Why did Bush lie about Saddam being connected to 9/11?

[Lakhota]

• List Of George W. Bush Lies - Pearly Gates - Tripod
  List Of George W. Bush Lies - 510k - 11 hours ago - similar pages
  Dolph Briscoe (2 consecutive four-year terms) January 16, 1973-January 16, 1979.George W. Bush (2 consecutive four-year terms) January 17, 1995 to present ...
• GeorgeWalkerBush.net - Top Ten Bush Lies
  GeorgeWalkerBush.net - Top Ten Bush Lies - 26k - similar pages
  But such a list would not be much good from a sales perspective, for the point of The Lies of George W. Bush: Mastering the Politics of Deception is to show that ...
• The 935 lies of George W. Bush / Yes, you already knew. But now ...
  http://www.sfgate.com / entertainment / morford / article / The-935-lies-of-George-W... - 268k - similar pages
  Jan 30, 2008 ... After all, it's common knowledge that, say, George Bush Sr.lied about Iran-Contra and "read my lips," Ronald Reagan lied like a nasty old rug ...
• Long List Of Bush-Cheney Administration Lies - Rense
  Long List Of Bush-Cheney Administration Lies - 17k - similar pages
  George W. Bush, September 12 2002; "If he declares he has none, then we will know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world." - Ari Fleischer ...
• 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from ...
  http://thedailybanter.com / 2013 / 05 / 13-benghazis-that-occurr / - 959k - similar pages
  May 8, 2013 ... 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News ... consulate/embassy attacks that occurred when George W. Bush and Dick ... My initial listwas quoted from an article on the Daily Kos which actually ... and automatons who take all of these lies at face value — not to mention ...
• Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war ...
  Study Bush aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war - CNN.com - 80k - similar pages
  Jan 23, 2008 ...President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false ... Also on the list: Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, former White House spokesmen
• Bush Lies... - Bush Watch
  Bush Lies... - 75k - similar pages
  Back in 2003, the President cited another student's thesis when making a case .... What follows, then, is an informal listing of just some of the lies he typically tells ...
• What was the single worst thing about George W. Bush's presidency ...
  http://www.washingtonmonthly.com / political-animal-a / 2013_04 / what_was_the_single_wors... - 102k - similar pages
  Apr 27, 2013 ... A key innovation of Prevaricator-in-Chief Bush and co. were the lies they told ... During my childhood, thepresident of the United States resigned in disgrace ... and tragic war on the basis of lieshas to be near the top of the list.
• The Bush Administration's Top 40 Lies about War and Terrorism ...
  The Bush Administration s Top 40 Lies about War and Terrorism Common Dreams Breaking News Views for the Progressive Community - 97k - similar pages
  Jul 30, 2003 ...The Bush Administration's Top 40 Lies about War and Terrorism ..... 'There is nothing in thepresident's homeland security program that makes .... National Museum second on a listof sites requiring protection after the fall of ...
• Bush's Top 10 Lies - Democrats.com
  Bush s Top 10 Lies - 45k - similar pages
  There is no official National Guard record for George W. Bush's service in ... Indeed, Bush's discharge paperslist his service and duty station for each of his first ...

Read 'em and weep, NaziCons.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

I consider this to be Bush's biggest lie about Iraq and Saddam.

Rightwingers like to distract from the event that Bush tried to link Saddam to - 9/11. Even the dumbest of rightwingers should now be convinced that Saddam HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11. However, if any of them still think so - please provide credible proof.

I heard and saw Bush live on TV when he first tried to make this link. If there are any doubters - just Google "bush links saddam to 9/11"...

Bush said Obama had WMDs , he said nothing about them being involved with 9/11. Liekhota lies again.

 

[kaz]

Bush lied to the world and America when he declared that Saddam was providing aid and protection to al Qaeda. No evidence has ever been provided to show this was anything other than a lie.

The big lie in Iraq was the Democrats ... saying you were lied to.

And this one. Once again, a liberal without a link. I challenge your manhood, show the quote he said that, liar.

He made the claim in his State of the Union Address on Jan. 29, 2002. "Saddam aids and protects terrorist including members of al Qaeda" is the exact quote.

That quote doesn't say that Al Qaeda was behind 9/11.

So you admit you lied about that part?

