Where’s The Evidence?? Are You Kidding??

[BluesLegend]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth. Liberal assholes do this because it's surprisingly effective.

 

[Skylar]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth.

You have to ask yourself.....if your 'evidence' is compelling as you imagine, why isn't it being presented in court by Trump's attorneys?

 

[Billiejeens]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

And yet NO Trump Nazi Lawyer has been able to produce any of that "evidence" in a court of law, so yeah, Where's the evidence, and YOU are kidding!

You seem really uninformed,
Plus - there are no Nazi's involved - You lose.

 

[Skylar]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

And yet NO Trump Nazi Lawyer has been able to produce any of that "evidence" in a court of law, so yeah, Where's the evidence, and YOU are kidding!

You seem really uninformed,
Plus - there are no Nazi's involved - You lose.

Dude....just yesterday, Gulliani admitted that fraud isn't even part of their legal argument.

As have Trump's lawyer again and again. The horseshit you're being fed by Trump and his ilk has almost nothing to do with the arguments being made in court.

 

[Billiejeens]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

And yet NO Trump Nazi Lawyer has been able to produce any of that "evidence" in a court of law, so yeah, Where's the evidence, and YOU are kidding!

You seem really uninformed,
Plus - there are no Nazi's involved - You lose.

Dude....just yesterday, Gulliani admitted that fraud isn't even part of their legal argument.

As have Trump's lawyer again and again. The horseshit you're being fed by Trump and his ilk has almost nothing to do with the arguments being made in court.

I realize that the nuance is above your ability.
Words mean things.
Stay tuned.

 

[Billiejeens]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth. Liberal assholes do this because it's surprisingly effective.

Rank and file liberal assholes are very weak minded.

 

[Skylar]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

And yet NO Trump Nazi Lawyer has been able to produce any of that "evidence" in a court of law, so yeah, Where's the evidence, and YOU are kidding!

You seem really uninformed,
Plus - there are no Nazi's involved - You lose.

Dude....just yesterday, Gulliani admitted that fraud isn't even part of their legal argument.

As have Trump's lawyer again and again. The horseshit you're being fed by Trump and his ilk has almost nothing to do with the arguments being made in court.

I realize that the nuance is above your ability.
Words mean things.
Stay tuned.

Translation: you can't show us Trump's lawyers presenting this 'evidence' in court. And Trump's lawyers aren't even making a legal argument of fraud.

So the question is......if the 'evidence' is as compelling as you claim, why won't Trump's lawyers submit it to the court?

That's a rather conspicuous indictment of your argument.

 

[Billiejeens]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

And yet NO Trump Nazi Lawyer has been able to produce any of that "evidence" in a court of law, so yeah, Where's the evidence, and YOU are kidding!

You seem really uninformed,
Plus - there are no Nazi's involved - You lose.

Dude....just yesterday, Gulliani admitted that fraud isn't even part of their legal argument.

As have Trump's lawyer again and again. The horseshit you're being fed by Trump and his ilk has almost nothing to do with the arguments being made in court.

I realize that the nuance is above your ability.
Words mean things.
Stay tuned.

Translation: you can't show us Trump's lawyers presenting this 'evidence' in court. And Trump's lawyers aren't even making a legal argument of fraud.

So the question is......if the 'evidence' is as compelling as you claim, why won't Trump's lawyers submit it to the court?

That's a rather conspicuous indictment of your argument.

Do you have a decent understanding of how the court system works?

 

[Skylar]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

And yet NO Trump Nazi Lawyer has been able to produce any of that "evidence" in a court of law, so yeah, Where's the evidence, and YOU are kidding!

You seem really uninformed,
Plus - there are no Nazi's involved - You lose.

Dude....just yesterday, Gulliani admitted that fraud isn't even part of their legal argument.

As have Trump's lawyer again and again. The horseshit you're being fed by Trump and his ilk has almost nothing to do with the arguments being made in court.

I realize that the nuance is above your ability.
Words mean things.
Stay tuned.

Translation: you can't show us Trump's lawyers presenting this 'evidence' in court. And Trump's lawyers aren't even making a legal argument of fraud.

So the question is......if the 'evidence' is as compelling as you claim, why won't Trump's lawyers submit it to the court?

That's a rather conspicuous indictment of your argument.

Do you have a decent understanding of how the court system works?

Yup. And plenty of legal professionals are asking the same question......why Trump's public claims don't match his legal arguments.

If the 'evidence' is as compelling as you claim, why won't Trump's lawyers submit it to the court?

 

[Agit8r]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Source?

 

[BluesLegend]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth.

You have to ask yourself.....if your 'evidence' is compelling as you imagine, why isn't it being presented in court by Trump's attorneys?

^^^ and right on cue, the liberal narrative.

 

[Skylar]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth.

You have to ask yourself.....if your 'evidence' is compelling as you imagine, why isn't it being presented in court by Trump's attorneys?

^^^ and right on cue, the liberal narrative.

Laughing.....you mean the logic narrative.

You keep claiming 'evidence'......but Trump's lawyers won't use it in court.

