Who is the "other campaign worker"?

What's the "campaign finance violation"?

It's the one for which David Pecker provided testimony, and to which Michael Cohen pleaded Guilty.
Hate to break it to you but these right wingers wont believe it until they see a tweet from Drumpf in prison complaining about the food.

So, you have no idea either what this imaginary "campaign Finance violation" might be

glad you asked Crus. I have been wondering too
this guy is a supposed lawyer? wayyyyy to funny

jillian, please help
 
STUPID STUPID STUPID. The hush money payments are PERFECTLY LEGAL. Classification of them as "campaign expenditures" is preposterous. Even if the WERE campaign expenditures, the worst possible outcome for The Donald would be that he would have to pay a fine.

The "admissions" of Cohen ARE MADE ENTIRELY AT THE DIRECTION OF THE PROSECUTORS, AND HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY POTENTIAL CRIMINALITY OF THE DONALD.

ARE YOU REALLY THIS STUPID????????
yes he is.
 
It's the one for which David Pecker provided testimony, and to which Michael Cohen pleaded Guilty.
Hate to break it to you but these right wingers wont believe it until they see a tweet from Drumpf in prison complaining about the food.

So, you have no idea either what this imaginary "campaign Finance violation" might be

glad you asked Crus. I have been wondering too
this guy is a supposed lawyer? wayyyyy to funny

jillian, please help

is Jillian a lawyer?
 
What's the "campaign finance violation"?

It's the one for which David Pecker provided testimony, and to which Michael Cohen pleaded Guilty.
Hate to break it to you but these right wingers wont believe it until they see a tweet from Drumpf in prison complaining about the food.

So, you have no idea either what this imaginary "campaign Finance violation" might be
Not my job to know the specifics. I'm good with knowing Cohen plead guilty to several.

The butterfly credo. "THE less I know, the happier I am...."
No. Thats a delegation technique. Let the experts handle the details. I cant run everything.
 
What's the "campaign finance violation"?

It's the one for which David Pecker provided testimony, and to which Michael Cohen pleaded Guilty.
Hate to break it to you but these right wingers wont believe it until they see a tweet from Drumpf in prison complaining about the food.

So, you have no idea either what this imaginary "campaign Finance violation" might be
Not my job to know the specifics. I'm good with knowing Cohen plead guilty to several.

...and you find comfort in that?
I find peace in that. Since I have other things to concentrate on I let the investigators and courts do what I pay them to do. Convict criminals like Drumpf and Cohen.

I get it though. Its human nature to try and rationalize getting tricked by a carnival barker like Drumpf. I'm sure you want to see every detail of the case in the hopes you can say its not so.
 
Last edited:
What's the "campaign finance violation"?

It's the one for which David Pecker provided testimony, and to which Michael Cohen pleaded Guilty.
oh. that one.

well that should stop all confusion now.

I wasn't interested in the people pretending it didn't happen.
or what the actual crime was apparently.

Read all about it, if you want: Transcript of Michael Cohen sentencing

I'm curious as to the other campaign member in the room. He/she likely shares the same exposure as Cohen and Pecker. Pecker was granted immunity; Cohen was sentenced.
 
What's the "campaign finance violation"?

It's the one for which David Pecker provided testimony, and to which Michael Cohen pleaded Guilty.
oh. that one.

well that should stop all confusion now.

I wasn't interested in the people pretending it didn't happen.
or what the actual crime was apparently.

Read all about it, if you want: Transcript of Michael Cohen sentencing

I'm curious as to the other campaign member in the room. He/she likely shares the same exposure as Cohen and Pecker. Pecker was granted immunity; Cohen was sentenced.
reading about it wasn't the issue. so far you've not even said what the law was that was broken or what was actually going on. you did what far too many do these days, repeat a tweet or there about and not even comprehend what it's about. if you don't like someone, don't care. push it forward anyway and tell people to look it up when challenged because you can't talk intelligently about it, directly.
 
It's the one for which David Pecker provided testimony, and to which Michael Cohen pleaded Guilty.
oh. that one.

well that should stop all confusion now.

I wasn't interested in the people pretending it didn't happen.
or what the actual crime was apparently.

Read all about it, if you want: Transcript of Michael Cohen sentencing

I'm curious as to the other campaign member in the room. He/she likely shares the same exposure as Cohen and Pecker. Pecker was granted immunity; Cohen was sentenced.
reading about it wasn't the issue. so far you've not even said what the law was that was broken or what was actually going on. you did what far too many do these days, repeat a tweet or there about and not even comprehend what it's about. if you don't like someone, don't care. push it forward anyway and tell people to look it up when challenged because you can't talk intelligently about it, directly.
Whats there to talk about? He pled guilty to the charges.
 
The $150,000 payment Pecker made to McDougal qualifies as an excessive campaign contribution, and an unlawful corporate contribution. Since Cohen made the transfer of cash between Pecker and McDougal, there are probably more false statements to a financial institution, too. Ones for which Cohen was not convicted.

Stormy is a poor negotiator. The Playboy model got $20,000 more than she did for sleeping with Toad boi.
 
One wonders what other spiked stories Pecker has in his office safe...

Pissing hookers?
 
It's the one for which David Pecker provided testimony, and to which Michael Cohen pleaded Guilty.
oh. that one.

well that should stop all confusion now.

I wasn't interested in the people pretending it didn't happen.
or what the actual crime was apparently.

Read all about it, if you want: Transcript of Michael Cohen sentencing

I'm curious as to the other campaign member in the room. He/she likely shares the same exposure as Cohen and Pecker. Pecker was granted immunity; Cohen was sentenced.
reading about it wasn't the issue. so far you've not even said what the law was that was broken or what was actually going on. you did what far too many do these days, repeat a tweet or there about and not even comprehend what it's about. if you don't like someone, don't care. push it forward anyway and tell people to look it up when challenged because you can't talk intelligently about it, directly.

It is a fact that Cohen pled Guilty and a Judge accepted the plea (citing the Statute, if you doubt it so much). You haven't challenged that.
 
It's the one for which David Pecker provided testimony, and to which Michael Cohen pleaded Guilty.
oh. that one.

well that should stop all confusion now.

I wasn't interested in the people pretending it didn't happen.
or what the actual crime was apparently.

Read all about it, if you want: Transcript of Michael Cohen sentencing

I'm curious as to the other campaign member in the room. He/she likely shares the same exposure as Cohen and Pecker. Pecker was granted immunity; Cohen was sentenced.
reading about it wasn't the issue. so far you've not even said what the law was that was broken or what was actually going on. you did what far too many do these days, repeat a tweet or there about and not even comprehend what it's about. if you don't like someone, don't care. push it forward anyway and tell people to look it up when challenged because you can't talk intelligently about it, directly.


The court record and a tweet are two vastly different things.
 
oh. that one.

well that should stop all confusion now.

I wasn't interested in the people pretending it didn't happen.
or what the actual crime was apparently.

Read all about it, if you want: Transcript of Michael Cohen sentencing

I'm curious as to the other campaign member in the room. He/she likely shares the same exposure as Cohen and Pecker. Pecker was granted immunity; Cohen was sentenced.
reading about it wasn't the issue. so far you've not even said what the law was that was broken or what was actually going on. you did what far too many do these days, repeat a tweet or there about and not even comprehend what it's about. if you don't like someone, don't care. push it forward anyway and tell people to look it up when challenged because you can't talk intelligently about it, directly.

It is a fact that Cohen pled Guilty and a Judge accepted the plea (citing the Statute, if you doubt it so much). You haven't challenged that.
dude, way to skate!!! when did you get the lesson? what's the violation? be specific. you been on here now for quite some time today, yet haven't said a fking thing.
 
What's the "campaign finance violation"?

It's the one for which David Pecker provided testimony, and to which Michael Cohen pleaded Guilty.
Hate to break it to you but these right wingers wont believe it until they see a tweet from Drumpf in prison complaining about the food.

So, you have no idea either what this imaginary "campaign Finance violation" might be

You could simply look at Cohen's court documents and learn all you wish to rather than asking dopey questions.

This reality is a bitch for you. I get it.
I completely understand your reluctance to accept it.
 
I wasn't interested in the people pretending it didn't happen.
or what the actual crime was apparently.

Read all about it, if you want: Transcript of Michael Cohen sentencing

I'm curious as to the other campaign member in the room. He/she likely shares the same exposure as Cohen and Pecker. Pecker was granted immunity; Cohen was sentenced.
reading about it wasn't the issue. so far you've not even said what the law was that was broken or what was actually going on. you did what far too many do these days, repeat a tweet or there about and not even comprehend what it's about. if you don't like someone, don't care. push it forward anyway and tell people to look it up when challenged because you can't talk intelligently about it, directly.

It is a fact that Cohen pled Guilty and a Judge accepted the plea (citing the Statute, if you doubt it so much). You haven't challenged that.
dude, way to skate!!! when did you get the lesson? what's the violation? be specific. you been on here now for quite some time today, yet haven't said a fking thing.

Dude, you fucknuts have been deflecting from the OP from the minute it was posted. Who do you think the other campaign member was?
 
oh. that one.

well that should stop all confusion now.

I wasn't interested in the people pretending it didn't happen.
or what the actual crime was apparently.

Read all about it, if you want: Transcript of Michael Cohen sentencing

I'm curious as to the other campaign member in the room. He/she likely shares the same exposure as Cohen and Pecker. Pecker was granted immunity; Cohen was sentenced.
reading about it wasn't the issue. so far you've not even said what the law was that was broken or what was actually going on. you did what far too many do these days, repeat a tweet or there about and not even comprehend what it's about. if you don't like someone, don't care. push it forward anyway and tell people to look it up when challenged because you can't talk intelligently about it, directly.

It is a fact that Cohen pled Guilty and a Judge accepted the plea (citing the Statute, if you doubt it so much). You haven't challenged that.
and you still have not said what he pled guilty to. :)

like i said, you parakeet but you don't seem to know, understand or choose to try and comprehend the details. just "orange man bad" and mock anyone who disagrees.

fyi - i've not agreed nor disagreed at this point - just finding it funny you can't even talk to the point, just to the talking points.
 

Forum List

Back
Top