He said Saddam was giving aid and protection to members of al Qaeda. He led us to believe there was collusion and some kind of connection between Saddam and al Qaeda. The preceding paragraphs of his speech were about all the weapons of mass destruction Saddam had. The implication was that because of the connection between Saddam and al Qaeda, Saddam might supply these weapons to al Qaeda. There was never the collusion or connection Bush claimed as a point of fact. That means he lied to us.

You said he claimed Al Qaeda was behind 9/11, so you're doing a bunch of spinning but admitting that was a lie?

W said "Saddam aids and protects terrorist including members of al Qaeda."

And you said, "he lied to us."

Where is your proof that Hussein did not aid and protect terrorists including members of Al Qaeda? Still seeing bupkus from you regarding actual evidence.

Now we do know the Democrats lied that they were lied to. They were in the White House for 8 of 9 years before the buildup began, they were all over the Senate intelligence committee, and they said the same things W did. Even the ones who voted against it said it was true, they just didn't want to invade. You're worshipping liars, that's one thing we do know. And you are a liar, you said W claimed Al Qaeda was behind 9/11 and that was a lie.

Do you even know what the truth is at this point or even what you believe?

 

[The Rabbi]

Oh look a bunch of left wing batshit crazy accusations with no basis in fact! What a shocker! Not.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Because telling the truth wouldn't have garnered support for his illegal war.

Oh look... partisan bigotry and intellectual dishonesty. Who would have guessed.

If the war was illegal why did Hillary vote for it?

The notion of an "illegal war" is preposterous.

The law is in fact quite clear, the President is empowered to send US troops wherever he deems necessary for 60 days (plus another 30 to withdraw from the theater) without Congressional approval.

If Congress approves, soldiers can be kept somewhere indefinitely with or without a declaration of war.

The same holds true for Obama by the way.

The ONLY people who have claimed it was an illegal invasion is the UN. And frankly who gives a fuck about the UN, they have no authority over the US.

 

[Camp]

Bush lied to the world and America when he declared that Saddam was providing aid and protection to al Qaeda. No evidence has ever been provided to show this was anything other than a lie.

The big lie in Iraq was the Democrats ... saying you were lied to.

And this one. Once again, a liberal without a link. I challenge your manhood, show the quote he said that, liar.

He made the claim in his State of the Union Address on Jan. 29, 2002. "Saddam aids and protects terrorist including members of al Qaeda" is the exact quote.

That quote doesn't say that Al Qaeda was behind 9/11.

So you admit you lied about that part?

He said Saddam was giving aid and protection to members of al Qaeda. He led us to believe there was collusion and some kind of connection between Saddam and al Qaeda. The preceding paragraphs of his speech were about all the weapons of mass destruction Saddam had. The implication was that because of the connection between Saddam and al Qaeda, Saddam might supply these weapons to al Qaeda. There was never the collusion or connection Bush claimed as a point of fact. That means he lied to us.

OOpS

WikiLeaks The Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Confirmed Again The Weekly Standard
Yeah, that's gonna hurt.

That link doesn't provide any evidence of collusion between Iraq and Saddam. It only shows that an Iraqi went to Afghanistan, joined with al Qaeda and returned to Iraq years after we invaded Iraq.

 

[kaz]

