Who the hell is Kamala Harris and why the hell is she running for President?

Buying votes!

Sacramento Bee ^

American families making less than $100,000 a year could be eligible for a monthly tax credit of up to $500, or $6,000 a year, under new legislation announced Thursday by Democratic U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris of California.
 
She is someone with qualifications and not a reality tv show host. It makes sense you wouldn't have heard of her.
The woman is only known in liberal Calif and we all know what Calif is all about. Knowing her stand on immigration, this democrat will not give her a vote.

Kamala Harris is NOT eligible to be President. Her father arrived from Jamaica in 1961—mother from India arrived in 1960
Neither parent was a legal resident for 5 years prior to Harris’s birth, a requirement for naturalization
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.
FACT CHECK: Is Kamala Harris Not Eligible to Serve as U.S. President?
 
"Could Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., be generating more early buzz than former President Barack Obama did more than 10 years ago?⠀

If attendance is any indicator, the answer could be yes.⠀

The California senator officially entered the 2020 fray on Sunday with a speech outside Oakland City Hall. Ian Sams, Harris' press secretary, tweeted that more than 20,000 people showed up to see the event.⠀"
 
So gross Horseface had to bang that 60 year old Black dude, Willie Brown, to get a promotion. :p Democrats are scum. What is up with their fucking TEETH? Alex "Sandy" Cortez, Hussaine Obama, when they giggle they got these fucking giant TEETH sticking out. WTF.

rawImage.jpg
Racist pig. Get real.
 
The Democrats must be really desperate to have all these no name people running for President.

And gosh, it's January 2019. The first primary is MORE THAN A YEAR FROM NOW.
Ah yes....another assertive woman....and of color too. Let's trash her!!!!!!

She is doing a really great job of getting trashed by her own fellow Democrats!
 
Kamala Harris is a leftist bureaucrat that slept with Frisco Mayor Willie Brown to launch her political career back in the 90s. She's just another sleazy democrat whore.
Did it ever occur to you that Mayor Brown put her in those positions because he thought she'd be GOOD at them? Kamala Harris is one smart woman. You don't have to agree with her politics to see that she is very intelligent and quick on her feet.
Sure, I thought that Mayor Brown put her in those positions because he thought she'd be GOOD at them, but then I read yesterday that he admitted he put her in those positions after he "DATED" her, so I adjusted my fantasy to reality. Idiot,
So what, he put her in those positions after he "DATED" her. He got to know her so he thought she'd be good at it. You are the one who jumped to fantasy for no reason except that you don't like her politics. Or her color. Or her gender. I don't know which.
Yep, and Harris didn't like Kavanaugh's conservative Constitutional views even though he is more than qualified, so she accused him of sexual harassment without any evidence. You jackals shouldn't dish it out if you can't take it.
 
The Democrats must be really desperate to have all these no name people running for President.

And gosh, it's January 2019. The first primary is MORE THAN A YEAR FROM NOW.
She's a mulatto woman who slept her way to the top...If only she were a rug muncher, another identity politics box could be checked.

A prog dream come true.
Same for the First Lady.


Don't repeat that lie in the United Kingdom. They have serious libel laws, and a leading newspaper had to pony up big time recently for lying about Mrs. Trump.

BTW, the constitution bars Mrs. Trump from succeeding to the Presidency.

I don't think she would want to stay in a backwater hick town like Washington indefinitely anyhow, and like other attractive eastern European broads like Eva Gabor she wants to go back to Manhattan.

Mrs. Trump would be a good fit for the Secretary General job at the UN, which is just a short limo ride from her residency in Midtown.
You crack me up. Kamala Harris is a slut who fucked her way into political prominence, but "Mrs. Trump" who was a mostly-nude model and worked for an outfit that supplied female "escorts" for a large fee (prostitutes) is somehow off the hook? And let's not forget who "Mrs. Trump" fucks in order to be incredibly wealthy and live at the top of a golden tower.

What office is FLOTUS running for?
 
Kamala Harris is a leftist bureaucrat that slept with Frisco Mayor Willie Brown to launch her political career back in the 90s. She's just another sleazy democrat whore.
Did it ever occur to you that Mayor Brown put her in those positions because he thought she'd be GOOD at them? Kamala Harris is one smart woman. You don't have to agree with her politics to see that she is very intelligent and quick on her feet.

Positions? Interesting choice of words!

