Why Democrats Happily Lie about Cheating in the Election

[Skylar]

This is very simple:

Democrats are people who burn down cities, murder cops, terrorize neighborhoods, have roving Nazi brownshirts (BLM and Antifa), shut down churches, impose Nazi curfews, and so much more. Do any of you think for a moment that a little thing like election fraud bothers them? Lying about an election is peanuts compared to the crimes against humanity they happily commit.

I have said it before:

Democrats are the party of infanticide, socialism, government control, smashing Free Speech rights, giving free stuff to illegal aliens, and now they are the party of mobs in the streets burning and destroying cities. See the burning cities and torn down statues, and you see the democrat party world. Mobs.

Republicans are the party of Traditional Values, Liberty and freedom. Donald Trump gave us the lowest unemployment rates since John F Kennedy until the virus hit, and now Democrats are trying to keep the virus going because they are so evil they are happy to destroy the economy simply to defeat Trump. That’s right. Masks and continued shutdowns are a joke, based totally on fear. There is a 0.04 death rate for Corona. People have more chance of dying from the Flu.

A totalitarian socialist state of mobs is what the Democrats offer, and liberty and freedom and jobs-not-mobs is what Trump offers.

Police officers killed surge 28% this year and some point to civil unrest and those looking to exploit it

Slayings of US police officers are up 28% compared to the same time last year.

abcnews.go.com

I can agree with many things about democrats.

But the fact is Trump lost. That is proven and no one can demonstrate otherwise.

If you think he won present some evidence.

This is a civil question....So, in that respect, we are now entering the 'discovery' phase of this...Let's let the process play out, unless you believe you won't win, and Rudi's got you....

There is no process.

The pphase we are in is various dupes claiming Trump won

They have no evidence and neither does this loser Powell

Pretty much. The burden is on the Plantiff to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. And Trump's team has failed spectacularly to do this. With the lack of evidence being cited as the lead cause of that failure.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Please document each case, who brought it, and who the attorney's of record were....

If you did that you'd know that the Trump campaign has to date brought exactly 3 cases, one of which they won, the other two are still in the court....

What you are doing is either parroting the MSM, (Who we already know are in the pocket of Democrats), or you're just lying to try and attack the moral of republicans...

Either way nothing is settled yet and you should pipe down with your statements...

The point of this thread is that they LIE. They will not provide you with any facts.

Yes they do

The few losers who claim Trump won are doing the exact same thing.

You are just as bad as the dems you hate. He lost that is fact.
No oone is saying he won because of de

Please document each case, who brought it, and who the attorney's of record were....

If you did that you'd know that the Trump campaign has to date brought exactly 3 cases, one of which they won, the other two are still in the court....

What you are doing is either parroting the MSM, (Who we already know are in the pocket of Democrats), or you're just lying to try and attack the moral of republicans...

Either way nothing is settled yet and you should pipe down with your statements...

The point of this thread is that they LIE. They will not provide you with any facts.

YEs they do and so do you.

You lie just as bad

It is irrefutablle fact Trump lost. To deny that is to childishly lie

 

[j-mac]

Team Trump s not only cheating but lying about the election.

An assault on our Democracy

charge them all with sedition.

So, here you see the real feeling of liberal progressives...Those who don't blindly follow their corrosive ideology, must be imprisioned...They are totalitarian from the jump...Seeking to criminalize opposition for having different views than yourself is disgusting playtime.

ummmm... no.

read the definition of sedition.

"

According to the statutory definition of sedition, it is a crime for two or more people within the jurisdiction of the United States:

• To conspire to overthrow or destroy by force the government of the United States or to level war against them;
• To oppose by force the authority of the United States government; to prevent, hinder, or delay by force the execution of any law of the United States; or
• To take, seize, or possess by force any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof."