• List Of George W. Bush Lies - Pearly Gates - Tripod
  List Of George W. Bush Lies - 510k - 11 hours ago - similar pages
  Dolph Briscoe (2 consecutive four-year terms) January 16, 1973-January 16, 1979.George W. Bush (2 consecutive four-year terms) January 17, 1995 to present ...
• GeorgeWalkerBush.net - Top Ten Bush Lies
  GeorgeWalkerBush.net - Top Ten Bush Lies - 26k - similar pages
  But such a list would not be much good from a sales perspective, for the point of The Lies of George W. Bush: Mastering the Politics of Deception is to show that ...
• The 935 lies of George W. Bush / Yes, you already knew. But now ...
  http://www.sfgate.com / entertainment / morford / article / The-935-lies-of-George-W... - 268k - similar pages
  Jan 30, 2008 ... After all, it's common knowledge that, say, George Bush Sr.lied about Iran-Contra and "read my lips," Ronald Reagan lied like a nasty old rug ...
• Long List Of Bush-Cheney Administration Lies - Rense
  Long List Of Bush-Cheney Administration Lies - 17k - similar pages
  George W. Bush, September 12 2002; "If he declares he has none, then we will know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world." - Ari Fleischer ...
• 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from ...
  http://thedailybanter.com / 2013 / 05 / 13-benghazis-that-occurr / - 959k - similar pages
  May 8, 2013 ... 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News ... consulate/embassy attacks that occurred when George W. Bush and Dick ... My initial listwas quoted from an article on the Daily Kos which actually ... and automatons who take all of these lies at face value — not to mention ...
• Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war ...
  Study Bush aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war - CNN.com - 80k - similar pages
  Jan 23, 2008 ...President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false ... Also on the list: Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, former White House spokesmen
• Bush Lies... - Bush Watch
  Bush Lies... - 75k - similar pages
  Back in 2003, the President cited another student's thesis when making a case .... What follows, then, is an informal listing of just some of the lies he typically tells ...
• What was the single worst thing about George W. Bush's presidency ...
  http://www.washingtonmonthly.com / political-animal-a / 2013_04 / what_was_the_single_wors... - 102k - similar pages
  Apr 27, 2013 ... A key innovation of Prevaricator-in-Chief Bush and co. were the lies they told ... During my childhood, thepresident of the United States resigned in disgrace ... and tragic war on the basis of lieshas to be near the top of the list.
• The Bush Administration's Top 40 Lies about War and Terrorism ...
  The Bush Administration s Top 40 Lies about War and Terrorism Common Dreams Breaking News Views for the Progressive Community - 97k - similar pages
  Jul 30, 2003 ...The Bush Administration's Top 40 Lies about War and Terrorism ..... 'There is nothing in thepresident's homeland security program that makes .... National Museum second on a listof sites requiring protection after the fall of ...
• Bush's Top 10 Lies - Democrats.com
  Bush s Top 10 Lies - 45k - similar pages
  There is no official National Guard record for George W. Bush's service in ... Indeed, Bush's discharge paperslist his service and duty station for each of his first ...

Read 'em and weep, NaziCons.

If you can't dazzle them with your wit, baffle them with your bullshit.

Does any of this address your flat out lie that W claimed Al Qaeda was behind 9/11? Can you direct us to that?

I am challenging your manhood. I'm calling you a flat out full of crap lying sack of shit. You not only made the claim, you started a thread on it.

Back up your lie, eunuch.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

lackfotka will now simply ignore everyone and spam his own thread

his name is Lieknota, get it right.

And yes, prove he's a liar, and he claims some imaginary high ground and ignores you. Until his next lie.

 

[kaz]

The big lie in Iraq was the Democrats ... saying you were lied to.

And this one. Once again, a liberal without a link. I challenge your manhood, show the quote he said that, liar.

He made the claim in his State of the Union Address on Jan. 29, 2002. "Saddam aids and protects terrorist including members of al Qaeda" is the exact quote.

That quote doesn't say that Al Qaeda was behind 9/11.

So you admit you lied about that part?

He said Saddam was giving aid and protection to members of al Qaeda. He led us to believe there was collusion and some kind of connection between Saddam and al Qaeda. The preceding paragraphs of his speech were about all the weapons of mass destruction Saddam had. The implication was that because of the connection between Saddam and al Qaeda, Saddam might supply these weapons to al Qaeda. There was never the collusion or connection Bush claimed as a point of fact. That means he lied to us.

OOpS

WikiLeaks The Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Confirmed Again The Weekly Standard
Yeah, that's gonna hurt.

That link doesn't provide any evidence of collusion between Iraq and Saddam. It only shows that an Iraqi went to Afghanistan, joined with al Qaeda and returned to Iraq years after we invaded Iraq.

Where's your proof that Al Qaeda did not get support from Hussein since you stated as fact it was a lie to say they did?

 

[Theowl32]

Why did Clinton lie and tell us saddam (liberal hero now) had WMDs?

 

[kaz]

Because telling the truth wouldn't have garnered support for his illegal war.

Oh look... partisan bigotry and intellectual dishonesty. Who would have guessed.

If the war was illegal why did Hillary vote for it?

The notion of an "illegal war" is preposterous.

The law is in fact quite clear, the President is empowered to send US troops wherever he deems necessary for 60 days (plus another 30 to withdraw from the theater) without Congressional approval.

If Congress approves, soldiers can be kept somewhere indefinitely with or without a declaration of war.

The same holds true for Obama by the way.

That doesn't make it Constitutional. I agree 100% with this statement

The ONLY people who have claimed it was an illegal invasion is the UN. And frankly who gives a fuck about the UN, they have no authority over the US.

However, an Unconsitutional war is an illegal war, and that standard does matter. The Constituiton is an enumerated document. The Federal government has only those powers that are enumerated. And the only enumerated power of the military is "defense" of the United States.

Policeman to the world is not defense of the United States. The founders got it right.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Because telling the truth wouldn't have garnered support for his illegal war.

Oh look... partisan bigotry and intellectual dishonesty. Who would have guessed.

If the war was illegal why did Hillary vote for it?

The notion of an "illegal war" is preposterous.

The law is in fact quite clear, the President is empowered to send US troops wherever he deems necessary for 60 days (plus another 30 to withdraw from the theater) without Congressional approval.

If Congress approves, soldiers can be kept somewhere indefinitely with or without a declaration of war.

The same holds true for Obama by the way.

That doesn't make it Constitutional. I agree 100% with this statement

The ONLY people who have claimed it was an illegal invasion is the UN. And frankly who gives a fuck about the UN, they have no authority over the US.

However, an Unconsitutional war is an illegal war, and that standard does matter. The Constituiton is an enumerated document. The Federal government has only those powers that are enumerated. And the only enumerated power of the military is "defense" of the United States.

Policeman to the world is not defense of the United States. The founders got it right.

Certainly right, but I think a clear case can be made that destroying ISIL over there is in the best interest of our national defense.

The founders themselves practiced this my friend, the so called Barbary Wars were undeclared wars fIought halfway around the world. Starting in 1801

 

[The Rabbi]

The big lie in Iraq was the Democrats ... saying you were lied to.

And this one. Once again, a liberal without a link. I challenge your manhood, show the quote he said that, liar.

He made the claim in his State of the Union Address on Jan. 29, 2002. "Saddam aids and protects terrorist including members of al Qaeda" is the exact quote.

That quote doesn't say that Al Qaeda was behind 9/11.

So you admit you lied about that part?

He said Saddam was giving aid and protection to members of al Qaeda. He led us to believe there was collusion and some kind of connection between Saddam and al Qaeda. The preceding paragraphs of his speech were about all the weapons of mass destruction Saddam had. The implication was that because of the connection between Saddam and al Qaeda, Saddam might supply these weapons to al Qaeda. There was never the collusion or connection Bush claimed as a point of fact. That means he lied to us.

OOpS

WikiLeaks The Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Confirmed Again The Weekly Standard
Yeah, that's gonna hurt.

That link doesn't provide any evidence of collusion between Iraq and Saddam. It only shows that an Iraqi went to Afghanistan, joined with al Qaeda and returned to Iraq years after we invaded Iraq.

Didnt bother to read past Page 1, did you?

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Poor Liekhota another thread, another fail.

Go Redskins.

 

[The Rabbi]

Because telling the truth wouldn't have garnered support for his illegal war.

Oh look... partisan bigotry and intellectual dishonesty. Who would have guessed.

If the war was illegal why did Hillary vote for it?

The notion of an "illegal war" is preposterous.

The law is in fact quite clear, the President is empowered to send US troops wherever he deems necessary for 60 days (plus another 30 to withdraw from the theater) without Congressional approval.

If Congress approves, soldiers can be kept somewhere indefinitely with or without a declaration of war.

The same holds true for Obama by the way.

That doesn't make it Constitutional. I agree 100% with this statement

The ONLY people who have claimed it was an illegal invasion is the UN. And frankly who gives a fuck about the UN, they have no authority over the US.

However, an Unconsitutional war is an illegal war, and that standard does matter. The Constituiton is an enumerated document. The Federal government has only those powers that are enumerated. And the only enumerated power of the military is "defense" of the United States.

Policeman to the world is not defense of the United States. The founders got it right.

Defense of the US is a changing concept. Just because the Chinese arent storming over the Mexican border does not mean they are not a threat.
The wars were legal. Congress and the Chief Executive have wide latitude in deciding on military action. No court has ever ruled a war unconstitutional.

 

[Lakhota]

I consider this to be Bush's biggest lie about Iraq and Saddam.

Rightwingers like to distract from the event that Bush tried to link Saddam to - 9/11. Even the dumbest of rightwingers should now be convinced that Saddam HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11. However, if any of them still think so - please provide credible proof.

I heard and saw Bush live on TV when he first tried to make this link. If there are any doubters - just Google "bush links saddam to 9/11"...

Bush said Obama had WMDs , he said nothing about them being involved with 9/11. Liekhota lies again.

What WMDs did "Obama" have?

 

[Theowl32]

Say, why again didn't UN ever charge Bush with war crimes?

