Why are republicans so stupid when it comes to Food Stamps?

Sure wish Ronnie/Dubya didn't try just half of Keynes, you know when they both blew up spending AS they gutted revenues :(

You are so IGNORANT!!!
EXPLAIN Where the $5.2 Trillion Surplus WAS????
EXPLAIN how YOU or your idiots would have responded to the $8T dot.com bust that started under Clinton? Or the Recession that started? Or 9/11 due to the
Gorelick Memo from Clinton trying to hide Chinese payoff, or Try to explain how YOU would have handled the worst Hurricane SEASONs in history?
And yet.. after the 2003 tax cuts LOOK at the receipts- deficits down!
2004 INCREASE in receipts - deficits down!
2005, increase receipts - deficits down!
,2006 increase receipts - deficits down
,2007 increase receipts - NOTE DEFICIT DOWN..

NOTHING in American history equaled the chaos, the economic losses, the people losses that occurred in these 8 years... and idiots like you blame Bush??

View attachment 129870


Yes, we agree, 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies SUCKED Cupcake :(

But instead of being fiscally responsible Dubya GUTTED revenues 25% WHILE blowing up spending 20% with 2 UNFUNDED Tax cuts, 2 UNFUNDED wars, UNFUNDED Medicare expansion and cheering on the Bankster subprime bubble cupcake

OCTOBER 17, 2008

...Notice that in both 2001 and 2002, the US economy continued to grow on an annual basis (the "technical" recession was just a few quarters). Their work suggests that this growth was entirely due to MEWs. In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.



The Economic Blue Screen of Death



ObamasNumbers-2016-Q31.png

ce32e914f763779d163513b730a044bf--2012-election-common-sense.jpg

AND absolutely NO national cataclysmic EVENTS like THESE!
Of course the Idiot Obama made the worst GDP growth in modern history with NOTHING to hold him back except his stupid comments.

View attachment 129892

And so Obama HAD NO problems to face, economy on rebound and what kind of stupid comments did HE MAKE that discouraged businesses?

- Obama wanted to bankrupt 1,400 companies, that pay $100 billion a year in taxes and unemployed
450,000 people that work for these companies! (Obama told us he favored a "single payer health system"... so what happens to the above?)
- " if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.”
(Pretty easy way of increasing unemployment.)
- "I prefer higher gas prices". (And Obama signed 40% fewer Federal oil lease exploration then Bush).
- Trump will never tell a foreign country such as "Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be
their best customer"!
- "Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." (That certainly puts a dent in the pocketbook..._

Obama WANTED unemployment! He wanted businesses to fail!


Sure Cupcake, sure. 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies (that Cheeto wants to put on steroids) and ALL you Klowns have are excuses why they failed and left US in the biggest hole since the first GOP great depression :(

And why Obama dug it twice as deep.

SURE CUPCAKE :)


ObamasNumbers-2016-Q31.png
 
Hey fruitcake......that's a load of crap.

Sorry Cupcake what you are doing is called an ad hominem :(

Yes, Fruitcake....in response to your propaganda.

Sure Cupcake when you can't refute it call it propaganda :(


Spending.jpg

Cdbsh-1UEAAaKwD.jpg

Yes, and both lost democratic houses to the GOP in their first midterms....in historic spankings.

In both cases the houses stayed (or remain) GOP for a long time.

Keep it up fruitcake.....my side hurts from laughing at you.


Republicans Make Big Advances Thanks to Citizens United


The increase in corporate money in elections has favored one party over the other.

Republicans Make Big Advances Thanks to Citizens United


The researchers found the ruling, in Citizens United v. FEC, was associated with a six percentage-point increase in the likelihood that a Republican candidate would win a state legislative race.

And in six of the most affected states — Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, Ohio and Tennessee — the probability that a Republican would be elected to a state legislative seat increased by 10 percentage points or more.

In five other states — Colorado, Iowa, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming — Republican candidates were seven percentage points more likely to win.

