Where is the Liberal outrage?????

"Two black males in Milwaukee walked up to the home of a white family, in a majority black neighborhood, and unleashed a hail of gunfire. A five year old white girl was murdered while sitting on her grandfather’s lap."

Now this makes it sound like the girl and her grandfather were sitting outside and were shot at point blank range, right?

This is what is known as a lie of omission.



Here are some facts:
Petersen and her grandfather were on a couch inside the grandparents' home when, according to police, about a dozen bullets that were fired at the house tore through a wall Thursday night. One struck Laylah in the head. There have been no arrests.

Investigators said they don't believe the family members were the intended victims, and the chief said the residence may have been mistakenly targeted.
Family of 5-Year-Old Laylah Petersen Killed in Drive-By Shooting Donates Her Heart


Laylah Petersen was sitting on her grandfather's lap Thursday evening when two people approached the house and fired at it numerous times, with one bullet piercing a wall and striking the girl in the head, police said.

The window was scarred with five bullet holes. Four more could be seen in the siding above the window and another below it.

Family mourns loss of 5-year-old seeks public s help finding shooters
 
Fuck you Flash. You want some outrage? Get your conservative buddies to start portraying her as a thug who deserved it.

As it is, you won't find a single democrat or republican not wanting justice for her killers. You ass.

Sorry conservatives call thugs thugs. As is you won't see a democrat say anything about this. They like to ignore shit like this.
 
From the last link I posted:

The problem of violence concerns everyone, not just the people who live in this neighborhood or in this city, said the Rev. Willie Brisco, president of MICAH, the Milwaukee Inner-city Congregations Allied for Hope.

How much do you want to bet the Reverend and the Milwaukee Inner-city Congregations Allied for Hope are conservative, Flash?
 
"Two black males in Milwaukee walked up to the home of a white family, in a majority black neighborhood, and unleashed a hail of gunfire. A five year old white girl was murdered while sitting on her grandfather’s lap."

Now this makes it sound like the girl and her grandfather were sitting outside and were shot at point blank range, right?

This is what is known as a lie of omission.



Here are some facts:
Petersen and her grandfather were on a couch inside the grandparents' home when, according to police, about a dozen bullets that were fired at the house tore through a wall Thursday night. One struck Laylah in the head. There have been no arrests.

Investigators said they don't believe the family members were the intended victims, and the chief said the residence may have been mistakenly targeted.
Family of 5-Year-Old Laylah Petersen Killed in Drive-By Shooting Donates Her Heart


Laylah Petersen was sitting on her grandfather's lap Thursday evening when two people approached the house and fired at it numerous times, with one bullet piercing a wall and striking the girl in the head, police said.

The window was scarred with five bullet holes. Four more could be seen in the siding above the window and another below it.

Family mourns loss of 5-year-old seeks public s help finding shooters
Oh! So it was not what the OP said it was? Shocker!
 
Excuse me. Did they catch the killers and then release them without charges?

There's plenty of blacks who commit horrible atrocities and get off Scot free. Nobody ever says anything about that. Face it the people who you champion as victims aren't victims at all.
 
Again.. all we're looking at here is the product of socialism. Which is to say, that which inevitably results from a culture wherein the Patriarch is addled, thus leaving the Matriarch, who being female leaves only the nurturer... which when that is addled through chronic subsidy, produces sociopathy... and it takes Sociopathy to build a psychotic.

The people that gunned down that families home, murdering that innocent little girl... are what must result from socialism. And where science shows that, in well over a century of innumerable experiments, that no other result has ever been realized... at some point the people not addled by such must come to understand that those who have must be destroyed.

There's no easier way... no means to 're-train' them. Their minds have been altered... they are not sound and they cannot be 'made' sound.

And that is truly, all there is to it.

Knowing that is the easy part... doing it, not so much.

But all things in good time. First things must come first.

And the first things that must come are those things which establish in the majority of the people, the certainty that there is no other way. The good news is that the Left is incapable of turning from evil... because the Left IS EVIL. So those things will come.

And of THAT you may rest assured.
 
"Two black males in Milwaukee walked up to the home of a white family, in a majority black neighborhood, and unleashed a hail of gunfire. A five year old white girl was murdered while sitting on her grandfather’s lap."

Now this makes it sound like the girl and her grandfather were sitting outside and were shot at point blank range, right?

This is what is known as a lie of omission.



Here are some facts:
Petersen and her grandfather were on a couch inside the grandparents' home when, according to police, about a dozen bullets that were fired at the house tore through a wall Thursday night. One struck Laylah in the head. There have been no arrests.

Investigators said they don't believe the family members were the intended victims, and the chief said the residence may have been mistakenly targeted.
Family of 5-Year-Old Laylah Petersen Killed in Drive-By Shooting Donates Her Heart


Laylah Petersen was sitting on her grandfather's lap Thursday evening when two people approached the house and fired at it numerous times, with one bullet piercing a wall and striking the girl in the head, police said.

The window was scarred with five bullet holes. Four more could be seen in the siding above the window and another below it.

Family mourns loss of 5-year-old seeks public s help finding shooters
So the little girl was sitting on grandpas lap and wasn't the intended victim of yet another murderous black gang shooting. That makes it so much better.
 
"Two black males in Milwaukee walked up to the home of a white family, in a majority black neighborhood, and unleashed a hail of gunfire. A five year old white girl was murdered while sitting on her grandfather’s lap."

Now this makes it sound like the girl and her grandfather were sitting outside and were shot at point blank range, right?

This is what is known as a lie of omission.



