Why did Christians build Churches over existing Pagan temples?

[irosie91]

Actually the cross was the sign of death & destruction, thus the mark of the beast which has the power of death and destruction.
The crossed out cross (8raystar known as the Evening Star) was the symbol of birth and life, so it's only fitting the openly claimed son of baal choose his father's sun cross.
But the cross with the sickly man on it was Mithraic. Rome brought Mithraism and it's temples to Tarsus where it was popular. Soldiers like Lucius made it popular in Rome by bringing back the Mithraic myths on books. The Bacilica with the cross and altar and relics kept from the Mithraic temple is called Basilica of San Clemente look it up. I stated a fact and you changed the point with the snide remark. What is the purpose of that, deflecting a bad day?

He was not crucified or death. That is a later christians addition to mix Mithras with Jesus as the same.

Agree the NT says slew & hanged
source;
Acts 5:30 "Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 10:39 "whom they slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 13:29 "they took him down from the tree" 1 Peter 2:24 "who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree" Galatians 3:13 "Christ... being made a curse upon us... Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree" also read Deuteronomy 21:22.
The Yeshu son of Mary figure of 100bc was stpned & hanged pn Passover
But the Galilean 5ax revolter 6bc figure and his 2 sons were crucified & the
Ad era river Jordan w/ apostles martyred figure was also crucified.
You know my position, You can't crucify or kill a fictitious character without a pen and Rome merely used the Canaanite Dying god mythology of Athtar the fierce, whereby the son (called Morning Star) dies to surpass his father Baal on the throne.
So they borrowed the Baal death scene and father became masked with the son as one in the same mythology whereby the son in martyrdom becomes higher then the previous mythology growing old and out of favor. Dagon the father of Baal became replaced by Baal through his death scenecand now the son morning star
-Rev 22:16 in impersonating the scene surpasses his father Baal on the throne and becomes higher then the father as the father did with Dag0n (the fishman god).

Sources:

1)they never say the father's name.
2)Baal's son is the morning star-rev 22:16
3)Ishtar(easter) son was the morning star.
4)they are imitating the dying god mythology of the Canaanites whereby the son called morning star surpasses his father Baal on the throne by dying and bringing attention to himself as the new mask for Baal.
5)the crucifixion scene is written from plagiarizing the Baal passion play.
Source:the predated Assyrian (700bc) Marduk-Bel Tablets housed now in the Brittish Museum.
6)He's this god's only Begotten son and Yhwh's begotten was David in Psalms, so Jesus can't be YHWH's only begotten son.
We do know however, that Baal's only son is the Morning Star
(Jesus claimed to be Rev 22:16)
=Jesus is claimed the son of Baal.
David claimed to be the begotten son of Shalem thus naming his 2 sons after Shalem.

Question: "Why are both Jesus and Satan referred to as the morning star?"

Answer: The first reference to the morning star as an individual is in Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!” (NIV). The KJV and NKJV both translate “morning star” as “Lucifer, son of the morning.” It is clear from the rest of the passage that Isaiah is referring to Satan’s fall from heaven (Luke 10:18). So in this case, the morning star refers to Satan. In Revelation 22:16, Jesus unmistakably identifies Himself as the morning star. Why are both Jesus and Satan described as the “morning star”?

It is interesting to note that the concept of the “morning star” is not the only concept that is applied to both Jesus and Satan. In Revelation 5:5, Jesus is referred to as the Lion of the tribe of Judah. In 1 Peter 5:8, Satan is compared to a lion, seeking someone to devour. The point is this, both Jesus and Satan, to a certain extent, have similarities to lions. Jesus is similar to a lion in that He is the King, He is royal and majestic. Satan is similar to a lion in that he seeks to devour other creatures. That is where the similarities between Jesus, Satan, and lions end, however. Jesus and Satan are like lions in very different ways.

The idea of a “bright morning star” is a star that outshines all the others. Satan, as perhaps the most beautiful creation of God, probably the most powerful of all the angels, was a bright morning star. Jesus, as God incarnate, the Lord of the universe, is THE bright and morning star. Jesus is the most holy and powerful “light” in all the universe. So, while both Jesus and Satan can be described as “bright morning stars,” in no sense is this equating Jesus and Satan. Satan is a created being. His light only exists to the extent that God created it. Jesus is the light of the world (John 9:5). Only Jesus’ light is self-existent. Satan may be a bright morning star, but he is only a poor imitation of the one true bright morning star, Jesus Christ, the light of the world.

WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!
EXCUSES EXCUSES!
You Satanists are so bad at lying for your beast.
Everytime you guys are shown your mistake you never apologize for lying to people with false info that you know is
fallacious=willingly & knowingly doing
evil. With no Teshuva you always repeat the sin over and over and ignore the corrected information pretending it doesn't exist thus hiding and making excuses. This is the 3rd Time I answered this purposeful misdirection by you, all times unrefuted.

Facts:
they used symbols to describe emulations and resemblances.
Venus was used to symbolize
the 2 arch malakhs thus Morning Star being the fallen arc of the planet made the perfect symbol to Lucifers fall-(Rev 22:16, Ezekiel 28) and Evening Star(Shalem) the rising arc of the planet became Symbolism for Michael the rising arch malakh-Dan 12:1-4.

Jesus is claimed to be the Nemesis of the one named in the Holy City. But also note Morning Star is Baal's son.
Note; they never name this Father who is one in the same Jesus. That's the mystery easily solved. Research the Assyrian Bel Tablet in the Brittish Museum circa 700bc. The story of Baal's death and resurrection EXACTLY plagerized and used for the Jesus scene thus one in the same mythology given a mask and new name.
Thus:
“... from my Father (Baal). To the one who conquers(DESTROYS) I will also give the morning star(LUCIFER).” -- Revelation 2:28
· Revelation 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify these things in the churches.
· I am the bright and Morning Star (lucifer)

[See Lucifer here etymology of "": "[ the morning star, a fallen rebel archangel, THE Devil, fr. OE. fr. Latin, the morning star, fr. Lucifer light-bearing, fr. luc light + -fer -ferous--more at LIGHT]" (Webster's, p.677)

Even Baal's wife Isis is another cultures Ishtar (easter) whocs son is the Morning Star symboled as a fish (because Grandpa idol Dagon was the fishman god). It's why the Pope wears the fishman god ring, fishead hat called Mitre and scales on his Robe. They were selling the mystery Babylon religions to the Jews through a created image of a half Jewish man.
So now you have the number of his name
Baal Jesus=666 in ASCll numerology used to secret numbers from names. Father and son are one in the same myth.
Research -google search:
The Canaanite dying god mythology
morning star son of baal.
Then research Shalem the Evening Star.
Then research how City of YeruShalem becomes the city of peace (Shalom).
When "the Night" removes "the Day" there will be peace.

Rome created a satanic mockery impersonation of the Temple and the Kohanim just as Levay satanist's are mocking Christianity and emulating the RCC rituals with satanic twists.
That's why they create canibalism bread wine sacriment, incest birth story where the son impregnates his mother, they call him scarab (dung beetle), lucifer (morning star) ,
cursed (on cross), chose the curse of death not blessing of life, breaks all ten commands, call him the forbiden swine
(IE-Sous=the swine).
The lineage the Nt gives Jesus is through all the Biblical Harlots and their use of the mother Harlot Mary of 100bc is probably why the other christ cults deemed Rome's adoption as the Harlot church. Otherwise Rome was purposely taunting the flocks by setting up a total mockery idol as representing all the forbidden things.
Anyway because they use the half Roman Yeshu son of Mary who was born out of wedlock that figure would not be allowed in the Temple according to Deut..

