Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In doing so they saved lots of time fulfilling the idol making verses in Isaiah 44.
They saved money reusing the items left behind the old Mithraic temples.
The Mithraic cross with the sickly man on it predates Christianity. The Roman Church even used old Mithraic temples with the altar and cross and used them as Bascilicas. If you want to know what Mithraic crosses looked like, Pope John Paul used to carry the replica.
In doing so they saved lots of time fulfilling the idol making verses in Isaiah 44.
They saved money reusing the items left behind the old Mithraic temples.
The Mithraic cross with the sickly man on it predates Christianity. The Roman Church even used old Mithraic temples with the altar and cross and used them as Bascilicas. If you want to know what Mithraic crosses looked like, Pope John Paul used to carry the replica.
The religion that respects neither time nor place and has verses dedicated to sternly preaching prayer in private went ape building houses of worship.
the vatican was built upon pagan religious site and used pagan imagery , what was the purpose of this
The Vatican is partly built over a temple of Cybele. The Mithraic meetings were held in underground chambers
why so many pagan statues at the vatican?
Actually the cross was the sign of death & destruction, thus the mark of the beast which has the power of death and destruction.
The crossed out cross (8raystar known as the Evening Star) was the symbol of birth and life, so it's only fitting the openly claimed son of baal choose his father's sun cross.
But the cross with the sickly man on it was Mithraic. Rome brought Mithraism and it's temples to Tarsus where it was popular. Soldiers like Lucius made it popular in Rome by bringing back the Mithraic myths on books. The Bacilica with the cross and altar and relics kept from the Mithraic temple is called Basilica of San Clemente look it up. I stated a fact and you changed the point with the snide remark. What is the purpose of that, deflecting a bad day?
Actually the cross was the sign of death & destruction, thus the mark of the beast which has the power of death and destruction.
The crossed out cross (8raystar known as the Evening Star) was the symbol of birth and life, so it's only fitting the openly claimed son of baal choose his father's sun cross.
But the cross with the sickly man on it was Mithraic. Rome brought Mithraism and it's temples to Tarsus where it was popular. Soldiers like Lucius made it popular in Rome by bringing back the Mithraic myths on books. The Bacilica with the cross and altar and relics kept from the Mithraic temple is called Basilica of San Clemente look it up. I stated a fact and you changed the point with the snide remark. What is the purpose of that, deflecting a bad day?
He was not crucified or death. That is a later christians addition to mix Mithras with Jesus as the same.
the vatican was built upon pagan religious site and used pagan imagery , what was the purpose of this
The Vatican is partly built over a temple of Cybele. The Mithraic meetings were held in underground chambers
why so many pagan statues at the vatican?
Question: "Why are both Jesus and Satan referred to as the morning star?"Actually the cross was the sign of death & destruction, thus the mark of the beast which has the power of death and destruction.
The crossed out cross (8raystar known as the Evening Star) was the symbol of birth and life, so it's only fitting the openly claimed son of baal choose his father's sun cross.
But the cross with the sickly man on it was Mithraic. Rome brought Mithraism and it's temples to Tarsus where it was popular. Soldiers like Lucius made it popular in Rome by bringing back the Mithraic myths on books. The Bacilica with the cross and altar and relics kept from the Mithraic temple is called Basilica of San Clemente look it up. I stated a fact and you changed the point with the snide remark. What is the purpose of that, deflecting a bad day?
He was not crucified or death. That is a later christians addition to mix Mithras with Jesus as the same.
Agree the NT says slew & hanged
source;
Acts 5:30 "Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 10:39 "whom they slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 13:29 "they took him down from the tree" 1 Peter 2:24 "who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree" Galatians 3:13 "Christ... being made a curse upon us... Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree" also read Deuteronomy 21:22.
The Yeshu son of Mary figure of 100bc was stpned & hanged pn Passover
But the Galilean 5ax revolter 6bc figure and his 2 sons were crucified & the
Ad era river Jordan w/ apostles martyred figure was also crucified.
You know my position, You can't crucify or kill a fictitious character without a pen and Rome merely used the Canaanite Dying god mythology of Athtar the fierce, whereby the son (called Morning Star) dies to surpass his father Baal on the throne.
So they borrowed the Baal death scene and father became masked with the son as one in the same mythology whereby the son in martyrdom becomes higher then the previous mythology growing old and out of favor. Dagon the father of Baal became replaced by Baal through his death scenecand now the son morning star
-Rev 22:16 in impersonating the scene surpasses his father Baal on the throne and becomes higher then the father as the father did with Dag0n (the fishman god).
Sources:
1)they never say the father's name.
2)Baal's son is the morning star-rev 22:16
3)Ishtar(easter) son was the morning star.
4)they are imitating the dying god mythology of the Canaanites whereby the son called morning star surpasses his father Baal on the throne by dying and bringing attention to himself as the new mask for Baal.
5)the crucifixion scene is written from plagiarizing the Baal passion play.
Source:the predated Assyrian (700bc) Marduk-Bel Tablets housed now in the Brittish Museum.
6)He's this god's only Begotten son and Yhwh's begotten was David in Psalms, so Jesus can't be YHWH's only begotten son.
We do know however, that Baal's only son is the Morning Star
(Jesus claimed to be Rev 22:16)
=Jesus is claimed the son of Baal.
David claimed to be the begotten son of Shalem thus naming his 2 sons after Shalem.
the vatican was built upon pagan religious site and used pagan imagery , what was the purpose of this
The Vatican is partly built over a temple of Cybele.
The Mithraic meetings were held in underground chambers
why so many pagan statues at the vatican?