Love it.

Remember morons like this OP thought and could not wait for obama to call for an independent investigation into Bush's "illegal war?"

Is it not interesting how their god did not do that? In fact, is it not interesting that not only did he not do that, but he has yet to close GTMO.

Almost as though he is privy to intel that he had not been when he was making his false claims when he was running. Naaaah, the liberals do not care about that. Never have. They, do think they know more than anyone...all of the time though.

Remember folks, these are the same assholes who claim Bush is as guilty as hitler. Mainly cause he is white and a republican. Having said that, they think he is as guilty as hitler. They thought there was going to be trial like at Nuremberg.

Not only was there no trial, there is nothing close to charges.

With all of this "conclusive evidence" they did not see fit to charge them? Why again? Cause they just let the mass genocide go?

LOL at the level of stupidity of liberals that cannot be classified in the English language.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

I consider this to be Bush's biggest lie about Iraq and Saddam.

Rightwingers like to distract from the event that Bush tried to link Saddam to - 9/11. Even the dumbest of rightwingers should now be convinced that Saddam HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11. However, if any of them still think so - please provide credible proof.

I heard and saw Bush live on TV when he first tried to make this link. If there are any doubters - just Google "bush links saddam to 9/11"...

Bush said Obama had WMDs , he said nothing about them being involved with 9/11. Liekhota lies again.

What WMDs did "Obama" have?

Oh no you don't Liekhota, you don't get to change the topic now. First you must answer for your lies about Bush claiming Saddam was involved in 9/11.

Admit you lied there, and then we can move on.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Say, why again didn't UN ever charge Bush with war crimes?

Love it.

Remember morons like this OP thought and could not wait for obama to call for an independent investigation into Bush's "illegal war?"

Is it not interesting how their god did not do that? In fact, is it not interesting that not only did he not do that, but he has yet to close GTMO.

Almost as though he is privy to intel that he had not been when he was making his false claims when he was running. Naaaah, the liberals do not care about that. Never have. They, do think they know more than anyone...all of the time though.

Remember folks, these are the same assholes who claim Bush is as guilty as hitler. Mainly cause he is white and a republican. Having said that, they think he is as guilty as hitler. They thought there was going to be trial like at Nuremberg.

Not only was there no trial, there is nothing close to charges.

With all of this "conclusive evidence" they did not see fit to charge them? Why again? Cause they just let the mass genocide go?

LOL at the level of stupidity of liberals that cannot be classified in the English language.

The UN doesn't charge people with war crimes. the Hague does.

 

[kaz]

Why did Clinton lie and tell us saddam (liberal hero now) had WMDs?

Because telling the truth wouldn't have garnered support for his illegal war.

Oh look... partisan bigotry and intellectual dishonesty. Who would have guessed.

If the war was illegal why did Hillary vote for it?

The notion of an "illegal war" is preposterous.

The law is in fact quite clear, the President is empowered to send US troops wherever he deems necessary for 60 days (plus another 30 to withdraw from the theater) without Congressional approval.

If Congress approves, soldiers can be kept somewhere indefinitely with or without a declaration of war.

The same holds true for Obama by the way.

That doesn't make it Constitutional. I agree 100% with this statement

The ONLY people who have claimed it was an illegal invasion is the UN. And frankly who gives a fuck about the UN, they have no authority over the US.

However, an Unconsitutional war is an illegal war, and that standard does matter. The Constituiton is an enumerated document. The Federal government has only those powers that are enumerated. And the only enumerated power of the military is "defense" of the United States.

Policeman to the world is not defense of the United States. The founders got it right.

Certainly right, but I think a clear case can be made that destroying ISIL over there is in the best interest of our national defense.

The founders themselves practiced this my friend, the so called Barbary Wars were undeclared wars fIought halfway around the world. Starting in 1801

I didn't say anything about "declared" wars, I only addressed that the war needs to be for defense.

Fighting ISIL only matters because our military is where it should not be, we should leave the middle east entirely and focus on fracking and energy exploration domestically. And there's plenty of energy here.

We have no business being in the middle east, and one wrong doesn't make another. Let's fix it by bringing our troops home. Then if they attack us, we'll blast the crap out of them, if they leave us alone, we leave them alone. The biggest beneficiaries of our meddling int he middle east are the Europeans, the Japanese and despotic dictators in the Middle East. As for the Europeans and Japanese, let them deal with their own problems.