WAPO

Study: Citizens United elected more Republicans


GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority


“The rationale was straightforward,” reads the memo. “Controlling the redistricting process in these states would have the greatest impact on determining how both state legislative and congressional district boundaries would be drawn. Drawing new district lines in states with the most redistricting activity presented the opportunity to solidify conservative policymaking at the state level and maintain a Republican stronghold in the U.S. House of Representatives for the next decade.”

GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority


Democrats won popular vote in the Senate, too

Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans
We're the popular party: Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans


It's official: Clinton swamps Trump in popular vote
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/

I hope this makes you feel better.

But somehow, I don't think the recordbooks are going to rewrite themselves.

Clinton and Obama both got spanked and spanked bad in their first mid-terms.

As to being the popular party....this isn't about being popular...it's about winning.

Suck on it, fruitcake.
 
Yes, it was dropping, who said it would continue WITHOUT the LBJ works cupcake?

What proof do you have it wouldn't fruitcake? Seems to me we were on the right track long before he did anything.


YOU made the posit it was going down REGARDLESS cupcake, seems YOU should be able to back it up?

5. Did it reduce poverty, actually?

It did. A recent study from economists at Columbia broke down changes in poverty before and after the government gets involved in the form of taxes and transfers, and found that, when you take government intervention into account, poverty is down considerably from 1967 to 2012, from 26 percent to 16 percent:


WAPO

Everything you need to know about the war on poverty


Indeed, Demos estimates that 40 million Americans were kept out of poverty due to food stamps, the Earned Income Tax Credit, Medicaid, and other programs in 2010.

WAPO

Poverty in the 50 years since ‘The Other America,’ in five charts

An east coast college study.

Now that's funny.

The War on Poverty: 50 years of failure

Do these living conditions mean the War on Poverty was a success? Not really. When President Johnson launched the War on Poverty, he wanted to give the poor a "hand up, not a hand out." He stated that his war would shrink welfare rolls and turn the poor from "taxeaters" into "taxpayers." Johnson's aim was to make poor families self-sufficient - able to rise above poverty through their own earnings without dependence on welfare.

The exact opposite happened. For a decade and a half before the War on Poverty began, self-sufficiency in American improved dramatically. But for the last 45 years, there has been no improvement at all. Many groups are less capable of self-support today than when Johnson's war started.

The culprit is, in part, the welfare system itself, which discourages work and penalizes marriage. When the War on Poverty began, 7 percent of American children were born outside marriage. Today the number is 41 percent. The collapse of marriage is the main cause of child poverty today.

Black female head of households number is 68 percent
The truth is that black female-headed households were just 18 percent of households in 1950, as opposed to about 68 percent today.
In fact, from 1890 to 1940, the black marriage rate was slightly higher than that of whites.
Even during slavery, when marriage was forbidden for blacks, most black children lived in biological two-parent families.
In New York City, in 1925, 85 percent of black households were two-parent households.
A study of 1880 family structure in Philadelphia shows that three-quarters of black families were two-parent households."
Black female head of households number is 68 percent
By Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. (Oh by the way in the famous words of Obama..."And did I mention he's black?")

You'll notice this one didn't get addressed except to put out a red herring to detract from a very inconvenient truth (for the left).


Why is that cupcake? Oh right without righties giving US FALSE PREMISES, distortions and lies what would they EVER have? :)
 
You are so IGNORANT!!!
EXPLAIN Where the $5.2 Trillion Surplus WAS????
EXPLAIN how YOU or your idiots would have responded to the $8T dot.com bust that started under Clinton? Or the Recession that started? Or 9/11 due to the
Gorelick Memo from Clinton trying to hide Chinese payoff, or Try to explain how YOU would have handled the worst Hurricane SEASONs in history?
And yet.. after the 2003 tax cuts LOOK at the receipts- deficits down!
2004 INCREASE in receipts - deficits down!
2005, increase receipts - deficits down!
,2006 increase receipts - deficits down
,2007 increase receipts - NOTE DEFICIT DOWN..

NOTHING in American history equaled the chaos, the economic losses, the people losses that occurred in these 8 years... and idiots like you blame Bush??

