Where You Can Get Contraceptives After Your Employer And The Supreme Court Refuse To Give Them To You

[Frankeneinstein]

Well, it happened: The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that U.S. employers can refuse to provide their employees with insurance coverage for contraception under the Affordable Care Act because of the eloyer’s religious or moral objection. This decision potentially deprives over 126,000 people of the option to get their birth control method of choice through their employer-provided health insurance coverage. If you’re one of the people affected by this decision, you’re probably wondering how you can avoid paying exorbitant out-of-pocket fees for your birth control method of choice, and/or how you’re going to renew your prescription without the aid of your doctor’s office.

Even more contraceptive resources can be found on Free the Pill. Free the Pill is a campaign setting its sights on making the pill available over the counter in the United States. Until they accomplish that, they’re providing a wealth of information on where you can get your pill online.

What finally happened is you proved there was/is no need for anyone else to pay for contraceptives.

 

[Polishprince]

There are no exorbitant prices for birth control.

Sandra Fluke complained about going through $3000 a month for rubbers, so it can add up depending on the broad.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Again, the abortion opponents can't see the forest for the trees. And yes I know this is about birth control. But the subjects go hand in hand. Easy and affordable access to birth control reduces the need for abortion. Sure, you can walk into a pharmacy and buy it...if you can afford it. But hey, let's let the corporations and their Republican party donating board members decide who gets that right.

If a man can't afford his own rubber, why would a broad have relations with him in the first place?

Millions of people stop and ask themselves that same question before sex everyday and...NOT. Point here is these decisions always penalize the woman because birth control for them comes in the form of a pill that has to be obtained at a pharmacy or an implant that has to be obtained from a doctor. Either way, most roads for them lead through insurance. Sure, rubbers are cheap and covering their John Thomas should be an automatic for men...which we all know doesn't happen. Same old double standard.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Free to the user on the NHS. Grown up country free from religious loons.

 

[Penelope]

This decision potentially deprives over 126,000 people of the option to get their birth control method of choice through their employer-provided health insurance coverage.

They can walk into any pharmacy and purchase birth control.

Really? how much are birth control pills now? Make your husband get a vasectomy.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Again, the abortion opponents can't see the forest for the trees. And yes I know this is about birth control. But the subjects go hand in hand. Easy and affordable access to birth control reduces the need for abortion. Sure, you can walk into a pharmacy and buy it...if you can afford it. But hey, let's let the corporations and their Republican party donating board members decide who gets that right.

You're clueless, the pill, implants, morning after pill and comdons can be obtained easily at any county or public health center

Cripes condoms are handed out at outreach sites every week here.

Just stop


If a man can't afford his own rubber, why would a broad have relations with him in the first place?

Millions of people stop and ask themselves that same question before sex everyday and...NOT. Point here is these decisions always penalize the woman because birth control for them comes in the form of a pill that has to be obtained at a pharmacy or an implant that has to be obtained from a doctor. Either way, most roads for them lead through insurance. Sure, rubbers are cheap and covering their John Thomas should be an automatic for men...which we all know doesn't happen. Same old double standard.

 

[Kondor3]

Well, it happened: The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that U.S. employers can refuse to provide their employees with insurance coverage for contraception under the Affordable Care Act because of the eloyer’s religious or moral objection. This decision potentially deprives over 126,000 people of the option to get their birth control method of choice through their employer-provided health insurance coverage. If you’re one of the people affected by this decision, you’re probably wondering how you can avoid paying exorbitant out-of-pocket fees for your birth control method of choice, and/or how you’re going to renew your prescription without the aid of your doctor’s office.

Even more contraceptive resources can be found on Free the Pill. Free the Pill is a campaign setting its sights on making the pill available over the counter in the United States. Until they accomplish that, they’re providing a wealth of information on where you can get your pill online.

Where to get contraceptives after your employer (and the Supreme Court) refuses to give them to you

Well, it happened: The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that U.S. employers can refuse to provide their employees with insurance coverage for contraception under the Affordable Care Act because of the employer’s religious or moral objection. This decision...

www.dailykos.com

A public service announcement for normal people, A kick in the balls to religious and political nutjobs.

Much ado about nothing.

If you work for a religious organization that opposes the use of contraceptives (1-2% of the workforce?) you simply have to pay retail prices.

If you work for a secular organization that doesn't care one way or another (98-99% of the workforce?) this doesn't impact you in the slightest.

The United States Supreme Court has determined that it is unlawful to force people to violate their legitimate and long-held religious principles.