Question: "Why are both Jesus and Satan referred to as the morning star?"Actually the cross was the sign of death & destruction, thus the mark of the beast which has the power of death and destruction.
The crossed out cross (8raystar known as the Evening Star) was the symbol of birth and life, so it's only fitting the openly claimed son of baal choose his father's sun cross.
But the cross with the sickly man on it was Mithraic. Rome brought Mithraism and it's temples to Tarsus where it was popular. Soldiers like Lucius made it popular in Rome by bringing back the Mithraic myths on books. The Bacilica with the cross and altar and relics kept from the Mithraic temple is called Basilica of San Clemente look it up. I stated a fact and you changed the point with the snide remark. What is the purpose of that, deflecting a bad day?
He was not crucified or death. That is a later christians addition to mix Mithras with Jesus as the same.
Agree the NT says slew & hanged
source;
Acts 5:30 "Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 10:39 "whom they slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 13:29 "they took him down from the tree" 1 Peter 2:24 "who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree" Galatians 3:13 "Christ... being made a curse upon us... Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree" also read Deuteronomy 21:22.
The Yeshu son of Mary figure of 100bc was stpned & hanged pn Passover
But the Galilean 5ax revolter 6bc figure and his 2 sons were crucified & the
Ad era river Jordan w/ apostles martyred figure was also crucified.
You know my position, You can't crucify or kill a fictitious character without a pen and Rome merely used the Canaanite Dying god mythology of Athtar the fierce, whereby the son (called Morning Star) dies to surpass his father Baal on the throne.
So they borrowed the Baal death scene and father became masked with the son as one in the same mythology whereby the son in martyrdom becomes higher then the previous mythology growing old and out of favor. Dagon the father of Baal became replaced by Baal through his death scenecand now the son morning star
-Rev 22:16 in impersonating the scene surpasses his father Baal on the throne and becomes higher then the father as the father did with Dag0n (the fishman god).
Sources:
1)they never say the father's name.
2)Baal's son is the morning star-rev 22:16
3)Ishtar(easter) son was the morning star.
4)they are imitating the dying god mythology of the Canaanites whereby the son called morning star surpasses his father Baal on the throne by dying and bringing attention to himself as the new mask for Baal.
5)the crucifixion scene is written from plagiarizing the Baal passion play.
Source:the predated Assyrian (700bc) Marduk-Bel Tablets housed now in the Brittish Museum.
6)He's this god's only Begotten son and Yhwh's begotten was David in Psalms, so Jesus can't be YHWH's only begotten son.
We do know however, that Baal's only son is the Morning Star
(Jesus claimed to be Rev 22:16)
=Jesus is claimed the son of Baal.
David claimed to be the begotten son of Shalem thus naming his 2 sons after Shalem.
Answer: The first reference to the morning star as an individual is in Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!” (NIV). The KJV and NKJV both translate “morning star” as “Lucifer, son of the morning.” It is clear from the rest of the passage that Isaiah is referring to Satan’s fall from heaven (Luke 10:18). So in this case, the morning star refers to Satan. In Revelation 22:16, Jesus unmistakably identifies Himself as the morning star. Why are both Jesus and Satan described as the “morning star”?
It is interesting to note that the concept of the “morning star” is not the only concept that is applied to both Jesus and Satan. In Revelation 5:5, Jesus is referred to as the Lion of the tribe of Judah. In 1 Peter 5:8, Satan is compared to a lion, seeking someone to devour. The point is this, both Jesus and Satan, to a certain extent, have similarities to lions. Jesus is similar to a lion in that He is the King, He is royal and majestic. Satan is similar to a lion in that he seeks to devour other creatures. That is where the similarities between Jesus, Satan, and lions end, however. Jesus and Satan are like lions in very different ways.
The idea of a “bright morning star” is a star that outshines all the others. Satan, as perhaps the most beautiful creation of God, probably the most powerful of all the angels, was a bright morning star. Jesus, as God incarnate, the Lord of the universe, is THE bright and morning star. Jesus is the most holy and powerful “light” in all the universe. So, while both Jesus and Satan can be described as “bright morning stars,” in no sense is this equating Jesus and Satan. Satan is a created being. His light only exists to the extent that God created it. Jesus is the light of the world (John 9:5). Only Jesus’ light is self-existent. Satan may be a bright morning star, but he is only a poor imitation of the one true bright morning star, Jesus Christ, the light of the world.
Question: "Why are both Jesus and Satan referred to as the morning star?"Actually the cross was the sign of death & destruction, thus the mark of the beast which has the power of death and destruction.
The crossed out cross (8raystar known as the Evening Star) was the symbol of birth and life, so it's only fitting the openly claimed son of baal choose his father's sun cross.
But the cross with the sickly man on it was Mithraic. Rome brought Mithraism and it's temples to Tarsus where it was popular. Soldiers like Lucius made it popular in Rome by bringing back the Mithraic myths on books. The Bacilica with the cross and altar and relics kept from the Mithraic temple is called Basilica of San Clemente look it up. I stated a fact and you changed the point with the snide remark. What is the purpose of that, deflecting a bad day?
He was not crucified or death. That is a later christians addition to mix Mithras with Jesus as the same.
Agree the NT says slew & hanged
source;
Acts 5:30 "Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 10:39 "whom they slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 13:29 "they took him down from the tree" 1 Peter 2:24 "who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree" Galatians 3:13 "Christ... being made a curse upon us... Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree" also read Deuteronomy 21:22.
The Yeshu son of Mary figure of 100bc was stpned & hanged pn Passover
But the Galilean 5ax revolter 6bc figure and his 2 sons were crucified & the
Ad era river Jordan w/ apostles martyred figure was also crucified.