View attachment 129870


Yes, we agree, 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies SUCKED Cupcake :(

But instead of being fiscally responsible Dubya GUTTED revenues 25% WHILE blowing up spending 20% with 2 UNFUNDED Tax cuts, 2 UNFUNDED wars, UNFUNDED Medicare expansion and cheering on the Bankster subprime bubble cupcake

OCTOBER 17, 2008

...Notice that in both 2001 and 2002, the US economy continued to grow on an annual basis (the "technical" recession was just a few quarters). Their work suggests that this growth was entirely due to MEWs. In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.



The Economic Blue Screen of Death



ObamasNumbers-2016-Q31.png

ce32e914f763779d163513b730a044bf--2012-election-common-sense.jpg

AND absolutely NO national cataclysmic EVENTS like THESE!
Of course the Idiot Obama made the worst GDP growth in modern history with NOTHING to hold him back except his stupid comments.

View attachment 129892

And so Obama HAD NO problems to face, economy on rebound and what kind of stupid comments did HE MAKE that discouraged businesses?

- Obama wanted to bankrupt 1,400 companies, that pay $100 billion a year in taxes and unemployed
450,000 people that work for these companies! (Obama told us he favored a "single payer health system"... so what happens to the above?)
- " if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.”
(Pretty easy way of increasing unemployment.)
- "I prefer higher gas prices". (And Obama signed 40% fewer Federal oil lease exploration then Bush).
- Trump will never tell a foreign country such as "Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be
their best customer"!
- "Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." (That certainly puts a dent in the pocketbook..._

Obama WANTED unemployment! He wanted businesses to fail!


Sure Cupcake, sure. 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies (that Cheeto wants to put on steroids) and ALL you Klowns have are excuses why they failed and left US in the biggest hole since the first GOP great depression :(

And why Obama dug it twice as deep.

SURE CUPCAKE :)


ObamasNumbers-2016-Q31.png

Funny....your chart has nothing about the debt.

Here you go.....

imrs.php


And that was just for half his term.
 
Sorry Cupcake what you are doing is called an ad hominem :(

Yes, Fruitcake....in response to your propaganda.

Sure Cupcake when you can't refute it call it propaganda :(


Spending.jpg

Cdbsh-1UEAAaKwD.jpg

Yes, and both lost democratic houses to the GOP in their first midterms....in historic spankings.

In both cases the houses stayed (or remain) GOP for a long time.

Keep it up fruitcake.....my side hurts from laughing at you.


Republicans Make Big Advances Thanks to Citizens United


The increase in corporate money in elections has favored one party over the other.

Republicans Make Big Advances Thanks to Citizens United


The researchers found the ruling, in Citizens United v. FEC, was associated with a six percentage-point increase in the likelihood that a Republican candidate would win a state legislative race.

And in six of the most affected states — Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, Ohio and Tennessee — the probability that a Republican would be elected to a state legislative seat increased by 10 percentage points or more.

In five other states — Colorado, Iowa, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming — Republican candidates were seven percentage points more likely to win.

WAPO

Study: Citizens United elected more Republicans


GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority


“The rationale was straightforward,” reads the memo. “Controlling the redistricting process in these states would have the greatest impact on determining how both state legislative and congressional district boundaries would be drawn. Drawing new district lines in states with the most redistricting activity presented the opportunity to solidify conservative policymaking at the state level and maintain a Republican stronghold in the U.S. House of Representatives for the next decade.”

GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority


Democrats won popular vote in the Senate, too

Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans
We're the popular party: Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans


It's official: Clinton swamps Trump in popular vote
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/

I hope this makes you feel better.

But somehow, I don't think the recordbooks are going to rewrite themselves.

Clinton and Obama both got spanked and spanked bad in their first mid-terms.

As to being the popular party....this isn't about being popular...it's about winning.

Suck on it, fruitcake.

If by being spanked bad means the US voters are easily duped after the Dems bring fiscal sanity into the picture, true :)

Cdbsh-1UEAAaKwD.jpg
 
What proof do you have it wouldn't fruitcake? Seems to me we were on the right track long before he did anything.


YOU made the posit it was going down REGARDLESS cupcake, seems YOU should be able to back it up?

