Big Bend Texas
Platinum Member
- Mar 14, 2022
- 9,242
- 5,226
So you can support your claim.Why? Last chance
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you can support your claim.Why? Last chance
Ok you're done. You got cornered and you are running nowSo you can support your claim.
I'm not running anywhere. I'm asking you to support your claim which you cannot and we both know it.Ok you're done. You hot cornered and you are running now
Your claim is EVERY SOCIAL PROGRAM in the US is unconstitutional
And that is just flat out laughable
You are dismissed
Is every social program in the US unconstitutional?I'm not running anywhere. I'm asking you to support your claim which you cannot and we both know it.
“Shuffling money from one hand to another” is called commerce.They aren't generating any wealth, they aren't creating anything at all, they are simply shuffling money from one hand to another.
Yes, I realize you're going to do everything humanly possible to dodge the original question which is where under the spending clause such spending is authorized because it isn't there.Is every social program in the US unconstitutional?
I'll just keep asking while you run
Man they know how to run in texasYes, I realize you're going to do everything humanly possible to dodge the original question which is where under the spending clause such spending is authorized because it isn't there.
We both know that don't we?
You don't understand the difference in creating wealth and spreading it around.“Shuffling money from one hand to another” is called commerce.
Uh huh. No new Suburban sprawl generated by wealth and demand anywhere.![]()
I'm still not running anywhere you are.Man they know how to run in texas
Look how scared you are of my question
HAHAHAHAHA
Dismissed
You are now fabricating.Cause 1 is a full and complete clause. Each clause is independent. So spending on the general welfare is WELL ESTABLISHED to mean spending on social programs
Clause one is a full and complete clause. It states spending on general welfare.I'm still not running anywhere you are.
Headin’ for old Mexico.Man they know how to run in texas
Look how scared you are of my question
HAHAHAHAHA
Dismissed
You are now fabricating.
It isn't there.
No, the entire clause is one long running sentence spelling out both the overall authority and specific areas of legitimate spending.Clause one is a full and complete clause. It states spending on general welfare.
You are done
Section 8. The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
28
To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;
29
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
30
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
31
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
32
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;
33
To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;
34
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
35
To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
36
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;
37
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
38
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer term than two Years;
39
To provide and maintain a Navy;
40
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
41
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
42
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
43
To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress,become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, Dockyards, and other needful Buildings;—And
44
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof... .
Each clause is a independent power of congress.No, the entire clause is one long running sentence spelling out both the overall authority and specific areas of legitimate spending.
There's a reason it was constructed in that manner, to limit federal spending to those specifically listed items.
They can't be independent since they are all listed in the same sentence.Each clause is a independent power of congress.
You may have a different opinion but no jurist in the land believes you and you woukd be laughed out of court
And yet NO ONE BELIEVES YOUThey can't be independent since they are all listed in the same sentence.
The entire purpose of our constitution was to organize the structure of and limit the scope and powers of the Federal Gov't.
If authority is not specifically granted to the Federal Gov't, it remains the purview of the states and individuals.
A court can rule tomorrow that a dog is a butterfly and a cat is a pig but everyone who looks at them knows it isn't true.
Yet I'm not the one having to fabricate things that are not there to bolster my argument, you are.And yet NO ONE BELIEVES YOU
You cant find a jurist in the country that believes all social programs are unconstitutional
You would have judges on their knees laughing at you for that opinion.
Fabricate? It's right hereYet I'm not the one having to fabricate things that are not there to bolster my argument, you are.