The2ndAmendment
Gold Member
I am Republicanism + National Debt Free Currency + Positive Rights = border of Anarcho-capitalism and John Locke
If you notice that your core beliefs don't have an intersecting area in the Venn diagram, it's because you harbor incompatible and contradictory beliefs, riddled with paradoxes and logical absurdities. If you don't believe me, you should really go and get yourself an education and discover where your true philosophies are rooted.
You can't be an "Anarchist" who believes in both Socialism and Progressivism simultaneously. Conversely you can't be a Progressive who believes in Socialism and Anarchism; or a Socialist who believes in Anarchism and Progressivism.
You can't believe in a free market and corporatism at the same time (WHAT A SHOCKER FOR NEO-CON-TARDS). You can't believe in Natural Rights (Classical Liberalism) and forced tolerance at the same time (WHAT A SHOCKER FOR LIBTARDS).
You can't believe in Republicanism combined with unaccountable & unelected bloated bureaucracies (Our Supreme Court decides to allow Congress to delegate its law making powers to the Bureaucracy).
If you're a Classical Liberal and a Capitalist, you cannot be an Authoritarian. Conversely, if you're an Authoritarian, you cannot be both Capitalist and a Classical Liberal; nor can you be Capitalist and be both Classical Liberal and Authoritarian.
This is not to say that there exists neither persons nor philosophies that actually harbor these combinations, its just that these person's/philosophies contain contradictory elements (a Marxist-Capitalist, A Libertarian-Statist, Republican-Monarchy, etc) and/or hidden paradoxes (A Classical Liberal that believes in Socialism and Progressivism).
Contradictions are seen in the diametrically opposed circles, where hidden paradoxes are exposed by combining a circle to the two circles adjacent to the diametrically opposed circle.
For instance, 1 and 4 are polar opposites, as are 2 and 5, and 3 and 6. These are direct contradictions.
Hidden paradoxes arise in 1 and (3,5) ; 2 and (4,6) ; 3 and (1, 5) ; 4 and (2, 6) ; 5 and (1,3) ; 6 and (2,4)
This is not to be construed to mean that the combination of 1 + 3, or 1 + 5 contain hidden paradoxes in philosophical thought; however the combination of all three 1 + 3 + 5 will lead to paradoxes.
If you notice that your core beliefs don't have an intersecting area in the Venn diagram, it's because you harbor incompatible and contradictory beliefs, riddled with paradoxes and logical absurdities. If you don't believe me, you should really go and get yourself an education and discover where your true philosophies are rooted.
You can't be an "Anarchist" who believes in both Socialism and Progressivism simultaneously. Conversely you can't be a Progressive who believes in Socialism and Anarchism; or a Socialist who believes in Anarchism and Progressivism.
You can't believe in a free market and corporatism at the same time (WHAT A SHOCKER FOR NEO-CON-TARDS). You can't believe in Natural Rights (Classical Liberalism) and forced tolerance at the same time (WHAT A SHOCKER FOR LIBTARDS).
You can't believe in Republicanism combined with unaccountable & unelected bloated bureaucracies (Our Supreme Court decides to allow Congress to delegate its law making powers to the Bureaucracy).
If you're a Classical Liberal and a Capitalist, you cannot be an Authoritarian. Conversely, if you're an Authoritarian, you cannot be both Capitalist and a Classical Liberal; nor can you be Capitalist and be both Classical Liberal and Authoritarian.
This is not to say that there exists neither persons nor philosophies that actually harbor these combinations, its just that these person's/philosophies contain contradictory elements (a Marxist-Capitalist, A Libertarian-Statist, Republican-Monarchy, etc) and/or hidden paradoxes (A Classical Liberal that believes in Socialism and Progressivism).
Contradictions are seen in the diametrically opposed circles, where hidden paradoxes are exposed by combining a circle to the two circles adjacent to the diametrically opposed circle.
For instance, 1 and 4 are polar opposites, as are 2 and 5, and 3 and 6. These are direct contradictions.
Hidden paradoxes arise in 1 and (3,5) ; 2 and (4,6) ; 3 and (1, 5) ; 4 and (2, 6) ; 5 and (1,3) ; 6 and (2,4)
This is not to be construed to mean that the combination of 1 + 3, or 1 + 5 contain hidden paradoxes in philosophical thought; however the combination of all three 1 + 3 + 5 will lead to paradoxes.
Last edited:
