congress people just don't make decisions for the people that elected them.

I well remember the Roy Moore daze. As I said incessantly throughout those threads, it was up to the people of Alabama, not me or anybody else outside that state. Same thing. Nor have I ever attempted to tell the people of Kentucky who their senator should be. Or anywhere else I don't live.

Summa y'all don't seem to get the concept of representation.

Is that what you think this discussion is about, who people in New York should vote on? Hardly. The discussion Is about her outrageous comments and political stance. It’s no different than any other discussion about other politicians across the country. Maybe that’s why you’re confused.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Exactly. And those comments and stances are relevant to the district in Queens where she's running. If she were running for a district in Cleveland... or Idaho.... but she's not.

Is she.

Every district has its own viewpoints and sensibilities and values. Those of a district in Tampa ain't going to match up with those in St George Utah. And vice versa. Nor can they be expected to. So again, how this subject's comments and stances are judged, is up to the values of the residents of Queens in exactly the same way the local officials of Tashkent or Rio de Janeiro or Sri Lanka are up to theirs.

Anybody anywhere can have an opinion on that of course. It's just instructive how all these wags want to push around the local decisions in places nowhere remotely near them.

A congress person is part of our Federal Government. You do understand that, don't you? She's not running for state rep, state AG, Governor, she's running for the United States Congress. Now if she ran for any of those other jobs, what her decisions would be would have no effect on me here in Cleveland.

But that's not so in the US Congress. What she would be voting on as a congress person may very will have an impact on me here in Cleveland. So of course it's a concern for everybody outside of Queens.
Even those position have ramifications and grater meanings, however small, that are worthy of discussion by people in other parts of the nation.

I wonder how a democracy is supposed to work if you try and insulate yourself from representatives outside of your area. That is a massively myopic way of thinking.
 
Pogo said:
Tell us again how many votes you get in Cleveland for a representative in Queens.
She's Not Running For The NY Legislature
She's Running For A Seat In
The United States House of Representatives
Her Vote Will Count As Much As Nancy Pelosi's
Or Anyone Else In The
United States House Of Representatives

That WILL Affect Everyone In Idaho
Everyone In Cleveland
Everyone In The United States

There...
Does That Touch On Your Point, Dumb-Dumb ??
 

Forum List

Back
Top