Whole Foods CEO Shreds Socialism...

[danielpalos]

No it does not.

Persons always do a better job providing their own welfare

Yes it does.

And, persons are better off by solving for simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

No it does not

In any state they are better off without government welfare

Is that why welfare was created to begin with? You make no sense in our first world economy.

I make perfectly good sense being first world does not create a requirement for welfare.No it

It was created to secure long term votes for democrats

Maybe in right wing fantasy. Corporate welfare is alive and well too. Right wingers only complain more about the Poor.

Yes corporate welfare is alive and well and should be abolished.

The existence of corporate welfare does not support your argument

Yes, it does. It was invented after "capitalism died in 1929".

No it does not and capitalism never died

Free market capitalism doesn't exist since the fall of Mogadishu. Anarcho-Capitalism works even less than socialism.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Socialism is what achieved full employment and won WWII.

It never achieved full employment

It did not win. Wwii

yes, it did. you have no "gospel Truth" only fallacy.

No it did not that is fact, it is you stating fallacy

Tell, which fallacy and explain how I resorted to it. Stating with you state is just gossip, hearsay, and soothsay without any valid argument that rebutts my argument.

You stated fallacy that government is socialism.

It is not

That fact rebuts and destroys your retarded and false proclamation

You have no facts. Government is socialism since it cannot be free market capitalism.

I am statign facts which you lack the intellect to challenge and I am proving you wrong and ignorant with those facts

Which facts? I could claim the facts are right wingers have nothing but fallacy. Prove me wrong.

You make mamh claims which are ignorant lies and I have proven you wrong.

You merely appeal to ignorance of economics. The public sector is socialism and gets it authority from the People. Capitalism deals in capital and profits not powers.

I state facts of economics you only make up fallacy's about econnomics.

The public secotr is not socialism and it not the means of production.

Private enterprise gets no such authority from the people,

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it does not.

Persons always do a better job providing their own welfare

Yes it does.

And, persons are better off by solving for simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

No it does not

In any state they are better off without government welfare

Is that why welfare was created to begin with? You make no sense in our first world economy.

I make perfectly good sense being first world does not create a requirement for welfare.No it

It was created to secure long term votes for democrats

Maybe in right wing fantasy. Corporate welfare is alive and well too. Right wingers only complain more about the Poor.

Yes corporate welfare is alive and well and should be abolished.

The existence of corporate welfare does not support your argument

Yes, it does. It was invented after "capitalism died in 1929".

No it does not and capitalism never died

Free market capitalism doesn't exist since the fall of Mogadishu. Anarcho-Capitalism works even less than socialism.

Capitalism still exists and is alive and well

 

[danielpalos]

Democrats are the party of Social Security.

Republicans think Social Security is Soviet Socialism.

Social Security is a scam----------like playing musical chairs, one day it will just dry up thanks to the socialist mismanaging all the money that they steal from those actually work and are forced to pay in.

Don't just whine about it, right winger; come up with a fine capital solution that outperforms what we have right now, on an Institutional basis.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Democrats are the party of Social Security.

Republicans think Social Security is Soviet Socialism.

Social Security is a scam----------like playing musical chairs, one day it will just dry up thanks to the socialist mismanaging all the money that they steal from those actually work and are forced to pay in.

Don't just whine about it, right winger; come up with a fine capital solution that outperforms what we have right now, on an Institutional basis.

Private investments work better

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism is what achieved full employment and won WWII.

It never achieved full employment

It did not win. Wwii

yes, it did. you have no "gospel Truth" only fallacy.

No it did not that is fact, it is you stating fallacy

Tell, which fallacy and explain how I resorted to it. Stating with you state is just gossip, hearsay, and soothsay without any valid argument that rebutts my argument.

You stated fallacy that government is socialism.

It is not

That fact rebuts and destroys your retarded and false proclamation

You have no facts. Government is socialism since it cannot be free market capitalism.

Government is not socialism no one ever said it was free market capitalism and it is not a strictly either / or choice

Yes, it is. The public sector must be socialism since it is not private sector free market capitalism.

Why do you believe Government is not socialism?

The private sector and the public sector is not the same. Socialismn is govermment ownership of the means of production. It is not all government,

Government of, by, and for, the People. The People own Government as that form of public sector means of production. The power of eminent domain proves it.

Ingtrudocution only and not law.

The power of eminent domain does not prove it

The private secotr and public secotr are not the same

Socialism is not government it is only one form of government

Capitalism is about capital and profit not any form of powers. The power of eminent domain is a power made available by socialism not capitalism.