You know my position, You can't crucify or kill a fictitious character without a pen and Rome merely used the Canaanite Dying god mythology of Athtar the fierce, whereby the son (called Morning Star) dies to surpass his father Baal on the throne.
So they borrowed the Baal death scene and father became masked with the son as one in the same mythology whereby the son in martyrdom becomes higher then the previous mythology growing old and out of favor. Dagon the father of Baal became replaced by Baal through his death scenecand now the son morning star
-Rev 22:16 in impersonating the scene surpasses his father Baal on the throne and becomes higher then the father as the father did with Dag0n (the fishman god).
Sources:
1)they never say the father's name.
2)Baal's son is the morning star-rev 22:16
3)Ishtar(easter) son was the morning star.
4)they are imitating the dying god mythology of the Canaanites whereby the son called morning star surpasses his father Baal on the throne by dying and bringing attention to himself as the new mask for Baal.
5)the crucifixion scene is written from plagiarizing the Baal passion play.
Source:the predated Assyrian (700bc) Marduk-Bel Tablets housed now in the Brittish Museum.
6)He's this god's only Begotten son and Yhwh's begotten was David in Psalms, so Jesus can't be YHWH's only begotten son.
We do know however, that Baal's only son is the Morning Star
(Jesus claimed to be Rev 22:16)
=Jesus is claimed the son of Baal.
David claimed to be the begotten son of Shalem thus naming his 2 sons after Shalem.
Answer: The first reference to the morning star as an individual is in Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!” (NIV). The KJV and NKJV both translate “morning star” as “Lucifer, son of the morning.” It is clear from the rest of the passage that Isaiah is referring to Satan’s fall from heaven (Luke 10:18). So in this case, the morning star refers to Satan. In Revelation 22:16, Jesus unmistakably identifies Himself as the morning star. Why are both Jesus and Satan described as the “morning star”?
It is interesting to note that the concept of the “morning star” is not the only concept that is applied to both Jesus and Satan. In Revelation 5:5, Jesus is referred to as the Lion of the tribe of Judah. In 1 Peter 5:8, Satan is compared to a lion, seeking someone to devour. The point is this, both Jesus and Satan, to a certain extent, have similarities to lions. Jesus is similar to a lion in that He is the King, He is royal and majestic. Satan is similar to a lion in that he seeks to devour other creatures. That is where the similarities between Jesus, Satan, and lions end, however. Jesus and Satan are like lions in very different ways.
The idea of a “bright morning star” is a star that outshines all the others. Satan, as perhaps the most beautiful creation of God, probably the most powerful of all the angels, was a bright morning star. Jesus, as God incarnate, the Lord of the universe, is THE bright and morning star. Jesus is the most holy and powerful “light” in all the universe. So, while both Jesus and Satan can be described as “bright morning stars,” in no sense is this equating Jesus and Satan. Satan is a created being. His light only exists to the extent that God created it. Jesus is the light of the world (John 9:5). Only Jesus’ light is self-existent. Satan may be a bright morning star, but he is only a poor imitation of the one true bright morning star, Jesus Christ, the light of the world.
WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!
EXCUSES EXCUSES!
You Satanists are so bad at lying for your beast.
Everytime you guys are shown your mistake you never apologize for lying to people with false info that you know is
fallacious=willingly & knowingly doing
evil. With no Teshuva you always repeat the sin over and over and ignore the corrected information pretending it doesn't exist thus hiding and making excuses. This is the 3rd Time I answered this purposeful misdirection by you, all times unrefuted.
Facts:
they used symbols to describe emulations and resemblances.
Venus was used to symbolize
the 2 arch malakhs thus Morning Star being the fallen arc of the planet made the perfect symbol to Lucifers fall-(Rev 22:16, Ezekiel 28) and Evening Star(Shalem) the rising arc of the planet became Symbolism for Michael the rising arch malakh-Dan 12:1-4.
Jesus is claimed to be the Nemesis of the one named in the Holy City. But also note Morning Star is Baal's son.
Note; they never name this Father who is one in the same Jesus. That's the mystery easily solved. Research the Assyrian Bel Tablet in the Brittish Museum circa 700bc. The story of Baal's death and resurrection EXACTLY plagerized and used for the Jesus scene thus one in the same mythology given a mask and new name.
Thus:
“... from my Father (Baal). To the one who conquers(DESTROYS) I will also give the morning star(LUCIFER).” -- Revelation 2:28
· Revelation 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify these things in the churches.
· I am the bright and Morning Star (lucifer)
[See Lucifer here etymology of "": "[ the morning star, a fallen rebel archangel, THE Devil, fr. OE. fr. Latin, the morning star, fr. Lucifer light-bearing, fr. luc light + -fer -ferous--more at LIGHT]" (Webster's, p.677)
Even Baal's wife Isis is another cultures Ishtar (easter) whocs son is the Morning Star symboled as a fish (because Grandpa idol Dagon was the fishman god). It's why the Pope wears the fishman god ring, fishead hat called Mitre and scales on his Robe. They were selling the mystery Babylon religions to the Jews through a created image of a half Jewish man.
So now you have the number of his name
Baal Jesus=666 in ASCll numerology used to secret numbers from names. Father and son are one in the same myth.
Research -google search:
The Canaanite dying god mythology
morning star son of baal.
Then research Shalem the Evening Star.
Then research how City of YeruShalem becomes the city of peace (Shalom).
When "the Night" removes "the Day" there will be peace.
Rome created a satanic mockery impersonation of the Temple and the Kohanim just as Levay satanist's are mocking Christianity and emulating the RCC rituals with satanic twists.
That's why they create canibalism bread wine sacriment, incest birth story where the son impregnates his mother, they call him scarab (dung beetle), lucifer (morning star) ,
cursed (on cross), chose the curse of death not blessing of life, breaks all ten commands, call him the forbiden swine
(IE-Sous=the swine).
The lineage the Nt gives Jesus is through all the Biblical Harlots and their use of the mother Harlot Mary of 100bc is probably why the other christ cults deemed Rome's adoption as the Harlot church. Otherwise Rome was purposely taunting the flocks by setting up a total mockery idol as representing all the forbidden things.
Anyway because they use the half Roman Yeshu son of Mary who was born out of wedlock that figure would not be allowed in the Temple according to Deut..
Sources:
Matthew mentions four sinful harlot women of the bible conveniently and coincidentally in the Joseph genealogy:
1) (Genesis 38:12-19) Tamar who was the one who disguised herself as a harlot to seduce her father-in-law Judah.
2) (Joshua 2:1) Rahab who was a harlot living in the city of Jericho. And note wasn’t even of Jewish lineage, she was a Canaanite. The creators of the legend/image icon in trying to create his lineage and plagiarizing the OT goofed this one big time.
3) (Ruth 3:1-14) Ruth who was the one through her mother-in-law Naomi's request, came secretly to where Boaz was sleeping and spent the night with him. Later Ruth and Boaz were married.
4) (2 Samuel 11:2-5) Bathsheba was the controversial one who became pregnant by King David while she was still married to Uriah.
In Matthew 1:19 he states Joseph didn't want to expose her to public disgrace, so he had a mind to divorce her (Mary) quietly (as to not get her stoned).
Deut. 23:2 disqualifies Jesus from entering the Temple let alone leading it.
Plus there's a little known rule about n0t listening to political prisoners that prevents following any of the captured christs and even Paul.
Question: "Why are both Jesus and Satan referred to as the morning star?"Actually the cross was the sign of death & destruction, thus the mark of the beast which has the power of death and destruction.
The crossed out cross (8raystar known as the Evening Star) was the symbol of birth and life, so it's only fitting the openly claimed son of baal choose his father's sun cross.
But the cross with the sickly man on it was Mithraic. Rome brought Mithraism and it's temples to Tarsus where it was popular. Soldiers like Lucius made it popular in Rome by bringing back the Mithraic myths on books. The Bacilica with the cross and altar and relics kept from the Mithraic temple is called Basilica of San Clemente look it up. I stated a fact and you changed the point with the snide remark. What is the purpose of that, deflecting a bad day?
He was not crucified or death. That is a later christians addition to mix Mithras with Jesus as the same.
Agree the NT says slew & hanged
source;
Acts 5:30 "Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 10:39 "whom they slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 13:29 "they took him down from the tree" 1 Peter 2:24 "who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree" Galatians 3:13 "Christ... being made a curse upon us... Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree" also read Deuteronomy 21:22.
The Yeshu son of Mary figure of 100bc was stpned & hanged pn Passover
But the Galilean 5ax revolter 6bc figure and his 2 sons were crucified & the
Ad era river Jordan w/ apostles martyred figure was also crucified.
You know my position, You can't crucify or kill a fictitious character without a pen and Rome merely used the Canaanite Dying god mythology of Athtar the fierce, whereby the son (called Morning Star) dies to surpass his father Baal on the throne.
So they borrowed the Baal death scene and father became masked with the son as one in the same mythology whereby the son in martyrdom becomes higher then the previous mythology growing old and out of favor. Dagon the father of Baal became replaced by Baal through his death scenecand now the son morning star
-Rev 22:16 in impersonating the scene surpasses his father Baal on the throne and becomes higher then the father as the father did with Dag0n (the fishman god).
Sources:
1)they never say the father's name.
2)Baal's son is the morning star-rev 22:16
3)Ishtar(easter) son was the morning star.
4)they are imitating the dying god mythology of the Canaanites whereby the son called morning star surpasses his father Baal on the throne by dying and bringing attention to himself as the new mask for Baal.
5)the crucifixion scene is written from plagiarizing the Baal passion play.
Source:the predated Assyrian (700bc) Marduk-Bel Tablets housed now in the Brittish Museum.
6)He's this god's only Begotten son and Yhwh's begotten was David in Psalms, so Jesus can't be YHWH's only begotten son.
We do know however, that Baal's only son is the Morning Star
(Jesus claimed to be Rev 22:16)
=Jesus is claimed the son of Baal.
David claimed to be the begotten son of Shalem thus naming his 2 sons after Shalem.
Answer: The first reference to the morning star as an individual is in Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!” (NIV). The KJV and NKJV both translate “morning star” as “Lucifer, son of the morning.” It is clear from the rest of the passage that Isaiah is referring to Satan’s fall from heaven (Luke 10:18). So in this case, the morning star refers to Satan. In Revelation 22:16, Jesus unmistakably identifies Himself as the morning star. Why are both Jesus and Satan described as the “morning star”?
It is interesting to note that the concept of the “morning star” is not the only concept that is applied to both Jesus and Satan. In Revelation 5:5, Jesus is referred to as the Lion of the tribe of Judah. In 1 Peter 5:8, Satan is compared to a lion, seeking someone to devour. The point is this, both Jesus and Satan, to a certain extent, have similarities to lions. Jesus is similar to a lion in that He is the King, He is royal and majestic. Satan is similar to a lion in that he seeks to devour other creatures. That is where the similarities between Jesus, Satan, and lions end, however. Jesus and Satan are like lions in very different ways.
The idea of a “bright morning star” is a star that outshines all the others. Satan, as perhaps the most beautiful creation of God, probably the most powerful of all the angels, was a bright morning star. Jesus, as God incarnate, the Lord of the universe, is THE bright and morning star. Jesus is the most holy and powerful “light” in all the universe. So, while both Jesus and Satan can be described as “bright morning stars,” in no sense is this equating Jesus and Satan. Satan is a created being. His light only exists to the extent that God created it. Jesus is the light of the world (John 9:5). Only Jesus’ light is self-existent. Satan may be a bright morning star, but he is only a poor imitation of the one true bright morning star, Jesus Christ, the light of the world.
WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!
EXCUSES EXCUSES!
You Satanists are so bad at lying for your beast.
Everytime you guys are shown your mistake you never apologize for lying to people with false info that you know is
fallacious=willingly & knowingly doing
evil. With no Teshuva you always repeat the sin over and over and ignore the corrected information pretending it doesn't exist thus hiding and making excuses. This is the 3rd Time I answered this purposeful misdirection by you, all times unrefuted.
Facts:
they used symbols to describe emulations and resemblances.
Venus was used to symbolize
the 2 arch malakhs thus Morning Star being the fallen arc of the planet made the perfect symbol to Lucifers fall-(Rev 22:16, Ezekiel 28) and Evening Star(Shalem) the rising arc of the planet became Symbolism for Michael the rising arch malakh-Dan 12:1-4.
Jesus is claimed to be the Nemesis of the one named in the Holy City. But also note Morning Star is Baal's son.
Note; they never name this Father who is one in the same Jesus. That's the mystery easily solved. Research the Assyrian Bel Tablet in the Brittish Museum circa 700bc. The story of Baal's death and resurrection EXACTLY plagerized and used for the Jesus scene thus one in the same mythology given a mask and new name.
Thus:
“... from my Father (Baal). To the one who conquers(DESTROYS) I will also give the morning star(LUCIFER).” -- Revelation 2:28
· Revelation 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify these things in the churches.
· I am the bright and Morning Star (lucifer)
[See Lucifer here etymology of "": "[ the morning star, a fallen rebel archangel, THE Devil, fr. OE. fr. Latin, the morning star, fr. Lucifer light-bearing, fr. luc light + -fer -ferous--more at LIGHT]" (Webster's, p.677)
Even Baal's wife Isis is another cultures Ishtar (easter) whocs son is the Morning Star symboled as a fish (because Grandpa idol Dagon was the fishman god). It's why the Pope wears the fishman god ring, fishead hat called Mitre and scales on his Robe. They were selling the mystery Babylon religions to the Jews through a created image of a half Jewish man.
So now you have the number of his name
Baal Jesus=666 in ASCll numerology used to secret numbers from names. Father and son are one in the same myth.
Research -google search:
The Canaanite dying god mythology
morning star son of baal.
Then research Shalem the Evening Star.
Then research how City of YeruShalem becomes the city of peace (Shalom).
When "the Night" removes "the Day" there will be peace.
Rome created a satanic mockery impersonation of the Temple and the Kohanim just as Levay satanist's are mocking Christianity and emulating the RCC rituals with satanic twists.
That's why they create canibalism bread wine sacriment, incest birth story where the son impregnates his mother, they call him scarab (dung beetle), lucifer (morning star) ,
cursed (on cross), chose the curse of death not blessing of life, breaks all ten commands, call him the forbiden swine
(IE-Sous=the swine).
The lineage the Nt gives Jesus is through all the Biblical Harlots and their use of the mother Harlot Mary of 100bc is probably why the other christ cults deemed Rome's adoption as the Harlot church. Otherwise Rome was purposely taunting the flocks by setting up a total mockery idol as representing all the forbidden things.
Anyway because they use the half Roman Yeshu son of Mary who was born out of wedlock that figure would not be allowed in the Temple according to Deut..
Sources:
Matthew mentions four sinful harlot women of the bible conveniently and coincidentally in the Joseph genealogy:
1) (Genesis 38:12-19) Tamar who was the one who disguised herself as a harlot to seduce her father-in-law Judah.
2) (Joshua 2:1) Rahab who was a harlot living in the city of Jericho. And note wasn’t even of Jewish lineage, she was a Canaanite. The creators of the legend/image icon in trying to create his lineage and plagiarizing the OT goofed this one big time.
3) (Ruth 3:1-14) Ruth who was the one through her mother-in-law Naomi's request, came secretly to where Boaz was sleeping and spent the night with him. Later Ruth and Boaz were married.
4) (2 Samuel 11:2-5) Bathsheba was the controversial one who became pregnant by King David while she was still married to Uriah.
In Matthew 1:19 he states Joseph didn't want to expose her to public disgrace, so he had a mind to divorce her (Mary) quietly (as to not get her stoned).
Deut. 23:2 disqualifies Jesus from entering the Temple let alone leading it.
Plus there's a little known rule about n0t listening to political prisoners that prevents following any of the captured christs and even Paul.
Question: "Why are both Jesus and Satan referred to as the morning star?"Actually the cross was the sign of death & destruction, thus the mark of the beast which has the power of death and destruction.
The crossed out cross (8raystar known as the Evening Star) was the symbol of birth and life, so it's only fitting the openly claimed son of baal choose his father's sun cross.
But the cross with the sickly man on it was Mithraic. Rome brought Mithraism and it's temples to Tarsus where it was popular. Soldiers like Lucius made it popular in Rome by bringing back the Mithraic myths on books. The Bacilica with the cross and altar and relics kept from the Mithraic temple is called Basilica of San Clemente look it up. I stated a fact and you changed the point with the snide remark. What is the purpose of that, deflecting a bad day?
He was not crucified or death. That is a later christians addition to mix Mithras with Jesus as the same.
Agree the NT says slew & hanged
source;
Acts 5:30 "Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 10:39 "whom they slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 13:29 "they took him down from the tree" 1 Peter 2:24 "who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree" Galatians 3:13 "Christ... being made a curse upon us... Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree" also read Deuteronomy 21:22.
The Yeshu son of Mary figure of 100bc was stpned & hanged pn Passover
But the Galilean 5ax revolter 6bc figure and his 2 sons were crucified & the
Ad era river Jordan w/ apostles martyred figure was also crucified.
You know my position, You can't crucify or kill a fictitious character without a pen and Rome merely used the Canaanite Dying god mythology of Athtar the fierce, whereby the son (called Morning Star) dies to surpass his father Baal on the throne.
So they borrowed the Baal death scene and father became masked with the son as one in the same mythology whereby the son in martyrdom becomes higher then the previous mythology growing old and out of favor. Dagon the father of Baal became replaced by Baal through his death scenecand now the son morning star
-Rev 22:16 in impersonating the scene surpasses his father Baal on the throne and becomes higher then the father as the father did with Dag0n (the fishman god).
Sources:
1)they never say the father's name.
2)Baal's son is the morning star-rev 22:16
3)Ishtar(easter) son was the morning star.
4)they are imitating the dying god mythology of the Canaanites whereby the son called morning star surpasses his father Baal on the throne by dying and bringing attention to himself as the new mask for Baal.
5)the crucifixion scene is written from plagiarizing the Baal passion play.
Source:the predated Assyrian (700bc) Marduk-Bel Tablets housed now in the Brittish Museum.
6)He's this god's only Begotten son and Yhwh's begotten was David in Psalms, so Jesus can't be YHWH's only begotten son.
We do know however, that Baal's only son is the Morning Star
(Jesus claimed to be Rev 22:16)
=Jesus is claimed the son of Baal.
David claimed to be the begotten son of Shalem thus naming his 2 sons after Shalem.
Answer: The first reference to the morning star as an individual is in Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!” (NIV). The KJV and NKJV both translate “morning star” as “Lucifer, son of the morning.” It is clear from the rest of the passage that Isaiah is referring to Satan’s fall from heaven (Luke 10:18). So in this case, the morning star refers to Satan. In Revelation 22:16, Jesus unmistakably identifies Himself as the morning star. Why are both Jesus and Satan described as the “morning star”?
It is interesting to note that the concept of the “morning star” is not the only concept that is applied to both Jesus and Satan. In Revelation 5:5, Jesus is referred to as the Lion of the tribe of Judah. In 1 Peter 5:8, Satan is compared to a lion, seeking someone to devour. The point is this, both Jesus and Satan, to a certain extent, have similarities to lions. Jesus is similar to a lion in that He is the King, He is royal and majestic. Satan is similar to a lion in that he seeks to devour other creatures. That is where the similarities between Jesus, Satan, and lions end, however. Jesus and Satan are like lions in very different ways.
The idea of a “bright morning star” is a star that outshines all the others. Satan, as perhaps the most beautiful creation of God, probably the most powerful of all the angels, was a bright morning star. Jesus, as God incarnate, the Lord of the universe, is THE bright and morning star. Jesus is the most holy and powerful “light” in all the universe. So, while both Jesus and Satan can be described as “bright morning stars,” in no sense is this equating Jesus and Satan. Satan is a created being. His light only exists to the extent that God created it. Jesus is the light of the world (John 9:5). Only Jesus’ light is self-existent. Satan may be a bright morning star, but he is only a poor imitation of the one true bright morning star, Jesus Christ, the light of the world.
WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!
EXCUSES EXCUSES!
You Satanists are so bad at lying for your beast.
Everytime you guys are shown your mistake you never apologize for lying to people with false info that you know is
fallacious=willingly & knowingly doing
evil. With no Teshuva you always repeat the sin over and over and ignore the corrected information pretending it doesn't exist thus hiding and making excuses. This is the 3rd Time I answered this purposeful misdirection by you, all times unrefuted.
Facts:
they used symbols to describe emulations and resemblances.
Venus was used to symbolize
the 2 arch malakhs thus Morning Star being the fallen arc of the planet made the perfect symbol to Lucifers fall-(Rev 22:16, Ezekiel 28) and Evening Star(Shalem) the rising arc of the planet became Symbolism for Michael the rising arch malakh-Dan 12:1-4.
Jesus is claimed to be the Nemesis of the one named in the Holy City. But also note Morning Star is Baal's son.
Note; they never name this Father who is one in the same Jesus. That's the mystery easily solved. Research the Assyrian Bel Tablet in the Brittish Museum circa 700bc. The story of Baal's death and resurrection EXACTLY plagerized and used for the Jesus scene thus one in the same mythology given a mask and new name.
Thus:
“... from my Father (Baal). To the one who conquers(DESTROYS) I will also give the morning star(LUCIFER).” -- Revelation 2:28
· Revelation 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify these things in the churches.
· I am the bright and Morning Star (lucifer)
[See Lucifer here etymology of "": "[ the morning star, a fallen rebel archangel, THE Devil, fr. OE. fr. Latin, the morning star, fr. Lucifer light-bearing, fr. luc light + -fer -ferous--more at LIGHT]" (Webster's, p.677)
Even Baal's wife Isis is another cultures Ishtar (easter) whocs son is the Morning Star symboled as a fish (because Grandpa idol Dagon was the fishman god). It's why the Pope wears the fishman god ring, fishead hat called Mitre and scales on his Robe. They were selling the mystery Babylon religions to the Jews through a created image of a half Jewish man.
So now you have the number of his name
Baal Jesus=666 in ASCll numerology used to secret numbers from names. Father and son are one in the same myth.
Research -google search:
The Canaanite dying god mythology
morning star son of baal.
Then research Shalem the Evening Star.
Then research how City of YeruShalem becomes the city of peace (Shalom).
When "the Night" removes "the Day" there will be peace.
Rome created a satanic mockery impersonation of the Temple and the Kohanim just as Levay satanist's are mocking Christianity and emulating the RCC rituals with satanic twists.
That's why they create canibalism bread wine sacriment, incest birth story where the son impregnates his mother, they call him scarab (dung beetle), lucifer (morning star) ,
cursed (on cross), chose the curse of death not blessing of life, breaks all ten commands, call him the forbiden swine
(IE-Sous=the swine).
The lineage the Nt gives Jesus is through all the Biblical Harlots and their use of the mother Harlot Mary of 100bc is probably why the other christ cults deemed Rome's adoption as the Harlot church. Otherwise Rome was purposely taunting the flocks by setting up a total mockery idol as representing all the forbidden things.
Anyway because they use the half Roman Yeshu son of Mary who was born out of wedlock that figure would not be allowed in the Temple according to Deut..
Sources:
Matthew mentions four sinful harlot women of the bible conveniently and coincidentally in the Joseph genealogy:
1) (Genesis 38:12-19) Tamar who was the one who disguised herself as a harlot to seduce her father-in-law Judah.
2) (Joshua 2:1) Rahab who was a harlot living in the city of Jericho. And note wasn’t even of Jewish lineage, she was a Canaanite. The creators of the legend/image icon in trying to create his lineage and plagiarizing the OT goofed this one big time.
3) (Ruth 3:1-14) Ruth who was the one through her mother-in-law Naomi's request, came secretly to where Boaz was sleeping and spent the night with him. Later Ruth and Boaz were married.
4) (2 Samuel 11:2-5) Bathsheba was the controversial one who became pregnant by King David while she was still married to Uriah.
In Matthew 1:19 he states Joseph didn't want to expose her to public disgrace, so he had a mind to divorce her (Mary) quietly (as to not get her stoned).
Deut. 23:2 disqualifies Jesus from entering the Temple let alone leading it.
Plus there's a little known rule about n0t listening to political prisoners that prevents following any of the captured christs and even Paul.
Your right the famous Jewish women are harlots. No ifs ands or buts about it.
Actually it was the HS who impregnated Mary according to the NT.
Question: "Why are both Jesus and Satan referred to as the morning star?"He was not crucified or death. That is a later christians addition to mix Mithras with Jesus as the same.
Agree the NT says slew & hanged
source;
Acts 5:30 "Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 10:39 "whom they slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 13:29 "they took him down from the tree" 1 Peter 2:24 "who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree" Galatians 3:13 "Christ... being made a curse upon us... Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree" also read Deuteronomy 21:22.
The Yeshu son of Mary figure of 100bc was stpned & hanged pn Passover
But the Galilean 5ax revolter 6bc figure and his 2 sons were crucified & the
Ad era river Jordan w/ apostles martyred figure was also crucified.
You know my position, You can't crucify or kill a fictitious character without a pen and Rome merely used the Canaanite Dying god mythology of Athtar the fierce, whereby the son (called Morning Star) dies to surpass his father Baal on the throne.
So they borrowed the Baal death scene and father became masked with the son as one in the same mythology whereby the son in martyrdom becomes higher then the previous mythology growing old and out of favor. Dagon the father of Baal became replaced by Baal through his death scenecand now the son morning star
-Rev 22:16 in impersonating the scene surpasses his father Baal on the throne and becomes higher then the father as the father did with Dag0n (the fishman god).
Sources:
1)they never say the father's name.
2)Baal's son is the morning star-rev 22:16
3)Ishtar(easter) son was the morning star.
4)they are imitating the dying god mythology of the Canaanites whereby the son called morning star surpasses his father Baal on the throne by dying and bringing attention to himself as the new mask for Baal.
5)the crucifixion scene is written from plagiarizing the Baal passion play.
Source:the predated Assyrian (700bc) Marduk-Bel Tablets housed now in the Brittish Museum.
6)He's this god's only Begotten son and Yhwh's begotten was David in Psalms, so Jesus can't be YHWH's only begotten son.
We do know however, that Baal's only son is the Morning Star
(Jesus claimed to be Rev 22:16)
=Jesus is claimed the son of Baal.
David claimed to be the begotten son of Shalem thus naming his 2 sons after Shalem.
Answer: The first reference to the morning star as an individual is in Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!” (NIV). The KJV and NKJV both translate “morning star” as “Lucifer, son of the morning.” It is clear from the rest of the passage that Isaiah is referring to Satan’s fall from heaven (Luke 10:18). So in this case, the morning star refers to Satan. In Revelation 22:16, Jesus unmistakably identifies Himself as the morning star. Why are both Jesus and Satan described as the “morning star”?
It is interesting to note that the concept of the “morning star” is not the only concept that is applied to both Jesus and Satan. In Revelation 5:5, Jesus is referred to as the Lion of the tribe of Judah. In 1 Peter 5:8, Satan is compared to a lion, seeking someone to devour. The point is this, both Jesus and Satan, to a certain extent, have similarities to lions. Jesus is similar to a lion in that He is the King, He is royal and majestic. Satan is similar to a lion in that he seeks to devour other creatures. That is where the similarities between Jesus, Satan, and lions end, however. Jesus and Satan are like lions in very different ways.
