White people are disproportionately killed by the police. How come libs. screwed up again?

[Timmy]

Fallacy !

Not all cop shootings are equal.

 

[Lewdog]

I have to teach a college course Monday about reentry of felons that are getting released back into society and the problems they face. To start the class I am going to play a slide show of celebrity pictures and have the students guess which are felons and which are not. The pictures don't have the names, so if a student doesn't recognize the celebrity they will have to guess based on their appearance. Though it won't be the same here because many of you will cheat and look up if someone is a felon or not, I'll post the pictures here for you to guess.

Danny Trejo, Tim Allen, Mark Walberg, Winona Ryder (sp). final answer.
This is some serious "feeeeels" libby shit though.

You didn't get all of them. Two more are felons. Ryder is technically not a felon. She was the trick question in this. She was convicted as a felon, and was given probation and community service. However after doing some of her community service, the judge decided to reduce her charges to misdemeanors. (Can you say celebrity privilege?)

 

[AVISSSER]

Haha...thought so!
Translation:
"You've made way too much sense...I'm at a loss for words."

No, you just admitted racial profiling. You should look at the stats of the number of young White kids in the suburbs use and sell drugs, yet go without being prosecuted... then look at the punishment difference between Black and White kids that are convicted of the exact same charge.

All bullshit fabricated by Loons and excuse makers. You can't believe everything Al, Jesse and Maxine tell you. Sorry to expose you to truth bud...read below then roll up in the fetal position.

The Color of Crime - American Renaissance
Major Findings

• The evidence suggests that if there is police racial bias in arrests it is negligible. Victim and witness surveys show that police arrest violent criminals in close proportion to the rates at which criminals of different races commit violent crimes.
• Both violent and nonviolent crime has been declining in the United States since a high in 1993. 2015 saw a disturbing rise in murder in major American cities that some observers associated with depolicing” in response to intense media and public scrutiny of police activity.

Crime rates

• There are dramatic race differences in crime rates. Asians have the lowest rates, followed by whites, and then Hispanics. Blacks have notably high crime rates. This pattern holds true for virtually all crime categories and for virtually all age groups.
• In 2013, a black was six times more likely than a nonblack to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.

Interracial crime

• In 2013, of the approximately 660,000 crimes of interracial violence that involved blacks and whites, blacks were the perpetrators 85 percent of the time. This meant a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. A Hispanic was eight times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa.

Urban centers

• In 2014 in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely. For the crime of “shooting”—defined as firing a bullet that hits someone—a black was 98.4 times more likely than a white to be arrested, and a Hispanic was 23.6 times more likely.
• If New York City were all white, the murder rate would drop by 91 percent, the robbery rate by 81 percent, and the shootings rate by 97 percent.
• In an all-white Chicago, murder would decline 90 percent, rape by 81 percent, and robbery by 90 percent.

Police shootings

• In 2015, a black person was 2.45 times more likely than a white person to be shot and killed by the police. A Hispanic person was 1.21 times more likely. These figures are well within what would be expected given race differences in crime rates and likelihood to resist arrest.
• In 2015, police killings of blacks accounted for approximately 4 percent of homicides of blacks. Police killings of unarmed blacks accounted for approximately 0.6 percent of homicides of blacks. The overwhelming majority of black homicide victims (93 percent from 1980 to 2008) were killed by blacks.

Lies?

Google is not your friend. Pick up a book. If you are serious about becoming more aware I can give you a list of books to read.

I think he read "The Little Train

What tactics would you suggest the police utilize to fight crime if not statistics driven?

White people are less likely to be arrested for drug crimes because namely they dont hang around street corners, in broad daylight, selling drugs. When was the last time you saw a white guy on a corner slinging dope?
It's called intelligence smokey.

Is it less of a crime to sell drugs in your house than on a street corner?

I dont mean to be rude...but you are thick as pig shit. When one stands outside in broad daylight selling narcotics they makes themselves are ready and very visible target.
You have absolutely no common sense do you? You really are a liberal.

You didn't answer my question. If a person is selling drugs in their home, is that LESS of a crime than someone that sells drugs on a street corner?

Ahh more goalpost moving. You initially cited how blacks are more likely to be killed by the police. I addressed that. Then you changed your argument to targeted by police and we addressed that. Now you have moved to definition and severity of crime.
Brother, you have moved that goal past so many times you're not even in the stadium.