Why?

 

[BluesLegend]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth. Liberal assholes do this because it's surprisingly effective.

Rank and file liberal assholes are very weak minded.

They are more like Borg controlled by a central cube that broadcast the narrative across subspace.

 

[Skylar]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth. Liberal assholes do this because it's surprisingly effective.

Rank and file liberal assholes are very weak minded.

They are more like Borg controlled by a central cube that broadcast the narrative across subspace.

Or, anyone actually using their brain.

If the ''evidence' is so damning, so compelling, so game changing.......then why aren't Trump's attorneys using it in court? They've lost essentially every court case they've presented, so they could use a win.

Instead, Trump's attorneys are retreating from even the ALLEGATION of fraud, insisting its not part of their legal arguments.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Tons of evidence. Saying that there is not, doesn't change that fact. Start with Dominion and Smartmatic...

Then why, pray tell, is this 'evidence' not being presented in court?

Remember, the horsehit that you're being fed and what Trump's lawyers argue in court.......have very little to do with each other. Even Gulliani admitted that they aren't making a legal argument of fraud.

One big problem is that a lot of the evidence can't be found without a court compelling the election machine companies to allow independent access to their software. The various judges don't seem willing to allow any in depth verification of the software to insure that it's written honestly. The judges seem to want proof before allowing a search for proof which is what discovery is. That isn't usually how civil cases operate.

 

[Billiejeens]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth. Liberal assholes do this because it's surprisingly effective.

Rank and file liberal assholes are very weak minded.

They are more like Borg controlled by a central cube that broadcast the narrative across subspace.

Or, anyone actually using their brain.

If the ''evidence' is so damning, so compelling, so game changing.......then why aren't Trump's attorneys using it in court? They've lost essentially every court case they've presented, so they could use a win.

Instead, Trump's attorneys are retreating from even the ALLEGATION of fraud, insisting its not part of their legal arguments.

again the nuance seems to simply be above your pay grade.

 

[Skylar]

Tons of evidence. Saying that there is not, doesn't change that fact. Start with Dominion and Smartmatic...

Then why, pray tell, is this 'evidence' not being presented in court?

Remember, the horsehit that you're being fed and what Trump's lawyers argue in court.......have very little to do with each other. Even Gulliani admitted that they aren't making a legal argument of fraud.

One big problem is that a lot of the evidence can't be found without a court compelling the election machine companies to allow independent access to their software. The various judges don't seem willing to allow any in depth verification of the software to insure that it's written honestly. The judges seem to want proof before allowing a search for proof which is what discovery is. That isn't usually how civil cases operate.

And the problem with that....is probable cause. There's simply none to justify 'compelling the election companies to allow independent access to their software'. As probable cause is established with evidence.

And there isn't evidence of widespread voter fraud.

"But what if anything I want to make is ....is true' isn't a standard of evidence.

Which explains why Trump's attorneys, when pressed by judges in court to present their evidence of widespread voter fraud, admit that the aren't even ALLEGING voter fraud in their legal arguments. Only in the horseshit they feed their followers.

 

[Billiejeens]

Tons of evidence. Saying that there is not, doesn't change that fact. Start with Dominion and Smartmatic...

Then why, pray tell, is this 'evidence' not being presented in court?

Remember, the horsehit that you're being fed and what Trump's lawyers argue in court.......have very little to do with each other. Even Gulliani admitted that they aren't making a legal argument of fraud.

One big problem is that a lot of the evidence can't be found without a court compelling the election machine companies to allow independent access to their software. The various judges don't seem willing to allow any in depth verification of the software to insure that it's written honestly. The judges seem to want proof before allowing a search for proof which is what discovery is. That isn't usually how civil cases operate.

I think that there have been a sufficient number of whistle blowers to have a case made, prior to inspection.

 

[Skylar]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's the evidence is the liberal narrative. No matter how much evidence is presented they will continue to ask where's the evidence because that's how liberal narratives work. Just keep spewing the lie until the masses assume its the truth. Liberal assholes do this because it's surprisingly effective.

Rank and file liberal assholes are very weak minded.

They are more like Borg controlled by a central cube that broadcast the narrative across subspace.

Or, anyone actually using their brain.

If the ''evidence' is so damning, so compelling, so game changing.......then why aren't Trump's attorneys using it in court? They've lost essentially every court case they've presented, so they could use a win.

Instead, Trump's attorneys are retreating from even the ALLEGATION of fraud, insisting its not part of their legal arguments.

again the nuance seems to simply be above your pay grade.

Or.....the 'evidence' isn't compelling. Which perfectly explains why Trump's attorneys neither present it in court nor are even alleging fraud.

Occam's Razor, my friend.

 

[miketx]

As the KEEP FINDING errors, missing Votes, Votes from Dead People, “Glitches” in the machines, Poll watches testimonies, uncounted votes, etc.... The Socialist Democrats Keep saying “
“Where's the Evidence”?

Where's your link? Nothing to back op up?

Classic babblism.

progressive shill ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect

3. Ignore any facts presented.