I think it had more to do with her being on her back or knees instead of her feet, and having a pretty mouth! Her conduct during the Kavanaugh hearings will be campaign ad material until she drops out.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by a Bernie supporter!

67x9b4vp93d21.jpg


The DemonRAT presidential debates will truly be a circus!
 
Please demonize her. Call her a slut. Women will show up for her because you did this shit.

Me too!

You really think that women voters will be jazzed up to vote for a proven home wrecker? Maybe you're right, I'm not a political expert.
I already put the link showing that the Mayor and his wife had long been separated when the affair happened.

so what? having relations with married men to advance your career just shows that she is a Low Life.
Stop. You do not know that she had a relationship with Brown to advance her career.

Well, we only have quotes from Willy Brown saying that is exactly what happened.
 
Besides
Kamala is not eligible to be President.

She is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.!!!!!! Chew on that. For awhile!
Explain.
If her father was still a British royal subject at the time of her birth then she does not qualify.

To think otherwise is to admit that the founding fathers meant to allow the child of king George himself to be president. Which is lunacy.

We still don't know who the Surrender monkeys father was...

ObamaDavisObamaDunham.jpg


Want to see naked pictures of the Obamas mother in Franks apartment in Hawaii?....I am not allowed to post them here but a search will get a few different ones!....Talk about a whore!

side-photos-of-frank-and-obama.jpg

She was born in the US, so she is an anchor baby and a US citizen. Catch a clue!
 
So what, he put her in those positions after he "DATED" her. He got to know her so he thought she'd be good at it. You are the one who jumped to fantasy for no reason except that you don't like her politics. Or her color. Or her gender. I don't know which.

Under Kamala's leadership HUNDREDS of cases were overturned when it was discovered evidence was fabricated to convict the defendants. Do you really want someone like that leading the country? She's Hillary 2.0 another Dem with a track record of corruption and failures.
It might be that she is a slick and corrupt politician--I don't know that, but I highly doubt that you know that either. I'd like a link, please to the hundreds of cases overturned because of fabricated evidence. Please.
 
She is someone with qualifications and not a reality tv show host. It makes sense you wouldn't have heard of her.
The woman is only known in liberal Calif and we all know what Calif is all about. Knowing her stand on immigration, this democrat will not give her a vote.

Kamala Harris is NOT eligible to be President. Her father arrived from Jamaica in 1961—mother from India arrived in 1960
Neither parent was a legal resident for 5 years prior to Harris’s birth, a requirement for naturalization
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.
FACT CHECK: Is Kamala Harris Not Eligible to Serve as U.S. President?

You conveniently ignore the 14th Amendment. Do us all a favor and shut up!

it just shows how ignorance is not only a character trait for liberals.
 
She is someone with qualifications and not a reality tv show host. It makes sense you wouldn't have heard of her.


What are her "qualifications" for high office? At least with Hillary Clinton, she was fucking a US President, the highest ranking man that Harris fucked was the mayor of San Francisco.

Who is going to run next? Obama's gay lover Larry Sinclair? Marla Maples?

Shocking that a Repub sheep would think a woman’s only qualification is who they have had sex with...


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Did you watch the Kavanaugh hearings?

I did. This thread reminds me how alike the wingnuts on both sides are.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
So what, he put her in those positions after he "DATED" her. He got to know her so he thought she'd be good at it. You are the one who jumped to fantasy for no reason except that you don't like her politics. Or her color. Or her gender. I don't know which.

Under Kamala's leadership HUNDREDS of cases were overturned when it was discovered evidence was fabricated to convict the defendants. Do you really want someone like that leading the country? She's Hillary 2.0 another Dem with a track record of corruption and failures.
Sure wouldn't be any worse than what we've got leading the country right now? Are you serious?
But I didn't jump into this thread to talk about that. I'm just p.o.'d that some of you folks are smearing her as a slut for an affair with a separated man thirty years ago. Jesus.

I'm focused on her track record of corruption and failure, cross this candidate off the list.
link
 
What to Expect from a Kamala Harris Presidency.....

Via email~

The SCOTUS has never directly ruled on the meaning of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the constitution with regard to POTUS eligibility. But in SCOTUS cases wherein they have given a definition of what a NBC (or a 14th amendment citizen in the case of Wong Kim Ark)is, Minor vs Haperstatt, Venus Merchantman Case of 1814) they defined an NBC as a person born of TWO, count them TWO citizen parents (the parents don’t have to be NBC) and born in one of the states of the Union, or the territories.