5. Did it reduce poverty, actually?

It did. A recent study from economists at Columbia broke down changes in poverty before and after the government gets involved in the form of taxes and transfers, and found that, when you take government intervention into account, poverty is down considerably from 1967 to 2012, from 26 percent to 16 percent:


WAPO

Everything you need to know about the war on poverty


Indeed, Demos estimates that 40 million Americans were kept out of poverty due to food stamps, the Earned Income Tax Credit, Medicaid, and other programs in 2010.

WAPO

Poverty in the 50 years since ‘The Other America,’ in five charts

An east coast college study.

Now that's funny.

The War on Poverty: 50 years of failure

Do these living conditions mean the War on Poverty was a success? Not really. When President Johnson launched the War on Poverty, he wanted to give the poor a "hand up, not a hand out." He stated that his war would shrink welfare rolls and turn the poor from "taxeaters" into "taxpayers." Johnson's aim was to make poor families self-sufficient - able to rise above poverty through their own earnings without dependence on welfare.

The exact opposite happened. For a decade and a half before the War on Poverty began, self-sufficiency in American improved dramatically. But for the last 45 years, there has been no improvement at all. Many groups are less capable of self-support today than when Johnson's war started.

The culprit is, in part, the welfare system itself, which discourages work and penalizes marriage. When the War on Poverty began, 7 percent of American children were born outside marriage. Today the number is 41 percent. The collapse of marriage is the main cause of child poverty today.

Black female head of households number is 68 percent
The truth is that black female-headed households were just 18 percent of households in 1950, as opposed to about 68 percent today.
In fact, from 1890 to 1940, the black marriage rate was slightly higher than that of whites.
Even during slavery, when marriage was forbidden for blacks, most black children lived in biological two-parent families.
In New York City, in 1925, 85 percent of black households were two-parent households.
A study of 1880 family structure in Philadelphia shows that three-quarters of black families were two-parent households."
Black female head of households number is 68 percent
By Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. (Oh by the way in the famous words of Obama..."And did I mention he's black?")

You'll notice this one didn't get addressed except to put out a red herring to detract from a very inconvenient truth (for the left).


Why is that cupcake? Oh right without righties giving US FALSE PREMISES, distortions and lies what would they EVER have? :)

Hey fruitcake....

Might want to work on those elections.

You guys seems to suck.
 
Yes, we agree, 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies SUCKED Cupcake :(

But instead of being fiscally responsible Dubya GUTTED revenues 25% WHILE blowing up spending 20% with 2 UNFUNDED Tax cuts, 2 UNFUNDED wars, UNFUNDED Medicare expansion and cheering on the Bankster subprime bubble cupcake

OCTOBER 17, 2008

...Notice that in both 2001 and 2002, the US economy continued to grow on an annual basis (the "technical" recession was just a few quarters). Their work suggests that this growth was entirely due to MEWs. In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.



The Economic Blue Screen of Death



ObamasNumbers-2016-Q31.png

ce32e914f763779d163513b730a044bf--2012-election-common-sense.jpg

AND absolutely NO national cataclysmic EVENTS like THESE!
Of course the Idiot Obama made the worst GDP growth in modern history with NOTHING to hold him back except his stupid comments.

View attachment 129892

And so Obama HAD NO problems to face, economy on rebound and what kind of stupid comments did HE MAKE that discouraged businesses?

- Obama wanted to bankrupt 1,400 companies, that pay $100 billion a year in taxes and unemployed
450,000 people that work for these companies! (Obama told us he favored a "single payer health system"... so what happens to the above?)
- " if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.”
(Pretty easy way of increasing unemployment.)
- "I prefer higher gas prices". (And Obama signed 40% fewer Federal oil lease exploration then Bush).
- Trump will never tell a foreign country such as "Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be
their best customer"!
- "Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." (That certainly puts a dent in the pocketbook..._

Obama WANTED unemployment! He wanted businesses to fail!


Sure Cupcake, sure. 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies (that Cheeto wants to put on steroids) and ALL you Klowns have are excuses why they failed and left US in the biggest hole since the first GOP great depression :(

And why Obama dug it twice as deep.

SURE CUPCAKE :)


ObamasNumbers-2016-Q31.png

Funny....your chart has nothing about the debt.