Sources:
Matthew mentions four sinful harlot women of the bible conveniently and coincidentally in the Joseph genealogy:
1) (Genesis 38:12-19) Tamar who was the one who disguised herself as a harlot to seduce her father-in-law Judah.
2) (Joshua 2:1) Rahab who was a harlot living in the city of Jericho. And note wasn’t even of Jewish lineage, she was a Canaanite. The creators of the legend/image icon in trying to create his lineage and plagiarizing the OT goofed this one big time.
3) (Ruth 3:1-14) Ruth who was the one through her mother-in-law Naomi's request, came secretly to where Boaz was sleeping and spent the night with him. Later Ruth and Boaz were married.
4) (2 Samuel 11:2-5) Bathsheba was the controversial one who became pregnant by King David while she was still married to Uriah.

In Matthew 1:19 he states Joseph didn't want to expose her to public disgrace, so he had a mind to divorce her (Mary) quietly (as to not get her stoned).

Deut. 23:2 disqualifies Jesus from entering the Temple let alone leading it.
Plus there's a little known rule about n0t listening to political prisoners that prevents following any of the captured christs and even Paul.

Your right the famous Jewish women are harlots. No ifs ands or buts about it.

Actually it was the HS who impregnated Mary according to the NT.

how much did she charge for turning that trick?

 

[Penelope]

He was not crucified or death. That is a later christians addition to mix Mithras with Jesus as the same.

Agree the NT says slew & hanged
source;
Acts 5:30 "Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 10:39 "whom they slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 13:29 "they took him down from the tree" 1 Peter 2:24 "who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree" Galatians 3:13 "Christ... being made a curse upon us... Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree" also read Deuteronomy 21:22.
The Yeshu son of Mary figure of 100bc was stpned & hanged pn Passover
But the Galilean 5ax revolter 6bc figure and his 2 sons were crucified & the
Ad era river Jordan w/ apostles martyred figure was also crucified.
You know my position, You can't crucify or kill a fictitious character without a pen and Rome merely used the Canaanite Dying god mythology of Athtar the fierce, whereby the son (called Morning Star) dies to surpass his father Baal on the throne.
So they borrowed the Baal death scene and father became masked with the son as one in the same mythology whereby the son in martyrdom becomes higher then the previous mythology growing old and out of favor. Dagon the father of Baal became replaced by Baal through his death scenecand now the son morning star
-Rev 22:16 in impersonating the scene surpasses his father Baal on the throne and becomes higher then the father as the father did with Dag0n (the fishman god).

Sources:

1)they never say the father's name.
2)Baal's son is the morning star-rev 22:16
3)Ishtar(easter) son was the morning star.
4)they are imitating the dying god mythology of the Canaanites whereby the son called morning star surpasses his father Baal on the throne by dying and bringing attention to himself as the new mask for Baal.
5)the crucifixion scene is written from plagiarizing the Baal passion play.
Source:the predated Assyrian (700bc) Marduk-Bel Tablets housed now in the Brittish Museum.
6)He's this god's only Begotten son and Yhwh's begotten was David in Psalms, so Jesus can't be YHWH's only begotten son.
We do know however, that Baal's only son is the Morning Star
(Jesus claimed to be Rev 22:16)
=Jesus is claimed the son of Baal.
David claimed to be the begotten son of Shalem thus naming his 2 sons after Shalem.

Question: "Why are both Jesus and Satan referred to as the morning star?"

Answer: The first reference to the morning star as an individual is in Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!” (NIV). The KJV and NKJV both translate “morning star” as “Lucifer, son of the morning.” It is clear from the rest of the passage that Isaiah is referring to Satan’s fall from heaven (Luke 10:18). So in this case, the morning star refers to Satan. In Revelation 22:16, Jesus unmistakably identifies Himself as the morning star. Why are both Jesus and Satan described as the “morning star”?

It is interesting to note that the concept of the “morning star” is not the only concept that is applied to both Jesus and Satan. In Revelation 5:5, Jesus is referred to as the Lion of the tribe of Judah. In 1 Peter 5:8, Satan is compared to a lion, seeking someone to devour. The point is this, both Jesus and Satan, to a certain extent, have similarities to lions. Jesus is similar to a lion in that He is the King, He is royal and majestic. Satan is similar to a lion in that he seeks to devour other creatures. That is where the similarities between Jesus, Satan, and lions end, however. Jesus and Satan are like lions in very different ways.

The idea of a “bright morning star” is a star that outshines all the others. Satan, as perhaps the most beautiful creation of God, probably the most powerful of all the angels, was a bright morning star. Jesus, as God incarnate, the Lord of the universe, is THE bright and morning star. Jesus is the most holy and powerful “light” in all the universe. So, while both Jesus and Satan can be described as “bright morning stars,” in no sense is this equating Jesus and Satan. Satan is a created being. His light only exists to the extent that God created it. Jesus is the light of the world (John 9:5). Only Jesus’ light is self-existent. Satan may be a bright morning star, but he is only a poor imitation of the one true bright morning star, Jesus Christ, the light of the world.

WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!
EXCUSES EXCUSES!
You Satanists are so bad at lying for your beast.
Everytime you guys are shown your mistake you never apologize for lying to people with false info that you know is
fallacious=willingly & knowingly doing
evil. With no Teshuva you always repeat the sin over and over and ignore the corrected information pretending it doesn't exist thus hiding and making excuses. This is the 3rd Time I answered this purposeful misdirection by you, all times unrefuted.

Facts:
they used symbols to describe emulations and resemblances.
Venus was used to symbolize
the 2 arch malakhs thus Morning Star being the fallen arc of the planet made the perfect symbol to Lucifers fall-(Rev 22:16, Ezekiel 28) and Evening Star(Shalem) the rising arc of the planet became Symbolism for Michael the rising arch malakh-Dan 12:1-4.

Jesus is claimed to be the Nemesis of the one named in the Holy City. But also note Morning Star is Baal's son.
Note; they never name this Father who is one in the same Jesus. That's the mystery easily solved. Research the Assyrian Bel Tablet in the Brittish Museum circa 700bc. The story of Baal's death and resurrection EXACTLY plagerized and used for the Jesus scene thus one in the same mythology given a mask and new name.
Thus:
“... from my Father (Baal). To the one who conquers(DESTROYS) I will also give the morning star(LUCIFER).” -- Revelation 2:28
· Revelation 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify these things in the churches.
· I am the bright and Morning Star (lucifer)

[See Lucifer here etymology of "": "[ the morning star, a fallen rebel archangel, THE Devil, fr. OE. fr. Latin, the morning star, fr. Lucifer light-bearing, fr. luc light + -fer -ferous--more at LIGHT]" (Webster's, p.677)

Even Baal's wife Isis is another cultures Ishtar (easter) whocs son is the Morning Star symboled as a fish (because Grandpa idol Dagon was the fishman god). It's why the Pope wears the fishman god ring, fishead hat called Mitre and scales on his Robe. They were selling the mystery Babylon religions to the Jews through a created image of a half Jewish man.
So now you have the number of his name
Baal Jesus=666 in ASCll numerology used to secret numbers from names. Father and son are one in the same myth.
Research -google search:
The Canaanite dying god mythology
morning star son of baal.
Then research Shalem the Evening Star.
Then research how City of YeruShalem becomes the city of peace (Shalom).
When "the Night" removes "the Day" there will be peace.