Sedition - FindLaw

Sedition, a serious felony punishable by fines and up to 20 years in prison, refers to the act of inciting revolt or violence against a lawful authority with the goal of destroying or overthrowing it. FindLaw provides an overview of this particular crime against the government, with historical...

criminal.findlaw.com

Ok, so lay out for me what exactly republican's who voted for President Trump violated to be charged with sedition then?

Because I could very easily lay out a case about Democrats violating this law not only in the run up to the election, but present day....

 

[Skylar]

They have no evidence

That has now become SPAM, you have posted that lie so many times.


And the first post in the thread still stands unrefuted.
Of course, it cannot be refuted since it is the truth.

Then show us, don't tell us.

Not 'promises' of evidence'. SHow us the evidence of voter fraud.

Because the evidence of the election outcome is superb: the tallies by each State of votes cast. Its evidence so good its been used for generations to establish the winner of elections. And it shows an easy victory for Biden.

 

[Soupnazi630]

They have no evidence

That has now become SPAM, you have posted that lie so many times.


And the first post in the thread still stands unrefuted.
Of course, it cannot be refuted since it is the truth.

It is fact which you cannot refute.

They are not lying about Trump losing

They may lie about many things but the evidence proves you are as big a liar as any dem

 

[j-mac]

Please document each case, who brought it, and who the attorney's of record were....

If you did that you'd know that the Trump campaign has to date brought exactly 3 cases, one of which they won, the other two are still in the court....

What you are doing is either parroting the MSM, (Who we already know are in the pocket of Democrats), or you're just lying to try and attack the moral of republicans...

Either way nothing is settled yet and you should pipe down with your statements...

The point of this thread is that they LIE. They will not provide you with any facts.

Yes they do

The few losers who claim Trump won are doing the exact same thing.

You are just as bad as the dems you hate. He lost that is fact.
No oone is saying he won because of de

Please document each case, who brought it, and who the attorney's of record were....

If you did that you'd know that the Trump campaign has to date brought exactly 3 cases, one of which they won, the other two are still in the court....

What you are doing is either parroting the MSM, (Who we already know are in the pocket of Democrats), or you're just lying to try and attack the moral of republicans...

Either way nothing is settled yet and you should pipe down with your statements...

The point of this thread is that they LIE. They will not provide you with any facts.

YEs they do and so do you.

You lie just as bad

It is irrefutablle fact Trump lost. To deny that is to childishly lie

No one has won anything yet, and you are doing little but showing how little you understand the election process...

 

[LiberalsLIE]

No one has won anything yet, and you are doing little but showing how little you understand the election process...

I love your posts man, but remember the premise of the thread: THEY LIE! Its not that they don't understand the election process, its that they just don't care. Lying and cheating are in their bloodstream,

As the first post says:

Democrats are people who burn down cities, murder cops, terrorize neighborhoods, have roving Nazi brownshirts (BLM and Antifa), shut down churches, impose Nazi curfews, and so much more. Do any of you think for a moment that a little thing like election fraud bothers them? Lying about an election is peanuts compared to the crimes against humanity they happily commit.

 

[rightwinger]

Team Trump s not only cheating but lying about the election.

An assault on our Democracy

How exactly is Trump cheating?

Calling those who make the election decisions to the White House to unfairly influence their decision is an abuse of power.

 

[LiberalsLIE]

Calling those who make the election decisions to the White House to unfairly influence their decision is an abuse of power.

You yet again prove the first post to be correct. Thanks Dopey

 

[j-mac]

They have no evidence

That has now become SPAM, you have posted that lie so many times.


And the first post in the thread still stands unrefuted.
Of course, it cannot be refuted since it is the truth.

Then show us, don't tell us.

Not 'promises' of evidence'. SHow us the evidence of voter fraud.

Because the evidence of the election outcome is superb: the tallies by each State of votes cast. Its evidence so good its been used for generations to establish the winner of elections. And it shows an easy victory for Biden.

Good grief, is it possible that seemingly smart people don't know what the hell a civil suit is, or what the process is?