Here you go.....

imrs.php


And that was just for half his term.

YEP, 8 YEARS OF DUBYA/GOP "JOB CREATOR" POLICIES CUPCAKE :)



CBPPpublicdebt.jpg
 
Yes, Fruitcake....in response to your propaganda.

Sure Cupcake when you can't refute it call it propaganda :(


Spending.jpg

Cdbsh-1UEAAaKwD.jpg

Yes, and both lost democratic houses to the GOP in their first midterms....in historic spankings.

In both cases the houses stayed (or remain) GOP for a long time.

Keep it up fruitcake.....my side hurts from laughing at you.


Republicans Make Big Advances Thanks to Citizens United


The increase in corporate money in elections has favored one party over the other.

Republicans Make Big Advances Thanks to Citizens United


The researchers found the ruling, in Citizens United v. FEC, was associated with a six percentage-point increase in the likelihood that a Republican candidate would win a state legislative race.

And in six of the most affected states — Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, Ohio and Tennessee — the probability that a Republican would be elected to a state legislative seat increased by 10 percentage points or more.

In five other states — Colorado, Iowa, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming — Republican candidates were seven percentage points more likely to win.

WAPO

Study: Citizens United elected more Republicans


GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority


“The rationale was straightforward,” reads the memo. “Controlling the redistricting process in these states would have the greatest impact on determining how both state legislative and congressional district boundaries would be drawn. Drawing new district lines in states with the most redistricting activity presented the opportunity to solidify conservative policymaking at the state level and maintain a Republican stronghold in the U.S. House of Representatives for the next decade.”

GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority


Democrats won popular vote in the Senate, too

Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans
We're the popular party: Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans


It's official: Clinton swamps Trump in popular vote
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/

I hope this makes you feel better.

But somehow, I don't think the recordbooks are going to rewrite themselves.

Clinton and Obama both got spanked and spanked bad in their first mid-terms.

As to being the popular party....this isn't about being popular...it's about winning.

Suck on it, fruitcake.

If by being spanked bad means the US voters are easily duped after the Dems bring fiscal sanity into the picture, true :)

Cdbsh-1UEAAaKwD.jpg

Sure...fruitcake....does not fit your narrative....blame it on the voters.

But those are the same stupid voters that put these two in office.

Must suck to live in an alternate reality.
 
AND absolutely NO national cataclysmic EVENTS like THESE!
Of course the Idiot Obama made the worst GDP growth in modern history with NOTHING to hold him back except his stupid comments.

View attachment 129892

And so Obama HAD NO problems to face, economy on rebound and what kind of stupid comments did HE MAKE that discouraged businesses?

- Obama wanted to bankrupt 1,400 companies, that pay $100 billion a year in taxes and unemployed
450,000 people that work for these companies! (Obama told us he favored a "single payer health system"... so what happens to the above?)
- " if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can – it’s just that it will bankrupt them.”
(Pretty easy way of increasing unemployment.)
- "I prefer higher gas prices". (And Obama signed 40% fewer Federal oil lease exploration then Bush).
- Trump will never tell a foreign country such as "Brazil to develop oil and that the USA will be
their best customer"!
- "Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." (That certainly puts a dent in the pocketbook..._

Obama WANTED unemployment! He wanted businesses to fail!


Sure Cupcake, sure. 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies (that Cheeto wants to put on steroids) and ALL you Klowns have are excuses why they failed and left US in the biggest hole since the first GOP great depression :(

And why Obama dug it twice as deep.

SURE CUPCAKE :)


ObamasNumbers-2016-Q31.png

Funny....your chart has nothing about the debt.

Here you go.....

imrs.php


And that was just for half his term.

YEP, 8 YEARS OF DUBYA/GOP "JOB CREATOR" POLICIES CUPCAKE :)



CBPPpublicdebt.jpg

And Pelosi, Reid, and Obama just kept on spending.

Thanks for sharing.
 
Sure Cupcake when you can't refute it call it propaganda :(


Spending.jpg

Cdbsh-1UEAAaKwD.jpg

Yes, and both lost democratic houses to the GOP in their first midterms....in historic spankings.