You've not "proved" anything I said was wrong.

I've not moved the goal posts... the argument has simply evolved into factors that you are not paying attention to.

I'll ask you one more time, a simple yes or no answer will do. If someone sells drugs in their home, is it not on the same level of crime as someone sells drugs on a street corner?

No...it varies. If a person sells drugs within 1000 feet of a school or daycare, depending upon jurisdiction the penalties can be much greater. In addition, the customer which a person sells to (minor) may affect punishment.
Concurrently, if someone sells drugs from their, or someone's domicile and police raid the home that home may be subject to asset forfeiture. Additionally if a person sells drugs in their home in front of minors or to minors this may result in state seizure of the minors and a much more substantial penalty.
Answer...it depends.

Oh and you have moved the shit out of this goalpost.
Moving the Goalposts

What's next? School funding and the effects on black communities?

 

[gallantwarrior]

We're supposed to believe the purpose of the NFL protests and BLM is a response to the police force mistreating black people. Specifically, blacks killed by police.

Turns out fuckers, the math doesn't support the regurgitation, because as usual, liberal narrative doesn't see past the surface. The surface shows blacks are disproportionately killed by police, per capita. However, when you look at the level of violent crimes, burglaries etc., it turns out white people are more likely to be killed by police. Which must fucking mean our police force discriminates against white people, right? I mean it's their narrative for how shit works.

So as the NFL practices up for failure, they only prove to be simple dumbed-down Americans. Because according to their logic, they "should" be taking a knee for whites.

Facts do not fit the narrative. Therefore, facts must be ignored and fake news must be shouted loud and long...at least until dissenters comply with the narrative.

 

[AVISSSER]

I have to teach a college course Monday about reentry of felons that are getting released back into society and the problems they face. To start the class I am going to play a slide show of celebrity pictures and have the students guess which are felons and which are not. The pictures don't have the names, so if a student doesn't recognize the celebrity they will have to guess based on their appearance. Though it won't be the same here because many of you will cheat and look up if someone is a felon or not, I'll post the pictures here for you to guess.

Danny Trejo, Tim Allen, Mark Walberg, Winona Ryder (sp). final answer.
This is some serious "feeeeels" libby shit though.

You didn't get all of them. Two more are felons. Ryder is technically not a felon. She was the trick question in this. She was convicted as a felon, and was given probation and community service. However after doing some of her community service, the judge decided to reduce her charges to misdemeanors. (Can you say celebrity privilege?)

No...I can however say; rich=good defense.

 

[BrokeLoser]

I have to teach a college course Monday about reentry of felons that are getting released back into society and the problems they face. To start the class I am going to play a slide show of celebrity pictures and have the students guess which are felons and which are not. The pictures don't have the names, so if a student doesn't recognize the celebrity they will have to guess based on their appearance. Though it won't be the same here because many of you will cheat and look up if someone is a felon or not, I'll post the pictures here for you to guess.

OH SHIT....a professor?
Say no more...we know who programmed you and built your whacked-out belief system. Funny shit!

 

[Lewdog]

No, you just admitted racial profiling. You should look at the stats of the number of young White kids in the suburbs use and sell drugs, yet go without being prosecuted... then look at the punishment difference between Black and White kids that are convicted of the exact same charge.

All bullshit fabricated by Loons and excuse makers. You can't believe everything Al, Jesse and Maxine tell you. Sorry to expose you to truth bud...read below then roll up in the fetal position.

The Color of Crime - American Renaissance
Major Findings

• The evidence suggests that if there is police racial bias in arrests it is negligible. Victim and witness surveys show that police arrest violent criminals in close proportion to the rates at which criminals of different races commit violent crimes.
• Both violent and nonviolent crime has been declining in the United States since a high in 1993. 2015 saw a disturbing rise in murder in major American cities that some observers associated with depolicing” in response to intense media and public scrutiny of police activity.

Crime rates

• There are dramatic race differences in crime rates. Asians have the lowest rates, followed by whites, and then Hispanics. Blacks have notably high crime rates. This pattern holds true for virtually all crime categories and for virtually all age groups.
• In 2013, a black was six times more likely than a nonblack to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.

Interracial crime

• In 2013, of the approximately 660,000 crimes of interracial violence that involved blacks and whites, blacks were the perpetrators 85 percent of the time. This meant a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. A Hispanic was eight times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa.