Rome created a satanic mockery impersonation of the Temple and the Kohanim just as Levay satanist's are mocking Christianity and emulating the RCC rituals with satanic twists.
That's why they create canibalism bread wine sacriment, incest birth story where the son impregnates his mother, they call him scarab (dung beetle), lucifer (morning star) ,
cursed (on cross), chose the curse of death not blessing of life, breaks all ten commands, call him the forbiden swine
(IE-Sous=the swine).
The lineage the Nt gives Jesus is through all the Biblical Harlots and their use of the mother Harlot Mary of 100bc is probably why the other christ cults deemed Rome's adoption as the Harlot church. Otherwise Rome was purposely taunting the flocks by setting up a total mockery idol as representing all the forbidden things.
Anyway because they use the half Roman Yeshu son of Mary who was born out of wedlock that figure would not be allowed in the Temple according to Deut..

Sources:
Matthew mentions four sinful harlot women of the bible conveniently and coincidentally in the Joseph genealogy:
1) (Genesis 38:12-19) Tamar who was the one who disguised herself as a harlot to seduce her father-in-law Judah.
2) (Joshua 2:1) Rahab who was a harlot living in the city of Jericho. And note wasn’t even of Jewish lineage, she was a Canaanite. The creators of the legend/image icon in trying to create his lineage and plagiarizing the OT goofed this one big time.
3) (Ruth 3:1-14) Ruth who was the one through her mother-in-law Naomi's request, came secretly to where Boaz was sleeping and spent the night with him. Later Ruth and Boaz were married.
4) (2 Samuel 11:2-5) Bathsheba was the controversial one who became pregnant by King David while she was still married to Uriah.

In Matthew 1:19 he states Joseph didn't want to expose her to public disgrace, so he had a mind to divorce her (Mary) quietly (as to not get her stoned).

Deut. 23:2 disqualifies Jesus from entering the Temple let alone leading it.
Plus there's a little known rule about n0t listening to political prisoners that prevents following any of the captured christs and even Paul.

Your right the famous Jewish women are harlots. No ifs ands or buts about it.

Actually it was the HS who impregnated Mary according to the NT.

how much did she charge for turning that trick?

It was a privilege for her to oblige the HS. Perpetual virginity and total loyalty to God. She was not an adulteress.

 

[irosie91]

Agree the NT says slew & hanged
source;
Acts 5:30 "Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 10:39 "whom they slew and hanged on a tree" Acts 13:29 "they took him down from the tree" 1 Peter 2:24 "who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree" Galatians 3:13 "Christ... being made a curse upon us... Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree" also read Deuteronomy 21:22.
The Yeshu son of Mary figure of 100bc was stpned & hanged pn Passover
But the Galilean 5ax revolter 6bc figure and his 2 sons were crucified & the
Ad era river Jordan w/ apostles martyred figure was also crucified.
You know my position, You can't crucify or kill a fictitious character without a pen and Rome merely used the Canaanite Dying god mythology of Athtar the fierce, whereby the son (called Morning Star) dies to surpass his father Baal on the throne.
So they borrowed the Baal death scene and father became masked with the son as one in the same mythology whereby the son in martyrdom becomes higher then the previous mythology growing old and out of favor. Dagon the father of Baal became replaced by Baal through his death scenecand now the son morning star
-Rev 22:16 in impersonating the scene surpasses his father Baal on the throne and becomes higher then the father as the father did with Dag0n (the fishman god).

Sources:

1)they never say the father's name.
2)Baal's son is the morning star-rev 22:16
3)Ishtar(easter) son was the morning star.
4)they are imitating the dying god mythology of the Canaanites whereby the son called morning star surpasses his father Baal on the throne by dying and bringing attention to himself as the new mask for Baal.
5)the crucifixion scene is written from plagiarizing the Baal passion play.
Source:the predated Assyrian (700bc) Marduk-Bel Tablets housed now in the Brittish Museum.
6)He's this god's only Begotten son and Yhwh's begotten was David in Psalms, so Jesus can't be YHWH's only begotten son.
We do know however, that Baal's only son is the Morning Star
(Jesus claimed to be Rev 22:16)
=Jesus is claimed the son of Baal.
David claimed to be the begotten son of Shalem thus naming his 2 sons after Shalem.

Question: "Why are both Jesus and Satan referred to as the morning star?"

Answer: The first reference to the morning star as an individual is in Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!” (NIV). The KJV and NKJV both translate “morning star” as “Lucifer, son of the morning.” It is clear from the rest of the passage that Isaiah is referring to Satan’s fall from heaven (Luke 10:18). So in this case, the morning star refers to Satan. In Revelation 22:16, Jesus unmistakably identifies Himself as the morning star. Why are both Jesus and Satan described as the “morning star”?

It is interesting to note that the concept of the “morning star” is not the only concept that is applied to both Jesus and Satan. In Revelation 5:5, Jesus is referred to as the Lion of the tribe of Judah. In 1 Peter 5:8, Satan is compared to a lion, seeking someone to devour. The point is this, both Jesus and Satan, to a certain extent, have similarities to lions. Jesus is similar to a lion in that He is the King, He is royal and majestic. Satan is similar to a lion in that he seeks to devour other creatures. That is where the similarities between Jesus, Satan, and lions end, however. Jesus and Satan are like lions in very different ways.

The idea of a “bright morning star” is a star that outshines all the others. Satan, as perhaps the most beautiful creation of God, probably the most powerful of all the angels, was a bright morning star. Jesus, as God incarnate, the Lord of the universe, is THE bright and morning star. Jesus is the most holy and powerful “light” in all the universe. So, while both Jesus and Satan can be described as “bright morning stars,” in no sense is this equating Jesus and Satan. Satan is a created being. His light only exists to the extent that God created it. Jesus is the light of the world (John 9:5). Only Jesus’ light is self-existent. Satan may be a bright morning star, but he is only a poor imitation of the one true bright morning star, Jesus Christ, the light of the world.

WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!
EXCUSES EXCUSES!
You Satanists are so bad at lying for your beast.
Everytime you guys are shown your mistake you never apologize for lying to people with false info that you know is
fallacious=willingly & knowingly doing
evil. With no Teshuva you always repeat the sin over and over and ignore the corrected information pretending it doesn't exist thus hiding and making excuses. This is the 3rd Time I answered this purposeful misdirection by you, all times unrefuted.

Facts:
they used symbols to describe emulations and resemblances.
Venus was used to symbolize
the 2 arch malakhs thus Morning Star being the fallen arc of the planet made the perfect symbol to Lucifers fall-(Rev 22:16, Ezekiel 28) and Evening Star(Shalem) the rising arc of the planet became Symbolism for Michael the rising arch malakh-Dan 12:1-4.

Jesus is claimed to be the Nemesis of the one named in the Holy City. But also note Morning Star is Baal's son.
Note; they never name this Father who is one in the same Jesus. That's the mystery easily solved. Research the Assyrian Bel Tablet in the Brittish Museum circa 700bc. The story of Baal's death and resurrection EXACTLY plagerized and used for the Jesus scene thus one in the same mythology given a mask and new name.
Thus:
“... from my Father (Baal). To the one who conquers(DESTROYS) I will also give the morning star(LUCIFER).” -- Revelation 2:28
· Revelation 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify these things in the churches.
· I am the bright and Morning Star (lucifer)

[See Lucifer here etymology of "": "[ the morning star, a fallen rebel archangel, THE Devil, fr. OE. fr. Latin, the morning star, fr. Lucifer light-bearing, fr. luc light + -fer -ferous--more at LIGHT]" (Webster's, p.677)

Even Baal's wife Isis is another cultures Ishtar (easter) whocs son is the Morning Star symboled as a fish (because Grandpa idol Dagon was the fishman god). It's why the Pope wears the fishman god ring, fishead hat called Mitre and scales on his Robe. They were selling the mystery Babylon religions to the Jews through a created image of a half Jewish man.
So now you have the number of his name
Baal Jesus=666 in ASCll numerology used to secret numbers from names. Father and son are one in the same myth.
Research -google search:
The Canaanite dying god mythology
morning star son of baal.
Then research Shalem the Evening Star.
Then research how City of YeruShalem becomes the city of peace (Shalom).
When "the Night" removes "the Day" there will be peace.

