Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The point is, our legislators have no authority to deny or disparage our civil rights without due process.A bot could come up with a more coherent sequence of words. I think we've broken him.Our legislature is denied and disparaged authority over Any forms of bills of attainder.
What civil right(s) are you being denied?
The law is employment at the will of either party, not just the employer for Any reason.
The law is employment at the will of either party, not just the employer for Any reason.
Equal means equal. What basis do you have to deny and disparage equal protection of the law?The point is, our legislators have no authority to deny or disparage our civil rights without due process.A bot could come up with a more coherent sequence of words. I think we've broken him.Our legislature is denied and disparaged authority over Any forms of bills of attainder.
What civil right(s) are you being denied?
The law is employment at the will of either party, not just the employer for Any reason.
There is no law that gives a right to work. It gives BOTH the employer and the employee to terminate the working arrangement at any time. It does not allow the employee to collect unemployment if they are fired with cause. It allows them to collect the money granted to them from the unemployment insurance if fired without cause. Thus equal protection exists.
Equal protection of the law is a civil right. Only the right wing, never gets it.The law is employment at the will of either party, not just the employer for Any reason.
Oh, so you are protesting a nonexisting civil right, how special.
Equal protection of the law is a civil right. Only the right wing, never gets it.
Equal means equal. What basis do you have to deny and disparage equal protection of the law?
it was an issue then; it is still an issue now.Equal protection of the law is a civil right. Only the right wing, never gets it.
The law says you are an at will employee. It was that way under Obama too, not like it changed all of a sudden moron.
equal protection of the law, for unemployment compensation purposes.Equal means equal. What basis do you have to deny and disparage equal protection of the law?
ALL employees are at will, what is unequal about that?
Equal means equal. What basis do you have to deny and disparage equal protection of the law?The point is, our legislators have no authority to deny or disparage our civil rights without due process.A bot could come up with a more coherent sequence of words. I think we've broken him.
What civil right(s) are you being denied?
The law is employment at the will of either party, not just the employer for Any reason.
There is no law that gives a right to work. It gives BOTH the employer and the employee to terminate the working arrangement at any time. It does not allow the employee to collect unemployment if they are fired with cause. It allows them to collect the money granted to them from the unemployment insurance if fired without cause. Thus equal protection exists.
equal protection of the law, for unemployment compensation purposes.Equal means equal. What basis do you have to deny and disparage equal protection of the law?
ALL employees are at will, what is unequal about that?
Unequal is requiring for-cause criteria for Only the employee, to receive unemployment compensation under our current regime. Why "reward" lousy capitalists with more "loyalty" than they deserve.Equal means equal. What basis do you have to deny and disparage equal protection of the law?The point is, our legislators have no authority to deny or disparage our civil rights without due process.
What civil right(s) are you being denied?
The law is employment at the will of either party, not just the employer for Any reason.
There is no law that gives a right to work. It gives BOTH the employer and the employee to terminate the working arrangement at any time. It does not allow the employee to collect unemployment if they are fired with cause. It allows them to collect the money granted to them from the unemployment insurance if fired without cause. Thus equal protection exists.
Equal is equal, what part isn’t equal?
Because they're Communist Globalists.
Folks really should check out this fascinating documentary. You can watch the full movie on places like Amazon Prime. Socialism does = Totalitarianism.
Employment is at-will, not for-cause.equal protection of the law, for unemployment compensation purposes.Equal means equal. What basis do you have to deny and disparage equal protection of the law?
ALL employees are at will, what is unequal about that?
There is equal protection, you choose not to work. An employer doesn’t pay you for not working.
You aren’t looking for work, you want the government to pay you for a lazy choice.
equal protection of the law, for unemployment compensation purposes.
Employment is at-will, not for-cause.
Any for-cause criteria must require a for-cause employment relationship.equal protection of the law, for unemployment compensation purposes.
There is equal protection, if you are fired or your employer basically forces you to quit due to lower wages you get a check. On the other hand quitting for personal reasons results in equal treatment of no compensation. So what malfunction caused your denial?
Employment is at-will, not for-cause, in any at-will employment State; unless proved otherwise by EDD.Employment is at-will, not for-cause.
Correct, and everyone is treated equally on that point. You still haven't made your case.
Any for-cause criteria must require a for-cause employment relationship.equal protection of the law, for unemployment compensation purposes.
There is equal protection, if you are fired or your employer basically forces you to quit due to lower wages you get a check. On the other hand quitting for personal reasons results in equal treatment of no compensation. So what malfunction caused your denial?
