Who Needs Planned Parenthood??

I subscribe to the Ten Commandments.....how about you?
Really? How about this one?

"You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 6 but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments."


So glad you provided that....

Perhaps now you will disassemble that creche with Obama at the center.
 
Seems like the liberal crowd is firmly behind Planned Parenthood, private funding should not be a problem. Stop using public funds.
 
1. planned parenthood is not an "abortion mill".
2. even if it was it would be legal.
3. no federal money is going to abortion.

now run along.
Great...

Then since all of those other services are covered by Obozocare, and are readily available from other providers (unless you are ready to admit Obozocare is a failure), the federal government doesn't need to finance PP...

Thanks for playing...

always funny when really, really stupid people who don't even know their own president's name try to play

p.s. there is no insurance plan called "obamacare". there is the Affordable Care Act which allowed millions of people to obtain affordable insurance. there are still many people who aren't insured or who are underinsured.

but it's good to know that you hate women so much that you think that the millions of cancer screenings, etc, that planned parenthood does every year, which forms the vast majority of that planned parenthood does, should be terminated because you "disapprove" of a legal act which isn't funded by your tax dollars.

good thing is no one cares what you approve of.
So you're saying Obozocare isn't working...

Please continue...

no, i'm saying there is no such thing as "obozocare" and that you don't understand the Affordable Care Act.

idiota.



So....how come you haven't provided the percentages of folks who disapprove of it?

It's about the same 60% you quoted earlier.

Sometimes percentages don't count, huh?

So you're willing to accept poll numbers as the arbiters of these issues?

How about the 2 to 1 support for continuing to fund PP? Will you concede to that?

How about the 2 to 1 opposition to repealing Roe v Wade? Will you concede to that?
 
Then why don't you support sending women to prison for having abortions?

Why wouldn't she? She supports sending women to prison for carving up and dismembering Dogs... or shoplifting, or stealing other people's property.

Why would someone not be for sending a woman to prison for murdering her baby that was depending upon her protection as it was developing in her womb?

Well, unfortunately she's Korean, so your butchering of dogs analogy is a bit misguided, BUT, more importantly,

she will not state for the record her view on what the penalty SHOULD be for women having abortions.

Unlike you, crazed as you are, she is dishonest...

...she loves the rhetoric but runs from the reality.

PC is one of an ethnicity that will soon outnumber Hispanics in America and I say:

Hurry up...we need your skills! :woohoo:
 
Flat-out lie...

"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
  • Misquoted by Diane S. Dew (2001)
  • Omits words from a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble Sanger proposing the "Negro Project", where Sanger wrote: "And we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
    Margaret Sanger - Wikiquote
 
She was against abortion.

Why did Martin Luther King say this about her?

"There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist — a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.

Recently the subject of Negro family life has received extensive attention. Unfortunately, studies have overemphasized the problem of the Negro male ego and almost entirely ignored the most serious element — Negro migration. During the past half century Negroes have migrated on a massive scale, transplanting millions from rural communities to crammed urban ghettoes. In their migration, as with all migrants, they carried with them the folkways of the countryside into an inhospitable city slum. The size of family that may have been appropriate and tolerable on a manually cultivated farm was carried over to the jammed streets of the ghetto. In all respects Negroes were atomized, neglected and discriminated against. Yet, the worst omission was the absence of institutions to acclimate them to their new environment. Margaret Sanger, who offered an important institutional remedy, was unfortunately ignored by social and political leaders in this period. In consequence, Negro folkways in family size persisted. The problem was compounded when unrestrained exploitation and discrimination accented the bewilderment of the newcomer, and high rates of illegitimacy and fragile family relationships resulted.

For the Negro, therefore, intelligent guides of family planning are a profoundly important ingredient in his quest for security and a decent life. There are mountainous obstacles still separating Negroes from a normal existence. Yet one element in stabilizing his life would be an understanding of and easy access to the means to develop a family related in size to his community environment and to the income potential he can command."

Margaret Sanger and the African American Community


nice quote, no where does MLK say that he supported black genocide via abortion.

Neither did Sanger.


I have given you her quotes proving otherwise. Here they are again

Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood, In Her Own Words
The very first quote in that link says Sanger called blacks "human weeds".

That's a lie. And you can tell it is a lie by the fact they put those words in total isolation without showing the full context. She makes NO reference to blacks in the statement that comes from.

In short, your source is full of shit.

Ole' Margaret misspelled slaves??

View attachment 51115
Another flat-out lie...

Margaret Sanger - Wikiquote
 
ROFLMNAO!

STOP!

You don't want to MISS THIS:
The would-be "Contributor" comes to belittle the cited creator of the Meme, through the claim that the quote COULD NOT have been a Leftist icon... because

"Slaves is misspelled"... which of course would be a problem centered in IGNORANCE of the Meme's Creator.

The only problem is that the Ignorance is NOT of the Meme's Creator, but of the Contributor...
ROFL... "Slavs" is not misspelled... it is a Reference to Slavic Cultures.

LOL! You cannot BUY that level of Comedy... THAT has to come from the ROOT!


Ole' Margaret misspelled slaves??
5841336146_margaret_sanger_jewslatinos_human_weeds.jpeg
 
Then why don't you support sending women to prison for having abortions?

Why wouldn't she? She supports sending women to prison for carving up and dismembering Dogs... or shoplifting, or stealing other people's property.

Why would someone not be for sending a woman to prison for murdering her baby that was depending upon her protection as it was developing in her womb?

Well, unfortunately she's Korean, so your butchering of dogs analogy is a bit misguided, BUT, more importantly,

she will not state for the record her view on what the penalty SHOULD be for women having abortions.

Unlike you, crazed as you are, she is dishonest...

...she loves the rhetoric but runs from the reality.

PC is one of an ethnicity that will soon outnumber Hispanics in America and I say:

Hurry up...we need your skills! :woohoo:

You think crazy old Korean women are going to outnumber Latinos any time soon?

lol good one.
 
"no. it's part of the woman's body."
No, it isn't.
Since it dies the same time that she does, that matters very little, if at all.


How often is that the case?

And....it matters a great deal, since the death rate for abortion is very near 100%.
It doesn't matter how often. One can survive without the other, and one cannot.

False.


  1. According to studies between 2003 and 2005, 20 to 35 percent of babies born at 23 weeks of gestation survive, while 50 to 70 percent of babies born at 24 to 25 weeks, and more than 90 percent born at 26 to 27weeks, survive. It is rare for a baby weighing less than 500g (17.6 ounces) to survive.
    Fetal viability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Fetal viability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Wikipedia
 
"no. it's part of the woman's body."
No, it isn't.
Since it dies the same time that she does, that matters very little, if at all.


How often is that the case?

And....it matters a great deal, since the death rate for abortion is very near 100%.

Then why don't you support sending women to prison for having abortions?

Here's the plan:

  1. ...the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortion unless the pregnancy arises from incest, rape, or to save the life of the mother.
    Hyde Amendment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaHyde_Amendment
    Wikipedia
 
"no. it's part of the woman's body."
No, it isn't.
Since it dies the same time that she does, that matters very little, if at all.


How often is that the case?

And....it matters a great deal, since the death rate for abortion is very near 100%.
It doesn't matter how often. One can survive without the other, and one cannot.

False.


  1. According to studies between 2003 and 2005, 20 to 35 percent of babies born at 23 weeks of gestation survive, while 50 to 70 percent of babies born at 24 to 25 weeks, and more than 90 percent born at 26 to 27weeks, survive. It is rare for a baby weighing less than 500g (17.6 ounces) to survive.
    Fetal viability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Fetal viability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Wikipedia
And when born that young, we hook them up to an artificial host, because they cannot survive on their own. See how that works?
 
"no. it's part of the woman's body."
No, it isn't.
Since it dies the same time that she does, that matters very little, if at all.


How often is that the case?

And....it matters a great deal, since the death rate for abortion is very near 100%.

Then why don't you support sending women to prison for having abortions?

Here's the plan:

  1. ...the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortion unless the pregnancy arises from incest, rape, or to save the life of the mother.
    Hyde Amendment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaHyde_Amendment
    Wikipedia

And for over 30 years Planned Parenthood has complied with that law and continues to do so. Nothing has changed.
 
"no. it's part of the woman's body."
No, it isn't.
Since it dies the same time that she does, that matters very little, if at all.


How often is that the case?

And....it matters a great deal, since the death rate for abortion is very near 100%.
It doesn't matter how often. One can survive without the other, and one cannot.

False.


  1. According to studies between 2003 and 2005, 20 to 35 percent of babies born at 23 weeks of gestation survive, while 50 to 70 percent of babies born at 24 to 25 weeks, and more than 90 percent born at 26 to 27weeks, survive. It is rare for a baby weighing less than 500g (17.6 ounces) to survive.
    Fetal viability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Fetal viability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Wikipedia

Roe v Wade allows states to ban late term abortion. What's your problem?
 
"no. it's part of the woman's body."
No, it isn't.
Since it dies the same time that she does, that matters very little, if at all.


How often is that the case?

And....it matters a great deal, since the death rate for abortion is very near 100%.
It doesn't matter how often. One can survive without the other, and one cannot.

False.


  1. According to studies between 2003 and 2005, 20 to 35 percent of babies born at 23 weeks of gestation survive, while 50 to 70 percent of babies born at 24 to 25 weeks, and more than 90 percent born at 26 to 27weeks, survive. It is rare for a baby weighing less than 500g (17.6 ounces) to survive.
    Fetal viability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Fetal viability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Wikipedia

Roe v Wade allows states to ban late term abortion. What's your problem?
Not ban, regulate.
 
Then why don't you support sending women to prison for having abortions?

Why wouldn't she? She supports sending women to prison for carving up and dismembering Dogs... or shoplifting, or stealing other people's property.

Why would someone not be for sending a woman to prison for murdering her baby that was depending upon her protection as it was developing in her womb?

Well, unfortunately she's Korean, so your butchering of dogs analogy is a bit misguided, BUT, more importantly,

she will not state for the record her view on what the penalty SHOULD be for women having abortions.

Unlike you, crazed as you are, she is dishonest...

...she loves the rhetoric but runs from the reality.



Again?

Sure:

...the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of certain federal funds to pay for abortion unless the pregnancy arises from incest, rape, or to save the life of the mother.

  1. Hyde Amendment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaHyde_Amendment
    Wikipedia
 

Forum List

Back
Top