The idea of a “bright morning star” is a star that outshines all the others. Satan, as perhaps the most beautiful creation of God, probably the most powerful of all the angels, was a bright morning star. Jesus, as God incarnate, the Lord of the universe, is THE bright and morning star. Jesus is the most holy and powerful “light” in all the universe. So, while both Jesus and Satan can be described as “bright morning stars,” in no sense is this equating Jesus and Satan. Satan is a created being. His light only exists to the extent that God created it. Jesus is the light of the world (John 9:5). Only Jesus’ light is self-existent. Satan may be a bright morning star, but he is only a poor imitation of the one true bright morning star, Jesus Christ, the light of the world.
WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!
EXCUSES EXCUSES!
You Satanists are so bad at lying for your beast.
Everytime you guys are shown your mistake you never apologize for lying to people with false info that you know is
fallacious=willingly & knowingly doing
evil. With no Teshuva you always repeat the sin over and over and ignore the corrected information pretending it doesn't exist thus hiding and making excuses. This is the 3rd Time I answered this purposeful misdirection by you, all times unrefuted.
Facts:
they used symbols to describe emulations and resemblances.
Venus was used to symbolize
the 2 arch malakhs thus Morning Star being the fallen arc of the planet made the perfect symbol to Lucifers fall-(Rev 22:16, Ezekiel 28) and Evening Star(Shalem) the rising arc of the planet became Symbolism for Michael the rising arch malakh-Dan 12:1-4.
Jesus is claimed to be the Nemesis of the one named in the Holy City. But also note Morning Star is Baal's son.
Note; they never name this Father who is one in the same Jesus. That's the mystery easily solved. Research the Assyrian Bel Tablet in the Brittish Museum circa 700bc. The story of Baal's death and resurrection EXACTLY plagerized and used for the Jesus scene thus one in the same mythology given a mask and new name.
Thus:
“... from my Father (Baal). To the one who conquers(DESTROYS) I will also give the morning star(LUCIFER).” -- Revelation 2:28
· Revelation 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify these things in the churches.
· I am the bright and Morning Star (lucifer)
[See Lucifer here etymology of "": "[ the morning star, a fallen rebel archangel, THE Devil, fr. OE. fr. Latin, the morning star, fr. Lucifer light-bearing, fr. luc light + -fer -ferous--more at LIGHT]" (Webster's, p.677)
Even Baal's wife Isis is another cultures Ishtar (easter) whocs son is the Morning Star symboled as a fish (because Grandpa idol Dagon was the fishman god). It's why the Pope wears the fishman god ring, fishead hat called Mitre and scales on his Robe. They were selling the mystery Babylon religions to the Jews through a created image of a half Jewish man.
So now you have the number of his name
Baal Jesus=666 in ASCll numerology used to secret numbers from names. Father and son are one in the same myth.
Research -google search:
The Canaanite dying god mythology
morning star son of baal.
Then research Shalem the Evening Star.
Then research how City of YeruShalem becomes the city of peace (Shalom).
When "the Night" removes "the Day" there will be peace.
Rome created a satanic mockery impersonation of the Temple and the Kohanim just as Levay satanist's are mocking Christianity and emulating the RCC rituals with satanic twists.
That's why they create canibalism bread wine sacriment, incest birth story where the son impregnates his mother, they call him scarab (dung beetle), lucifer (morning star) ,
cursed (on cross), chose the curse of death not blessing of life, breaks all ten commands, call him the forbiden swine
(IE-Sous=the swine).
The lineage the Nt gives Jesus is through all the Biblical Harlots and their use of the mother Harlot Mary of 100bc is probably why the other christ cults deemed Rome's adoption as the Harlot church. Otherwise Rome was purposely taunting the flocks by setting up a total mockery idol as representing all the forbidden things.
Anyway because they use the half Roman Yeshu son of Mary who was born out of wedlock that figure would not be allowed in the Temple according to Deut..
Sources:
Matthew mentions four sinful harlot women of the bible conveniently and coincidentally in the Joseph genealogy:
1) (Genesis 38:12-19) Tamar who was the one who disguised herself as a harlot to seduce her father-in-law Judah.
2) (Joshua 2:1) Rahab who was a harlot living in the city of Jericho. And note wasn’t even of Jewish lineage, she was a Canaanite. The creators of the legend/image icon in trying to create his lineage and plagiarizing the OT goofed this one big time.
3) (Ruth 3:1-14) Ruth who was the one through her mother-in-law Naomi's request, came secretly to where Boaz was sleeping and spent the night with him. Later Ruth and Boaz were married.
4) (2 Samuel 11:2-5) Bathsheba was the controversial one who became pregnant by King David while she was still married to Uriah.
In Matthew 1:19 he states Joseph didn't want to expose her to public disgrace, so he had a mind to divorce her (Mary) quietly (as to not get her stoned).
Deut. 23:2 disqualifies Jesus from entering the Temple let alone leading it.
Plus there's a little known rule about n0t listening to political prisoners that prevents following any of the captured christs and even Paul.
Your right the famous Jewish women are harlots. No ifs ands or buts about it.
Actually it was the HS who impregnated Mary according to the NT.
A not existing Catholic agrees with a not existing Jew about what exactly? He knows not what he is speaking about and you don't know what you are speaking about. I guess we could call such an absurde behavior meanwhile "the Ryan-Lochte-Complex".