" Civil lawsuits arise out of disputes between people, businesses, or other entities, including government entities. Civil lawsuits generally proceed through distinct steps: pleadings, discovery, trial, and possibly an appeal. "

How Does a Lawsuit Work? Basic Steps in the Civil Litigation Process

www.stoel.com

At this moment in the process we are in the "pleadings" part of the over all process....

"

The Complaint: Litigation begins when the plaintiff files a complaint with the court and formally delivers a copy to the defendant. The complaint describes what the defendant did (or failed to do) that caused harm to the plaintiff and the legal basis for holding the defendant responsible for that harm.

The Answer: The defendant is given a specific amount of time to file an answer to the complaint. The answer provides the defendant’s side of the dispute. The defendant may also file counter-claims against the plaintiff, alleging that the plaintiff has harmed the defendant and should be held liable for that harm. Sometimes, the plaintiff responds to the defendant’s answer or counter-claims by filing a reply. In some instances, in lieu of an answer or reply, a party may request that the other party clarify or correct deficiencies in its factual allegations or legal theories, or may ask the court to dismiss part or all of the suit. This may lead to amended complaints or amended answers. Once the parties have completed the complaint, answer, and any reply, the issues for resolution by the court have been defined."

Now what you are asking for is evidence of claim, which is fair in a debate, it is not yet at that stage of the process...

"

Thorough case preparation is critical to any successful litigation. Discovery is the method by which parties gather relevant information from each other or from third parties. Research of the law, document review and organization, and witness interviews help clients and their lawyers assess the merits of claims and defenses. The extent to which these and other steps are needed is determined by the issues of the case.

Discovery: Discovery is usually the longest part of the case. It begins soon after a lawsuit is filed and often does not stop until shortly before trial. During discovery, the parties ask each other and third parties for information about the facts and issues of the case. Information is gathered formally through written questions (known as “interrogatories”), requests for copies of documents, and requests for admission (which ask a party to admit or deny statements of fact). Another key method of obtaining information is to conduct depositions, in which witnesses are questioned under oath by the parties’ attorneys and the witnesses’ answers are recorded by a court reporter. Depositions are used to learn more about the facts of a case and about what the different witnesses contend happened. Depositions also may be used at trial to show inconsistencies in a witness’s story or to question the witness’s credibility. The recorded testimony from a deposition sometimes may also be used at trial in place of a witness who is not able to attend the trial in person.

Expert Witnesses: Often a claim or defense requires support from expert witnesses to explain technical information or validate an argument. One or more experts might be needed to testify about the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the loss suffered by the plaintiff, or the existence and amount of the plaintiff’s damages. Expert witnesses work closely with a party’s representatives and attorneys to prepare the party’s case.

Motions: Before trial, the parties may use motions to ask the court to rule or act. Motions usually pertain to law or facts in the case, but sometimes they seek clarification or resolution of procedural disputes between the parties. Some motions, such as a motion for summary judgment, which asks the court to dismiss part or all of a plaintiff’s case or a defendant’s defense, dispose of issues without trial. Other motions might ask the court to order a party to produce documents or to exclude evidence from trial.

Timing: The duration of a lawsuit depends on the issues of the case, the amount of discovery to be conducted, and court scheduling and availability. The parties, guided by the rules of court, usually decide the timing of discovery. Trial dates are set by the court. Timing and scheduling differ between state and federal courts."

So, there are only two reasons that you, and others would be pushing so hard now for evidence, that clearly is the "discovery" phase, and not the "pleadings" phase, and that is that either,

1. you know that there is massive election fraud through players like Dominion, and if allowed to go through the process, Biden will lose.

2. You are a blustering gas bag that is gas lighting us.

Other than that there are no other reasons that I can think of that you want so hard for Trump to give up...

 

[j-mac]

Team Trump s not only cheating but lying about the election.