Rome created a satanic mockery impersonation of the Temple and the Kohanim just as Levay satanist's are mocking Christianity and emulating the RCC rituals with satanic twists.
That's why they create canibalism bread wine sacriment, incest birth story where the son impregnates his mother, they call him scarab (dung beetle), lucifer (morning star) ,
cursed (on cross), chose the curse of death not blessing of life, breaks all ten commands, call him the forbiden swine
(IE-Sous=the swine).
The lineage the Nt gives Jesus is through all the Biblical Harlots and their use of the mother Harlot Mary of 100bc is probably why the other christ cults deemed Rome's adoption as the Harlot church. Otherwise Rome was purposely taunting the flocks by setting up a total mockery idol as representing all the forbidden things.
Anyway because they use the half Roman Yeshu son of Mary who was born out of wedlock that figure would not be allowed in the Temple according to Deut..

Sources:
Matthew mentions four sinful harlot women of the bible conveniently and coincidentally in the Joseph genealogy:
1) (Genesis 38:12-19) Tamar who was the one who disguised herself as a harlot to seduce her father-in-law Judah.
2) (Joshua 2:1) Rahab who was a harlot living in the city of Jericho. And note wasn’t even of Jewish lineage, she was a Canaanite. The creators of the legend/image icon in trying to create his lineage and plagiarizing the OT goofed this one big time.
3) (Ruth 3:1-14) Ruth who was the one through her mother-in-law Naomi's request, came secretly to where Boaz was sleeping and spent the night with him. Later Ruth and Boaz were married.
4) (2 Samuel 11:2-5) Bathsheba was the controversial one who became pregnant by King David while she was still married to Uriah.

In Matthew 1:19 he states Joseph didn't want to expose her to public disgrace, so he had a mind to divorce her (Mary) quietly (as to not get her stoned).

Deut. 23:2 disqualifies Jesus from entering the Temple let alone leading it.
Plus there's a little known rule about n0t listening to political prisoners that prevents following any of the captured christs and even Paul.

Your right the famous Jewish women are harlots. No ifs ands or buts about it.

Actually it was the HS who impregnated Mary according to the NT.

how much did she charge for turning that trick?

It was a privilege for her to oblige the HS. Perpetual virginity and total loyalty to God. She was not an adulteress.

she was not married-----only a married girl can commit adultery-----so those idiot stories about "JAMES" a putative
brother of 'jesus' are lies too? ----Mary was a VIRGIN forever?. poor mary

 

[Penelope]

Question: "Why are both Jesus and Satan referred to as the morning star?"

Answer: The first reference to the morning star as an individual is in Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!” (NIV). The KJV and NKJV both translate “morning star” as “Lucifer, son of the morning.” It is clear from the rest of the passage that Isaiah is referring to Satan’s fall from heaven (Luke 10:18). So in this case, the morning star refers to Satan. In Revelation 22:16, Jesus unmistakably identifies Himself as the morning star. Why are both Jesus and Satan described as the “morning star”?

It is interesting to note that the concept of the “morning star” is not the only concept that is applied to both Jesus and Satan. In Revelation 5:5, Jesus is referred to as the Lion of the tribe of Judah. In 1 Peter 5:8, Satan is compared to a lion, seeking someone to devour. The point is this, both Jesus and Satan, to a certain extent, have similarities to lions. Jesus is similar to a lion in that He is the King, He is royal and majestic. Satan is similar to a lion in that he seeks to devour other creatures. That is where the similarities between Jesus, Satan, and lions end, however. Jesus and Satan are like lions in very different ways.

The idea of a “bright morning star” is a star that outshines all the others. Satan, as perhaps the most beautiful creation of God, probably the most powerful of all the angels, was a bright morning star. Jesus, as God incarnate, the Lord of the universe, is THE bright and morning star. Jesus is the most holy and powerful “light” in all the universe. So, while both Jesus and Satan can be described as “bright morning stars,” in no sense is this equating Jesus and Satan. Satan is a created being. His light only exists to the extent that God created it. Jesus is the light of the world (John 9:5). Only Jesus’ light is self-existent. Satan may be a bright morning star, but he is only a poor imitation of the one true bright morning star, Jesus Christ, the light of the world.

WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!
EXCUSES EXCUSES!
You Satanists are so bad at lying for your beast.
Everytime you guys are shown your mistake you never apologize for lying to people with false info that you know is
fallacious=willingly & knowingly doing
evil. With no Teshuva you always repeat the sin over and over and ignore the corrected information pretending it doesn't exist thus hiding and making excuses. This is the 3rd Time I answered this purposeful misdirection by you, all times unrefuted.

Facts:
they used symbols to describe emulations and resemblances.
Venus was used to symbolize
the 2 arch malakhs thus Morning Star being the fallen arc of the planet made the perfect symbol to Lucifers fall-(Rev 22:16, Ezekiel 28) and Evening Star(Shalem) the rising arc of the planet became Symbolism for Michael the rising arch malakh-Dan 12:1-4.

Jesus is claimed to be the Nemesis of the one named in the Holy City. But also note Morning Star is Baal's son.
Note; they never name this Father who is one in the same Jesus. That's the mystery easily solved. Research the Assyrian Bel Tablet in the Brittish Museum circa 700bc. The story of Baal's death and resurrection EXACTLY plagerized and used for the Jesus scene thus one in the same mythology given a mask and new name.
Thus:
“... from my Father (Baal). To the one who conquers(DESTROYS) I will also give the morning star(LUCIFER).” -- Revelation 2:28
· Revelation 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify these things in the churches.
· I am the bright and Morning Star (lucifer)

[See Lucifer here etymology of "": "[ the morning star, a fallen rebel archangel, THE Devil, fr. OE. fr. Latin, the morning star, fr. Lucifer light-bearing, fr. luc light + -fer -ferous--more at LIGHT]" (Webster's, p.677)

Even Baal's wife Isis is another cultures Ishtar (easter) whocs son is the Morning Star symboled as a fish (because Grandpa idol Dagon was the fishman god). It's why the Pope wears the fishman god ring, fishead hat called Mitre and scales on his Robe. They were selling the mystery Babylon religions to the Jews through a created image of a half Jewish man.
So now you have the number of his name
Baal Jesus=666 in ASCll numerology used to secret numbers from names. Father and son are one in the same myth.
Research -google search:
The Canaanite dying god mythology
morning star son of baal.
Then research Shalem the Evening Star.
Then research how City of YeruShalem becomes the city of peace (Shalom).
When "the Night" removes "the Day" there will be peace.

Rome created a satanic mockery impersonation of the Temple and the Kohanim just as Levay satanist's are mocking Christianity and emulating the RCC rituals with satanic twists.
That's why they create canibalism bread wine sacriment, incest birth story where the son impregnates his mother, they call him scarab (dung beetle), lucifer (morning star) ,
cursed (on cross), chose the curse of death not blessing of life, breaks all ten commands, call him the forbiden swine
(IE-Sous=the swine).
The lineage the Nt gives Jesus is through all the Biblical Harlots and their use of the mother Harlot Mary of 100bc is probably why the other christ cults deemed Rome's adoption as the Harlot church. Otherwise Rome was purposely taunting the flocks by setting up a total mockery idol as representing all the forbidden things.
Anyway because they use the half Roman Yeshu son of Mary who was born out of wedlock that figure would not be allowed in the Temple according to Deut..

