Having a hearing on the merits isn't the same as having a trial on the merits.You are lying
not remotely true.
I just posted:
A group of conservatives that included former U.S. senators, Republican lawyers and retired federal judges, examined 64 casesbrought by Trump and his supporters and authored a report titled, "Lost, not stolen: The conservative case that Trump lost and Biden won the 2020 presidential election."
Of 64 cases, the group found:
- 20 were dismissed before hearings on the merits,
- 14 were voluntarily dismissed by Trump and his allies before hearings on the merits,
- And 30 cases included hearings on the merits.
AND the AZ audit was a total fail. It produced nothing but crybaby excuses.
When you lose 60 court cases and all audits, its time to man up and accept there was no fraud and the election is over.
A hearing is just where both sides present what they think is the evidence and the judge decides if the evidence is worth taking to trial....but as you stated....the only times the judge actually heard evidence were rejected before trial....so you're really not proving your case.