Urban centers

• In 2014 in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely. For the crime of “shooting”—defined as firing a bullet that hits someone—a black was 98.4 times more likely than a white to be arrested, and a Hispanic was 23.6 times more likely.
• If New York City were all white, the murder rate would drop by 91 percent, the robbery rate by 81 percent, and the shootings rate by 97 percent.
• In an all-white Chicago, murder would decline 90 percent, rape by 81 percent, and robbery by 90 percent.

Police shootings

• In 2015, a black person was 2.45 times more likely than a white person to be shot and killed by the police. A Hispanic person was 1.21 times more likely. These figures are well within what would be expected given race differences in crime rates and likelihood to resist arrest.
• In 2015, police killings of blacks accounted for approximately 4 percent of homicides of blacks. Police killings of unarmed blacks accounted for approximately 0.6 percent of homicides of blacks. The overwhelming majority of black homicide victims (93 percent from 1980 to 2008) were killed by blacks.

Lies?

Google is not your friend. Pick up a book. If you are serious about becoming more aware I can give you a list of books to read.

I think he read "The Little Train

Is it less of a crime to sell drugs in your house than on a street corner?

I dont mean to be rude...but you are thick as pig shit. When one stands outside in broad daylight selling narcotics they makes themselves are ready and very visible target.
You have absolutely no common sense do you? You really are a liberal.

You didn't answer my question. If a person is selling drugs in their home, is that LESS of a crime than someone that sells drugs on a street corner?

Ahh more goalpost moving. You initially cited how blacks are more likely to be killed by the police. I addressed that. Then you changed your argument to targeted by police and we addressed that. Now you have moved to definition and severity of crime.
Brother, you have moved that goal past so many times you're not even in the stadium.

You've not "proved" anything I said was wrong.

I've not moved the goal posts... the argument has simply evolved into factors that you are not paying attention to.

I'll ask you one more time, a simple yes or no answer will do. If someone sells drugs in their home, is it not on the same level of crime as someone sells drugs on a street corner?

No...it varies. If a person sells drugs within 1000 feet of a school or daycare, depending upon jurisdiction the penalties can be much greater. In addition, the customer which a person sells to (minor) may affect punishment.
Concurrently, if someone sells drugs from their, or someone's domicile and police raid the home that home may be subject to asset forfeiture. Additionally if a person sells drugs in their home in front of minors or to minors this may result in state seizure of the minors and a much more substantial penalty.
Answer...it depends.

Oh and you have moved the shit out of this goalpost.
Moving the Goalposts

What's next? School funding and the effects on black communities?

We aren't talking about schools and churches.

You said that the Black people deserved to be arrested because they sold drugs on the street corner and not in a house.

Why won't you answer my question? Is it because it shows you have no fucking clue what you are talking about?

 

[Lewdog]

I have to teach a college course Monday about reentry of felons that are getting released back into society and the problems they face. To start the class I am going to play a slide show of celebrity pictures and have the students guess which are felons and which are not. The pictures don't have the names, so if a student doesn't recognize the celebrity they will have to guess based on their appearance. Though it won't be the same here because many of you will cheat and look up if someone is a felon or not, I'll post the pictures here for you to guess.

OH SHIT....a professor?
Say no more...we know who programmed you and built your whacked-out belief system. Funny shit!

No, not a professor yet... but it is funny that if someone in academia has a point of view they are "programmed," but if they share the same opinion as you do they are well-educated.

 

[AVISSSER]

All bullshit fabricated by Loons and excuse makers. You can't believe everything Al, Jesse and Maxine tell you. Sorry to expose you to truth bud...read below then roll up in the fetal position.

The Color of Crime - American Renaissance
Major Findings

• The evidence suggests that if there is police racial bias in arrests it is negligible. Victim and witness surveys show that police arrest violent criminals in close proportion to the rates at which criminals of different races commit violent crimes.
• Both violent and nonviolent crime has been declining in the United States since a high in 1993. 2015 saw a disturbing rise in murder in major American cities that some observers associated with depolicing” in response to intense media and public scrutiny of police activity.

Crime rates

• There are dramatic race differences in crime rates. Asians have the lowest rates, followed by whites, and then Hispanics. Blacks have notably high crime rates. This pattern holds true for virtually all crime categories and for virtually all age groups.
• In 2013, a black was six times more likely than a nonblack to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.