In both cases the houses stayed (or remain) GOP for a long time.

Keep it up fruitcake.....my side hurts from laughing at you.


Republicans Make Big Advances Thanks to Citizens United


The increase in corporate money in elections has favored one party over the other.

Republicans Make Big Advances Thanks to Citizens United


The researchers found the ruling, in Citizens United v. FEC, was associated with a six percentage-point increase in the likelihood that a Republican candidate would win a state legislative race.

And in six of the most affected states — Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, Ohio and Tennessee — the probability that a Republican would be elected to a state legislative seat increased by 10 percentage points or more.

In five other states — Colorado, Iowa, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming — Republican candidates were seven percentage points more likely to win.

WAPO

Study: Citizens United elected more Republicans


GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority


“The rationale was straightforward,” reads the memo. “Controlling the redistricting process in these states would have the greatest impact on determining how both state legislative and congressional district boundaries would be drawn. Drawing new district lines in states with the most redistricting activity presented the opportunity to solidify conservative policymaking at the state level and maintain a Republican stronghold in the U.S. House of Representatives for the next decade.”

GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority


Democrats won popular vote in the Senate, too

Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans
We're the popular party: Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans


It's official: Clinton swamps Trump in popular vote
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/

I hope this makes you feel better.

But somehow, I don't think the recordbooks are going to rewrite themselves.

Clinton and Obama both got spanked and spanked bad in their first mid-terms.

As to being the popular party....this isn't about being popular...it's about winning.

Suck on it, fruitcake.

If by being spanked bad means the US voters are easily duped after the Dems bring fiscal sanity into the picture, true :)

Cdbsh-1UEAAaKwD.jpg

Sure...fruitcake....does not fit your narrative....blame it on the voters.

But those are the same stupid voters that put these two in office.

Must suck to live in an alternate reality.

Sorry Cupcake you don't understand what midterms are vs Prez elections :(
 
Sure Cupcake, sure. 8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies (that Cheeto wants to put on steroids) and ALL you Klowns have are excuses why they failed and left US in the biggest hole since the first GOP great depression :(

And why Obama dug it twice as deep.

SURE CUPCAKE :)


ObamasNumbers-2016-Q31.png

Funny....your chart has nothing about the debt.

Here you go.....

imrs.php


And that was just for half his term.

YEP, 8 YEARS OF DUBYA/GOP "JOB CREATOR" POLICIES CUPCAKE :)



CBPPpublicdebt.jpg

And Pelosi, Reid, and Obama just kept on spending.

Thanks for sharing.


Care to give those laws they passed that created the debt like Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies 2001-2009 did cupcake? You know TWO UNFUNDED tax cuts, TWO UNFUNDED WARS, UNFUNDED MEDICARE expansion that CBO said cost as much as Obamacares does 2013-2020, but Obamnacares was 100+ funded!

Unfortunately cupcake, policy and consequences (like Dubya cheering on the Banksters subprime bubble) don't end the day the next guy enters office :)
 
You advocating slavery then cupcake?

Slavery? Like involuntary servitude?

"BAKE THE CAKE CHRISTIAN SCUM"

Like that, Brown Shirt?

Equating laws against bigotry with slavery. My don't we love to play victim. They were being paid and paid well to bake that cake.

If you want the privilege of operating a business serving the public, you don't get to say that you won't serve law abiding customers because you don't like their kind.
 
Yes, it was dropping, who said it would continue WITHOUT the LBJ works cupcake?

What proof do you have it wouldn't fruitcake? Seems to me we were on the right track long before he did anything.


YOU made the posit it was going down REGARDLESS cupcake, seems YOU should be able to back it up?

5. Did it reduce poverty, actually?

It did. A recent study from economists at Columbia broke down changes in poverty before and after the government gets involved in the form of taxes and transfers, and found that, when you take government intervention into account, poverty is down considerably from 1967 to 2012, from 26 percent to 16 percent:


WAPO

Everything you need to know about the war on poverty


Indeed, Demos estimates that 40 million Americans were kept out of poverty due to food stamps, the Earned Income Tax Credit, Medicaid, and other programs in 2010.

