Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 66,960
- 17,017
- 2,190
You didn’t answer. Why isn’t there an impeachment hearing??yes we do, it's why hunter biden is being prosecuted for income tax evation next month
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You didn’t answer. Why isn’t there an impeachment hearing??yes we do, it's why hunter biden is being prosecuted for income tax evation next month
Freezing the war on the current frontline. Ukraine legally adopts a neutral status.Agreed… How do you think it gets stopped?
Why should I care if he's gobbling up former republics? I'm more concerned about interest on the national debt being over a trillion dollars per year, and growing. I'm more concerned about the FBI pressuring social media companies to censor people. I'm more concerned about our military and intelligence agencies being rogue organizations. I'm more concerned about the Secret Service letting an assassin shoot at a Trump (and I'm not even a Trump supporter). I'm more concerned about communists in Congress. I'm more concerned about Progressive DAs dropping charges against violent leftists while using lawfare against people on the right. There are thousands of things more concerning than wars half-way around the world.I’m not ok with russia gobbling up any more former republics
Which is the choice you are offering
So no name?Try paying attention to the discussion before butting in.
Zelenskyy. Duh.So no name?
Freezing the war on the current frontline.
Ukraine legally adopts a neutral status.
Yes, by all means we should triple down on a failed policy because it excites the rubes.He won't be president, Trump will. I suspect Trump will deal with the issue. Europe has to pull their weight also. China in particular, is not going to enjoy Trumps initiatives as he is going to try to cut off their interference in propping Russia up. In fact, Chinas helping of Russia gives Trump the perfect cover for increasing tariffs and restrictions against them.
Yes, by all means we should triple down on a failed policy because it excites the rubes.
Trump's trade war on China was a failure in every possible way
Trump's trade war on China was a failure in every possible way
China isn't even close to fulfilling its end of the deal.www.axios.com
It worked quite well with Austria and Finland in the Cold War 1.0. I think it can be tried with Ukraine. It should be an international agreement involving a number of regional powers, including China, India, Saudi Arabia among others. In other words, Russia should make obligations to its 'allies' too.What exactly makes you think that either Putin or Ukranians want to freeze the war on the current front line?
So Russia can regroup, rebuild and just invade them later like they did with Chechens?
Or do you seriously propose Ukraine should just take Russia's worth-nothing signature for it's security guarantees?
This much like the debate during the 1930’s leading up to WWIIWhy should I care if he's gobbling up former republics? I'm more concerned about interest on the national debt being over a trillion dollars per year, and growing. I'm more concerned about the FBI pressuring social media companies to censor people. I'm more concerned about our military and intelligence agencies being rogue organizations. I'm more concerned about the Secret Service letting an assassin shoot at a Trump (and I'm not even a Trump supporter). I'm more concerned about communists in Congress. I'm more concerned about Progressive DAs dropping charges against violent leftists while using lawfare against people on the right. There are thousands of things more concerning than wars half-way around the world.
How do both sides agree to do that?Freezing the war on the current frontline. Ukraine legally adopts a neutral status.
It worked quite well with Austria and Finland in the Cold War 1.0. I think it can be tried with Ukraine. It should be an international agreement involving a number of regional powers, including China, India, Saudi Arabia among others. In other words, Russia should make obligations to its 'allies' too.
Jesus. Finland was a neutral state since the late 1940s to a quite recent time.Finland? The country that has just joined NATO, never signed any agreement about it's neutrality.
Trough a negotiations, obviously.How do both sides agree to do that?
There were people in the UK who wanted Hitler to march on the Soviet Union and let them bloody each other. Unfortunately the defenders of communism had their way instead.This much like the debate during the 1930’s leading up to WWII
The future Axis powers were on the march and Hitler was occupying the Rhineland, Austria, Czechoslovakia, and finally Poland
WWII was caused by german territorial expansion just as russia is practicing today
Trough a negotiations, obviously.
Yeah, the war to the last Ukrainian is obviously not among them.More like through your fantasies.
Yeah, the war to the last Ukrainian is obviously not among them.
Tough to see that happening under the current state of affairsTrough a negotiations, obviously.