Interracial crime

• In 2013, of the approximately 660,000 crimes of interracial violence that involved blacks and whites, blacks were the perpetrators 85 percent of the time. This meant a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. A Hispanic was eight times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa.

Urban centers

• In 2014 in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely. For the crime of “shooting”—defined as firing a bullet that hits someone—a black was 98.4 times more likely than a white to be arrested, and a Hispanic was 23.6 times more likely.
• If New York City were all white, the murder rate would drop by 91 percent, the robbery rate by 81 percent, and the shootings rate by 97 percent.
• In an all-white Chicago, murder would decline 90 percent, rape by 81 percent, and robbery by 90 percent.

Police shootings

• In 2015, a black person was 2.45 times more likely than a white person to be shot and killed by the police. A Hispanic person was 1.21 times more likely. These figures are well within what would be expected given race differences in crime rates and likelihood to resist arrest.
• In 2015, police killings of blacks accounted for approximately 4 percent of homicides of blacks. Police killings of unarmed blacks accounted for approximately 0.6 percent of homicides of blacks. The overwhelming majority of black homicide victims (93 percent from 1980 to 2008) were killed by blacks.

Lies?

Google is not your friend. Pick up a book. If you are serious about becoming more aware I can give you a list of books to read.

I think he read "The Little Train

I dont mean to be rude...but you are thick as pig shit. When one stands outside in broad daylight selling narcotics they makes themselves are ready and very visible target.
You have absolutely no common sense do you? You really are a liberal.

You didn't answer my question. If a person is selling drugs in their home, is that LESS of a crime than someone that sells drugs on a street corner?

Ahh more goalpost moving. You initially cited how blacks are more likely to be killed by the police. I addressed that. Then you changed your argument to targeted by police and we addressed that. Now you have moved to definition and severity of crime.
Brother, you have moved that goal past so many times you're not even in the stadium.

You've not "proved" anything I said was wrong.

I've not moved the goal posts... the argument has simply evolved into factors that you are not paying attention to.

I'll ask you one more time, a simple yes or no answer will do. If someone sells drugs in their home, is it not on the same level of crime as someone sells drugs on a street corner?

No...it varies. If a person sells drugs within 1000 feet of a school or daycare, depending upon jurisdiction the penalties can be much greater. In addition, the customer which a person sells to (minor) may affect punishment.
Concurrently, if someone sells drugs from their, or someone's domicile and police raid the home that home may be subject to asset forfeiture. Additionally if a person sells drugs in their home in front of minors or to minors this may result in state seizure of the minors and a much more substantial penalty.
Answer...it depends.

Oh and you have moved the shit out of this goalpost.
Moving the Goalposts

What's next? School funding and the effects on black communities?

We aren't talking about schools and churches.

You said that the Black people deserved to be arrested because they sold drugs on the street corner and not in a house.

Why won't you answer my question? Is it because it shows you have no fucking clue what you are talking about?

They let you be a professor? Seriously?
Firstly, I never stated that anyone "deserved" anything, those are your words. Secondly, I was drawing a comparison between the two communities and their likelihood to be focused upon. Blacks commit drug offenses with more transparency e.g. on the street corner. Whites do not sling dope on street corners by and large. It's called the low hanging fruit principle.
Police, like all entities focus on the obvious problems. Whites who do deal, do it primarily with a bit more subterfuge. As I stated, more intelligently.

 

[Lewdog]

Lies?

Google is not your friend. Pick up a book. If you are serious about becoming more aware I can give you a list of books to read.

I think he read "The Little Train

You didn't answer my question. If a person is selling drugs in their home, is that LESS of a crime than someone that sells drugs on a street corner?

Ahh more goalpost moving. You initially cited how blacks are more likely to be killed by the police. I addressed that. Then you changed your argument to targeted by police and we addressed that. Now you have moved to definition and severity of crime.
Brother, you have moved that goal past so many times you're not even in the stadium.

You've not "proved" anything I said was wrong.

I've not moved the goal posts... the argument has simply evolved into factors that you are not paying attention to.

I'll ask you one more time, a simple yes or no answer will do. If someone sells drugs in their home, is it not on the same level of crime as someone sells drugs on a street corner?

No...it varies. If a person sells drugs within 1000 feet of a school or daycare, depending upon jurisdiction the penalties can be much greater. In addition, the customer which a person sells to (minor) may affect punishment.
Concurrently, if someone sells drugs from their, or someone's domicile and police raid the home that home may be subject to asset forfeiture. Additionally if a person sells drugs in their home in front of minors or to minors this may result in state seizure of the minors and a much more substantial penalty.
Answer...it depends.