An assault on our Democracy

How exactly is Trump cheating?

Calling those who make the election decisions to the White House to unfairly influence their decision is an abuse of power.

Speculation....Just saw the Michigan Speaker of the House on TV, and he said there was "NO, influence on his process" from the President...

You need to stop lying.

 

[Soupnazi630]

They have no evidence

That has now become SPAM, you have posted that lie so many times.


And the first post in the thread still stands unrefuted.
Of course, it cannot be refuted since it is the truth.

Then show us, don't tell us.

Not 'promises' of evidence'. SHow us the evidence of voter fraud.

Because the evidence of the election outcome is superb: the tallies by each State of votes cast. Its evidence so good its been used for generations to establish the winner of elections. And it shows an easy victory for Biden.

Good grief, is it possible that seemingly smart people don't know what the hell a civil suit is, or what the process is?

" Civil lawsuits arise out of disputes between people, businesses, or other entities, including government entities. Civil lawsuits generally proceed through distinct steps: pleadings, discovery, trial, and possibly an appeal. "

How Does a Lawsuit Work? Basic Steps in the Civil Litigation Process

www.stoel.com

At this moment in the process we are in the "pleadings" part of the over all process....

"

The Complaint: Litigation begins when the plaintiff files a complaint with the court and formally delivers a copy to the defendant. The complaint describes what the defendant did (or failed to do) that caused harm to the plaintiff and the legal basis for holding the defendant responsible for that harm.

The Answer: The defendant is given a specific amount of time to file an answer to the complaint. The answer provides the defendant’s side of the dispute. The defendant may also file counter-claims against the plaintiff, alleging that the plaintiff has harmed the defendant and should be held liable for that harm. Sometimes, the plaintiff responds to the defendant’s answer or counter-claims by filing a reply. In some instances, in lieu of an answer or reply, a party may request that the other party clarify or correct deficiencies in its factual allegations or legal theories, or may ask the court to dismiss part or all of the suit. This may lead to amended complaints or amended answers. Once the parties have completed the complaint, answer, and any reply, the issues for resolution by the court have been defined."

Now what you are asking for is evidence of claim, which is fair in a debate, it is not yet at that stage of the process...

"

Thorough case preparation is critical to any successful litigation. Discovery is the method by which parties gather relevant information from each other or from third parties. Research of the law, document review and organization, and witness interviews help clients and their lawyers assess the merits of claims and defenses. The extent to which these and other steps are needed is determined by the issues of the case.

Discovery: Discovery is usually the longest part of the case. It begins soon after a lawsuit is filed and often does not stop until shortly before trial. During discovery, the parties ask each other and third parties for information about the facts and issues of the case. Information is gathered formally through written questions (known as “interrogatories”), requests for copies of documents, and requests for admission (which ask a party to admit or deny statements of fact). Another key method of obtaining information is to conduct depositions, in which witnesses are questioned under oath by the parties’ attorneys and the witnesses’ answers are recorded by a court reporter. Depositions are used to learn more about the facts of a case and about what the different witnesses contend happened. Depositions also may be used at trial to show inconsistencies in a witness’s story or to question the witness’s credibility. The recorded testimony from a deposition sometimes may also be used at trial in place of a witness who is not able to attend the trial in person.

Expert Witnesses: Often a claim or defense requires support from expert witnesses to explain technical information or validate an argument. One or more experts might be needed to testify about the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the loss suffered by the plaintiff, or the existence and amount of the plaintiff’s damages. Expert witnesses work closely with a party’s representatives and attorneys to prepare the party’s case.

Motions: Before trial, the parties may use motions to ask the court to rule or act. Motions usually pertain to law or facts in the case, but sometimes they seek clarification or resolution of procedural disputes between the parties. Some motions, such as a motion for summary judgment, which asks the court to dismiss part or all of a plaintiff’s case or a defendant’s defense, dispose of issues without trial. Other motions might ask the court to order a party to produce documents or to exclude evidence from trial.