It was the correct determination.

Don't like it?

Change jobs.

Or shut-the-phukk-up and pay retail prices for your contraceptives.

Whatever.

 

[Penelope]

Again, the abortion opponents can't see the forest for the trees. And yes I know this is about birth control. But the subjects go hand in hand. Easy and affordable access to birth control reduces the need for abortion. Sure, you can walk into a pharmacy and buy it...if you can afford it. But hey, let's let the corporations and their Republican party donating board members decide who gets that right.

If a man can't afford his own rubber, why would a broad have relations with him in the first place?

Rule of thumb:

Don't have sex with anyone you're not willing to be tied to for 18 years and 9 months.

Men don't have strength in that way, men can supply condoms.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Well, it happened: The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that U.S. employers can refuse to provide their employees with insurance coverage for contraception under the Affordable Care Act because of the eloyer’s religious or moral objection. This decision potentially deprives over 126,000 people of the option to get their birth control method of choice through their employer-provided health insurance coverage. If you’re one of the people affected by this decision, you’re probably wondering how you can avoid paying exorbitant out-of-pocket fees for your birth control method of choice, and/or how you’re going to renew your prescription without the aid of your doctor’s office.

Even more contraceptive resources can be found on Free the Pill. Free the Pill is a campaign setting its sights on making the pill available over the counter in the United States. Until they accomplish that, they’re providing a wealth of information on where you can get your pill online.

Where to get contraceptives after your employer (and the Supreme Court) refuses to give them to you

Well, it happened: The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that U.S. employers can refuse to provide their employees with insurance coverage for contraception under the Affordable Care Act because of the employer’s religious or moral objection. This decision...

www.dailykos.com

A public service announcement for normal people, A kick in the balls to religious and political nutjobs.

Much ado about nothing.

If you work for a religious organization that opposes the use of contraceptives (1-2% of the workforce?) you simply have to pay retail prices.

If you work for a secular organization that doesn't care one way or another (98-99% of the workforce?) this doesn't impact you in the slightest.

The United States Supreme Court has determined that it is unlawful to force people to violate their legitimate and long-held religious principles.

It was the correct determination.

Don't like it?

Change jobs.

Or shut-the-phukk-up and pay retail prices for your contraceptives.

Whatever.

Much like homos who sign contracts with religious organizations and then are flabbergasted when they get fired.

They knew it going in

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Again, the abortion opponents can't see the forest for the trees. And yes I know this is about birth control. But the subjects go hand in hand. Easy and affordable access to birth control reduces the need for abortion. Sure, you can walk into a pharmacy and buy it...if you can afford it. But hey, let's let the corporations and their Republican party donating board members decide who gets that right.

You can get birth control for a few bucks a month.
If you cant afford that you probably should stop fucking.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

$4 for a month supply at walmart. No insurance.

What I don't get is why a broad would have relations with a man who is either too cheap or too poor to provide his own rubbers? Why didn't anyone ask Sandra Fluke about that? She complained before Congress about spending $3000 a month on prophylactics. Getting her sex partners to pony up was my suggestion to her.

I remember the huge uproar when Rush called her a slut.
At 50 cents a pop I bet you could drive a train down that tunnel.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Again, the abortion opponents can't see the forest for the trees. And yes I know this is about birth control. But the subjects go hand in hand. Easy and affordable access to birth control reduces the need for abortion. Sure, you can walk into a pharmacy and buy it...if you can afford it. But hey, let's let the corporations and their Republican party donating board members decide who gets that right.

If a man can't afford his own rubber, why would a broad have relations with him in the first place?

Rule of thumb:

Don't have sex with anyone you're not willing to be tied to for 18 years and 9 months.

Men don't have strength in that way, men can supply condoms.

And a woman cant?

 

[Penelope]

Again, the abortion opponents can't see the forest for the trees. And yes I know this is about birth control. But the subjects go hand in hand. Easy and affordable access to birth control reduces the need for abortion. Sure, you can walk into a pharmacy and buy it...if you can afford it. But hey, let's let the corporations and their Republican party donating board members decide who gets that right.

If a man can't afford his own rubber, why would a broad have relations with him in the first place?

Rule of thumb:

Don't have sex with anyone you're not willing to be tied to for 18 years and 9 months.

Men don't have strength in that way, men can supply condoms.

And a woman cant?

No, the man should pay!