Oh and you have moved the shit out of this goalpost.
Moving the Goalposts

What's next? School funding and the effects on black communities?

We aren't talking about schools and churches.

You said that the Black people deserved to be arrested because they sold drugs on the street corner and not in a house.

Why won't you answer my question? Is it because it shows you have no fucking clue what you are talking about?

They let you be a professor? Seriously?
Firstly, I never stated that anyone "deserved" anything, those are your words. Secondly, I was drawing a comparison between the two communities and their likelihood to be focused upon. Blacks commit drug offenses with more transparency e.g. on the street corner. Whites do not sling dope on street corners by and large. It's called the low hanging fruit principle.
Police, like all entities focus on the obvious problems. Whites who do deal, do it primarily with a bit more subterfuge. As I stated, more intelligently.

And you continue to make a piss poor argument.

"Hey let's arrest all the Black people that sell drugs because it is easier to do, and we'll just continue to let the White suburbanite kids sell drugs because it's too much work."



"And if we catch a white kid breaking the law, let's be more lenient with the punishment because they have a better chance of becoming contributors to society, over the Black kids who are just going to go back to selling drugs again."

And you can't see the flaw in that...

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

We're supposed to believe the purpose of the NFL protests and BLM is a response to the police force mistreating black people. Specifically, blacks killed by police.

Turns out fuckers, the math doesn't support the regurgitation, because as usual, liberal narrative doesn't see past the surface. The surface shows blacks are disproportionately killed by police, per capita. However, when you look at the level of violent crimes, burglaries etc., it turns out white people are more likely to be killed by police. Which must fucking mean our police force discriminates against white people, right? I mean it's their narrative for how shit works.

So as the NFL practices up for failure, they only prove to be simple dumbed-down Americans. Because according to their logic, they "should" be taking a knee for whites.

“White people are disproportionately killed by the police. How come libs. screwed up again?”

No, it’s just another example of how most clueless conservatives just don’t get it.

The issue isn’t the number of people killed by police, but the circumstances which contribute to police killings:

The fact that African-Americans are subject to a presumption of guilt – young black males in particular.

The fact that most white conservatives perceive police killings of blacks as just an ‘unfortunate consequence’ of urban crime and poverty, that doesn’t merit remedy or further consideration.

And the fact that a disproportionate number of encounters between the police and African-American suspects result in the death of black suspects, as correctly pointed out in post #14.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

We're supposed to believe the purpose of the NFL protests and BLM is a response to the police force mistreating black people. Specifically, blacks killed by police.

Turns out fuckers, the math doesn't support the regurgitation, because as usual, liberal narrative doesn't see past the surface. The surface shows blacks are disproportionately killed by police, per capita. However, when you look at the level of violent crimes, burglaries etc., it turns out white people are more likely to be killed by police. Which must fucking mean our police force discriminates against white people, right? I mean it's their narrative for how shit works.

So as the NFL practices up for failure, they only prove to be simple dumbed-down Americans. Because according to their logic, they "should" be taking a knee for whites.

Whites are NOT more likely to be killed by cops. Maybe you missed math class. "Likelihood" is based on percentages of the population of each race compared to the number killed. Take for example:

"Despite making up only 2% of the total US population, African American males between the ages of 15 and 34 comprised more than 15% of all deaths logged this year by an ongoing investigation into the use of deadly force by police. Their rate of police-involved deaths was five times higher than for white men of the same age."

Young black men killed by US police at highest rate in year of 1,134 deaths

Now post for us the crime rate for the same age group and race?

 

[Lewdog]

We're supposed to believe the purpose of the NFL protests and BLM is a response to the police force mistreating black people. Specifically, blacks killed by police.

Turns out fuckers, the math doesn't support the regurgitation, because as usual, liberal narrative doesn't see past the surface. The surface shows blacks are disproportionately killed by police, per capita. However, when you look at the level of violent crimes, burglaries etc., it turns out white people are more likely to be killed by police. Which must fucking mean our police force discriminates against white people, right? I mean it's their narrative for how shit works.

So as the NFL practices up for failure, they only prove to be simple dumbed-down Americans. Because according to their logic, they "should" be taking a knee for whites.