Timing: The duration of a lawsuit depends on the issues of the case, the amount of discovery to be conducted, and court scheduling and availability. The parties, guided by the rules of court, usually decide the timing of discovery. Trial dates are set by the court. Timing and scheduling differ between state and federal courts."

So, there are only two reasons that you, and others would be pushing so hard now for evidence, that clearly is the "discovery" phase, and not the "pleadings" phase, and that is that either,

1. you know that there is massive election fraud through players like Dominion, and if allowed to go through the process, Biden will lose.

2. You are a blustering gas bag that is gas lighting us.

Other than that there are no other reasons that I can think of that you want so hard for Trump to give up...

Wrong.

There is not a speck of evidence of MASSIVE voter fraud by dominion.

At this point the civil lawsuits are frivolous bullshit suits with no other purpose than to get a tiny biit more attention for media whores like Powell.

SHe is trying to present her case to the public not the courts and she is losing because she has nothing.

You are the only gaslighting windbag here BOY

Now get this straught.

She has no fucking evidence.

She is finished and it is over ABSOLUTE FRACT

 

[j-mac]

No one has won anything yet, and you are doing little but showing how little you understand the election process...

I love your posts man, but remember the premise of the thread: THEY LIE! Its not that they don't understand the election process, its that they just don't care. Lying and cheating are in their bloodstream,

As the first post says:

Democrats are people who burn down cities, murder cops, terrorize neighborhoods, have roving Nazi brownshirts (BLM and Antifa), shut down churches, impose Nazi curfews, and so much more. Do any of you think for a moment that a little thing like election fraud bothers them? Lying about an election is peanuts compared to the crimes against humanity they happily commit.

I fully understand that....And no, I don't think election fraud bothers them in the slightest...

Liberal progressive lying, and cheating, and Alinsky tactics have been long known....

 

[LiberalsLIE]

I fully understand that....And no, I don't think election fraud bothers them in the slightest...
Liberal progressive lying, and cheating, and Alinsky tactics have been long known....

How did we ever get to the point to where such disgusting people make up half of the electorate

 

[Soupnazi630]

No one has won anything yet, and you are doing little but showing how little you understand the election process...

I love your posts man, but remember the premise of the thread: THEY LIE! Its not that they don't understand the election process, its that they just don't care. Lying and cheating are in their bloodstream,

As the first post says:

Democrats are people who burn down cities, murder cops, terrorize neighborhoods, have roving Nazi brownshirts (BLM and Antifa), shut down churches, impose Nazi curfews, and so much more. Do any of you think for a moment that a little thing like election fraud bothers them? Lying about an election is peanuts compared to the crimes against humanity they happily commit.

I fully understand that....And no, I don't think election fraud bothers them in the slightest...

Liberal progressive lying, and cheating, and Alinsky tactics have been long known....

Alinski has nothing to do with this and yes his methods are well known.

Liberals can and sometimes do lie and cheat just like conservatives.

There is no evidence of massive fraud. Small localized indicents of fraud and cheating sure but for BOTH sides and not enough to change the outcome.

Powell has NOTHING. You have NOTHING.

This election is obver except for the paperwork annd formalities.

Trump lost he is on his way OUT and nothing can chaneg that

 

[j-mac]

They have no evidence

That has now become SPAM, you have posted that lie so many times.


And the first post in the thread still stands unrefuted.
Of course, it cannot be refuted since it is the truth.

Then show us, don't tell us.

Not 'promises' of evidence'. SHow us the evidence of voter fraud.

Because the evidence of the election outcome is superb: the tallies by each State of votes cast. Its evidence so good its been used for generations to establish the winner of elections. And it shows an easy victory for Biden.

Good grief, is it possible that seemingly smart people don't know what the hell a civil suit is, or what the process is?

