RightyTighty
VIP Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #61
Most will but unlike the GOP, the Dems actually do take care of them.The treatment of women and gays? Fuck 'em, most of them will vote Dem anyway.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Most will but unlike the GOP, the Dems actually do take care of them.The treatment of women and gays? Fuck 'em, most of them will vote Dem anyway.
.
I enforce the rules of - liberalism. That's authoritarian - in a way the Founders were. Gotta have some rules after all.If you are a classic liberal then we have few issues beyond I don't live in, 1789.Liberalism has not changed. You just misuse the term.With liberalism you get this - liberty.
![]()
Liberty rocks. The Founders were liberals.
Indeed they were. What passes today for liberalism under a purloined term is not.
Actually progressives have stolen the term and tried to twist it to their interpretation. I am a classical liberal. I am not, and will never be, a progressive.
Neither do I. However, classical liberal values are the best for the people and not for the government. We understand your an authoritarian. Authoritarianism is not "liberal", it is progressive.
A private business - their call, right?That's horseshit (and be adult enough to know it).Notice that - they do.And, I have no problem with this. However, it seems that those very same people, when they come here, want my wife and daughter to dress as they do lest it offend their tender sensibilities. This is the USA. Thus, if they move here, they conform to OUR laws. Not theirs.
Wrong. More and more they are demanding that I and mine must do what they wish. They are trying to make us conform to their ways. That's pure, unadulterated, bullshit.
It's already happening in the UK dude. Expect it to happen here quickly enough.
UK waterpark bans bikinis and orders visitors to wear 'Islamically appropriate' clothes
A BRITISH waterpark has sparked fury by banning bikinis and ordering visitors to cover up in "Islamically appropriate" clothing.
UK waterpark bans bikinis and orders visitors to wear 'Islamically appropriate' clothes
I enforce the rules of - liberalism. That's authoritarian - in a way the Founders were. Gotta have some rules after all.If you are a classic liberal then we have few issues beyond I don't live in, 1789.Liberalism has not changed. You just misuse the term.Indeed they were. What passes today for liberalism under a purloined term is not.
Actually progressives have stolen the term and tried to twist it to their interpretation. I am a classical liberal. I am not, and will never be, a progressive.
Neither do I. However, classical liberal values are the best for the people and not for the government. We understand your an authoritarian. Authoritarianism is not "liberal", it is progressive.
I enforce the rules of - liberalism. That's authoritarian - in a way the Founders were. Gotta have some rules after all.If you are a classic liberal then we have few issues beyond I don't live in, 1789.Liberalism has not changed. You just misuse the term.Indeed they were. What passes today for liberalism under a purloined term is not.
Actually progressives have stolen the term and tried to twist it to their interpretation. I am a classical liberal. I am not, and will never be, a progressive.
Neither do I. However, classical liberal values are the best for the people and not for the government. We understand your an authoritarian. Authoritarianism is not "liberal", it is progressive.
What's wrong with a mask? Here's a Catholic one.Defend the burka? Go?Liberalism has not changed.With liberalism you get this - liberty.
![]()
Liberty rocks. The Founders were liberals.
Indeed they were. What passes today for liberalism under a purloined term is not.
Indeed it has not. You people have merely pasted the term onto socialist totalitarianism.
I don't care if they want to sew Pampers together to make a poofy toga. Just don't tell anyone else they must comply.
And no masks. Sorry.
Care to explain what I've said that isn't - liberalism?I enforce the rules of - liberalism. That's authoritarian - in a way the Founders were. Gotta have some rules after all.If you are a classic liberal then we have few issues beyond I don't live in, 1789.Liberalism has not changed. You just misuse the term.
Actually progressives have stolen the term and tried to twist it to their interpretation. I am a classical liberal. I am not, and will never be, a progressive.
Neither do I. However, classical liberal values are the best for the people and not for the government. We understand your an authoritarian. Authoritarianism is not "liberal", it is progressive.
Really? You must have never read the Federalist Papers then. You're an amazingly ignorant person. I expect better from you, paint.
What's wrong with a mask? Here's a Catholic one.Defend the burka? Go?Liberalism has not changed.Indeed they were. What passes today for liberalism under a purloined term is not.
Indeed it has not. You people have merely pasted the term onto socialist totalitarianism.
I don't care if they want to sew Pampers together to make a poofy toga. Just don't tell anyone else they must comply.
And no masks. Sorry.
![]()
Not really but no matter. Do you think the DMV would approve either way? They are obeying their God. You can do that here.What's wrong with a mask? Here's a Catholic one.Defend the burka? Go?Liberalism has not changed.
Indeed it has not. You people have merely pasted the term onto socialist totalitarianism.
I don't care if they want to sew Pampers together to make a poofy toga. Just don't tell anyone else they must comply.
And no masks. Sorry.
![]()
See their faces?
One should not applaud, morons. it makes one - a moron.
Can't go that far but you are free enough, We still will have - speed limits.I wish to live in a country where EVERYONE is free to do as they wish so long as they harm no one else.
Not really but no matter. Do you think the DMV would approve either way? They are obeying their God. You can do that here.What's wrong with a mask? Here's a Catholic one.Defend the burka? Go?Indeed it has not. You people have merely pasted the term onto socialist totalitarianism.
I don't care if they want to sew Pampers together to make a poofy toga. Just don't tell anyone else they must comply.
And no masks. Sorry.
![]()
See their faces?
So? What does it matter to you? You aren't a Muslim (or Jewish - some of them) woman? Mind your own business little fascist.Not really but no matter. Do you think the DMV would approve either way? They are obeying their God. You can do that here.What's wrong with a mask? Here's a Catholic one.Defend the burka? Go?
I don't care if they want to sew Pampers together to make a poofy toga. Just don't tell anyone else they must comply.
And no masks. Sorry.
![]()
See their faces?
The persistence of ignorance is strong in you. You can see their faces fine. In a full burka you see only the eyes.
Not many real liberals around, Mac in the middle.I don't see a lot of other regressives defending the regressive who started this thread, do you?
He's even out there, compared to THEM.
.