Why do Republicans bash socialism - when it's all around them?

[The Purge]

:
Can any of you Socialist/DemonRATS dispute this as being untrue?

 

[beautress]

[
And American Capitalism is what brings home the bacon. Admit it.

And creates huge disparities of wealth between the haves and the have nots.

Dr Grump claims that American fiscal structure somehow "And creates huge disparities of wealth between the haves and the have nots.​

American have nots who have suffered the leftist-hated "trickle down" effect live better than kings and queens of the nineteenth century by an exponential rate.

Poor Demmies feel so bad about it, too.

 

[beautress]

[
And American Capitalism is what brings home the bacon. Admit it.

And creates huge disparities of wealth between the haves and the have nots.

Disparities in wealth harm no one and it actually exists between those who have a lot and those who have a lot more.

We do not need a mix we simply have a mix which does not work well and people lie about it claiming it does work well

Disparities in income and appreciation have been around since Cain and Able. The secret is for Cain the Humiliated bean grower to accept that Able the Hunter Hero and Apple of Dad's Eye as a little unfair without killing Able first and getting himself banned for life.

 

[danielpalos]

socialism
[ˈsōSHəˌlizəm]
NOUN


1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
synonyms:
leftism · Fabianism · syndicalism · consumer socialism · utopian socialism · welfarism · communism · Bolshevism · radicalism · militancy · progressivism · social democracy · laborism · Marxism · Leninism · Marxism–Leninism · neo-Marxism · Trotskyism · Maoism
antonyms:
conservatism

2. policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
synonyms:
leftism · Fabianism · syndicalism · consumer socialism · utopian socialism · welfarism · communism · Bolshevism · radicalism · militancy · progressivism · social democracy · laborism · Marxism · Leninism · Marxism–Leninism · neo-Marxism · Trotskyism · Maoism
antonyms:
conservatism

3. (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism.

QED

eminent domain enables the State to be able to do that.

Enables it do so does not mean it should

we simply have a market friendly form of socialism.

We do not have socialism

That is established fact

Yes, we do. Our Constitution says so. Providing for the general welfare and common defense requires socialism. and maybe post roads, post rails, and post canals.

 

[Soupnazi630]

socialism
[ˈsōSHəˌlizəm]
NOUN


1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
synonyms:
leftism · Fabianism · syndicalism · consumer socialism · utopian socialism · welfarism · communism · Bolshevism · radicalism · militancy · progressivism · social democracy · laborism · Marxism · Leninism · Marxism–Leninism · neo-Marxism · Trotskyism · Maoism
antonyms:
conservatism

2. policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
synonyms:
leftism · Fabianism · syndicalism · consumer socialism · utopian socialism · welfarism · communism · Bolshevism · radicalism · militancy · progressivism · social democracy · laborism · Marxism · Leninism · Marxism–Leninism · neo-Marxism · Trotskyism · Maoism
antonyms:
conservatism

3. (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism.

QED

eminent domain enables the State to be able to do that.

Enables it do so does not mean it should

we simply have a market friendly form of socialism.

We do not have socialism

That is established fact

Yes, we do. Our Constitution says so. Providing for the general welfare and common defense requires socialism. and maybe post roads, post rails, and post canals.

We do not have socialism and that is established fact.

the constitution does not say so and socialism is not providing defense and roads etc. Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production which we do not have and which consistently fails where it is tried.

Much like your ignorant claim is a constant failure

 

[danielpalos]

it is a self-evident truth. want to argue about it?

So is that you're moron. No argument about it.

you need a valid rebuttal; i don't pay attention to inferior arguments.

Here's one, but you may not get it right away.

Y'know how Rachel Maddow is on YOUR team, YOUR side, and she was gonna get President Trump's tax returns and absolutely, positively KILL HIS CHARACTER with it! She was gonna wipe him straight off the map of this planet with the revelations she and her partners at CNN were going to discover.

Turns out Maddow was played by the Master, President Trump, and here's how Gutfield rendered her true puerile pretentiousness in which she was going to ruin him with:

​

we have no problem with "our girl" doing an investigative, follow the money, report.

She will turn them over any day now.

Now, why have the left wing cities not been able to solve simple poverty and homeless in their cities and states? You claim the left has the solutions why have you not given any examples?

it may take more time to prepare an, expose of following the money trail.

Because, dear. The "social horror" of the Poor benefiting is sometimes more than the right wing can bear. Nothing but repeal is not better solutions at lower cost.

That is why some on the left have no problem with "echelon order until we can maneuver to hammer and anvil." Just stay in one place, right wingers.

 

[Soupnazi630]

So is that you're moron. No argument about it.

you need a valid rebuttal; i don't pay attention to inferior arguments.

Here's one, but you may not get it right away.

Y'know how Rachel Maddow is on YOUR team, YOUR side, and she was gonna get President Trump's tax returns and absolutely, positively KILL HIS CHARACTER with it! She was gonna wipe him straight off the map of this planet with the revelations she and her partners at CNN were going to discover.

Turns out Maddow was played by the Master, President Trump, and here's how Gutfield rendered her true puerile pretentiousness in which she was going to ruin him with:

​

we have no problem with "our girl" doing an investigative, follow the money, report.

She will turn them over any day now.

Now, why have the left wing cities not been able to solve simple poverty and homeless in their cities and states? You claim the left has the solutions why have you not given any examples?

it may take more time to prepare an, expose of following the money trail.

Because, dear. The "social horror" of the Poor benefiting is sometimes more than the right wing can bear. Nothing but repeal is not better solutions at lower cost.

That is why some on the left have no problem with "echelon order until we can maneuver to hammer and anvil." Just stay in one place, right wingers.

The reason for extreme poverty in democrat run cities is because of the left wing not the right. Democrats hurt the poor they do not benefit the poor with their policies.

Socialism never works which is why the nation rejects it and we do not try it.

 

[danielpalos]

true capitalism includes no Government. Socialism is Government because it Governs, social-ism.

Wrong.

True capitalism includes and requires government

Socialism is only one form of government and consistently a failure

Government is not by definition socialism and that is fact which you consistently get wrong

no, it doesn't. truly free markets have no government.

Free markets and capitalism are not the same thing dumbass

Free markets can and have existed with government

Capitalism is just a commerce related form of the free market.

And American Capitalism is what brings home the bacon. Admit it.

right wing tax cut economics are simple and socialized wealth redistribution on a national and international basis.

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

 

[danielpalos]

it is a self-evident truth. want to argue about it?

So is that you're moron. No argument about it.

you need a valid rebuttal; i don't pay attention to inferior arguments.

Here's one, but you may not get it right away.

Y'know how Rachel Maddow is on YOUR team, YOUR side, and she was gonna get President Trump's tax returns and absolutely, positively KILL HIS CHARACTER with it! She was gonna wipe him straight off the map of this planet with the revelations she and her partners at CNN were going to discover.

Turns out Maddow was played by the Master, President Trump, and here's how Gutfield rendered her true puerile pretentiousness in which she was going to ruin him with:

​

we have no problem with "our girl" doing an investigative, follow the money, report.

"Your girl" Madcow has fewer primetime viewers than reruns of "I Love Lucy" at 3 a.m. It could be because Maddow lies her ass off every night and can't deliver on her promises to "get" Trump.

Oh, yes, and gauging from the time of your response, I see you didn't bother to watch the bore in her delaying and never delivering. And she has everything on Trump. Yep his check to the gumment for 2005 $38,000,000+ cleared, but she couldn't explain how he paid a great percentage more than Democrats making the same amount as he. Maybe she's looking at the wrong returns?

it is enough to bother you.

i only watch her show occasionally.

And, there is plenty of trail to follow in some States and some foreign countries.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.