" Civil lawsuits arise out of disputes between people, businesses, or other entities, including government entities. Civil lawsuits generally proceed through distinct steps: pleadings, discovery, trial, and possibly an appeal. "

How Does a Lawsuit Work? Basic Steps in the Civil Litigation Process

www.stoel.com

At this moment in the process we are in the "pleadings" part of the over all process....

"

The Complaint: Litigation begins when the plaintiff files a complaint with the court and formally delivers a copy to the defendant. The complaint describes what the defendant did (or failed to do) that caused harm to the plaintiff and the legal basis for holding the defendant responsible for that harm.

The Answer: The defendant is given a specific amount of time to file an answer to the complaint. The answer provides the defendant’s side of the dispute. The defendant may also file counter-claims against the plaintiff, alleging that the plaintiff has harmed the defendant and should be held liable for that harm. Sometimes, the plaintiff responds to the defendant’s answer or counter-claims by filing a reply. In some instances, in lieu of an answer or reply, a party may request that the other party clarify or correct deficiencies in its factual allegations or legal theories, or may ask the court to dismiss part or all of the suit. This may lead to amended complaints or amended answers. Once the parties have completed the complaint, answer, and any reply, the issues for resolution by the court have been defined."

Now what you are asking for is evidence of claim, which is fair in a debate, it is not yet at that stage of the process...

"

Thorough case preparation is critical to any successful litigation. Discovery is the method by which parties gather relevant information from each other or from third parties. Research of the law, document review and organization, and witness interviews help clients and their lawyers assess the merits of claims and defenses. The extent to which these and other steps are needed is determined by the issues of the case.

Discovery: Discovery is usually the longest part of the case. It begins soon after a lawsuit is filed and often does not stop until shortly before trial. During discovery, the parties ask each other and third parties for information about the facts and issues of the case. Information is gathered formally through written questions (known as “interrogatories”), requests for copies of documents, and requests for admission (which ask a party to admit or deny statements of fact). Another key method of obtaining information is to conduct depositions, in which witnesses are questioned under oath by the parties’ attorneys and the witnesses’ answers are recorded by a court reporter. Depositions are used to learn more about the facts of a case and about what the different witnesses contend happened. Depositions also may be used at trial to show inconsistencies in a witness’s story or to question the witness’s credibility. The recorded testimony from a deposition sometimes may also be used at trial in place of a witness who is not able to attend the trial in person.

Expert Witnesses: Often a claim or defense requires support from expert witnesses to explain technical information or validate an argument. One or more experts might be needed to testify about the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the loss suffered by the plaintiff, or the existence and amount of the plaintiff’s damages. Expert witnesses work closely with a party’s representatives and attorneys to prepare the party’s case.

Motions: Before trial, the parties may use motions to ask the court to rule or act. Motions usually pertain to law or facts in the case, but sometimes they seek clarification or resolution of procedural disputes between the parties. Some motions, such as a motion for summary judgment, which asks the court to dismiss part or all of a plaintiff’s case or a defendant’s defense, dispose of issues without trial. Other motions might ask the court to order a party to produce documents or to exclude evidence from trial.

Timing: The duration of a lawsuit depends on the issues of the case, the amount of discovery to be conducted, and court scheduling and availability. The parties, guided by the rules of court, usually decide the timing of discovery. Trial dates are set by the court. Timing and scheduling differ between state and federal courts."

So, there are only two reasons that you, and others would be pushing so hard now for evidence, that clearly is the "discovery" phase, and not the "pleadings" phase, and that is that either,

1. you know that there is massive election fraud through players like Dominion, and if allowed to go through the process, Biden will lose.

2. You are a blustering gas bag that is gas lighting us.

Other than that there are no other reasons that I can think of that you want so hard for Trump to give up...

Wrong.

There is not a speck of evidence of MASSIVE voter fraud by dominion.

At this point the civil lawsuits are frivolous bullshit suits with no other purpose than to get a tiny biit more attention for media whores like Powell.

SHe is trying to present her case to the public not the courts and she is losing because she has nothing.

You are the only gaslighting windbag here BOY

Now get this straught.

She has no fucking evidence.

She is finished and it is over ABSOLUTE FRACT

LOL...."Not a spec of evidence"....That's a hoot...Remids of that time Obama sat up on tv and said that shit about the IRS targeting Republican 501c3's, then we found out about Lois Lerner....

Truth is all they did is start the Pleading part of the case, Discovery is next, then you will see the evidence...

Now, whether the judges they are up against care? That's another question...

 

[j-mac]

I fully understand that....And no, I don't think election fraud bothers them in the slightest...
Liberal progressive lying, and cheating, and Alinsky tactics have been long known....

How did we ever get to the point to where such disgusting people make up half of the electorate

We tried working with them, instead of crushing them....Short answer.

 

[Soupnazi630]

They have no evidence

That has now become SPAM, you have posted that lie so many times.


And the first post in the thread still stands unrefuted.
Of course, it cannot be refuted since it is the truth.

Then show us, don't tell us.

Not 'promises' of evidence'. SHow us the evidence of voter fraud.

Because the evidence of the election outcome is superb: the tallies by each State of votes cast. Its evidence so good its been used for generations to establish the winner of elections. And it shows an easy victory for Biden.

Good grief, is it possible that seemingly smart people don't know what the hell a civil suit is, or what the process is?

" Civil lawsuits arise out of disputes between people, businesses, or other entities, including government entities. Civil lawsuits generally proceed through distinct steps: pleadings, discovery, trial, and possibly an appeal. "

How Does a Lawsuit Work? Basic Steps in the Civil Litigation Process

www.stoel.com

At this moment in the process we are in the "pleadings" part of the over all process....

"

The Complaint: Litigation begins when the plaintiff files a complaint with the court and formally delivers a copy to the defendant. The complaint describes what the defendant did (or failed to do) that caused harm to the plaintiff and the legal basis for holding the defendant responsible for that harm.

The Answer: The defendant is given a specific amount of time to file an answer to the complaint. The answer provides the defendant’s side of the dispute. The defendant may also file counter-claims against the plaintiff, alleging that the plaintiff has harmed the defendant and should be held liable for that harm. Sometimes, the plaintiff responds to the defendant’s answer or counter-claims by filing a reply. In some instances, in lieu of an answer or reply, a party may request that the other party clarify or correct deficiencies in its factual allegations or legal theories, or may ask the court to dismiss part or all of the suit. This may lead to amended complaints or amended answers. Once the parties have completed the complaint, answer, and any reply, the issues for resolution by the court have been defined."

Now what you are asking for is evidence of claim, which is fair in a debate, it is not yet at that stage of the process...

"

Thorough case preparation is critical to any successful litigation. Discovery is the method by which parties gather relevant information from each other or from third parties. Research of the law, document review and organization, and witness interviews help clients and their lawyers assess the merits of claims and defenses. The extent to which these and other steps are needed is determined by the issues of the case.

Discovery: Discovery is usually the longest part of the case. It begins soon after a lawsuit is filed and often does not stop until shortly before trial. During discovery, the parties ask each other and third parties for information about the facts and issues of the case. Information is gathered formally through written questions (known as “interrogatories”), requests for copies of documents, and requests for admission (which ask a party to admit or deny statements of fact). Another key method of obtaining information is to conduct depositions, in which witnesses are questioned under oath by the parties’ attorneys and the witnesses’ answers are recorded by a court reporter. Depositions are used to learn more about the facts of a case and about what the different witnesses contend happened. Depositions also may be used at trial to show inconsistencies in a witness’s story or to question the witness’s credibility. The recorded testimony from a deposition sometimes may also be used at trial in place of a witness who is not able to attend the trial in person.

