Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,947
- 9,980
- 2,040
I am angry but mostly disappointed they did not show the entire video. From seeing most of your posts I really do not think it would change your opinion if you saw the entire video. As far as this shooting my hope is that all evidence be presented including the entire video. Hopefully the truth will prevail.I don't think any of them should have served time but with you seeing the media cut over version of the film I can see how you would.No one shot Rodney King. Very few of us have seen the complete video as most have only seen the media cut up version. The cops did not walk. They were found not guilty in the 1st trial and then there was a second trial (double jeopardy) where they were sentenced and sent to prison.Dont ever forget Rodney King. The cop may still walk.
Two cops walked, two served thirty months.
They got off easy and would have gotten off completely if not for the video proving they lied.
yeah we know they stand for truth and justice.....right.Just heard that the tape was given to the New York Times...good move.I'm guessing the guy filming was a little worried for his own safety.
I thought of that too. Hopefully, those who have videos like this won't make the mistake of taking them to the cops. Much smarter to take it to the district attorney.
Surely, this time, the cop won't walk.
Sounds like you're pissed that they made the video public.
Deal with it.
What I saw was a man running away, 30-40 feet away from the shooter and getting shot several times in the back.
I'm of a time when it was considered cowardly to shoot a man in the back, especially if he was running away.
No excuse for the cop gunning the man down. None.
If you disagree, make your case. Post the "entire video". Otherwise, people are going to judge on the video that has been shown.
Last edited: