Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who is Responible for the Benghazi debacle and how should they pay for it
You left out the obvious answer, scumbag terrorists. This just confirms my suspicion that the deaths are just an excuse for the the Ben Ghazi flap, not the reason. The bottom line is that many haven't come to terms with Obama's re-election and will use the bodies of the dead to flog the president. In the mean time they've completely forgotten about the real perpetrators, just like they forgot about bin Laden. PATHETIC!!!
The "bottom line", as you've put it...is that this Administration made a conscious decision to lie to the American people about what happened in Benghazi. The reason that Gregory Hicks was shocked and embarrassed when he heard what Susan Rice was saying on those 5 talk shows that Sunday morning was that he KNEW that the Obama Administration was lying about what took place. This isn't some Republican attack dog...this is a twenty year State Department veteran...the number two diplomat behind Chris Stevens in Libya...a man who in the course of his service, has received six Meritorious Service Increases, three individual Meritorious Honor Awards, and four individual Superior Honor Awards.
Now you can TRY to downplay the Benghazi scandal by calling it a "flap" or a witch hunt, Konradv...but the truth of the matter is very senior people in our government decided that rather than be honest with us about what happened in Libya that they would make up a story about what happened. Even though they knew that there was no protest that turned violent on that day they tried to push that narrative. Susan Rice did it. Hilary Clinton did it. Jay Carney did it. Joe Biden did it. Barack Obama did it. They lied.
You left out the obvious answer, scumbag terrorists. This just confirms my suspicion that the deaths are just an excuse for the the Ben Ghazi flap, not the reason. The bottom line is that many haven't come to terms with Obama's re-election and will use the bodies of the dead to flog the president. In the mean time they've completely forgotten about the real perpetrators, just like they forgot about bin Laden. PATHETIC!!!
The "bottom line", as you've put it...is that this Administration made a conscious decision to lie to the American people about what happened in Benghazi. The reason that Gregory Hicks was shocked and embarrassed when he heard what Susan Rice was saying on those 5 talk shows that Sunday morning was that he KNEW that the Obama Administration was lying about what took place. This isn't some Republican attack dog...this is a twenty year State Department veteran...the number two diplomat behind Chris Stevens in Libya...a man who in the course of his service, has received six Meritorious Service Increases, three individual Meritorious Honor Awards, and four individual Superior Honor Awards.
Now you can TRY to downplay the Benghazi scandal by calling it a "flap" or a witch hunt, Konradv...but the truth of the matter is very senior people in our government decided that rather than be honest with us about what happened in Libya that they would make up a story about what happened. Even though they knew that there was no protest that turned violent on that day they tried to push that narrative. Susan Rice did it. Hilary Clinton did it. Jay Carney did it. Joe Biden did it. Barack Obama did it. They lied.
The "bottom line" is that the terrorists are responsible, not the president or the SoS. What you call a lie could also be called a plausible explanation. This just convinces me more and more that those pushing this story the most don't actually care about the deaths, they're just an excuse to bash Obama. That's a lot more dishonest than any of the stories out of the administration. PATHETIC AND DISGUSTING!!!
Hillary ClintonBenghazi attack followed deep cuts in State Department security budget - Washington TimesWho is responsible? I would say the ones who cut the embassy security budget.
Since 2010, Congress cut $296 million from the State Departments spending request for embassy security and construction, with additional cuts in other State Department security accounts, according to an analysis by a former appropriations committee staffer.
Hmmmm.....
2010, hunh?
That's when (R)s took over the House.
But ya know what else?
The (D)s still controlled the Senate and the Presidency.
But we're not talking about who's responsible for the attack or lack of defense capabilities.
We're asking who made the deliberate decision to LIE to the American public.
I would say, "But you already knew that", but......
No one lied. The lying accusation is just that, only an accusation.
The "bottom line", as you've put it...is that this Administration made a conscious decision to lie to the American people about what happened in Benghazi. The reason that Gregory Hicks was shocked and embarrassed when he heard what Susan Rice was saying on those 5 talk shows that Sunday morning was that he KNEW that the Obama Administration was lying about what took place. This isn't some Republican attack dog...this is a twenty year State Department veteran...the number two diplomat behind Chris Stevens in Libya...a man who in the course of his service, has received six Meritorious Service Increases, three individual Meritorious Honor Awards, and four individual Superior Honor Awards.
Now you can TRY to downplay the Benghazi scandal by calling it a "flap" or a witch hunt, Konradv...but the truth of the matter is very senior people in our government decided that rather than be honest with us about what happened in Libya that they would make up a story about what happened. Even though they knew that there was no protest that turned violent on that day they tried to push that narrative. Susan Rice did it. Hilary Clinton did it. Jay Carney did it. Joe Biden did it. Barack Obama did it. They lied.
The "bottom line" is that the terrorists are responsible, not the president or the SoS. What you call a lie could also be called a plausible explanation. This just convinces me more and more that those pushing this story the most don't actually care about the deaths, they're just an excuse to bash Obama. That's a lot more dishonest than any of the stories out of the administration. PATHETIC AND DISGUSTING!!!
The "bottom line" is that the administration lied their ass off knowing full well that they were lying. They continued to lie for what 3 weeks??
The terrorists are responsible for the attack which isn't the bone of contention here. The lying is.
The administrations State Department and the SOS screwed the pooch on Benghazi and four very good men died.
The "bottom line", as you've put it...is that this Administration made a conscious decision to lie to the American people about what happened in Benghazi. The reason that Gregory Hicks was shocked and embarrassed when he heard what Susan Rice was saying on those 5 talk shows that Sunday morning was that he KNEW that the Obama Administration was lying about what took place. This isn't some Republican attack dog...this is a twenty year State Department veteran...the number two diplomat behind Chris Stevens in Libya...a man who in the course of his service, has received six Meritorious Service Increases, three individual Meritorious Honor Awards, and four individual Superior Honor Awards.
Now you can TRY to downplay the Benghazi scandal by calling it a "flap" or a witch hunt, Konradv...but the truth of the matter is very senior people in our government decided that rather than be honest with us about what happened in Libya that they would make up a story about what happened. Even though they knew that there was no protest that turned violent on that day they tried to push that narrative. Susan Rice did it. Hilary Clinton did it. Jay Carney did it. Joe Biden did it. Barack Obama did it. They lied.
The "bottom line" is that the terrorists are responsible, not the president or the SoS. What you call a lie could also be called a plausible explanation. This just convinces me more and more that those pushing this story the most don't actually care about the deaths, they're just an excuse to bash Obama. That's a lot more dishonest than any of the stories out of the administration. PATHETIC AND DISGUSTING!!!
The "bottom line" is that the administration lied their ass off knowing full well that they were lying. They continued to lie for what 3 weeks??
The terrorists are responsible for the attack which isn't the bone of contention here. The lying is.
The administrations State Department and the SOS screwed the pooch on Benghazi and four very good men died.
You left out the obvious answer, scumbag terrorists. This just confirms my suspicion that the deaths are just an excuse for the the Ben Ghazi flap, not the reason. The bottom line is that many haven't come to terms with Obama's re-election and will use the bodies of the dead to flog the president. In the mean time they've completely forgotten about the real perpetrators, just like they forgot about bin Laden. PATHETIC!!!
The "bottom line", as you've put it...is that this Administration made a conscious decision to lie to the American people about what happened in Benghazi. The reason that Gregory Hicks was shocked and embarrassed when he heard what Susan Rice was saying on those 5 talk shows that Sunday morning was that he KNEW that the Obama Administration was lying about what took place. This isn't some Republican attack dog...this is a twenty year State Department veteran...the number two diplomat behind Chris Stevens in Libya...a man who in the course of his service, has received six Meritorious Service Increases, three individual Meritorious Honor Awards, and four individual Superior Honor Awards.
Now you can TRY to downplay the Benghazi scandal by calling it a "flap" or a witch hunt, Konradv...but the truth of the matter is very senior people in our government decided that rather than be honest with us about what happened in Libya that they would make up a story about what happened. Even though they knew that there was no protest that turned violent on that day they tried to push that narrative. Susan Rice did it. Hilary Clinton did it. Jay Carney did it. Joe Biden did it. Barack Obama did it. They lied.
The "bottom line" is that the terrorists are responsible, not the president or the SoS. What you call a lie could also be called a plausible explanation. This just convinces me more and more that those pushing this story the most don't actually care about the deaths, they're just an excuse to bash Obama. That's a lot more dishonest than any of the stories out of the administration. PATHETIC AND DISGUSTING!!!
How come "The guys who attacked it" aren't on the list?
Call me a liberal hippy, but it seems they should at least be entered for consideration as the "Responsible" party...
The "bottom line" is that the terrorists are responsible, not the president or the SoS. What you call a lie could also be called a plausible explanation. This just convinces me more and more that those pushing this story the most don't actually care about the deaths, they're just an excuse to bash Obama. That's a lot more dishonest than any of the stories out of the administration. PATHETIC AND DISGUSTING!!!
The "bottom line" is that the administration lied their ass off knowing full well that they were lying. They continued to lie for what 3 weeks??
The terrorists are responsible for the attack which isn't the bone of contention here. The lying is.
The administrations State Department and the SOS screwed the pooch on Benghazi and four very good men died.
How did supposed lies cause the deaths? Many have died over the years. Why are some making their deaths so much more important than the others? That why I say that the hardcore Obama bashers don't care about the deaths at all. They're just a convenient excuse or we would have heard more about people that died under other presidents. I honor ALL the dead, not just those that the politically-motivated chose to honor.
The "bottom line" is that the terrorists are responsible, not the president or the SoS. What you call a lie could also be called a plausible explanation. This just convinces me more and more that those pushing this story the most don't actually care about the deaths, they're just an excuse to bash Obama. That's a lot more dishonest than any of the stories out of the administration. PATHETIC AND DISGUSTING!!!
The "bottom line" is that the administration lied their ass off knowing full well that they were lying. They continued to lie for what 3 weeks??
The terrorists are responsible for the attack which isn't the bone of contention here. The lying is.
The administrations State Department and the SOS screwed the pooch on Benghazi and four very good men died.
Lying isn't against the law.
I guess we all should accept lying from everybody. From our Banker, from the Police, from our leaders. Everybody just start lying. Who cares anymore. It just doesn't matter.
The internationalists that sided with A.Q. to unjustly intervene in Libya's internal affairs and helped invade a sovereign nation.Who is Responible for the Benghazi debacle
The western war criminals that violated a sovereign nation's territorial integrity.and how should they pay for it
Who is Responible for the Benghazi debacle
Terrorists.
and how should they pay for it
President Obama's drones.
