White man shoots innocent black teen....

Here is what this case is *really* about:
Florida's "Shoot First" Law: How George Zimmerman Claims Self-Defense

As the investigation of Trayvon Martin’s killing continues, one of the biggest unanswered questions has been what Florida law is the basis for the police department’s decision not to arrest the man who confessed to Martin’s killing, George Zimmerman.

A blog post shared with us on Twitter yesterday by theCoalition To Stop Gun Violence sheds some light on this subject. Here’s the relevant excerpt:

The reluctance of the Sanford Police Department to arrest Zimmerman probably has something to do with Florida’s outrageous “Stand Your Ground” law. The law removes the duty of individuals to retreat from a confrontation and allows them to use deadly force if they reasonably believe that it is necessary to prevent death or “great bodily harm.”

Libtards desperately want to protect their criminal constituency from possible violence as they rob/rape/kill people.
There's no evidence that this kid was trying to rob/rape/kill people.

Negged.
 
So, is there evidence that the police are corrupted or acting outside the law in this case?

I haven't seen any.

So, why is the FBI getting involved again?
Because they were asked to:

U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown, D-Fla., along with members of the Congressional Black Caucus and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, had asked the U.S. Department of Justice to review the case, and White House spokesman Jay Carney said earlier Monday during a briefing that officials there were aware of what happened.

Feds to probe killing of unarmed teen Trayvon Martin | FLORIDA TODAY | floridatoday.com
Ah. Politicians.

Thanks.

Rick Scott has also sent in the state.

And there is nothing wrong with doing either of those things. In fact, the reluctance of the local law enforcement to do anything demands it.
 
Here is what this case is *really* about:
Florida's "Shoot First" Law: How George Zimmerman Claims Self-Defense

As the investigation of Trayvon Martin’s killing continues, one of the biggest unanswered questions has been what Florida law is the basis for the police department’s decision not to arrest the man who confessed to Martin’s killing, George Zimmerman.

A blog post shared with us on Twitter yesterday by theCoalition To Stop Gun Violence sheds some light on this subject. Here’s the relevant excerpt:

The reluctance of the Sanford Police Department to arrest Zimmerman probably has something to do with Florida’s outrageous “Stand Your Ground” law. The law removes the duty of individuals to retreat from a confrontation and allows them to use deadly force if they reasonably believe that it is necessary to prevent death or “great bodily harm.”

Libtards desperately want to protect their criminal constituency from possible violence as they rob/rape/kill people.
Exactly.

I am not too much of a fan of this "stand your ground" stuff, but that IS the law in Florida.

The feds have no business being involved. Unless the "stand your ground" law is unconstitutional, Florida has a perfect right to have this law, no matter how retarded others may think it is.
 
Here is what this case is *really* about:
Florida's "Shoot First" Law: How George Zimmerman Claims Self-Defense

As the investigation of Trayvon Martin’s killing continues, one of the biggest unanswered questions has been what Florida law is the basis for the police department’s decision not to arrest the man who confessed to Martin’s killing, George Zimmerman.

A blog post shared with us on Twitter yesterday by theCoalition To Stop Gun Violence sheds some light on this subject. Here’s the relevant excerpt:

The reluctance of the Sanford Police Department to arrest Zimmerman probably has something to do with Florida’s outrageous “Stand Your Ground” law. The law removes the duty of individuals to retreat from a confrontation and allows them to use deadly force if they reasonably believe that it is necessary to prevent death or “great bodily harm.”

Libtards desperately want to protect their criminal constituency from possible violence as they rob/rape/kill people.
There's no evidence that this kid was trying to rob/rape/kill people.

Negged.

Good God, you are stupid.

The repeal of 'stand your ground' laws are what the Lame Ass Media are really going for, and if that gets repealed, then yes, a lot of rapes, robberies and murders will be committed because people were hesitant to protect themselves or other innocent people.

And as to Trayvors activities, walking around in the rain looking into peoples homes would often be considered a prelude to robbing the home later by another criminal or perhaps himself. So, yes, there is evidence it could have been a robbery being planned. How do you know it was not? Since you are accusing Zimmerman the burden of proof is on you, not on those defending Zimmermans presumption of guilt.

Also it would appear that Zimmerman claims that Trayvor attacked him from behind as he got out to check out the name of the street he was on.

'Zimmerman told police he had stepped out of his truck to check the name of the street he was on when Trayvon attacked him from behind as he walked back to his truck.'

So far the story Zimmerman has told has been verified by other witnesses, and this would explain how someone with Trayvors build could put a big guy like Zimmerman on the ground.

Man, you libtards really truly do have racist prejudice against whites to the point of being completely irrational. Amazing.
 
Ah. Politicians.

Thanks.

Rick Scott has also sent in the state.

And there is nothing wrong with doing either of those things. In fact, the reluctance of the local law enforcement to do anything demands it.
I'm wondering what the law hasn't done? :confused:

Are they refusing to investigate?

No, they are refusing to presume racist guilt for a white man who killed a black man.
 
Rick Scott has also sent in the state.

And there is nothing wrong with doing either of those things. In fact, the reluctance of the local law enforcement to do anything demands it.
I'm wondering what the law hasn't done? :confused:

Are they refusing to investigate?

No, they are refusing to presume racist guilt for a white man who killed a black man.
That seems to be the case - lack of presumption of guilt.

What the holy fuck?
 

Rick Scott has also sent in the state.