Sources:
Matthew mentions four sinful harlot women of the bible conveniently and coincidentally in the Joseph genealogy:
1) (Genesis 38:12-19) Tamar who was the one who disguised herself as a harlot to seduce her father-in-law Judah.
2) (Joshua 2:1) Rahab who was a harlot living in the city of Jericho. And note wasn’t even of Jewish lineage, she was a Canaanite. The creators of the legend/image icon in trying to create his lineage and plagiarizing the OT goofed this one big time.
3) (Ruth 3:1-14) Ruth who was the one through her mother-in-law Naomi's request, came secretly to where Boaz was sleeping and spent the night with him. Later Ruth and Boaz were married.
4) (2 Samuel 11:2-5) Bathsheba was the controversial one who became pregnant by King David while she was still married to Uriah.

In Matthew 1:19 he states Joseph didn't want to expose her to public disgrace, so he had a mind to divorce her (Mary) quietly (as to not get her stoned).

Deut. 23:2 disqualifies Jesus from entering the Temple let alone leading it.
Plus there's a little known rule about n0t listening to political prisoners that prevents following any of the captured christs and even Paul.

Your right the famous Jewish women are harlots. No ifs ands or buts about it.

Actually it was the HS who impregnated Mary according to the NT.

how much did she charge for turning that trick?

It was a privilege for her to oblige the HS. Perpetual virginity and total loyalty to God. She was not an adulteress.

she was not married-----only a married girl can commit adultery-----so those idiot stories about "JAMES" a putative
brother of 'jesus' are lies too? ----Mary was a VIRGIN forever?. poor mary

Yes, she never married or had sexual relations with any human man, according to RC and EO theology. That is why she is a virgin. Those were Joseph kids from his first marriage according to the church.

 

[zaangalewa]

... the HS impregnated Mary ...

This sounds in my language completly unacceptable. I guess this sounds in the most languages of the world unacceptable. So I think you don't have any feeling for this what you call "HS". You are not a Catholic. Why do you try to say you are a Catholic, Antisemite?

 

[irosie91]

... the HS impregnated Mary ...

This sounds in my language completly unacceptable. I guess this sounds in the most languages of the world unacceptable. So I think you don't have any feeling for this what you call "HS". You are not a Catholic. Why do you try to say so, Antisemite?

Zaan-----'holy ghost' is catholic lingo for that which is called
in Hebrew approx... "Shechina" I do not know the etymology of the word-----but it is usually defined as something
like "a divine presence"------it does not get incarnate or even
appear to be incarnate (like angels which are something like
holograms <??> ) I do not know how catholics conceptualize the "holy ghost" The fact that it is part of the trinity confuses me.

 

[irosie91]

WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!
EXCUSES EXCUSES!
You Satanists are so bad at lying for your beast.
Everytime you guys are shown your mistake you never apologize for lying to people with false info that you know is
fallacious=willingly & knowingly doing
evil. With no Teshuva you always repeat the sin over and over and ignore the corrected information pretending it doesn't exist thus hiding and making excuses. This is the 3rd Time I answered this purposeful misdirection by you, all times unrefuted.

Facts:
they used symbols to describe emulations and resemblances.
Venus was used to symbolize
the 2 arch malakhs thus Morning Star being the fallen arc of the planet made the perfect symbol to Lucifers fall-(Rev 22:16, Ezekiel 28) and Evening Star(Shalem) the rising arc of the planet became Symbolism for Michael the rising arch malakh-Dan 12:1-4.

Jesus is claimed to be the Nemesis of the one named in the Holy City. But also note Morning Star is Baal's son.
Note; they never name this Father who is one in the same Jesus. That's the mystery easily solved. Research the Assyrian Bel Tablet in the Brittish Museum circa 700bc. The story of Baal's death and resurrection EXACTLY plagerized and used for the Jesus scene thus one in the same mythology given a mask and new name.
Thus:
“... from my Father (Baal). To the one who conquers(DESTROYS) I will also give the morning star(LUCIFER).” -- Revelation 2:28
· Revelation 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify these things in the churches.
· I am the bright and Morning Star (lucifer)

[See Lucifer here etymology of "": "[ the morning star, a fallen rebel archangel, THE Devil, fr. OE. fr. Latin, the morning star, fr. Lucifer light-bearing, fr. luc light + -fer -ferous--more at LIGHT]" (Webster's, p.677)

Even Baal's wife Isis is another cultures Ishtar (easter) whocs son is the Morning Star symboled as a fish (because Grandpa idol Dagon was the fishman god). It's why the Pope wears the fishman god ring, fishead hat called Mitre and scales on his Robe. They were selling the mystery Babylon religions to the Jews through a created image of a half Jewish man.
So now you have the number of his name
Baal Jesus=666 in ASCll numerology used to secret numbers from names. Father and son are one in the same myth.
Research -google search:
The Canaanite dying god mythology
morning star son of baal.
Then research Shalem the Evening Star.
Then research how City of YeruShalem becomes the city of peace (Shalom).
When "the Night" removes "the Day" there will be peace.

Rome created a satanic mockery impersonation of the Temple and the Kohanim just as Levay satanist's are mocking Christianity and emulating the RCC rituals with satanic twists.
That's why they create canibalism bread wine sacriment, incest birth story where the son impregnates his mother, they call him scarab (dung beetle), lucifer (morning star) ,
cursed (on cross), chose the curse of death not blessing of life, breaks all ten commands, call him the forbiden swine
(IE-Sous=the swine).
The lineage the Nt gives Jesus is through all the Biblical Harlots and their use of the mother Harlot Mary of 100bc is probably why the other christ cults deemed Rome's adoption as the Harlot church. Otherwise Rome was purposely taunting the flocks by setting up a total mockery idol as representing all the forbidden things.
Anyway because they use the half Roman Yeshu son of Mary who was born out of wedlock that figure would not be allowed in the Temple according to Deut..

Sources:
Matthew mentions four sinful harlot women of the bible conveniently and coincidentally in the Joseph genealogy:
1) (Genesis 38:12-19) Tamar who was the one who disguised herself as a harlot to seduce her father-in-law Judah.
2) (Joshua 2:1) Rahab who was a harlot living in the city of Jericho. And note wasn’t even of Jewish lineage, she was a Canaanite. The creators of the legend/image icon in trying to create his lineage and plagiarizing the OT goofed this one big time.
3) (Ruth 3:1-14) Ruth who was the one through her mother-in-law Naomi's request, came secretly to where Boaz was sleeping and spent the night with him. Later Ruth and Boaz were married.
4) (2 Samuel 11:2-5) Bathsheba was the controversial one who became pregnant by King David while she was still married to Uriah.

In Matthew 1:19 he states Joseph didn't want to expose her to public disgrace, so he had a mind to divorce her (Mary) quietly (as to not get her stoned).

Deut. 23:2 disqualifies Jesus from entering the Temple let alone leading it.
Plus there's a little known rule about n0t listening to political prisoners that prevents following any of the captured christs and even Paul.

Your right the famous Jewish women are harlots. No ifs ands or buts about it.

Actually it was the HS who impregnated Mary according to the NT.

how much did she charge for turning that trick?

It was a privilege for her to oblige the HS. Perpetual virginity and total loyalty to God. She was not an adulteress.

she was not married-----only a married girl can commit adultery-----so those idiot stories about "JAMES" a putative
brother of 'jesus' are lies too? ----Mary was a VIRGIN forever?. poor mary

Yes, she never married or had sexual relations with any human man, according to RC and EO theology. That is why she is a virgin. Those were Joseph kids from his first marriage according to the church.

oh----so they are not really the brothers of Jesus----someone lied

 

[HaShev]

Humans always seek tangible descriptions and familiarity. That is why they make anthropromorphic descriptions of spiritual enlightened precepts in likeness to themselves,
out of simple words with non tangible meanings.
Nepes(soul) means breath
Spirit (nature essence of your being) are intangibles, but in an archaic poor communications and superstItious ancient world something so simple a concept gets turned into FORBIDDEN FIGURES AND FORMS. Even the concept of ghosts are anthropromorphic since they still have some form, but mostly because they are reflections of a form that lives in another realm according to believers in ghosts and miss taught afterlife beliefs.

