Whole Foods CEO Shreds Socialism...

[Soupnazi630]

...and sends a dire warning to America.

Wait...what? I always thought Whole Foods was where commie Democrats liked to shop?

"Whole Foods CEO John Mackey, who is not one to hold his tongue, recently let the world know what he thinks about the rising popularity of socialism. While speaking at an American Enterprise Institute event, Mackey declared, “They talk about trickle-down wealth, but socialism is trickle-up poverty. It just impoverishes everything”

He added, “Socialism has been tried 42 times in the last hundred years and 42 failures. It doesn’t work.”

Whole Foods CEO Shreds Socialism, Sends Dire Warning to America

Whole Foods is a publicly traded company. A publicly traded company that has all sorts of government Socialism propping up their stock prices so John Mackey can go screw himself.

Whole Foods is being run by the government? I did not know that!

It's being underwritten by the government.

So is Whole Foods being run by the government? Do they control Whole Foods and do they make all of Whole Food’s decisions? If not, then it isn’t socialism.

They could via the defense production act. Our use of socialism is limited by our Constitution.

Socialism is a form of government not government and certainly not a social act.

Society cannot act society is strictly a vague concept

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it does not.

Persons always do a better job providing their own welfare

Yes it does.

And, persons are better off by solving for simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

No it does not

In any state they are better off without government welfare

Is that why welfare was created to begin with? You make no sense in our first world economy.

I make perfectly good sense being first world does not create a requirement for welfare.No it

It was created to secure long term votes for democrats

Maybe in right wing fantasy. Corporate welfare is alive and well too. Right wingers only complain more about the Poor.

Yes corporate welfare is alive and well and should be abolished.

The existence of corporate welfare does not support your argument

Yes, it does. It was invented after "capitalism died in 1929".

No it does not and capitalism never died

Free market capitalism doesn't exist since the fall of Mogadishu. Anarcho-Capitalism works even less than socialism.

Capitalism still exists and is alive and well

Capitalism, well regulated is alive and works well when planned that way.

Capitalism unregulated works better. Central plannning always fails

Where has anarcho-capitalism ever worked for more than a relatively short while? Even Cuba is still around.

I never said anything about anarcho capitalism.
Cuba is communist

anarcho-capitalism is true free market capitalism.

Congress has the power to command fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy pursuant to Congressional policy decisions.

To Regulate Commerce is an express social power not free market capitalism.

No it is not. Anarcho capitalism is a step further than fre market capitalism which involves no government at all

To regulate commerce is a government power not a social power

True Capitalism is about free market activity not Government or a non-private sector.

No it is not. It is the private sector and protected by government.

We are quibbling about true capitalism since you want to quibble about socialism.

True capitalism includes no Government. A public sector is an externality to free market capitalism.

I am not quibbling

True capitalism includes government

No, it doesn't. Anarcho-Capitalism is the truest form of Capitalism. A mixed-market economy is an externality to true capitalism.

Anarcho capitaliskmm is only one proposed form of capitalism it is not the truest form

A mixed market economy does not exist

Anarcho-capitalism is true free market capitalism and is supposed to be so efficient no Government is necessary.

Anarcho capitalism is only one extreme form of proppsed capitalism. Capitalism is not the opposite of government nor excludes the need for government

Any externality to capitalism is a form of socialism in our mixed-market economy.

No it is not government is not socialism

 

[dblack]

No it does not.

Persons always do a better job providing their own welfare

Yes it does.

And, persons are better off by solving for simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

No it does not

In any state they are better off without government welfare

Is that why welfare was created to begin with? You make no sense in our first world economy.

I make perfectly good sense being first world does not create a requirement for welfare.No it

It was created to secure long term votes for democrats

Maybe in right wing fantasy. Corporate welfare is alive and well too. Right wingers only complain more about the Poor.

Yes corporate welfare is alive and well and should be abolished.

The existence of corporate welfare does not support your argument

Yes, it does. It was invented after "capitalism died in 1929".

No it does not and capitalism never died

Free market capitalism doesn't exist since the fall of Mogadishu. Anarcho-Capitalism works even less than socialism.