Whites are NOT more likely to be killed by cops. Maybe you missed math class. "Likelihood" is based on percentages of the population of each race compared to the number killed. Take for example:

"Despite making up only 2% of the total US population, African American males between the ages of 15 and 34 comprised more than 15% of all deaths logged this year by an ongoing investigation into the use of deadly force by police. Their rate of police-involved deaths was five times higher than for white men of the same age."

Young black men killed by US police at highest rate in year of 1,134 deaths

Now post for us the crime rate for the same age group and race?

There are serious problems with the unified crime report. For one it only reports arrests, and not anything that happens beyond that, like convictions. It also only reports what certain police departments send them, and not all of the police departments participate, of which most that don't participate are the ones in rural white areas, thus making the large metro area that are predominantly filled with Black communities become weighted highly in the statistics. Those are just a few of the problems.

 

[BrokeLoser]

We're supposed to believe the purpose of the NFL protests and BLM is a response to the police force mistreating black people. Specifically, blacks killed by police.

Turns out fuckers, the math doesn't support the regurgitation, because as usual, liberal narrative doesn't see past the surface. The surface shows blacks are disproportionately killed by police, per capita. However, when you look at the level of violent crimes, burglaries etc., it turns out white people are more likely to be killed by police. Which must fucking mean our police force discriminates against white people, right? I mean it's their narrative for how shit works.

So as the NFL practices up for failure, they only prove to be simple dumbed-down Americans. Because according to their logic, they "should" be taking a knee for whites.

Whites are NOT more likely to be killed by cops. Maybe you missed math class. "Likelihood" is based on percentages of the population of each race compared to the number killed. Take for example:

"Despite making up only 2% of the total US population, African American males between the ages of 15 and 34 comprised more than 15% of all deaths logged this year by an ongoing investigation into the use of deadly force by police. Their rate of police-involved deaths was five times higher than for white men of the same age."

Young black men killed by US police at highest rate in year of 1,134 deaths

Whites are NOT more likely to be killed by cops. Maybe you missed math class. "Likelihood" is based on percentages of the population of each race compared to the number killed. Ah, I get it. We're going to take into consideration per capita, but we're not going to take into consideration the WHY? What an awesome case for "likelihood" on your part. No cause, just effect.

You know what happens when trading dialogue with Loons....they steer, divert, disregard simple logic and create confusion...it's how they keep their heads parked in their asses.
It couldn't dare be as simple as black yoot having the ignorant tendency to disobey police orders, resist and be combative. Oh no...that's way too simple and makes way too much sense.

 

[BrokeLoser]

I think he read "The Little Train
Ahh more goalpost moving. You initially cited how blacks are more likely to be killed by the police. I addressed that. Then you changed your argument to targeted by police and we addressed that. Now you have moved to definition and severity of crime.
Brother, you have moved that goal past so many times you're not even in the stadium.

You've not "proved" anything I said was wrong.

I've not moved the goal posts... the argument has simply evolved into factors that you are not paying attention to.

I'll ask you one more time, a simple yes or no answer will do. If someone sells drugs in their home, is it not on the same level of crime as someone sells drugs on a street corner?

No...it varies. If a person sells drugs within 1000 feet of a school or daycare, depending upon jurisdiction the penalties can be much greater. In addition, the customer which a person sells to (minor) may affect punishment.
Concurrently, if someone sells drugs from their, or someone's domicile and police raid the home that home may be subject to asset forfeiture. Additionally if a person sells drugs in their home in front of minors or to minors this may result in state seizure of the minors and a much more substantial penalty.
Answer...it depends.

Oh and you have moved the shit out of this goalpost.
Moving the Goalposts

What's next? School funding and the effects on black communities?

We aren't talking about schools and churches.

You said that the Black people deserved to be arrested because they sold drugs on the street corner and not in a house.

Why won't you answer my question? Is it because it shows you have no fucking clue what you are talking about?

They let you be a professor? Seriously?
Firstly, I never stated that anyone "deserved" anything, those are your words. Secondly, I was drawing a comparison between the two communities and their likelihood to be focused upon. Blacks commit drug offenses with more transparency e.g. on the street corner. Whites do not sling dope on street corners by and large. It's called the low hanging fruit principle.
Police, like all entities focus on the obvious problems. Whites who do deal, do it primarily with a bit more subterfuge. As I stated, more intelligently.

And you continue to make a piss poor argument.

