C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Some of you remind me of Scalia in his Casey dissent. The Justice was hysterically apoplectic:
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
Note the scarcity of case law and precedent like some of you he blames politics and a kind of national peer pressure. He notes the issue of privacy only once and not in a directly legal context.
Clearly there is no firm legal ground upon which a case against the right to privacy may be built. And consequently there is no legal argument that can made to compel the issue of abortion to be moved from under that Constitutional protection.
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
Note the scarcity of case law and precedent like some of you he blames politics and a kind of national peer pressure. He notes the issue of privacy only once and not in a directly legal context.
Clearly there is no firm legal ground upon which a case against the right to privacy may be built. And consequently there is no legal argument that can made to compel the issue of abortion to be moved from under that Constitutional protection.