🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Who here thinks that running a real estate business is the same as running a country?

The two idiots above, simply love to openly admit that they're idiots.........Answer the fucking question, morons or go play with your guns.....LOL

Your question is the poster child for liberal dishonesty, it has the rotted festering stench of lying lowlife scum liberal eww.
 
Who here thinks that running a real estate business is the same as running a country?
Discussion in 'Politics' started by nat4900, 44 minutes ago.

The biggest problem this country faces is inefficiency and corruption. A business (ANY business) cannot survive and work that way. You obviously do not understand that Trump runs all kinds of businesses. The best thing this country could ever hope for is to be shaped up to run efficient, direct, honest and well-structured just like any good business. And before you go off spinning about dishonesty in business, understand that I mean INTERNALLY! For a business to run well, they must be honest to THEMSELVES, not the competition. You see, business is LOGICAL. Mathematical. Logic is intrinsically valid. The numbers either add up or they don't. Government and politics as usual is anything but those. That is the problem. But of course, words wasted on you.
 
Last edited:
In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

Does the flag in your avatar have meaning to you?

I would hate to think we have something in common.

I always thought it meant she was a three legged freak with her head up her ass.
 
In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.
Does it matter, our One Percenter in Chief, was not drafted into office; but merely ran, for his apparent, bottom line. It should be a "chore for their Republic" for the One Percent; not the poor regarding social services due to any lack of Jobs Boom.
 
Your question is the poster child for liberal dishonesty, it has the rotted festering stench of lying lowlife scum liberal eww.


You could just as well stated...."I'm too dumb to answer a question and I just love fat guys...."
Now, THAT would have been more honest....LOL
 
Pointing and laughing at the village idiot is a time honored tradition. Thank you for serving a purpose here

Unlike you, I find some worth in everybody......Yours is bumping up the original post......LOL
 
In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.
What were most of the Founders? Hint ...they werent lifetime politicians
 
Donald Trump is more qualified to be President than that crooked bitch, Hillary, and her crooked, bitch ass of a husband.
 
In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.


You mean running a world wide business enterprise, dealing with the heads of governments all around the world and dealing with their bureaucracies.....having to negotiate with all of them to get the required permits, licenses, understanding the trade policies and costs associated with building and running businesses there.....You mean like that?

Or being a do nothing community activist and a state senator who voted present for most votes and then a U.S. senator who voted present on most subjects...

Of the two...you are stupid enough to believe that Trump doesn't have far more experience to run the country...

Wow...does stupid run in your family, or did you develop it on your own?
 
In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

Well, Trump is doing extremely well, exceeding expectations... so I guess you have been proven wrong.

Now, who thought it was a good idea to nominate a community organizer as the president? And what's that... the DNC is talking about nominating the Rock for the next run. The Rock!

Everyone expected that Trump would be a complete fuck-up and yes, he has exceeded those expectations. He's a totally useless fuck-up who is now on the edge of being impeached.

The man has accomplished the least of any President in his first 100 days of any President since FDR started the whole 100 day plan as a thing. Unless you count firings, going back on his promises, and ignoring the Constitution as accomplishments.





Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Straw man. The presidency is so unique that nothing, not even the vice presidency would be comparable. No one claims it is.

But leadership experience and knowledge on how businesses work would certainly help
 
[


You mean running a world wide business enterprise, dealing with the heads of governments all around the world and dealing with their bureaucracies.....having to negotiate with all of them to get the required permits, licenses, understanding the trade policies and costs associated with building and running businesses there.....You mean like that?

?

No. I mean can't get Obamacare repealed, his NUMBER ONE promise, despite having a majority GOP Congress.

lol, that's like being a restaurant chain CEO and not being able to get wildebeest on the menu with a majority of lions on the board.
 
Who thinks being a lawyer is the same?

Who thinks being a community organizer is the same?

Who thinks being a congressman is the same?

It's always OJT.
 

Forum List

Back
Top