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Again, the abortion opponents can't see the forest for the trees. And yes I know this is about birth control. But the subjects go hand in hand. Easy and affordable access to birth control reduces the need for abortion. Sure, you can walk into a pharmacy and buy it...if you can afford it. But hey, let's let the corporations and their Republican party donating board members decide who gets that right.

If a man can't afford his own rubber, why would a broad have relations with him in the first place?

Rule of thumb:

Don't have sex with anyone you're not willing to be tied to for 18 years and 9 months.

Men don't have strength in that way, men can supply condoms.

And a woman cant?

No, the man should pay!

Why?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Again, the abortion opponents can't see the forest for the trees. And yes I know this is about birth control. But the subjects go hand in hand. Easy and affordable access to birth control reduces the need for abortion. Sure, you can walk into a pharmacy and buy it...if you can afford it. But hey, let's let the corporations and their Republican party donating board members decide who gets that right.

If a man can't afford his own rubber, why would a broad have relations with him in the first place?

Millions of people stop and ask themselves that same question before sex everyday and...NOT. Point here is these decisions always penalize the woman because birth control for them comes in the form of a pill that has to be obtained at a pharmacy or an implant that has to be obtained from a doctor. Either way, most roads for them lead through insurance. Sure, rubbers are cheap and covering their John Thomas should be an automatic for men...which we all know doesn't happen. Same old double standard.

Insurance, free clinic, planned abirtionhood, paying the doctor.

Very poor women on welfare already have state provided insurance. They can go anywhere they want.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Again, the abortion opponents can't see the forest for the trees. And yes I know this is about birth control. But the subjects go hand in hand. Easy and affordable access to birth control reduces the need for abortion. Sure, you can walk into a pharmacy and buy it...if you can afford it. But hey, let's let the corporations and their Republican party donating board members decide who gets that right.

If a man can't afford his own rubber, why would a broad have relations with him in the first place?

Rule of thumb:

Don't have sex with anyone you're not willing to be tied to for 18 years and 9 months.

Men don't have strength in that way, men can supply condoms.

And a woman cant?

No, the man should pay!

How about you give me a blowjob or take it in the ass.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Again, the abortion opponents can't see the forest for the trees. And yes I know this is about birth control. But the subjects go hand in hand. Easy and affordable access to birth control reduces the need for abortion. Sure, you can walk into a pharmacy and buy it...if you can afford it. But hey, let's let the corporations and their Republican party donating board members decide who gets that right.

If a man can't afford his own rubber, why would a broad have relations with him in the first place?

Rule of thumb:

Don't have sex with anyone you're not willing to be tied to for 18 years and 9 months.

Men don't have strength in that way, men can supply condoms.

And a woman cant?

No, the man should pay!

Sounds like a prostitute

 

[Penelope]

Again, the abortion opponents can't see the forest for the trees. And yes I know this is about birth control. But the subjects go hand in hand. Easy and affordable access to birth control reduces the need for abortion. Sure, you can walk into a pharmacy and buy it...if you can afford it. But hey, let's let the corporations and their Republican party donating board members decide who gets that right.

If a man can't afford his own rubber, why would a broad have relations with him in the first place?

Rule of thumb:

Don't have sex with anyone you're not willing to be tied to for 18 years and 9 months.

Men don't have strength in that way, men can supply condoms.

And a woman cant?

No, the man should pay!

Sounds like a prostitute

They need to make a pill for the man and he can pay if he wants to have sex.
Dimethandrolone undecanoate (DMAU) is a once-daily pill that suppresses two types of male hormones – follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) – to simultaneously decrease production of testosterone and sperm without causing symptoms of low-testosterone (low-T).Apr 30, 2019

'The pill' for guys: Male birth control option passes safety tests ...

 

[Mr Natural]

Aren’t they like 15 bucks for a months supply?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Again, the abortion opponents can't see the forest for the trees. And yes I know this is about birth control. But the subjects go hand in hand. Easy and affordable access to birth control reduces the need for abortion. Sure, you can walk into a pharmacy and buy it...if you can afford it. But hey, let's let the corporations and their Republican party donating board members decide who gets that right.

If a man can't afford his own rubber, why would a broad have relations with him in the first place?

Rule of thumb:

Don't have sex with anyone you're not willing to be tied to for 18 years and 9 months.

Men don't have strength in that way, men can supply condoms.

And a woman cant?

No, the man should pay!

Sounds like a prostitute

They need to make a pill for the man and he can pay if he wants to have sex.

It is what it is.

Buy condoms or insist he buy one

You're working your way into a corner