 

[danielpalos]

Democrats are the party of Social Security.

Republicans think Social Security is Soviet Socialism.

Social Security is a scam----------like playing musical chairs, one day it will just dry up thanks to the socialist mismanaging all the money that they steal from those actually work and are forced to pay in.

Don't just whine about it, right winger; come up with a fine capital solution that outperforms what we have right now, on an Institutional basis.

Private investments work better

It has to work better than what we have now.

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism is what achieved full employment and won WWII.

It never achieved full employment

It did not win. Wwii

yes, it did. you have no "gospel Truth" only fallacy.

No it did not that is fact, it is you stating fallacy

Tell, which fallacy and explain how I resorted to it. Stating with you state is just gossip, hearsay, and soothsay without any valid argument that rebutts my argument.

You stated fallacy that government is socialism.

It is not

That fact rebuts and destroys your retarded and false proclamation

You have no facts. Government is socialism since it cannot be free market capitalism.

I am statign facts which you lack the intellect to challenge and I am proving you wrong and ignorant with those facts

Which facts? I could claim the facts are right wingers have nothing but fallacy. Prove me wrong.

You make mamh claims which are ignorant lies and I have proven you wrong.

You merely appeal to ignorance of economics. The public sector is socialism and gets it authority from the People. Capitalism deals in capital and profits not powers.

I state facts of economics you only make up fallacy's about econnomics.

The public secotr is not socialism and it not the means of production.

Private enterprise gets no such authority from the people,

You are not being very serious. The public sector is not capitalism so it must be socialism in our mixed-market economy.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Socialism is what achieved full employment and won WWII.

It never achieved full employment

It did not win. Wwii

yes, it did. you have no "gospel Truth" only fallacy.

No it did not that is fact, it is you stating fallacy

Tell, which fallacy and explain how I resorted to it. Stating with you state is just gossip, hearsay, and soothsay without any valid argument that rebutts my argument.

You stated fallacy that government is socialism.

It is not

That fact rebuts and destroys your retarded and false proclamation

You have no facts. Government is socialism since it cannot be free market capitalism.

I am statign facts which you lack the intellect to challenge and I am proving you wrong and ignorant with those facts

Which facts? I could claim the facts are right wingers have nothing but fallacy. Prove me wrong.

You make mamh claims which are ignorant lies and I have proven you wrong.

You merely appeal to ignorance of economics. The public sector is socialism and gets it authority from the People. Capitalism deals in capital and profits not powers.

I state facts of economics you only make up fallacy's about econnomics.

The public secotr is not socialism and it not the means of production.

Private enterprise gets no such authority from the people,

You are not being very serious. The public sector is not capitalism so it must be socialism in our mixed-market economy.

I am quite serious and destroying your argument

The private secotr is capitalist. The public secotr is merely government which taxes the private sector but does not own it.

Socialism is only one form of govermmnent which never works it is not all government

 

[danielpalos]

No it does not.

Persons always do a better job providing their own welfare

Yes it does.

And, persons are better off by solving for simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

No it does not

In any state they are better off without government welfare

Is that why welfare was created to begin with? You make no sense in our first world economy.

I make perfectly good sense being first world does not create a requirement for welfare.No it

It was created to secure long term votes for democrats

Maybe in right wing fantasy. Corporate welfare is alive and well too. Right wingers only complain more about the Poor.

Yes corporate welfare is alive and well and should be abolished.

The existence of corporate welfare does not support your argument

Yes, it does. It was invented after "capitalism died in 1929".

No it does not and capitalism never died

Free market capitalism doesn't exist since the fall of Mogadishu. Anarcho-Capitalism works even less than socialism.

Capitalism still exists and is alive and well

Capitalism, well regulated is alive and works well when planned that way.

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism is what achieved full employment and won WWII.

It never achieved full employment

It did not win. Wwii

yes, it did. you have no "gospel Truth" only fallacy.

No it did not that is fact, it is you stating fallacy

Tell, which fallacy and explain how I resorted to it. Stating with you state is just gossip, hearsay, and soothsay without any valid argument that rebutts my argument.

You stated fallacy that government is socialism.

It is not

That fact rebuts and destroys your retarded and false proclamation

You have no facts. Government is socialism since it cannot be free market capitalism.

I am statign facts which you lack the intellect to challenge and I am proving you wrong and ignorant with those facts

Which facts? I could claim the facts are right wingers have nothing but fallacy. Prove me wrong.

You make mamh claims which are ignorant lies and I have proven you wrong.

You merely appeal to ignorance of economics. The public sector is socialism and gets it authority from the People. Capitalism deals in capital and profits not powers.

I state facts of economics you only make up fallacy's about econnomics.

The public secotr is not socialism and it not the means of production.

Private enterprise gets no such authority from the people,

You are not being very serious. The public sector is not capitalism so it must be socialism in our mixed-market economy.

I am quite serious and destroying your argument

The private secotr is capitalist. The public secotr is merely government which taxes the private sector but does not own it.

Socialism is only one form of govermmnent which never works it is not all government

You are missing the point. Government is socialism. It cannot be nothing but merely exist. Economics must account for it. And the easiest way is to describe it as a form of socialism external to private sector capitalism.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it does not.

Persons always do a better job providing their own welfare

Yes it does.

And, persons are better off by solving for simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

No it does not

In any state they are better off without government welfare

Is that why welfare was created to begin with? You make no sense in our first world economy.

I make perfectly good sense being first world does not create a requirement for welfare.No it

It was created to secure long term votes for democrats

Maybe in right wing fantasy. Corporate welfare is alive and well too. Right wingers only complain more about the Poor.

Yes corporate welfare is alive and well and should be abolished.

The existence of corporate welfare does not support your argument

Yes, it does. It was invented after "capitalism died in 1929".

No it does not and capitalism never died

Free market capitalism doesn't exist since the fall of Mogadishu. Anarcho-Capitalism works even less than socialism.

Capitalism still exists and is alive and well

Capitalism, well regulated is alive and works well when planned that way.

Capitalism unregulated works better. Central plannning always fails

 

[Soupnazi630]

Socialism is what achieved full employment and won WWII.

It never achieved full employment

It did not win. Wwii

yes, it did. you have no "gospel Truth" only fallacy.

No it did not that is fact, it is you stating fallacy

Tell, which fallacy and explain how I resorted to it. Stating with you state is just gossip, hearsay, and soothsay without any valid argument that rebutts my argument.

You stated fallacy that government is socialism.

It is not

That fact rebuts and destroys your retarded and false proclamation

You have no facts. Government is socialism since it cannot be free market capitalism.

I am statign facts which you lack the intellect to challenge and I am proving you wrong and ignorant with those facts

Which facts? I could claim the facts are right wingers have nothing but fallacy. Prove me wrong.

You make mamh claims which are ignorant lies and I have proven you wrong.

You merely appeal to ignorance of economics. The public sector is socialism and gets it authority from the People. Capitalism deals in capital and profits not powers.

I state facts of economics you only make up fallacy's about econnomics.

The public secotr is not socialism and it not the means of production.

Private enterprise gets no such authority from the people,

You are not being very serious. The public sector is not capitalism so it must be socialism in our mixed-market economy.

I am quite serious and destroying your argument

The private secotr is capitalist. The public secotr is merely government which taxes the private sector but does not own it.

Socialism is only one form of govermmnent which never works it is not all government

You are missing the point. Government is socialism. It cannot be nothing but merely exist. Economics must account for it. And the easiest way is to describe it as a form of socialism external to private sector capitalism.

I am spot on and destroying the point

Socialism is one form of government which always fails. It is not simply government

The worst and most iignorant way to describe government is socialism

 

[danielpalos]

No it does not.

Persons always do a better job providing their own welfare

Yes it does.

And, persons are better off by solving for simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

No it does not

In any state they are better off without government welfare

Is that why welfare was created to begin with? You make no sense in our first world economy.

I make perfectly good sense being first world does not create a requirement for welfare.No it

It was created to secure long term votes for democrats

Maybe in right wing fantasy. Corporate welfare is alive and well too. Right wingers only complain more about the Poor.

Yes corporate welfare is alive and well and should be abolished.

The existence of corporate welfare does not support your argument

Yes, it does. It was invented after "capitalism died in 1929".

No it does not and capitalism never died

Free market capitalism doesn't exist since the fall of Mogadishu. Anarcho-Capitalism works even less than socialism.

Capitalism still exists and is alive and well

Capitalism, well regulated is alive and works well when planned that way.

Capitalism unregulated works better. Central plannning always fails

Where has anarcho-capitalism ever worked for more than a relatively short while? Even Cuba is still around.

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism is what achieved full employment and won WWII.

It never achieved full employment

It did not win. Wwii

yes, it did. you have no "gospel Truth" only fallacy.

No it did not that is fact, it is you stating fallacy

Tell, which fallacy and explain how I resorted to it. Stating with you state is just gossip, hearsay, and soothsay without any valid argument that rebutts my argument.

You stated fallacy that government is socialism.

It is not

That fact rebuts and destroys your retarded and false proclamation

You have no facts. Government is socialism since it cannot be free market capitalism.

I am statign facts which you lack the intellect to challenge and I am proving you wrong and ignorant with those facts

Which facts? I could claim the facts are right wingers have nothing but fallacy. Prove me wrong.

You make mamh claims which are ignorant lies and I have proven you wrong.

You merely appeal to ignorance of economics. The public sector is socialism and gets it authority from the People. Capitalism deals in capital and profits not powers.

I state facts of economics you only make up fallacy's about econnomics.

The public secotr is not socialism and it not the means of production.

Private enterprise gets no such authority from the people,

You are not being very serious. The public sector is not capitalism so it must be socialism in our mixed-market economy.

I am quite serious and destroying your argument

The private secotr is capitalist. The public secotr is merely government which taxes the private sector but does not own it.

Socialism is only one form of govermmnent which never works it is not all government

You are missing the point. Government is socialism. It cannot be nothing but merely exist. Economics must account for it. And the easiest way is to describe it as a form of socialism external to private sector capitalism.

I am spot on and destroying the point

Socialism is one form of government which always fails. It is not simply government

The worst and most iignorant way to describe government is socialism

Yes, socialism is Government, the form of governance is different with each Constitution. Our Constitutions enumerate the extent of socialism to use for the furtherance of Governance.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it does not.

Persons always do a better job providing their own welfare

Yes it does.

And, persons are better off by solving for simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

No it does not

In any state they are better off without government welfare

Is that why welfare was created to begin with? You make no sense in our first world economy.

I make perfectly good sense being first world does not create a requirement for welfare.No it

It was created to secure long term votes for democrats

Maybe in right wing fantasy. Corporate welfare is alive and well too. Right wingers only complain more about the Poor.

Yes corporate welfare is alive and well and should be abolished.

The existence of corporate welfare does not support your argument

Yes, it does. It was invented after "capitalism died in 1929".

No it does not and capitalism never died

Free market capitalism doesn't exist since the fall of Mogadishu. Anarcho-Capitalism works even less than socialism.

Capitalism still exists and is alive and well

Capitalism, well regulated is alive and works well when planned that way.

Capitalism unregulated works better. Central plannning always fails

Where has anarcho-capitalism ever worked for more than a relatively short while? Even Cuba is still around.

I never said anything about anarcho capitalism.
Cuba is communist

 

[Soupnazi630]

Socialism is what achieved full employment and won WWII.

It never achieved full employment

It did not win. Wwii

yes, it did. you have no "gospel Truth" only fallacy.

No it did not that is fact, it is you stating fallacy

Tell, which fallacy and explain how I resorted to it. Stating with you state is just gossip, hearsay, and soothsay without any valid argument that rebutts my argument.

You stated fallacy that government is socialism.

It is not

That fact rebuts and destroys your retarded and false proclamation

You have no facts. Government is socialism since it cannot be free market capitalism.

I am statign facts which you lack the intellect to challenge and I am proving you wrong and ignorant with those facts

Which facts? I could claim the facts are right wingers have nothing but fallacy. Prove me wrong.

You make mamh claims which are ignorant lies and I have proven you wrong.

You merely appeal to ignorance of economics. The public sector is socialism and gets it authority from the People. Capitalism deals in capital and profits not powers.

I state facts of economics you only make up fallacy's about econnomics.

The public secotr is not socialism and it not the means of production.

Private enterprise gets no such authority from the people,

You are not being very serious. The public sector is not capitalism so it must be socialism in our mixed-market economy.

I am quite serious and destroying your argument

The private secotr is capitalist. The public secotr is merely government which taxes the private sector but does not own it.

Socialism is only one form of govermmnent which never works it is not all government

You are missing the point. Government is socialism. It cannot be nothing but merely exist. Economics must account for it. And the easiest way is to describe it as a form of socialism external to private sector capitalism.

I am spot on and destroying the point

Socialism is one form of government which always fails. It is not simply government

The worst and most iignorant way to describe government is socialism

Yes, socialism is Government, the form of governance is different with each Constitution. Our Constitutions enumerate the extent of socialism to use for the furtherance of Governance.

No, socialism is not government it is only one form of government which always fails.

