L.K.Eder
unbannable non-troll
Name calling doesn't change facts, Little man.
The OP plagiarized the text - word for word - from a media outlet who enforce copyright. THAT IS FUCKING PLAGIARISM.
Stupidity suits you.
The name calling was the sprinkles served on the ice cream cone of your frozen inability to comprehend simple posts. I criticized Si Modo's post based on:
Rotfl! Try. To. Pay. Attention. SiModo accused the OP of stealing Data from those who conducted the study without realizing the very first line states who did the Study:
Posted by SM:
"Soooooo, you do studies of bedtime habits of different ethnic groups, huh? As you haven't referenced who actually did this work, either YOU did it, or you are stealing the data of those who DID do the work. If YOU did the work, YOU should let us know your methodology.
Although I doubt YOU did the work. I suspect you plagiarizing the work of others. It's pathetic theft of intellectual work without a refernce."
Read that again you dummy bitch. The entire accusation is endemic to the Study Data. That is why SM is a whiny dumbass....the very first fuxxing line states who did the Study.
P.S. When I said "Read that again you dummy bitch." I was not being sarcastic. It was a prediction of fallout from your stupidity. Now read it again or don't and show your stupidity again.
You're still not getting it, so I'll go slowly for you. There are two points: (1) The OP copied, word for word, a newspaper article and (2) if citing a study, one properly references the persons who actually did the work (not just an organization). Both of those conditions - copying and not citing the persons who actually did the work - are plagiarism. Deal with it.
maybe if you PM the OP nicely, he will PM you his source.
btw:
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15.
you can take one shoe off and use your toes.