Dot Com
Nullius in verba
is it any wonder FoxFyre didn't didn't supply a link after giving her conservative corporate merkin manifesto?And health care at all levels was far more affordable before the federal government got involved. And survival rates for deadly diseases was higher in the USA than any other place. Once the government started pulling millions of people into the system, however, with guaranteed payments and the person's ability to pay was no longer a factor, the costs have been spiraling out of control ever since. It happens every single time the free market system is short circuited by something somebody promises will be better.
It is no accident that the more Medicaid and Medicare have been expanded, the higher insurance costs have risen and the more costly all forms of healthcare has become.
The argument can be made that health care would be more affordable and more patient friendly--the health care providers would have to provide a product at a cost people could afford - if the government got out of the business altogether.
It has to be part of the equation.
Totally false premise AGAIN.
![]()
High health care costs: Who's to blame?
Drug companies, insurers, politicians, lawyers, and the bad habits of Americans all figure into high and rising health-care costs. But the biggest contributors to high costsdoctors and hospitalsget off easier among consumers, our survey found.
"The aim of our health-care system should not be to make a profit for insurance and drug companies. It should be to provide affordable, high-quality care for all Americans," said Andrea Hanson, 31, a college teacher from Murphy, Texas, who responded to our invitation to share her story online.
The focus on drug and pharmaceutical companies is not surprising because of the way that most Americans pay for health care, said experts we consulted.
"Americans tend to focus on the bills they pay, not the total cost of health care," said Jacob S. Hacker, professor of political science at Yale University. "And the bills for most Americans ultimately reflect what insurance companies don't cover and what drug companies charge consumers at the pharmacy. They see the big profits these companies earn even as they, the patients, are struggling to pay their bills."
But a closer look at health-cost trends shows that these players, in roughly descending order, contributed the most to rising costs:
Hospitals and doctors. Doctors and hospitals account for by far the largest share, 52 percent in 2006, of all national health spending. There's abundant evidence that some of that spending is unnecessary. Under the present system, hospitals and doctors earn more money by doing costly interventions than by keeping people healthy. And more medical care doesn't necessarily mean better care, according to research on Medicare expenditures by the Dartmouth Medical School's Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice.
Yet just 59 percent of our survey respondents named hospitals, and 47 percent named doctors, as major spending culprits. (Percentages add up to more than 100 because respondents could select as many factors as they wanted.)
Drug companies. Prescription drugs account for only one-tenth of total health-care expenditures. But drug spending has increased as a share of overall expenditures over the past decade.
Seventy-six percent of respondents blamed drugmakers generally, and 74 percent said drugmakers charged too much for their products.
Insurance companies. Health-insurance premiums have grown faster than inflation or workers' earnings over the past decade, in parallel with the equally rapid rise in overall health costs. Industry spending on administrative and marketing costs, plus profits, consumes 12 percent of private-insurance premiums.
Seventy-seven percent of respondents blamed insurance companies in general for high costs, and 70 percent said insurers overcharged for their products and services.
Politicians and government regulators. Although the government directly controls only 46 percent of national health spending, many of its policies affect the bottom line of the health-care industry, for example, by setting Medicare reimbursement rates for doctors on which private insurers base their rates, or by regulating health insurance. Between 1999 and 2006, the health-care lobby spent more than any other business sector, according to a study by the Institute for Health & Socio-Economic Policy, a nonprofit policy and research group.
Sixty-four percent of respondents faulted politicians and 58 percent faulted government regulators for failing to control health-care costs.
Lawyers. Malpractice-insurance premiums and liability awards account for less than 2 percent of overall health-care spending, according to a 2004 study by the Congressional Budget Office. Defensive medicine, the practice of ordering extra tests or procedures to protect against lawsuits, might add another few percentage points, according to some estimates.
Yet 60 percent of respondents blamed lawyers for high costs, and 69 percent specifically pointed to "frivolous lawsuits."
Health-care consumers. "Modifiable" risk factors, such as eating too much, exercising too little, or smoking, are to blame for an estimated 25 percent of U.S. health-care costs, according to expert estimates. But even if every American took up healthful living overnight, our health-care expenses would still be the second highest in the world (after Luxembourg).
Sixty-eight percent of respondents thought those bad habits were to blame for high U.S. health costs.
A mere 41 percent of respondents blamed consumers for overusing services.
And the respondents "are correct not to believe that," said Hacker. "Patients have little control over the amount that hospitals and doctors charge. Our exorbitant medical prices are a result of the fragmented structure of our health-care system, not the choices of patients."
more
![eusa_whistle :eusa_whistle: :eusa_whistle:](/styles/smilies/eusa_whistle.gif)
Last edited: