Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unless US citizens or business are harmed. All harm is reviewable. No exceptions you more than ignorant anti Liberty fuck.
The president is clearly given the authority he has exercised under statutory law passed by Congress...
Trump has to have a rational reason to excercize his authority under statutory law.
Trump can't order law based upon his whims and campaign propaganda.
You are defending a tyrant that cannot and did not make his case in a court of law...
No, all potential possible harm is not reviewable. If that were so, congress would be permanently paralyzed as we worked out through courts the assorted possible people who might be harmed by legislation
The statute doesn't require him to make his case in a court of law.
Trump didn't order law. He exercised authority granted to him by Congress in already-existing statutory law.
You say "sham of a claim" as if you're the Director of Homeland Security... how much security clearance do you have? How much of our classified intelligence have you looked at?
When it gets to SCOTUS, it's going to be reversed.
The statute doesn't require him to make his case in a court of law.
just right wing propaganda. it is about the law.But you are trying to argue they are a supreme branch, not co-equal
No I am not. The Supreme Court does have the final say. But that is normally nine justices that know more about constitutional law that one man one president.
What has been at stake so far is that once the president invokes a sham of a claim about national security the lower courts have no standing to intervene.
That is fear driven fascism. Trump makes himself above the law when he claims national security is at stake. That can be easily abused.
No, it really can't be because courts are not privy to classified intelligence. To turn your national security over to the court is like turning your police department over to a school. It's just insanity.
You say "sham of a claim" as if you're the Director of Homeland Security... how much security clearance do you have? How much of our classified intelligence have you looked at? NONE... that's how much! You're a fucking idiot on a message board, shooting off your smart ass mouth about something you don't know a damn thing about, and you're putting our nation at risk.
The president is clearly given the authority he has exercised under statutory law passed by Congress... You don't like it? Fucking change the law! It's that simple... you don't even have to change the Constitution!
We are not at war. There is no War. And, we have peace time tax rates, to prove it.So... Let's say Congress and the President declare war. Do you think the court has authority to step in and intervene, declaring that some may be harmed, therefore, they have judicial oversight and rule that we can't go to war?
PPP POLL SAYS more than 60% believe the courts are right and trump is wrong.
Mormons could qualify for "religious persecution" status in the US; they are not allowed to practice their religion, peacefully.Lets go even further into the bullshit narrative being pushed by Dems and the media since ya'll don't seem to get it...
THIS is on the books /right/ now, and has been, part of title 8 1157 - 8 USC 1157: Annual admission of refugees and admission of emergency situation refugees
Establishing Categories of Aliens for Purposes of Refugee Determinations
"(a) In General.-In the case of an alien who is within a category of aliens established under subsection (b), the alien may establish, for purposes of admission as a refugee under section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1157], that the alien has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion by asserting such a fear and asserting a credible basis for concern about the possibility of such persecution.
"(b) Establishment of Categories.-
"(1) For purposes of subsection (a), the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Coordinator for Refugee Affairs, shall establish-
"(A) one or more categories of aliens who are or were nationals and residents of an independent state of the former Soviet Union or of Estonia, Latvia, or Lithuania and who share common characteristics that identify them as targets of persecution in that state on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion,[;]
"(B) one or more categories of aliens who are or were nationals and residents of Vietnam, Laos, or Cambodia and who share common characteristics that identify them as targets of persecution in such respective foreign state on such an account; and
"(C) one or more categories of aliens who are or were nationals and residents of the Islamic Republic or Iran who, as members of a religious minority in Iran, share common characteristics that identify them as targets of persecution in that state on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.
"(2)(A) Aliens who are (or were) nationals and residents of an independent state of the former Soviet Union or of Estonia, Latvia, or Lithuania and who are Jews or Evangelical Christians shall be deemed a category of alien established under paragraph (1)(A).
"(B) Aliens who are (or were) nationals of an independent state of the former Soviet Union or of Estonia, Latvia, or Lithuania and who are current members of, and demonstrate public, active, and continuous participation (or attempted participation) in the religious activities of, the Ukrainian Catholic Church or the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, shall be deemed a category of alien established under paragraph (1)(A).
-----
More to come, I'll flood you idiots with evidence that religious persecution as standing for higher priority refugee classification is nothing new and maybe you'll get it.
Boss, post: 16539011The statute doesn't require him to make his case in a court of law.
The Constitution does. Are you saying one statute supersedes the Constitution for fascist sakes?
We have a Second Amendment; we don't need silly vetting or other regulations.Until we fix vetting, a temp ban is logical. Our vetting system is a disaster, also been talked about for years and years by all sides.
