Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You support the protesters, they chanted death to cops. Sorry but you have blood on your hands. Oh yeah in the Giffords shooting you also tried to blame Palin, who really didn't have anything to do with it. I think you tried to say guilty by association, well in your own words, in the death of the cops. Your guilty by association.Liberals blamed Limbaugh for Giffords shooting. Till you found out it was a crazy liberal and we didn't blame your ideology. Now the cops that got killed was because of the protest. You cannot in public call for dead cops and it not happen. You have blood on your hands.I have said multiple times that the primary blame for the shootings is with the shooter. And I have said multiple times that I am referring to generations of tactics by the PC Police for creating an environment that can play a part in tragedies like this.
.
Okay, great. Now we're getting somewhere. What "PC Police" tactics played a part in THIS exact tragedy? What environment did the "PC Police" create in this event?
You apparently agree that the protesters have a right to protest. You seem to have indicated that they might even have reason to protest, yes? How are you then turning around and saying that the protesters protesting were in part responsible for the actions of a mentally disturbed individual?
He doesn't agree that the protestors have a right to protest, because he has blamed the cops' deaths on the protestors. He has assigned them the responsibility for 2 cops being murdered.
Logically one cannot believe that anyone has the RIGHT to take actions that are ultimately responsible for murders.
I wasn't at the protest fuckwit.
Goddam you people get more retarded every day.
No bias or hatred in liberalism, unless you disagree with them. Just ask a conservative black man.
Liberals are supposed to agree with a conservative just because he's black? lol
How many liberal black men do you agree with?
Liberals usually cannot tell the difference between disagreement and bias or hatred. If they could understand the difference ... They would have to address the fact they are not perfect and don't have the correct answer to every equation.
.
That's not liberalism or conservatism; that's politics.Liberals usually cannot tell the difference between disagreement and bias or hatred. If they could understand the difference ... They would have to address the fact they are not perfect and don't have the correct answer to every equation.
No, but your not suppose to hate them just because there conservative.No bias or hatred in liberalism, unless you disagree with them. Just ask a conservative black man.
Liberals are supposed to agree with a conservative just because he's black? lol
How many liberal black men do you agree with?
You support the protesters, they chanted death to cops. Sorry but you have blood on your hands. Oh yeah in the Giffords shooting you also tried to blame Palin, who really didn't have anything to do with it. I think you tried to say guilty by association, well in your own words, in the death of the cops. Your guilty by association.Liberals blamed Limbaugh for Giffords shooting. Till you found out it was a crazy liberal and we didn't blame your ideology. Now the cops that got killed was because of the protest. You cannot in public call for dead cops and it not happen. You have blood on your hands.I have said multiple times that the primary blame for the shootings is with the shooter. And I have said multiple times that I am referring to generations of tactics by the PC Police for creating an environment that can play a part in tragedies like this.
.
Okay, great. Now we're getting somewhere. What "PC Police" tactics played a part in THIS exact tragedy? What environment did the "PC Police" create in this event?
You apparently agree that the protesters have a right to protest. You seem to have indicated that they might even have reason to protest, yes? How are you then turning around and saying that the protesters protesting were in part responsible for the actions of a mentally disturbed individual?
He doesn't agree that the protestors have a right to protest, because he has blamed the cops' deaths on the protestors. He has assigned them the responsibility for 2 cops being murdered.
Logically one cannot believe that anyone has the RIGHT to take actions that are ultimately responsible for murders.
I wasn't at the protest fuckwit.
Goddam you people get more retarded every day.
No, but your not suppose to hate them just because there conservative.No bias or hatred in liberalism, unless you disagree with them. Just ask a conservative black man.
Liberals are supposed to agree with a conservative just because he's black? lol
How many liberal black men do you agree with?
So your claim is that conservatives disagree with President Obama in such dignified mature reasonable rational way that it could never possibly be seen as hateful.
Goddam, you win the prize! lol
How convenient you claim you didn't know.You support the protesters, they chanted death to cops. Sorry but you have blood on your hands. Oh yeah in the Giffords shooting you also tried to blame Palin, who really didn't have anything to do with it. I think you tried to say guilty by association, well in your own words, in the death of the cops. Your guilty by association.Liberals blamed Limbaugh for Giffords shooting. Till you found out it was a crazy liberal and we didn't blame your ideology. Now the cops that got killed was because of the protest. You cannot in public call for dead cops and it not happen. You have blood on your hands.Okay, great. Now we're getting somewhere. What "PC Police" tactics played a part in THIS exact tragedy? What environment did the "PC Police" create in this event?
You apparently agree that the protesters have a right to protest. You seem to have indicated that they might even have reason to protest, yes? How are you then turning around and saying that the protesters protesting were in part responsible for the actions of a mentally disturbed individual?
He doesn't agree that the protestors have a right to protest, because he has blamed the cops' deaths on the protestors. He has assigned them the responsibility for 2 cops being murdered.
Logically one cannot believe that anyone has the RIGHT to take actions that are ultimately responsible for murders.
I wasn't at the protest fuckwit.
Goddam you people get more retarded every day.
I hate to break this to you but I had never heard of any death to cops protests until AFTER the two cops were killed.
It's telling though to see that you are taking the stand that no one has the right to protest anymore. We'll see how that holds up the next time the RWnuts are out on the street.
That's not liberalism or conservatism; that's politics.Liberals usually cannot tell the difference between disagreement and bias or hatred. If they could understand the difference ... They would have to address the fact they are not perfect and don't have the correct answer to every equation.
You talking about Sharpton or Jackson? Race baiting hustlers. I would say Martin Luther king, but he was a conservative.No, but your not suppose to hate them just because there conservative.No bias or hatred in liberalism, unless you disagree with them. Just ask a conservative black man.
Liberals are supposed to agree with a conservative just because he's black? lol
How many liberal black men do you agree with?
So I guess your record is clean when it comes to saying hateful things about black liberals. lol
In my experience when a conservative talks about "personal responsibility", it's about the other guy.Yeah whatever ... Conservatism doesn't need your agreement or your politics ... Personal responsibility comes from within.
In my experience when a conservative talks about "personal responsibility", it's about the other guy.Yeah whatever ... Conservatism doesn't need your agreement or your politics ... Personal responsibility comes from within.
I've had plenty of experience, since '64. Both Rs elected in '68 were driven out of office for malfeasance in office. I don't think there's much you can tell me about conservatives talking out of both sides of their mouth.Guess your experience speaks for itself ... Let me know when you gain more and better experience with reality and conservatives.
You support the protesters, they chanted death to cops. Sorry but you have blood on your hands. Oh yeah in the Giffords shooting you also tried to blame Palin, who really didn't have anything to do with it. I think you tried to say guilty by association, well in your own words, in the death of the cops. Your guilty by association.Liberals blamed Limbaugh for Giffords shooting. Till you found out it was a crazy liberal and we didn't blame your ideology. Now the cops that got killed was because of the protest. You cannot in public call for dead cops and it not happen. You have blood on your hands.Okay, great. Now we're getting somewhere. What "PC Police" tactics played a part in THIS exact tragedy? What environment did the "PC Police" create in this event?
You apparently agree that the protesters have a right to protest. You seem to have indicated that they might even have reason to protest, yes? How are you then turning around and saying that the protesters protesting were in part responsible for the actions of a mentally disturbed individual?
He doesn't agree that the protesters have a right to protest, because he has blamed the cops' deaths on the protesters. He has assigned them the responsibility for 2 cops being murdered.
Logically one cannot believe that anyone has the RIGHT to take actions that are ultimately responsible for murders.
I wasn't at the protest fuckwit.
Goddam you people get more retarded every day.
I hate to break this to you but I had never heard of any death to cops protests until AFTER the two cops were killed.
It's telling though to see that you are taking the stand that no one has the right to protest anymore. We'll see how that holds up the next time the RWnuts are out on the street.
I've had plenty of experience, since '64. Both Rs elected in '68 were driven out of office for malfeasance in office. I don't think there's much you can tell me about conservatives talking out of both sides of their mouth.Guess your experience speaks for itself ... Let me know when you gain more and better experience with reality and conservatives.
Richard Nixon didn't do nearly what Obama has done. Between fast and furious, bengazi, and the irs scandal, Nixon is a saint.I've had plenty of experience, since '64. Both Rs elected in '68 were driven out of office for malfeasance in office. I don't think there's much you can tell me about conservatives talking out of both sides of their mouth.Guess your experience speaks for itself ... Let me know when you gain more and better experience with reality and conservatives.
No bias or hatred in liberalism, unless you disagree with them. Just ask a conservative black man.
Liberals are supposed to agree with a conservative just because he's black? lol
How many liberal black men do you agree with?
Liberals usually cannot tell the difference between disagreement and bias or hatred. If they could understand the difference ... They would have to address the fact they are not perfect and don't have the correct answer to every equation.
.
So your claim is that conservatives disagree with President Obama in such dignified mature reasonable rational way that it could never possibly be seen as hateful.
Goddam, you win the prize! lol
Now you're just moving the goal posts. I'm talking politics on a 'Politics' board. I think you're the one that's confused.The desire to cite politics as a measure is where your ideas fail ... In that a conservative doesn't require your cooperation, approval, funding, politics or government to accomplish what they are going to do either way.