Our constitution enumerates no form of socialism

 

[danielpalos]

No it does not.

Persons always do a better job providing their own welfare

Yes it does.

And, persons are better off by solving for simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

No it does not

In any state they are better off without government welfare

Is that why welfare was created to begin with? You make no sense in our first world economy.

I make perfectly good sense being first world does not create a requirement for welfare.No it

It was created to secure long term votes for democrats

Maybe in right wing fantasy. Corporate welfare is alive and well too. Right wingers only complain more about the Poor.

Yes corporate welfare is alive and well and should be abolished.

The existence of corporate welfare does not support your argument

Yes, it does. It was invented after "capitalism died in 1929".

No it does not and capitalism never died

Free market capitalism doesn't exist since the fall of Mogadishu. Anarcho-Capitalism works even less than socialism.

Capitalism still exists and is alive and well

Capitalism, well regulated is alive and works well when planned that way.

Capitalism unregulated works better. Central plannning always fails

Where has anarcho-capitalism ever worked for more than a relatively short while? Even Cuba is still around.

I never said anything about anarcho capitalism.
Cuba is communist

anarcho-capitalism is true free market capitalism.

Congress has the power to command fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy pursuant to Congressional policy decisions.

To Regulate Commerce is an express social power not free market capitalism.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it does not.

Persons always do a better job providing their own welfare

Yes it does.

And, persons are better off by solving for simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

No it does not

In any state they are better off without government welfare

Is that why welfare was created to begin with? You make no sense in our first world economy.

I make perfectly good sense being first world does not create a requirement for welfare.No it

It was created to secure long term votes for democrats

Maybe in right wing fantasy. Corporate welfare is alive and well too. Right wingers only complain more about the Poor.

Yes corporate welfare is alive and well and should be abolished.

The existence of corporate welfare does not support your argument

Yes, it does. It was invented after "capitalism died in 1929".

No it does not and capitalism never died

Free market capitalism doesn't exist since the fall of Mogadishu. Anarcho-Capitalism works even less than socialism.

Capitalism still exists and is alive and well

Capitalism, well regulated is alive and works well when planned that way.

Capitalism unregulated works better. Central plannning always fails

Where has anarcho-capitalism ever worked for more than a relatively short while? Even Cuba is still around.

I never said anything about anarcho capitalism.
Cuba is communist

anarcho-capitalism is true free market capitalism.

Congress has the power to command fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy pursuant to Congressional policy decisions.

To Regulate Commerce is an express social power not free market capitalism.

No it is not. Anarcho capitalism is a step further than fre market capitalism which involves no government at all

To regulate commerce is a government power not a social power

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism is what achieved full employment and won WWII.

It never achieved full employment

It did not win. Wwii

yes, it did. you have no "gospel Truth" only fallacy.

No it did not that is fact, it is you stating fallacy

Tell, which fallacy and explain how I resorted to it. Stating with you state is just gossip, hearsay, and soothsay without any valid argument that rebutts my argument.

You stated fallacy that government is socialism.

It is not

That fact rebuts and destroys your retarded and false proclamation

You have no facts. Government is socialism since it cannot be free market capitalism.

I am statign facts which you lack the intellect to challenge and I am proving you wrong and ignorant with those facts

Which facts? I could claim the facts are right wingers have nothing but fallacy. Prove me wrong.

You make mamh claims which are ignorant lies and I have proven you wrong.

You merely appeal to ignorance of economics. The public sector is socialism and gets it authority from the People. Capitalism deals in capital and profits not powers.

I state facts of economics you only make up fallacy's about econnomics.

The public secotr is not socialism and it not the means of production.

Private enterprise gets no such authority from the people,

You are not being very serious. The public sector is not capitalism so it must be socialism in our mixed-market economy.

I am quite serious and destroying your argument

The private secotr is capitalist. The public secotr is merely government which taxes the private sector but does not own it.

Socialism is only one form of govermmnent which never works it is not all government

You are missing the point. Government is socialism. It cannot be nothing but merely exist. Economics must account for it. And the easiest way is to describe it as a form of socialism external to private sector capitalism.

I am spot on and destroying the point

Socialism is one form of government which always fails. It is not simply government

The worst and most iignorant way to describe government is socialism

Yes, socialism is Government, the form of governance is different with each Constitution. Our Constitutions enumerate the extent of socialism to use for the furtherance of Governance.

No, socialism is not government it is only one form of government which always fails.

Our constitution enumerates no form of socialism

The US under the Articles already failed and we have our more central form of Government as a result.