Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How can you obstruct an investigation of a crime that did not occur?
Just another worthless leftist traitor hack thread. Nothing here folks.First let me state that if one is to believe Barr's subjective view of the SUPREME PRESIDENCY.......that same one voter should also be concerned that ANY future president now has the same foundation to exert powers formerly restricted to the oval office...........Anyone reading the Constitution's Article I should be really concerned of Barr's wish for a more despotic presidential set of powers.
But, let us go back and see what Barr wrote in his June 2018 letter AUDITIONING to Trump (and Rosenstein) for the job of AG .....or, as we now must assume......the job of Trump's highest defense attorney........Barr wrote:
..........a president does NOT act "corruptly" simply by action on--------even terminating------a matter that relates to HIS own conduct......"
Any objective review of the above statement should tell anyone that Barr is labeling the president as judge and jury and exculpator of his OWN misconduct..........aka a DESPOT.....
The Constitution is the ultimately law.First let me state that if one is to believe Barr's subjective view of the SUPREME PRESIDENCY.......that same one voter should also be concerned that ANY future president now has the same foundation to exert powers formerly restricted to the oval office...........Anyone reading the Constitution's Article I should be really concerned of Barr's wish for a more despotic presidential set of powers.
But, let us go back and see what Barr wrote in his June 2018 letter AUDITIONING to Trump (and Rosenstein) for the job of AG .....or, as we now must assume......the job of Trump's highest defense attorney........Barr wrote:
..........a president does NOT act "corruptly" simply by action on--------even terminating------a matter that relates to HIS own conduct......"
Any objective review of the above statement should tell anyone that Barr is labeling the president as judge and jury and exculpator of his OWN misconduct..........aka a DESPOT.....
Mueller found Trump committed no crimes.ence, NO OBSTRUCTION.
you mean Mueller replaced by ANOTHER LAPDOG like Barr replaced Sessions????.................LOL
You're saying Trump obstructed his exoneration?Another ILLITERATE Trump ass kisser who has NOT read a fucking single line of the report (hannity does all the reading for this idiot...LOL)
This is surreal. Facts just mean nothing to you people, do they? How can you obstruct an investigation of a crime that did not occur? Trump never ordered or asked anyone to lie to a federal investigator. He never destroyed documents. He never deleted thousands of e-mails or had his server wiped (much less while under subpoena). He never fired Mueller, although he could have done so if he had really wanted to do so. Again, do you really believe that if Mueller had believed he had even a halfway credible case for obstruction that he would not have said so?
Before long they'll try to convict a Trump WH cook of parking 69 minutes in a 1 hour parking space.This is how desperate libs have become. This is all they have and their fantasy has come to an end and now they're like rabid dogs, frothing for any tidbit that will never come.
You're almost as hilarious as AOC. She just spouts random stupidity, but you have a real knack for substituting words and pretending things mean whatever you want them to mean. It's a useless talent, and you can't last much longer before your head explodes. But it's funny while it lasts!First let me state that if one is to believe Barr's subjective view of the SUPREME PRESIDENCY.......that same one voter should also be concerned that ANY future president now has the same foundation to exert powers formerly restricted to the oval office...........Anyone reading the Constitution's Article I should be really concerned of Barr's wish for a more despotic presidential set of powers.
But, let us go back and see what Barr wrote in his June 2018 letter AUDITIONING to Trump (and Rosenstein) for the job of AG .....or, as we now must assume......the job of Trump's highest defense attorney........Barr wrote:
..........a president does NOT act "corruptly" simply by action on--------even terminating------a matter that relates to HIS own conduct......"
Any objective review of the above statement should tell anyone that Barr is labeling the president as judge and jury and exculpator of his OWN misconduct..........aka a DESPOT.....
The Constitution is the ultimately law.
Read it before you embarrass yourself further.[/QUOTE]
Fuckhead.......I'm pretty good on Constituional Law..........Soooooo, YOU read Article I of the Constitution.........or go cry to Hannity for some "guidance.".............
Don't breed more morons like you into this planet......PLEASE.
You're almost as hilarious as AOC. She just spouts random stupidity, but you have a real knack for substituting words and pretending things mean whatever you want them to mean. It's a useless talent, and you can't last much longer before your head explodes. But it's funny while it lasts!First let me state that if one is to believe Barr's subjective view of the SUPREME PRESIDENCY.......that same one voter should also be concerned that ANY future president now has the same foundation to exert powers formerly restricted to the oval office...........Anyone reading the Constitution's Article I should be really concerned of Barr's wish for a more despotic presidential set of powers.
But, let us go back and see what Barr wrote in his June 2018 letter AUDITIONING to Trump (and Rosenstein) for the job of AG .....or, as we now must assume......the job of Trump's highest defense attorney........Barr wrote:
..........a president does NOT act "corruptly" simply by action on--------even terminating------a matter that relates to HIS own conduct......"
Any objective review of the above statement should tell anyone that Barr is labeling the president as judge and jury and exculpator of his OWN misconduct..........aka a DESPOT.....
The IG Horowitz report should give you proof that the Mueller investigation was a setup by the Obama admin, aka the biggest scandal in US history. You can put up 10 bullshit threads a day for another month or two, but when the perp walks start you might want to reconsider whose side to be on.
All we have is trump and the ag treating our constitution like a piece of toilet paper ,,great going you repub fn traitorsThis is surreal. Facts just mean nothing to you people, do they? How can you obstruct an investigation of a crime that did not occur? Trump never ordered or asked anyone to lie to a federal investigator. He never destroyed documents. He never deleted thousands of e-mails or had his server wiped (much less while under subpoena). He never fired Mueller, although he could have done so if he had really wanted to do so. Again, do you really believe that if Mueller had believed he had even a halfway credible case for obstruction that he would not have said so?
This is how desperate libs have become. This is all they have and their fantasy has come to an end and now they're like rabid dogs, frothing for any tidbit that will never come.