Capitalism still exists and is alive and well

Capitalism, well regulated is alive and works well when planned that way.

Capitalism unregulated works better. Central plannning always fails

Where has anarcho-capitalism ever worked for more than a relatively short while? Even Cuba is still around.

I never said anything about anarcho capitalism.
Cuba is communist

anarcho-capitalism is true free market capitalism.

Congress has the power to command fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy pursuant to Congressional policy decisions.

To Regulate Commerce is an express social power not free market capitalism.

No it is not. Anarcho capitalism is a step further than fre market capitalism which involves no government at all

To regulate commerce is a government power not a social power

True Capitalism is about free market activity not Government or a non-private sector.

No it is not. It is the private sector and protected by government.

We are quibbling about true capitalism since you want to quibble about socialism.

True capitalism includes no Government. A public sector is an externality to free market capitalism.

I am not quibbling

True capitalism includes government

No, it doesn't. Anarcho-Capitalism is the truest form of Capitalism. A mixed-market economy is an externality to true capitalism.

Anarcho capitaliskmm is only one proposed form of capitalism it is not the truest form

A mixed market economy does not exist

Anarcho-capitalism is true free market capitalism and is supposed to be so efficient no Government is necessary.

Anarcho capitalism is only one extreme form of proppsed capitalism. Capitalism is not the opposite of government nor excludes the need for government

Any externality to capitalism is a form of socialism in our mixed-market economy.

No it is not government is not socialism

Please don't take daniel seriously. It's best to think of him as a bot that generates nonsense posts in response to certain keywords (particularly "socialism" and "minimum wage").

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it does not.

Persons always do a better job providing their own welfare

Yes it does.

And, persons are better off by solving for simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

No it does not

In any state they are better off without government welfare

Is that why welfare was created to begin with? You make no sense in our first world economy.

I make perfectly good sense being first world does not create a requirement for welfare.No it

It was created to secure long term votes for democrats

Maybe in right wing fantasy. Corporate welfare is alive and well too. Right wingers only complain more about the Poor.

Yes corporate welfare is alive and well and should be abolished.

The existence of corporate welfare does not support your argument

Yes, it does. It was invented after "capitalism died in 1929".

No it does not and capitalism never died

Free market capitalism doesn't exist since the fall of Mogadishu. Anarcho-Capitalism works even less than socialism.

Capitalism still exists and is alive and well

Capitalism, well regulated is alive and works well when planned that way.

Capitalism unregulated works better. Central plannning always fails

Where has anarcho-capitalism ever worked for more than a relatively short while? Even Cuba is still around.

I never said anything about anarcho capitalism.
Cuba is communist

anarcho-capitalism is true free market capitalism.

Congress has the power to command fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy pursuant to Congressional policy decisions.

To Regulate Commerce is an express social power not free market capitalism.

No it is not. Anarcho capitalism is a step further than fre market capitalism which involves no government at all

To regulate commerce is a government power not a social power

True Capitalism is about free market activity not Government or a non-private sector.

No it is not. It is the private sector and protected by government.

We are quibbling about true capitalism since you want to quibble about socialism.

True capitalism includes no Government. A public sector is an externality to free market capitalism.

I am not quibbling

True capitalism includes government

No, it doesn't. Anarcho-Capitalism is the truest form of Capitalism. A mixed-market economy is an externality to true capitalism.

Anarcho capitaliskmm is only one proposed form of capitalism it is not the truest form

A mixed market economy does not exist

Anarcho-capitalism is true free market capitalism and is supposed to be so efficient no Government is necessary.

Anarcho capitalism is only one extreme form of proppsed capitalism. Capitalism is not the opposite of government nor excludes the need for government

Any externality to capitalism is a form of socialism in our mixed-market economy.

No it is not government is not socialism

Please don't take daniel seriously. It's best to think of him as a bot that generates nonsense posts whenever certain keywords (particularly "socialism" and "minimum wage") are posted.

I never take him seriously.

No one does.

 

[danielpalos]

...and sends a dire warning to America.