Expert Witnesses: Often a claim or defense requires support from expert witnesses to explain technical information or validate an argument. One or more experts might be needed to testify about the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the loss suffered by the plaintiff, or the existence and amount of the plaintiff’s damages. Expert witnesses work closely with a party’s representatives and attorneys to prepare the party’s case.

Motions: Before trial, the parties may use motions to ask the court to rule or act. Motions usually pertain to law or facts in the case, but sometimes they seek clarification or resolution of procedural disputes between the parties. Some motions, such as a motion for summary judgment, which asks the court to dismiss part or all of a plaintiff’s case or a defendant’s defense, dispose of issues without trial. Other motions might ask the court to order a party to produce documents or to exclude evidence from trial.

Timing: The duration of a lawsuit depends on the issues of the case, the amount of discovery to be conducted, and court scheduling and availability. The parties, guided by the rules of court, usually decide the timing of discovery. Trial dates are set by the court. Timing and scheduling differ between state and federal courts."

So, there are only two reasons that you, and others would be pushing so hard now for evidence, that clearly is the "discovery" phase, and not the "pleadings" phase, and that is that either,

1. you know that there is massive election fraud through players like Dominion, and if allowed to go through the process, Biden will lose.

2. You are a blustering gas bag that is gas lighting us.

Other than that there are no other reasons that I can think of that you want so hard for Trump to give up...

Wrong.

There is not a speck of evidence of MASSIVE voter fraud by dominion.

At this point the civil lawsuits are frivolous bullshit suits with no other purpose than to get a tiny biit more attention for media whores like Powell.

SHe is trying to present her case to the public not the courts and she is losing because she has nothing.

You are the only gaslighting windbag here BOY

Now get this straught.

She has no fucking evidence.

She is finished and it is over ABSOLUTE FRACT

LOL...."Not a spec of evidence"....That's a hoot...Remids of that time Obama sat up on tv and said that shit about the IRS targeting Republican 501c3's, then we found out about Lois Lerner....

Truth is all they did is start the Pleading part of the case, Discovery is next, then you will see the evidence...

Now, whether the judges they are up against care? That's another question...

There is no evidence,

I will not see evidence and neither will you because they DO NOT HAVE ANY

Powell is a fraud a liar and a slimy scumbag of low reputation.

 

[my2¢]

Trump's assault on the system started early on when in at least two states he advocated Republicans cross over and vote for the weakest Democrat in their presidential primary. Now he can't accept that....

​

 

[Viktor]

This is very simple:

Democrats are people who burn down cities, murder cops, terrorize neighborhoods, have roving Nazi brownshirts (BLM and Antifa), shut down churches, impose Nazi curfews, and so much more. Do any of you think for a moment that a little thing like election fraud bothers them? Lying about an election is peanuts compared to the crimes against humanity they happily commit.

I have said it before:

Democrats are the party of infanticide, socialism, government control, smashing Free Speech rights, giving free stuff to illegal aliens, and now they are the party of mobs in the streets burning and destroying cities. See the burning cities and torn down statues, and you see the democrat party world. Mobs.

Republicans are the party of Traditional Values, Liberty and freedom. Donald Trump gave us the lowest unemployment rates since John F Kennedy until the virus hit, and now Democrats are trying to keep the virus going because they are so evil they are happy to destroy the economy simply to defeat Trump. That’s right. Masks and continued shutdowns are a joke, based totally on fear. There is a 0.04 death rate for Corona. People have more chance of dying from the Flu.

A totalitarian socialist state of mobs is what the Democrats offer, and liberty and freedom and jobs-not-mobs is what Trump offers.

Police officers killed surge 28% this year and some point to civil unrest and those looking to exploit it

Slayings of US police officers are up 28% compared to the same time last year.

abcnews.go.com

I can agree with many things about democrats.

But the fact is Trump lost. That is proven and no one can demonstrate otherwise.

If you think he won present some evidence.

THE MEDIA DOES NOT DECIDE ELECTIONS