Here are some facts:
Petersen and her grandfather were on a couch inside the grandparents' home when, according to police, about a dozen bullets that were fired at the house tore through a wall Thursday night. One struck Laylah in the head. There have been no arrests.

Investigators said they don't believe the family members were the intended victims, and the chief said the residence may have been mistakenly targeted.
Family of 5-Year-Old Laylah Petersen Killed in Drive-By Shooting Donates Her Heart


Laylah Petersen was sitting on her grandfather's lap Thursday evening when two people approached the house and fired at it numerous times, with one bullet piercing a wall and striking the girl in the head, police said.

The window was scarred with five bullet holes. Four more could be seen in the siding above the window and another below it.

Family mourns loss of 5-year-old seeks public s help finding shooters
Oh! So it was not what the OP said it was? Shocker!

I find no distinction in that and what the OP stated.

Please identify any distinctions you see... .
 
"Two black males in Milwaukee walked up to the home of a white family, in a majority black neighborhood, and unleashed a hail of gunfire. A five year old white girl was murdered while sitting on her grandfather’s lap."

Now this makes it sound like the girl and her grandfather were sitting outside and were shot at point blank range, right?

This is what is known as a lie of omission.



Here are some facts:
Petersen and her grandfather were on a couch inside the grandparents' home when, according to police, about a dozen bullets that were fired at the house tore through a wall Thursday night. One struck Laylah in the head. There have been no arrests.

Investigators said they don't believe the family members were the intended victims, and the chief said the residence may have been mistakenly targeted.
Family of 5-Year-Old Laylah Petersen Killed in Drive-By Shooting Donates Her Heart


Laylah Petersen was sitting on her grandfather's lap Thursday evening when two people approached the house and fired at it numerous times, with one bullet piercing a wall and striking the girl in the head, police said.

The window was scarred with five bullet holes. Four more could be seen in the siding above the window and another below it.

Family mourns loss of 5-year-old seeks public s help finding shooters
So the little girl was sitting on grandpas lap and wasn't the intended victim of yet another murderous black gang shooting. That makes it so much better.
It makes the apples to oranges fallacy of the OP that much more resting on a false premise.
 
Fuck you Flash. You want some outrage? Get your conservative buddies to start portraying her as a thug who deserved it.

As it is, you won't find a single democrat or republican not wanting justice for her killers. You ass.

Sorry conservatives call thugs thugs. As is you won't see a democrat say anything about this. They like to ignore shit like this.

Look at you joining in on using this murder for your agenda. How lovely.
 
Conservative Correctness: You aren't pro-choice. You're pro-abortion.

Pro-choice, is only legitimate where the choice is valid. For the choice to be valid there must be a valid 'right' at issue.

For there to be a valid right as issue, the claimant of right must first recognize the right in everyone else... therefore, the claimant cannot exercise their right, to the detriment of the means of another to exercise their own right.

Thus, where the claimant has a right, it may exercise that right only where their exercise does not injure the means of another to do the same for themselves.

Thus, where there is a valid claim to CHOOSE, the choice must be directly and exclusively affiliated with a valid right to make that choice, wherein the choice does not usurp the means of another to exercise their own right(s).

The female is therefore perfectly within her right to CHOOSE... with whom, when and where she engages in coitus.

Once having made her CHOICE... she is bound by the responsibilities intrinsic to that CHOICE. She is NOT rightfully entitled to end the life which was conceived as a direct result of her own willful and wanton CHOICE, because the life is not HER LIFE... as it rightfully belongs to the human being she conceived through her exercising her RIGHT TO CHOOSE.

See how that works?
 
Fuck you Flash. You want some outrage? Get your conservative buddies to start portraying her as a thug who deserved it.

As it is, you won't find a single democrat or republican not wanting justice for her killers. You ass.


I find it shocking that this 5 year old girl had just robbed a convenience store while menacing the clerk.

Thanks for the information!

I wonder if she liked skittles.

I wonder if you need to rethink your life.
 
Fuck you Flash. You want some outrage? Get your conservative buddies to start portraying her as a thug who deserved it.

As it is, you won't find a single democrat or republican not wanting justice for her killers. You ass.


I find it shocking that this 5 year old girl had just robbed a convenience store while menacing the clerk.

Thanks for the information!

I wonder if she liked skittles.

I wonder if you need to rethink your life.

Me? You find a job yet?
 
Conservative Correctness: You aren't pro-choice. You're pro-abortion.

Pro-choice, is only legitimate where the choice is valid. For the choice to be valid there must be a valid 'right' at issue.

For there to be a valid right as issue, the claimant of right must first recognize the right in everyone else... therefore, the claimant cannot exercise their right, to the detriment of the means of another to exercise their own right.

Thus, where the claimant has a right, it may exercise that right only where their exercise does not injure the means of another to do the same for themselves.

Thus, where there is a valid claim to CHOOSE, the choice must be directly and exclusively affiliated with a valid right to make that choice, wherein the choice does not usurp the means of another to exercise their own right(s).

The female is therefore perfectly within her right to CHOOSE... with whom, when and where she engages in coitus.

Once having made her CHOICE... she is bound by the responsibilities intrinsic to that CHOICE. She is NOT rightfully entitled to end the life which was conceived as a direct result of her own willful and wanton CHOICE, because the life is not HER LIFE... as it rightfully belongs to the human being she conceived through her exercising her RIGHT TO CHOOSE.

See how that works?

You chose to post this in the wrong topic, skippy.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
Can I have some of that stuff you're drinking?
 

Forum List

Back
Top