Wait...what? I always thought Whole Foods was where commie Democrats liked to shop?

"Whole Foods CEO John Mackey, who is not one to hold his tongue, recently let the world know what he thinks about the rising popularity of socialism. While speaking at an American Enterprise Institute event, Mackey declared, “They talk about trickle-down wealth, but socialism is trickle-up poverty. It just impoverishes everything”

He added, “Socialism has been tried 42 times in the last hundred years and 42 failures. It doesn’t work.”

Whole Foods CEO Shreds Socialism, Sends Dire Warning to America

Whole Foods is a publicly traded company. A publicly traded company that has all sorts of government Socialism propping up their stock prices so John Mackey can go screw himself.

Whole Foods is being run by the government? I did not know that!

It's being underwritten by the government.

So is Whole Foods being run by the government? Do they control Whole Foods and do they make all of Whole Food’s decisions? If not, then it isn’t socialism.

They could via the defense production act. Our use of socialism is limited by our Constitution.

Socialism is a form of government not government and certainly not a social act.

Society cannot act society is strictly a vague concept

How did you reach your conclusion? Society is about social order and in our case our form of Government.

 

[danielpalos]

No it is not government is not socialism

Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

 

[Soupnazi630]

...and sends a dire warning to America.

Wait...what? I always thought Whole Foods was where commie Democrats liked to shop?

"Whole Foods CEO John Mackey, who is not one to hold his tongue, recently let the world know what he thinks about the rising popularity of socialism. While speaking at an American Enterprise Institute event, Mackey declared, “They talk about trickle-down wealth, but socialism is trickle-up poverty. It just impoverishes everything”

He added, “Socialism has been tried 42 times in the last hundred years and 42 failures. It doesn’t work.”

Whole Foods CEO Shreds Socialism, Sends Dire Warning to America

Whole Foods is a publicly traded company. A publicly traded company that has all sorts of government Socialism propping up their stock prices so John Mackey can go screw himself.

Whole Foods is being run by the government? I did not know that!

It's being underwritten by the government.

So is Whole Foods being run by the government? Do they control Whole Foods and do they make all of Whole Food’s decisions? If not, then it isn’t socialism.

They could via the defense production act. Our use of socialism is limited by our Constitution.

Socialism is a form of government not government and certainly not a social act.

Society cannot act society is strictly a vague concept

How did you reach your conclusion? Society is about social order and in our case our form of Government.

No it is not society is simply a vague idea describing a large group of people with something in common

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it is not government is not socialism

Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

I do not need to account for capitalism as a form of government. It is not an either or choice between the two. socialism is only one form of government.

 

[danielpalos]

...and sends a dire warning to America.

Wait...what? I always thought Whole Foods was where commie Democrats liked to shop?

"Whole Foods CEO John Mackey, who is not one to hold his tongue, recently let the world know what he thinks about the rising popularity of socialism. While speaking at an American Enterprise Institute event, Mackey declared, “They talk about trickle-down wealth, but socialism is trickle-up poverty. It just impoverishes everything”

He added, “Socialism has been tried 42 times in the last hundred years and 42 failures. It doesn’t work.”

Whole Foods CEO Shreds Socialism, Sends Dire Warning to America

Whole Foods is a publicly traded company. A publicly traded company that has all sorts of government Socialism propping up their stock prices so John Mackey can go screw himself.

Whole Foods is being run by the government? I did not know that!

It's being underwritten by the government.

So is Whole Foods being run by the government? Do they control Whole Foods and do they make all of Whole Food’s decisions? If not, then it isn’t socialism.

They could via the defense production act. Our use of socialism is limited by our Constitution.

Socialism is a form of government not government and certainly not a social act.

Society cannot act society is strictly a vague concept

How did you reach your conclusion? Society is about social order and in our case our form of Government.

No it is not society is simply a vague idea describing a large group of people with something in common

Government is social-ism. It really is that simple.

 

[danielpalos]

No it is not government is not socialism

Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

I do not need to account for capitalism as a form of government. It is not an either or choice between the two. socialism is only one form of government.

Socialism can't be only one form of Government since we have a Constitution which limits our use of socialism for Government.