WAPO

Poverty in the 50 years since ‘The Other America,’ in five charts

An east coast college study.

Now that's funny.

The War on Poverty: 50 years of failure

Do these living conditions mean the War on Poverty was a success? Not really. When President Johnson launched the War on Poverty, he wanted to give the poor a "hand up, not a hand out." He stated that his war would shrink welfare rolls and turn the poor from "taxeaters" into "taxpayers." Johnson's aim was to make poor families self-sufficient - able to rise above poverty through their own earnings without dependence on welfare.

The exact opposite happened. For a decade and a half before the War on Poverty began, self-sufficiency in American improved dramatically. But for the last 45 years, there has been no improvement at all. Many groups are less capable of self-support today than when Johnson's war started.

The culprit is, in part, the welfare system itself, which discourages work and penalizes marriage. When the War on Poverty began, 7 percent of American children were born outside marriage. Today the number is 41 percent. The collapse of marriage is the main cause of child poverty today.

Black female head of households number is 68 percent
The truth is that black female-headed households were just 18 percent of households in 1950, as opposed to about 68 percent today.
In fact, from 1890 to 1940, the black marriage rate was slightly higher than that of whites.
Even during slavery, when marriage was forbidden for blacks, most black children lived in biological two-parent families.
In New York City, in 1925, 85 percent of black households were two-parent households.
A study of 1880 family structure in Philadelphia shows that three-quarters of black families were two-parent households."
Black female head of households number is 68 percent
By Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. (Oh by the way in the famous words of Obama..."And did I mention he's black?")

I usually leave out the part about Dr. Williams' race. Sometimes I can get a wild-eyed Progressive to start screaming RACISM! They're so cute when they do that.
 
Yes, and both lost democratic houses to the GOP in their first midterms....in historic spankings.

In both cases the houses stayed (or remain) GOP for a long time.

Keep it up fruitcake.....my side hurts from laughing at you.


Republicans Make Big Advances Thanks to Citizens United


The increase in corporate money in elections has favored one party over the other.

Republicans Make Big Advances Thanks to Citizens United


The researchers found the ruling, in Citizens United v. FEC, was associated with a six percentage-point increase in the likelihood that a Republican candidate would win a state legislative race.

And in six of the most affected states — Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, Ohio and Tennessee — the probability that a Republican would be elected to a state legislative seat increased by 10 percentage points or more.

In five other states — Colorado, Iowa, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming — Republican candidates were seven percentage points more likely to win.

WAPO

Study: Citizens United elected more Republicans


GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority


“The rationale was straightforward,” reads the memo. “Controlling the redistricting process in these states would have the greatest impact on determining how both state legislative and congressional district boundaries would be drawn. Drawing new district lines in states with the most redistricting activity presented the opportunity to solidify conservative policymaking at the state level and maintain a Republican stronghold in the U.S. House of Representatives for the next decade.”

GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority


Democrats won popular vote in the Senate, too

Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans
We're the popular party: Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans


It's official: Clinton swamps Trump in popular vote
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/

I hope this makes you feel better.

But somehow, I don't think the recordbooks are going to rewrite themselves.

Clinton and Obama both got spanked and spanked bad in their first mid-terms.

As to being the popular party....this isn't about being popular...it's about winning.

Suck on it, fruitcake.

If by being spanked bad means the US voters are easily duped after the Dems bring fiscal sanity into the picture, true :)

Cdbsh-1UEAAaKwD.jpg

Sure...fruitcake....does not fit your narrative....blame it on the voters.

But those are the same stupid voters that put these two in office.

Must suck to live in an alternate reality.

Sorry Cupcake you don't understand what midterms are vs Prez elections :(

I know that following the election of both these guys....the GOP bullrushed the midterms. Then debt went down.

Sorry, fruitcake...thems the facts.
 
And why Obama dug it twice as deep.

SURE CUPCAKE :)


ObamasNumbers-2016-Q31.png

Funny....your chart has nothing about the debt.

Here you go.....

imrs.php


And that was just for half his term.

YEP, 8 YEARS OF DUBYA/GOP "JOB CREATOR" POLICIES CUPCAKE :)



CBPPpublicdebt.jpg

And Pelosi, Reid, and Obama just kept on spending.