 

[HaShev]

Quote: HS impregnated Mary

In my best Bill Clinton voice:
"I H.S. did not have sexual relations with that woman"

THE Roman soldier Pantheras did.

sources:
Celsus (178 CE) Christian writer Epiphanius (c.320-403 CE), the Christian apologist Origen (c.185-254 CE) Within the Talmud Shabbos 104, the gemara explicitly discusses the mother being Stada and the father being Pandera. Jerusalem Talmud (Avodah Zerah II 40d)and in the Tosefta on Hullin II, and (Sanhedrin 43a & 67a). This story is further expanded upon in the Tosefta and Baraitas.
2 accounts:
-Dr. Franz Hartman -
& Gerald Massey's Lectures Originally published in a private edition c. 1900


According to the Babylonian Gemara to the Mishna of Tract "Shabbath," this Jehoshua, the son of Pandira and Stada, was stoned to death as a wizard, in the city of Lud, or Lydda,

Jesus ben Stada (or Pandera) was placedin the time period of about 90 B.C. in Lydda, a town Peter is said tohave visited in ACTS.
Interestingly, the early church father Epiphanius around 400 said Pandera was the grandfather of Jesus.

 

[irosie91]

Quote: HS impregnated Mary

In my best Bill Clinton voice:
"I H.S. did not have sexual relations with that woman"

THE Roman soldier Pantheras did.

sources:
Celsus (178 CE) Christian writer Epiphanius (c.320-403 CE), the Christian apologist Origen (c.185-254 CE) Within the Talmud Shabbos 104, the gemara explicitly discusses the mother being Stada and the father being Pandera. Jerusalem Talmud (Avodah Zerah II 40d)and in the Tosefta on Hullin II, and (Sanhedrin 43a & 67a). This story is further expanded upon in the Tosefta and Baraitas.
2 accounts:
-Dr. Franz Hartman -
& Gerald Massey's Lectures Originally published in a private edition c. 1900


According to the Babylonian Gemara to the Mishna of Tract "Shabbath," this Jehoshua, the son of Pandira and Stada, was stoned to death as a wizard, in the city of Lud, or Lydda,

Jesus ben Stada (or Pandera) was placedin the time period of about 90 B.C. in Lydda, a town Peter is said tohave visited in ACTS.
Interestingly, the early church father Epiphanius around 400 said Pandera was the grandfather of Jesus.

Paternal or maternal grandfather?

 

[irosie91]

WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!
EXCUSES EXCUSES!
You Satanists are so bad at lying for your beast.
Everytime you guys are shown your mistake you never apologize for lying to people with false info that you know is
fallacious=willingly & knowingly doing
evil. With no Teshuva you always repeat the sin over and over and ignore the corrected information pretending it doesn't exist thus hiding and making excuses. This is the 3rd Time I answered this purposeful misdirection by you, all times unrefuted.

Facts:
they used symbols to describe emulations and resemblances.
Venus was used to symbolize
the 2 arch malakhs thus Morning Star being the fallen arc of the planet made the perfect symbol to Lucifers fall-(Rev 22:16, Ezekiel 28) and Evening Star(Shalem) the rising arc of the planet became Symbolism for Michael the rising arch malakh-Dan 12:1-4.

Jesus is claimed to be the Nemesis of the one named in the Holy City. But also note Morning Star is Baal's son.
Note; they never name this Father who is one in the same Jesus. That's the mystery easily solved. Research the Assyrian Bel Tablet in the Brittish Museum circa 700bc. The story of Baal's death and resurrection EXACTLY plagerized and used for the Jesus scene thus one in the same mythology given a mask and new name.
Thus:
“... from my Father (Baal). To the one who conquers(DESTROYS) I will also give the morning star(LUCIFER).” -- Revelation 2:28
· Revelation 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify these things in the churches.
· I am the bright and Morning Star (lucifer)

[See Lucifer here etymology of "": "[ the morning star, a fallen rebel archangel, THE Devil, fr. OE. fr. Latin, the morning star, fr. Lucifer light-bearing, fr. luc light + -fer -ferous--more at LIGHT]" (Webster's, p.677)

Even Baal's wife Isis is another cultures Ishtar (easter) whocs son is the Morning Star symboled as a fish (because Grandpa idol Dagon was the fishman god). It's why the Pope wears the fishman god ring, fishead hat called Mitre and scales on his Robe. They were selling the mystery Babylon religions to the Jews through a created image of a half Jewish man.
So now you have the number of his name
Baal Jesus=666 in ASCll numerology used to secret numbers from names. Father and son are one in the same myth.
Research -google search:
The Canaanite dying god mythology
morning star son of baal.
Then research Shalem the Evening Star.
Then research how City of YeruShalem becomes the city of peace (Shalom).
When "the Night" removes "the Day" there will be peace.

Rome created a satanic mockery impersonation of the Temple and the Kohanim just as Levay satanist's are mocking Christianity and emulating the RCC rituals with satanic twists.
That's why they create canibalism bread wine sacriment, incest birth story where the son impregnates his mother, they call him scarab (dung beetle), lucifer (morning star) ,
cursed (on cross), chose the curse of death not blessing of life, breaks all ten commands, call him the forbiden swine
(IE-Sous=the swine).
The lineage the Nt gives Jesus is through all the Biblical Harlots and their use of the mother Harlot Mary of 100bc is probably why the other christ cults deemed Rome's adoption as the Harlot church. Otherwise Rome was purposely taunting the flocks by setting up a total mockery idol as representing all the forbidden things.
Anyway because they use the half Roman Yeshu son of Mary who was born out of wedlock that figure would not be allowed in the Temple according to Deut..

Sources:
Matthew mentions four sinful harlot women of the bible conveniently and coincidentally in the Joseph genealogy:
1) (Genesis 38:12-19) Tamar who was the one who disguised herself as a harlot to seduce her father-in-law Judah.
2) (Joshua 2:1) Rahab who was a harlot living in the city of Jericho. And note wasn’t even of Jewish lineage, she was a Canaanite. The creators of the legend/image icon in trying to create his lineage and plagiarizing the OT goofed this one big time.
3) (Ruth 3:1-14) Ruth who was the one through her mother-in-law Naomi's request, came secretly to where Boaz was sleeping and spent the night with him. Later Ruth and Boaz were married.
4) (2 Samuel 11:2-5) Bathsheba was the controversial one who became pregnant by King David while she was still married to Uriah.

In Matthew 1:19 he states Joseph didn't want to expose her to public disgrace, so he had a mind to divorce her (Mary) quietly (as to not get her stoned).

Deut. 23:2 disqualifies Jesus from entering the Temple let alone leading it.
Plus there's a little known rule about n0t listening to political prisoners that prevents following any of the captured christs and even Paul.

Your right the famous Jewish women are harlots. No ifs ands or buts about it.

Actually it was the HS who impregnated Mary according to the NT.

how much did she charge for turning that trick?

It was a privilege for her to oblige the HS. Perpetual virginity and total loyalty to God. She was not an adulteress.

she was not married-----only a married girl can commit adultery-----so those idiot stories about "JAMES" a putative
brother of 'jesus' are lies too? ----Mary was a VIRGIN forever?. poor mary

Yes, she never married or had sexual relations with any human man, according to RC and EO theology. That is why she is a virgin. Those were Joseph kids from his first marriage according to the church.

who was his first wife?