 

[Soupnazi630]

...and sends a dire warning to America.

Wait...what? I always thought Whole Foods was where commie Democrats liked to shop?

"Whole Foods CEO John Mackey, who is not one to hold his tongue, recently let the world know what he thinks about the rising popularity of socialism. While speaking at an American Enterprise Institute event, Mackey declared, “They talk about trickle-down wealth, but socialism is trickle-up poverty. It just impoverishes everything”

He added, “Socialism has been tried 42 times in the last hundred years and 42 failures. It doesn’t work.”

Whole Foods CEO Shreds Socialism, Sends Dire Warning to America

Whole Foods is a publicly traded company. A publicly traded company that has all sorts of government Socialism propping up their stock prices so John Mackey can go screw himself.

Whole Foods is being run by the government? I did not know that!

It's being underwritten by the government.

So is Whole Foods being run by the government? Do they control Whole Foods and do they make all of Whole Food’s decisions? If not, then it isn’t socialism.

They could via the defense production act. Our use of socialism is limited by our Constitution.

Socialism is a form of government not government and certainly not a social act.

Society cannot act society is strictly a vague concept

How did you reach your conclusion? Society is about social order and in our case our form of Government.

No it is not society is simply a vague idea describing a large group of people with something in common
Socialism is only one form of government it is not government

You are wrong and ignorant and it is THAT simple

 

[Papageorgio]

No it is not government is not socialism

Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

So there is only socialism and capitalism and nothing else?

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it is not government is not socialism

Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

I do not need to account for capitalism as a form of government. It is not an either or choice between the two. socialism is only one form of government.

Socialism can't be only one form of Government since we have a Constitution which limits our use of socialism for Government.

Socialism is only one form of government. The constitution makes no mention of socialism.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it is not government is not socialism

Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

I do not need to account for capitalism as a form of government. It is not an either or choice between the two. socialism is only one form of government.

Socialism can't be only one form of Government since we have a Constitution which limits our use of socialism for Government.

Socialism IS one form of government it is not simply government and the constitution makes no mention of socialism

 

[danielpalos]

No it is not government is not socialism

Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

So there is only socialism and capitalism and nothing else?

Can you come up with something else? We have quantum supremacy now. You are welcome to come up with new solutions.

 

[danielpalos]

No it is not government is not socialism

Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

I do not need to account for capitalism as a form of government. It is not an either or choice between the two. socialism is only one form of government.

Socialism can't be only one form of Government since we have a Constitution which limits our use of socialism for Government.

Socialism is only one form of government. The constitution makes no mention of socialism.

Our Constitution defines our use of socialism to Govern.

 

[Papageorgio]

No it is not government is not socialism

Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

So there is only socialism and capitalism and nothing else?

Can you come up with something else? We have quantum supremacy now. You are welcome to come up with new solutions.

I asked you a question and you disagree? Can you answer the question? It’s a simple yes or no.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it is not government is not socialism

Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

So there is only socialism and capitalism and nothing else?

Can you come up with something else? We have quantum supremacy now. You are welcome to come up with new solutions.

You do not comprehend what quantum means.

Ity means beyond microscopically small. As in the smallest amount of any physical entity involved in an interaction

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it is not government is not socialism

Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

I do not need to account for capitalism as a form of government. It is not an either or choice between the two. socialism is only one form of government.

Socialism can't be only one form of Government since we have a Constitution which limits our use of socialism for Government.

Socialism is only one form of government. The constitution makes no mention of socialism.

Our Constitution defines our use of socialism to Govern.

Our constition does not mention or define any form of socialism. Only socialist governments use socialism to govern

 

[danielpalos]

No it is not government is not socialism

Yes, it is and must be socialism. The proof is, you cannot account for it as a form of capitalism.

So there is only socialism and capitalism and nothing else?

Can you come up with something else? We have quantum supremacy now. You are welcome to come up with new solutions.

I asked you a question and you disagree? Can you answer the question? It’s a simple yes or no.

In our mixed market economy there is only socialism and capitalism. The public sector is socialism and the private sector is capitalism.