"Hey let's arrest all the Black people that sell drugs because it is easier to do, and we'll just continue to let the White suburbanite kids sell drugs because it's too much work."



"And if we catch a white kid breaking the law, let's be more lenient with the punishment because they have a better chance of becoming contributors to society, over the Black kids who are just going to go back to selling drugs again."

And you can't see the flaw in that...

Haha...more fabricated nutty Berkeley Professor type shit right there. Boy are you following protocol like a good little programmed nutjob would.

 

[Lewdog]

We're supposed to believe the purpose of the NFL protests and BLM is a response to the police force mistreating black people. Specifically, blacks killed by police.

Turns out fuckers, the math doesn't support the regurgitation, because as usual, liberal narrative doesn't see past the surface. The surface shows blacks are disproportionately killed by police, per capita. However, when you look at the level of violent crimes, burglaries etc., it turns out white people are more likely to be killed by police. Which must fucking mean our police force discriminates against white people, right? I mean it's their narrative for how shit works.

So as the NFL practices up for failure, they only prove to be simple dumbed-down Americans. Because according to their logic, they "should" be taking a knee for whites.

Whites are NOT more likely to be killed by cops. Maybe you missed math class. "Likelihood" is based on percentages of the population of each race compared to the number killed. Take for example:

"Despite making up only 2% of the total US population, African American males between the ages of 15 and 34 comprised more than 15% of all deaths logged this year by an ongoing investigation into the use of deadly force by police. Their rate of police-involved deaths was five times higher than for white men of the same age."

Young black men killed by US police at highest rate in year of 1,134 deaths

Whites are NOT more likely to be killed by cops. Maybe you missed math class. "Likelihood" is based on percentages of the population of each race compared to the number killed. Ah, I get it. We're going to take into consideration per capita, but we're not going to take into consideration the WHY? What an awesome case for "likelihood" on your part. No cause, just effect.

You know what happens when trading dialogue with Loons....they steer, divert, disregard simple logic and create confusion...it's how they keep their heads parked in their asses.
It couldn't dare be as simple as black yoot having the ignorant tendency to disobey police orders, resist and be combative. Oh no...that's way too simple and makes way too much sense.

If you had the initiative to educate yourself, you should pick up the book called The New Jim Crow.

"“The New Jim Crow offers a devastating account of a legal system doing its job perfectly well. We have simply replaced one caste system (Jim Crow) for another one (imprisonment, parole, detention) that keeps the majority of minorities in a permanent state of disenfranchisement. Alexander looks in detail at what economists usually miss, namely the entire legal structure of the courts, parole, probation and laws that effectively turn a perpetrator of a crime into a moral outlaw who is unworthy of rehabilitation. . . Alexander does a fine job of truth-telling, pointing the finger where it rightly should be pointed: at all of us, liberal and conservative, white and black.” —Forbes

Praise for The New Jim Crow - The New Jim Crow

You can buy it relatively cheap.

https://www.amazon.com/New-Jim-Crow...s&ie=UTF8&qid=1326116787&sr=1-1&tag=ff0d01-20

 

[MaryL]

We're supposed to believe the purpose of the NFL protests and BLM is a response to the police force mistreating black people. Specifically, blacks killed by police.

Turns out fuckers, the math doesn't support the regurgitation, because as usual, liberal narrative doesn't see past the surface. The surface shows blacks are disproportionately killed by police, per capita. However, when you look at the level of violent crimes, burglaries etc., it turns out white people are more likely to be killed by police. Which must fucking mean our police force discriminates against white people, right? I mean it's their narrative for how shit works.

So as the NFL practices up for failure, they only prove to be simple dumbed-down Americans. Because according to their logic, they "should" be taking a knee for whites.

This isn't an issue. These wealthy well endowed sports thugs want to make it one, then we unwashed masses stop watching and they back off because the NFL looses income when these wonderful testosterone driven dinks alienate consumers to the point we just don't watch or play madden NFL football on the Xbox. Who needs these chocolate Twinkies? Say bye bye.

 

[GHook93]

The issue is not police killing those who are criminals and directly threatening cops

It is unarmed suspects, those involved in petty crimes, shoot first ask questions later

Blacks are sentenced more harshly than whites for the same crimes

That is what they protest

Man you are delusional. The vast majority of the blacks shot and killed are criminals or their actions led to their death yet the BLM march in the street regardless


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Dragonlady]

We're supposed to believe the purpose of the NFL protests and BLM is a response to the police force mistreating black people. Specifically, blacks killed by police.