The authors of the 14th amendment, in the Congressional debates on the matter, also defined an NBC in the same manner. Rep. Bimgham and Senator Jacob Howard were the principal authors of the 14th amendment. Here is a quote from Howard which clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment in 1866, which was to define citizenship. He stated: “Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.”

Until this matter is formally adjudicated by the Court, I will defer to their NBC stare decisis definitions. Harris, Obama and a host of others were not, are not, and can NEVER be constitutionally eligible to be POTUS.

Whatever one thinks what the meaning of Article II, Section 1, clause 5 is, it is clear that the adoption of the 14th amendment did not alter it in any constitutional sense. How else can you account for the fact that the constitution only specifies for the office of senator and representative citizenship for a period of 9 and 7 years respectively, while the constitution requires the POTUS, to be NATURALLY born, owing allegiance to no other country? That is the ONLY constitutional provision for NBC. Obviously, there is a singular distinction with regard to that office. Under Jamaican and Indian citizenship law, for instance, It is conceivable that Jamaica or India could claim that Kamala Harris, thru her parents, is a citizen who owes allegiance to both of those countries FROM HER BIRTH. It was conferred upon her by those countries citizenship laws, just as valid as our own.

By the way, Ted Cruz (who I admire very much) made a very public demonstration of the fact that he was going to FORMALLY renounce his CANADIAN citizenship. What NATURALLY BORN US citizen has to do such a thing?

The framers of the constitution were patriarchs. (Yes I understand that is completely out of tune with modern sensibilities, but nonetheless it is true.) They believed that the citizenship of the FATHER was conferred upon his children. SCOUTUS incorporated in toto the ENTIRE 212th paragraph of Emerich De Vattel’s Law of Nations in their 1814 Venus merchantman case as they defined what an NBC is. Here is the money quote that Justice Livingstone that was cited when he wrote for the majority, “The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”

I suspect the reason that many do not want this issue formally examined is that they wish to foster and enhance the globalist influence on the office of POTUS. The NBC requirement was never intended to be a guarantee of allegiance, but a safeguard against undue foreign influence on the office of POTUS, PARTICULARLY from a father owing allegiance to a foreign sovereignty. The oath of naturalization requires a formal and legal renunciation of any prior national allegiances.

Jennie Spencer-Churchill, known as Lady Randolph Churchill, was a natural born US citizen, and a British socialite, the wife of Lord Randolph Churchill and the mother of British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill.

Under US citizenship law at the time of Churchill’s birth, despite the fact that his mother was a NATURAL BORN US citizen, she could not transmit her US citizenship on to young Winston owing to her marriage to a foreign national, Sir Randolph Spencer Churchill, who was Winston’s father. That would not be legally allowed until the passage of the Cable Act of 1922, well after Churchill’s birth in 1874. The Cable Act only confers citizenship, NOT NATURALLY BORN citizenship. It did not refer to, or alter the meaning of an Article II, Sec. 1, clause 5 “natural born citizen” in any way.

Churchill was granted HONORARY US citizenship by an act of Congress on 9 April 1963. It was understood that his birth to a an NBC citizen US mother in Great Britain did not make him a citizen by law.
This is just one more indication of the fact that Obama, Cruz, Rubio OR Harris can NEVER be constitutionally eligible to the office of POTUS. We need to have this issue finally adjudicated by SCOTUS for the first time in US history, and finally get a definitive answer one way or another.
We have enough naturally born anti-american, anti-constitutional cultural marxists in our country now who aspire to be POTUS. I say let’s eliminate all those who don’t even meet the basic Article II criteria. Winnow the opposition.

This matter is SCREAMING for a definitive ruling on the meaning of Article II, Section 1, clause 5, by the SCOTUS for the first time in the history of the US. It is revealing to note what Clarence Thomas told a House subcommittee that when it comes to determining whether a person born outside the 50 states can serve as U.S. president when he said that the high court is “evading” the issue. The comments came as part of Thomas’ testimony before a House appropriations panel discussing an increase in the Supreme Court’s budget in April of 2017. Thomas said that to Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y.

After two Obama terms, I think they are terrified of the implications of a ruling based on originalist constitutional intent and interpretation. That does not excuse the cowardice in refusing a grant of certiorari for those who wish to have SCOTUS exercise it’s Article III oversight on this matter.



If the people vote for this marxist hoe Kamala Harris, they'll deserve the punishment they get regardless of anyone's definition of "naturalized citizen".
 

Forum List

Back
Top