 

[Penelope]

Quote: HS impregnated Mary

In my best Bill Clinton voice:
"I H.S. did not have sexual relations with that woman"

THE Roman soldier Pantheras did.

sources:
Celsus (178 CE) Christian writer Epiphanius (c.320-403 CE), the Christian apologist Origen (c.185-254 CE) Within the Talmud Shabbos 104, the gemara explicitly discusses the mother being Stada and the father being Pandera. Jerusalem Talmud (Avodah Zerah II 40d)and in the Tosefta on Hullin II, and (Sanhedrin 43a & 67a). This story is further expanded upon in the Tosefta and Baraitas.
2 accounts:
-Dr. Franz Hartman -
& Gerald Massey's Lectures Originally published in a private edition c. 1900


According to the Babylonian Gemara to the Mishna of Tract "Shabbath," this Jehoshua, the son of Pandira and Stada, was stoned to death as a wizard, in the city of Lud, or Lydda,

Jesus ben Stada (or Pandera) was placedin the time period of about 90 B.C. in Lydda, a town Peter is said tohave visited in ACTS.
Interestingly, the early church father Epiphanius around 400 said Pandera was the grandfather of Jesus.

They have the wrong Jesus. Funny , the HS said he did not have sex with that woman,
as far as I know the RCC agrees, her hymen was said to be intact, and just the Holy Spirit hovering over her made her with child.

 

[Penelope]

Your right the famous Jewish women are harlots. No ifs ands or buts about it.

Actually it was the HS who impregnated Mary according to the NT.

how much did she charge for turning that trick?

It was a privilege for her to oblige the HS. Perpetual virginity and total loyalty to God. She was not an adulteress.

she was not married-----only a married girl can commit adultery-----so those idiot stories about "JAMES" a putative
brother of 'jesus' are lies too? ----Mary was a VIRGIN forever?. poor mary

Yes, she never married or had sexual relations with any human man, according to RC and EO theology. That is why she is a virgin. Those were Joseph kids from his first marriage according to the church.

who was his first wife?

Don't know.

 

[irosie91]

Quote: HS impregnated Mary

In my best Bill Clinton voice:
"I H.S. did not have sexual relations with that woman"

THE Roman soldier Pantheras did.

sources:
Celsus (178 CE) Christian writer Epiphanius (c.320-403 CE), the Christian apologist Origen (c.185-254 CE) Within the Talmud Shabbos 104, the gemara explicitly discusses the mother being Stada and the father being Pandera. Jerusalem Talmud (Avodah Zerah II 40d)and in the Tosefta on Hullin II, and (Sanhedrin 43a & 67a). This story is further expanded upon in the Tosefta and Baraitas.
2 accounts:
-Dr. Franz Hartman -
& Gerald Massey's Lectures Originally published in a private edition c. 1900


According to the Babylonian Gemara to the Mishna of Tract "Shabbath," this Jehoshua, the son of Pandira and Stada, was stoned to death as a wizard, in the city of Lud, or Lydda,

Jesus ben Stada (or Pandera) was placedin the time period of about 90 B.C. in Lydda, a town Peter is said tohave visited in ACTS.
Interestingly, the early church father Epiphanius around 400 said Pandera was the grandfather of Jesus.

They have the wrong Jesus. Funny , the HS said he did not have sex with that woman,
as far as I know the RCC agrees, her hymen was said to be intact, and just the Holy Spirit hovering over her made her with child.

my great grandmother was like that----she married at age 14 and by the time she was 23 she had 10 kids-----then her husband became a ghost (he died of a wound to his head) Didn't remember having sex either

 

[irosie91]

Quote: HS impregnated Mary

In my best Bill Clinton voice:
"I H.S. did not have sexual relations with that woman"

THE Roman soldier Pantheras did.

sources:
Celsus (178 CE) Christian writer Epiphanius (c.320-403 CE), the Christian apologist Origen (c.185-254 CE) Within the Talmud Shabbos 104, the gemara explicitly discusses the mother being Stada and the father being Pandera. Jerusalem Talmud (Avodah Zerah II 40d)and in the Tosefta on Hullin II, and (Sanhedrin 43a & 67a). This story is further expanded upon in the Tosefta and Baraitas.
2 accounts:
-Dr. Franz Hartman -
& Gerald Massey's Lectures Originally published in a private edition c. 1900


According to the Babylonian Gemara to the Mishna of Tract "Shabbath," this Jehoshua, the son of Pandira and Stada, was stoned to death as a wizard, in the city of Lud, or Lydda,

Jesus ben Stada (or Pandera) was placedin the time period of about 90 B.C. in Lydda, a town Peter is said tohave visited in ACTS.
Interestingly, the early church father Epiphanius around 400 said Pandera was the grandfather of Jesus.

They have the wrong Jesus. Funny , the HS said he did not have sex with that woman,
as far as I know the RCC agrees, her hymen was said to be intact, and just the Holy Spirit hovering over her made her with child.

it would be interesting to know his blood type

 

[Penelope]

Quote: HS impregnated Mary

In my best Bill Clinton voice:
"I H.S. did not have sexual relations with that woman"

THE Roman soldier Pantheras did.

sources:
Celsus (178 CE) Christian writer Epiphanius (c.320-403 CE), the Christian apologist Origen (c.185-254 CE) Within the Talmud Shabbos 104, the gemara explicitly discusses the mother being Stada and the father being Pandera. Jerusalem Talmud (Avodah Zerah II 40d)and in the Tosefta on Hullin II, and (Sanhedrin 43a & 67a). This story is further expanded upon in the Tosefta and Baraitas.
2 accounts:
-Dr. Franz Hartman -
& Gerald Massey's Lectures Originally published in a private edition c. 1900


According to the Babylonian Gemara to the Mishna of Tract "Shabbath," this Jehoshua, the son of Pandira and Stada, was stoned to death as a wizard, in the city of Lud, or Lydda,

Jesus ben Stada (or Pandera) was placedin the time period of about 90 B.C. in Lydda, a town Peter is said tohave visited in ACTS.
Interestingly, the early church father Epiphanius around 400 said Pandera was the grandfather of Jesus.

They have the wrong Jesus. Funny , the HS said he did not have sex with that woman,
as far as I know the RCC agrees, her hymen was said to be intact, and just the Holy Spirit hovering over her made her with child.

it would be interesting to know his blood type

Whose? Many were named Jesus in those days, Jesus Barabbas, the revolutionary who was set free.

 

[irosie91]

Quote: HS impregnated Mary

In my best Bill Clinton voice:
"I H.S. did not have sexual relations with that woman"

THE Roman soldier Pantheras did.

sources:
Celsus (178 CE) Christian writer Epiphanius (c.320-403 CE), the Christian apologist Origen (c.185-254 CE) Within the Talmud Shabbos 104, the gemara explicitly discusses the mother being Stada and the father being Pandera. Jerusalem Talmud (Avodah Zerah II 40d)and in the Tosefta on Hullin II, and (Sanhedrin 43a & 67a). This story is further expanded upon in the Tosefta and Baraitas.
2 accounts:
-Dr. Franz Hartman -
& Gerald Massey's Lectures Originally published in a private edition c. 1900


According to the Babylonian Gemara to the Mishna of Tract "Shabbath," this Jehoshua, the son of Pandira and Stada, was stoned to death as a wizard, in the city of Lud, or Lydda,

Jesus ben Stada (or Pandera) was placedin the time period of about 90 B.C. in Lydda, a town Peter is said tohave visited in ACTS.
Interestingly, the early church father Epiphanius around 400 said Pandera was the grandfather of Jesus.