And there is nothing wrong with doing either of those things. In fact, the reluctance of the local law enforcement to do anything demands it.


One phone call by the victim, indicates the victim was trying to get away from the killer, who continued to follow, backtracking to hunt done the victim. The victim's attempts at self defense, if any, were useless. Should HE have been armed?
 
Ah. Politicians.

Thanks.

Rick Scott has also sent in the state.

And there is nothing wrong with doing either of those things. In fact, the reluctance of the local law enforcement to do anything demands it.


One phone call by the victim, indicates the victim was trying to get away from the killer, who continued to follow, backtracking to hunt done the victim. The victim's attempts at self defense, if any, were useless. Should HE have been armed?
Could you please provide a link to that call or its transcript?

Thanks.
 
I still haven't heard any facts about what Martin was doing in the gated community in the first place.

His mom says he was visiting a friend. Does this friend have a name? Does this friend have a tongue?

:dunno:
He was at his father's fiance's house. He went to 711 to get a snack. He was talking to a friend on the phone when the nutbar started following him. The friend on the phone told him to run. He said he wouldn't run but he started walking faster.

He eventually ran.

Was the 7/11 inside the gated community?
 
Ah. Politicians.

Thanks.

Rick Scott has also sent in the state.

And there is nothing wrong with doing either of those things. In fact, the reluctance of the local law enforcement to do anything demands it.


One phone call by the victim, indicates the victim was trying to get away from the killer, who continued to follow, backtracking to hunt done the victim. The victim's attempts at self defense, if any, were useless. Should HE have been armed?

Are you talking about the Trayvon Martin case?

Apparently he had just clobbered Zimmerman from behind, knocking him to the ground.

How does that fit in with what you said?
 
Rick Scott has also sent in the state.

And there is nothing wrong with doing either of those things. In fact, the reluctance of the local law enforcement to do anything demands it.


One phone call by the victim, indicates the victim was trying to get away from the killer, who continued to follow, backtracking to hunt done the victim. The victim's attempts at self defense, if any, were useless. Should HE have been armed?

Are you talking about the Trayvon Martin case?

Apparently he had just clobbered Zimmerman from behind, knocking him to the ground.

How does that fit in with what you said?
Does anyone have a link to that phone call or its transcript?
 
Rick Scott has also sent in the state.

And there is nothing wrong with doing either of those things. In fact, the reluctance of the local law enforcement to do anything demands it.


One phone call by the victim, indicates the victim was trying to get away from the killer, who continued to follow, backtracking to hunt done the victim. The victim's attempts at self defense, if any, were useless. Should HE have been armed?
Could you please provide a link to that call or its transcript?

Thanks.

Trayvon Martin girlfriend speaks detail: Trayvon Martin's girlfriend speaks out with details of teen's death. - Orlando Sentinel
 
Rick Scott has also sent in the state.

And there is nothing wrong with doing either of those things. In fact, the reluctance of the local law enforcement to do anything demands it.


One phone call by the victim, indicates the victim was trying to get away from the killer, who continued to follow, backtracking to hunt done the victim. The victim's attempts at self defense, if any, were useless. Should HE have been armed?

Are you talking about the Trayvon Martin case?

Apparently he had just clobbered Zimmerman from behind, knocking him to the ground.

How does that fit in with what you said?


Uh, Zimmerman was following the VICTIM.
 
I'm wondering what the law hasn't done? :confused:

Are they refusing to investigate?

No, they are refusing to presume racist guilt for a white man who killed a black man.
That seems to be the case - lack of presumption of guilt.

What the holy fuck?

That is the USA we live in today.

And what will follow is equally bizare; libtards will use this as conversation at work, tagging anyone a racist who does not immediately aggree that Zimmerman is a racist and all the ignorant dumbfucks will agree without checking out the facts because they are stupid and lazy and 'why would all the media lie about this?'

Conservatives will knuckle down and remain silent, choosing to not 'fight this particular fight' and then later tell other conservatives who will speak out to 'just shut up your hurting the cause', because that is what conservatives do.

Zimmerman is going to wind up in prison and likely a suicide within a few years because that is how libtards want to treat 'vigilantes', i.e. anyone who would dare defend themselves against criminals.
 
One phone call by the victim, indicates the victim was trying to get away from the killer, who continued to follow, backtracking to hunt done the victim. The victim's attempts at self defense, if any, were useless. Should HE have been armed?
Could you please provide a link to that call or its transcript?

Thanks.

Trayvon Martin girlfriend speaks detail: Trayvon Martin's girlfriend speaks out with details of teen's death. - Orlando Sentinel
Hearsay, not a transcript, but let's look at it:
The girlfriend of slain Miami teenager Trayvon Martin spoke to attorneys for his parents, detailing the final moments before he was shot to death by a neighborhood watch volunteer, ABC News is reporting this morning.

The 16-year-old girl, who was not identified, said in a phone call recorded by the network that as Trayvon was walking he told her "some man was watching him" so he pulled his hoodie over his head.

She told attorneys she then heard the 17-year-old ask "What are you following me for?"

Then a man, presumably George Zimmerman, replied: "What are you doing around here?"

The girl said Trayvon must have been pushed because his headset fell off and the phone call ended.​

Speculation and hearsay. And, I'm trying to see where you got, "One phone call by the victim, indicates the victim was trying to get away from the killer, who continued to follow, backtracking to hunt done the victim."

Nothing you've provided comes close to supporting what you said.
 

Forum List

Back
Top