Turns out fuckers, the math doesn't support the regurgitation, because as usual, liberal narrative doesn't see past the surface. The surface shows blacks are disproportionately killed by police, per capita. However, when you look at the level of violent crimes, burglaries etc., it turns out white people are more likely to be killed by police. Which must fucking mean our police force discriminates against white people, right? I mean it's their narrative for how shit works.

So as the NFL practices up for failure, they only prove to be simple dumbed-down Americans. Because according to their logic, they "should" be taking a knee for whites.

Whites are NOT more likely to be killed by cops. Maybe you missed math class. "Likelihood" is based on percentages of the population of each race compared to the number killed. Take for example:

"Despite making up only 2% of the total US population, African American males between the ages of 15 and 34 comprised more than 15% of all deaths logged this year by an ongoing investigation into the use of deadly force by police. Their rate of police-involved deaths was five times higher than for white men of the same age."

Young black men killed by US police at highest rate in year of 1,134 deaths

Whites are NOT more likely to be killed by cops. Maybe you missed math class. "Likelihood" is based on percentages of the population of each race compared to the number killed. Ah, I get it. We're going to take into consideration per capita, but we're not going to take into consideration the WHY? What an awesome case for "likelihood" on your part. No cause, just effect.

You know what happens when trading dialogue with Loons....they steer, divert, disregard simple logic and create confusion...it's how they keep their heads parked in their asses.
It couldn't dare be as simple as black yoot having the ignorant tendency to disobey police orders, resist and be combative. Oh no...that's way too simple and makes way too much sense.

That's because those assumptions are either false and/or they fail to take into consideration the quite justifiable fear that blacks have of being killed or wrongly shot by police.

For example: The black caretaker who was on the ground with his hands on the air begging cops not to shoot the profoundly autistic man he was caring for, who was playing with a toy truck in the middle of the road. The cop who shot the caretaker said it was an accident. He was aiming at the "retard".

Or the black guy who was shot and killed with his hands in the air after telling officers he had a gun in the car and a carry permit. Or the guy who was shot in the back while running away?

Even when blacks don't resist they still end up dead. No wonder their encounters with police end badly so often. Frightened people do stupid things. And blacks have good reason to be frightened of police.

 

[TheDude]

We're supposed to believe the purpose of the NFL protests and BLM is a response to the police force mistreating black people. Specifically, blacks killed by police.

Turns out fuckers, the math doesn't support the regurgitation, because as usual, liberal narrative doesn't see past the surface. The surface shows blacks are disproportionately killed by police, per capita. However, when you look at the level of violent crimes, burglaries etc., it turns out white people are more likely to be killed by police. Which must fucking mean our police force discriminates against white people, right? I mean it's their narrative for how shit works.

So as the NFL practices up for failure, they only prove to be simple dumbed-down Americans. Because according to their logic, they "should" be taking a knee for whites.

Whites are NOT more likely to be killed by cops. Maybe you missed math class. "Likelihood" is based on percentages of the population of each race compared to the number killed. Take for example:

"Despite making up only 2% of the total US population, African American males between the ages of 15 and 34 comprised more than 15% of all deaths logged this year by an ongoing investigation into the use of deadly force by police. Their rate of police-involved deaths was five times higher than for white men of the same age."

Young black men killed by US police at highest rate in year of 1,134 deaths

Whites are NOT more likely to be killed by cops. Maybe you missed math class. "Likelihood" is based on percentages of the population of each race compared to the number killed. Ah, I get it. We're going to take into consideration per capita, but we're not going to take into consideration the WHY? What an awesome case for "likelihood" on your part. No cause, just effect.

You HAVE to take into ratio when considering the likelihood of it.

I do know the CAUSE of this mess... I've spent years studying and still am.

Let me ask you a simple math question.

If you have 100 people. 20 people are Black and 80 are White. 5 Black people are killed by cops. 10 White people are killed by cops. Which group is then more likely to be killed by cops based on those numbers?

Two meanings:

A. Whites account for the most deaths, as a people, when confronted by police.

B. As a race, you're more likely to be killed by police if you're a black person.

Not that difficult to figure out. But for the second time, your response is missing the cause. I don't know, seems to me that's important........... e.g., I was hurt being careless with a hammer Versus hammers hurt people, especially Mexicans, so they're racist and must be protested.