Thanks for sharing.


Care to give those laws they passed that created the debt like Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies 2001-2009 did cupcake? You know TWO UNFUNDED tax cuts, TWO UNFUNDED WARS, UNFUNDED MEDICARE expansion that CBO said cost as much as Obamacares does 2013-2020, but Obamnacares was 100+ funded!

Unfortunately cupcake, policy and consequences (like Dubya cheering on the Banksters subprime bubble) don't end the day the next guy enters office :)

Tough shit fruitcake.

You want to hand him all the credit for what goes on while he's in office.

He gets ALL the credit.

Suck on it.
 
Food stamp use increased 70% during the Obama years. Is that good news or bad news to the left?

Because we had a horrible depression brought about after 8 years of GW.

We DID?

Oh, you're a fascist, ergo a total fucking liar.. :thup:
Links, or should we take the word of a, "dopeless wonder"?

President Bush: Bush policies created "Depression Greater than the Great Depression"


You fascists are such fucking liars.

LMGTFY

KOS? You go for the most vile hate site in existence? :eek:
Why does the right complain about education?


Lying is not "education." Spicolli.

You lied, directly. Then you point to one of the most disreputable hate sites in existence as support for your blatant lie.

Why do you fascists hate integrity?
 
We DID?

Oh, you're a fascist, ergo a total fucking liar.. :thup:
Links, or should we take the word of a, "dopeless wonder"?

President Bush: Bush policies created "Depression Greater than the Great Depression"


You fascists are such fucking liars.

LMGTFY

KOS? You go for the most vile hate site in existence? :eek:
Why does the right complain about education?

Same reason the left does. It's an important tool in controlling what people think.
did you try the link?

Did you?

Last depression, 1929 - you uneducated dope fiend.
 
Tax cuts were never the federal government's to begin with... shit for brains


Sorry cupcake, unless you cut spending, you just drive up debt like Ronnie/Dubya did Cupcake:)


US-national-debt-GDP.png

Hey fruitcake......that's a load of crap.

Sorry Cupcake what you are doing is called an ad hominem :(

Yes, Fruitcake....in response to your propaganda.

Sure Cupcake when you can't refute it call it propaganda :(


Spending.jpg

Cdbsh-1UEAAaKwD.jpg


You're lying that Obama lowered the deficit?

:rofl:

Amazing what you fools think you can get away with.

usgs_chartDp01f.png


You lying pile of shit - ie democrat.

US Federal Deficit by Year - plus charts and analysis
 
Tax cuts were never the federal government's to begin with... shit for brains


Sorry cupcake, unless you cut spending, you just drive up debt like Ronnie/Dubya did Cupcake:)


US-national-debt-GDP.png

Hey fruitcake......that's a load of crap.

Sorry Cupcake what you are doing is called an ad hominem :(

Yes, Fruitcake....in response to your propaganda.

Sure Cupcake when you can't refute it call it propaganda :(


Spending.jpg

Cdbsh-1UEAAaKwD.jpg


Probably because at least with the above two people YOUR charts are full of CRAP!
FACTS!
A) What events EQUAL to inherited Recession, Dot.com Bust in 2001... Then what kind of idiot doesn't know the WORST attack on US soil EVER occurred 9/11? Did you forget 3,000 lives and nearly a trillion in losses jobs, businesses? How about the WORST Hurricane Seasons in History occurring again $1 T in losses jobs, deaths... and you then
forget the worst economic attack..9/18/08 $ half/trillion flowed out in 2 hours if Bush hadn't taken action the world's economy would collapse!
AND ALL THOSE years... The deficit declined after the first 2 years
2005 deficit down! Lowered from $377 Billion
2006 deficit down Lowered from $412 Billion
2007 defining down lowered from $318 Billion
LOWERED by nearly $700 Billion in 3 years.. LOOK AT THE BELOW CHART dummy!
Obama's deficits: $1.4T, $1.2 T. $1.3T, $1.1T, no where near the decline of Bush!
So your chart is full of CRAP because below are the FACTS


Bush_Obama-Budget2001-2016.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top