They have the wrong Jesus. Funny , the HS said he did not have sex with that woman,
as far as I know the RCC agrees, her hymen was said to be intact, and just the Holy Spirit hovering over her made her with child.

it would be interesting to know his blood type

Whose? Many were named Jesus in those days, Jesus Barabbas, the revolutionary who was set free.

the one who inherited a surface antigen from the holy ghost

 

[irosie91]

Quote: HS impregnated Mary

In my best Bill Clinton voice:
"I H.S. did not have sexual relations with that woman"

THE Roman soldier Pantheras did.

sources:
Celsus (178 CE) Christian writer Epiphanius (c.320-403 CE), the Christian apologist Origen (c.185-254 CE) Within the Talmud Shabbos 104, the gemara explicitly discusses the mother being Stada and the father being Pandera. Jerusalem Talmud (Avodah Zerah II 40d)and in the Tosefta on Hullin II, and (Sanhedrin 43a & 67a). This story is further expanded upon in the Tosefta and Baraitas.
2 accounts:
-Dr. Franz Hartman -
& Gerald Massey's Lectures Originally published in a private edition c. 1900


According to the Babylonian Gemara to the Mishna of Tract "Shabbath," this Jehoshua, the son of Pandira and Stada, was stoned to death as a wizard, in the city of Lud, or Lydda,

Jesus ben Stada (or Pandera) was placedin the time period of about 90 B.C. in Lydda, a town Peter is said tohave visited in ACTS.
Interestingly, the early church father Epiphanius around 400 said Pandera was the grandfather of Jesus.

They have the wrong Jesus. Funny , the HS said he did not have sex with that woman,
as far as I know the RCC agrees, her hymen was said to be intact, and just the Holy Spirit hovering over her made her with child.

it would be interesting to know his blood type

Whose? Many were named Jesus in those days, Jesus Barabbas, the revolutionary who was set free.

oh ---the one they claimed was a "thief"-----watta joke----unless he stole something from a roman pig----he wouldn't have been crucified. Romans crucified for two reasons-----sedition against rome and to entertain the vestal sluts when
there were no lions around to eat little children, Jesus of Nazareth was crucified for his violent action against the ROMAN SHIT in the temple courtyard-----not for claiming to be a king ----silly lie. Barabbas could very well have been a rebel against the filth of rome------probably a nice guy ---not a common thief as your catechism whore claimed. Jesus was a fairly common name as was Mary-----practically the Jane Smith of the time. Joseph was common too.

 

[Penelope]

Quote: HS impregnated Mary

In my best Bill Clinton voice:
"I H.S. did not have sexual relations with that woman"

THE Roman soldier Pantheras did.

sources:
Celsus (178 CE) Christian writer Epiphanius (c.320-403 CE), the Christian apologist Origen (c.185-254 CE) Within the Talmud Shabbos 104, the gemara explicitly discusses the mother being Stada and the father being Pandera. Jerusalem Talmud (Avodah Zerah II 40d)and in the Tosefta on Hullin II, and (Sanhedrin 43a & 67a). This story is further expanded upon in the Tosefta and Baraitas.
2 accounts:
-Dr. Franz Hartman -
& Gerald Massey's Lectures Originally published in a private edition c. 1900


According to the Babylonian Gemara to the Mishna of Tract "Shabbath," this Jehoshua, the son of Pandira and Stada, was stoned to death as a wizard, in the city of Lud, or Lydda,

Jesus ben Stada (or Pandera) was placedin the time period of about 90 B.C. in Lydda, a town Peter is said tohave visited in ACTS.
Interestingly, the early church father Epiphanius around 400 said Pandera was the grandfather of Jesus.

They have the wrong Jesus. Funny , the HS said he did not have sex with that woman,
as far as I know the RCC agrees, her hymen was said to be intact, and just the Holy Spirit hovering over her made her with child.

it would be interesting to know his blood type

Whose? Many were named Jesus in those days, Jesus Barabbas, the revolutionary who was set free.

oh ---the one they claimed was a "thief"-----watta joke----unless he stole something from a roman pig----he wouldn't have been crucified. Romans crucified for two reasons-----sedition against rome and to entertain the vestal sluts when
there were no lions around to eat little children, Jesus of Nazareth was crucified for his violent action against the ROMAN SHIT in the temple courtyard-----not for claiming to be a king ----silly lie. Barabbas could very well have been a rebel against the filth of rome------probably a nice guy ---not a common thief as your catechism whore claimed. Jesus was a fairly common name as was Mary-----practically the Jane Smith of the time. Joseph was common too.

No, Pilate did it to pacify the jews , according to the scriptures. He didn't want to, he found no problem with Jesus and his hands were clean. PS: the vestal virgins were not sluts they were virgins. They were in Rome, not Jerusalem.

 

[irosie91]

Quote: HS impregnated Mary

In my best Bill Clinton voice:
"I H.S. did not have sexual relations with that woman"

THE Roman soldier Pantheras did.

sources:
Celsus (178 CE) Christian writer Epiphanius (c.320-403 CE), the Christian apologist Origen (c.185-254 CE) Within the Talmud Shabbos 104, the gemara explicitly discusses the mother being Stada and the father being Pandera. Jerusalem Talmud (Avodah Zerah II 40d)and in the Tosefta on Hullin II, and (Sanhedrin 43a & 67a). This story is further expanded upon in the Tosefta and Baraitas.
2 accounts:
-Dr. Franz Hartman -
& Gerald Massey's Lectures Originally published in a private edition c. 1900


According to the Babylonian Gemara to the Mishna of Tract "Shabbath," this Jehoshua, the son of Pandira and Stada, was stoned to death as a wizard, in the city of Lud, or Lydda,

Jesus ben Stada (or Pandera) was placedin the time period of about 90 B.C. in Lydda, a town Peter is said tohave visited in ACTS.
Interestingly, the early church father Epiphanius around 400 said Pandera was the grandfather of Jesus.

They have the wrong Jesus. Funny , the HS said he did not have sex with that woman,
as far as I know the RCC agrees, her hymen was said to be intact, and just the Holy Spirit hovering over her made her with child.

it would be interesting to know his blood type

Whose? Many were named Jesus in those days, Jesus Barabbas, the revolutionary who was set free.

oh ---the one they claimed was a "thief"-----watta joke----unless he stole something from a roman pig----he wouldn't have been crucified. Romans crucified for two reasons-----sedition against rome and to entertain the vestal sluts when
there were no lions around to eat little children, Jesus of Nazareth was crucified for his violent action against the ROMAN SHIT in the temple courtyard-----not for claiming to be a king ----silly lie. Barabbas could very well have been a rebel against the filth of rome------probably a nice guy ---not a common thief as your catechism whore claimed. Jesus was a fairly common name as was Mary-----practically the Jane Smith of the time. Joseph was common too.

No, Pilate did it to pacify the jews , according to the scriptures. He didn't want to, he found no problem with Jesus and his hands were clean. PS: the vestal virgins were not sluts they were virgins. They were in Rome, not Jerusalem.

The story in the NT that Pilate "DID IT TO PACIFY THE JEWS"---is bullshit------in the course of his ten year stint
as prelate of Judea---Pilate crucified an estimated 20,000
innocent people-----In fact---rome recalled him because his
typical roman filth and barbarity was getting out of hand. The Vestal sluts -----were sluts----try reading a bit more about that
gaggle of whores-------of course they were not in Jerusalem---the people of Jerusalem did not tolerate the money changer shit----why would they tolerate a gaggle of roman whores. The vestal sluts were better entertained in rome-----they got
off on watching men kill each other and seeking children eaten by lions