True capitalism includes and requires government

Socialism is only one form of government and consistently a failure

Government is not by definition socialism and that is fact which you consistently get wrong

no, it doesn't. truly free markets have no government.

Free markets and capitalism are not the same thing dumbass

Free markets can and have existed with government

Capitalism is just a commerce related form of the free market.

And American Capitalism is what brings home the bacon. Admit it.

right wing tax cut economics are simple and socialized wealth redistribution on a national and international basis.

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

No they are not.

Tax cuts by definition distribute no wealth they leave wealth where it belongs in the hands of the people who earned it.

 

[danielpalos]

:
Can any of you Socialist/DemonRATS dispute this as being untrue?

...then, i learned that a missile crisis and sanctions is what impeded freer trade.

 

[Soupnazi630]

:
Can any of you Socialist/DemonRATS dispute this as being untrue?

...then, i learned the a missile crisis and sanctions is what impeded freer trade.

Communism as cuba practices it has nothing to do with free trade and always increases poverty it has nothing to do with other nations

What a moron

 

[danielpalos]

eminent domain enables the State to be able to do that.

Enables it do so does not mean it should

we simply have a market friendly form of socialism.

We do not have socialism

That is established fact

Yes, we do. Our Constitution says so. Providing for the general welfare and common defense requires socialism. and maybe post roads, post rails, and post canals.

We do not have socialism and that is established fact.

the constitution does not say so and socialism is not providing defense and roads etc. Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production which we do not have and which consistently fails where it is tried.

Much like your ignorant claim is a constant failure

i am not appealing to ignorance of our welfare clause General or our eminent domain clause.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Enables it do so does not mean it should

we simply have a market friendly form of socialism.

We do not have socialism

That is established fact

Yes, we do. Our Constitution says so. Providing for the general welfare and common defense requires socialism. and maybe post roads, post rails, and post canals.

We do not have socialism and that is established fact.

the constitution does not say so and socialism is not providing defense and roads etc. Socialism is the government ownership of the means of production which we do not have and which consistently fails where it is tried.

Much like your ignorant claim is a constant failure

i am not appealing to ignorance of our welfare clause General or our eminent domain clause.

All of your claims are ignorant.

The general welare clause has nothing to do with socialism.

your massive and laughable ignorance is about socialism in general and that is proven every time you post and get proven stupid

 

[danielpalos]

you need a valid rebuttal; i don't pay attention to inferior arguments.

Here's one, but you may not get it right away.

Y'know how Rachel Maddow is on YOUR team, YOUR side, and she was gonna get President Trump's tax returns and absolutely, positively KILL HIS CHARACTER with it! She was gonna wipe him straight off the map of this planet with the revelations she and her partners at CNN were going to discover.

Turns out Maddow was played by the Master, President Trump, and here's how Gutfield rendered her true puerile pretentiousness in which she was going to ruin him with:

​

we have no problem with "our girl" doing an investigative, follow the money, report.

She will turn them over any day now.

Now, why have the left wing cities not been able to solve simple poverty and homeless in their cities and states? You claim the left has the solutions why have you not given any examples?

it may take more time to prepare an, expose of following the money trail.

Because, dear. The "social horror" of the Poor benefiting is sometimes more than the right wing can bear. Nothing but repeal is not better solutions at lower cost.

That is why some on the left have no problem with "echelon order until we can maneuver to hammer and anvil." Just stay in one place, right wingers.

The reason for extreme poverty in democrat run cities is because of the left wing not the right. Democrats hurt the poor they do not benefit the poor with their policies.

Socialism never works which is why the nation rejects it and we do not try it.

socialism works for government. in this case, it is about equal protection of the law.

"that is a public sector means of production": social justice.

 

[danielpalos]

no, it doesn't. truly free markets have no government.

Free markets and capitalism are not the same thing dumbass

Free markets can and have existed with government

Capitalism is just a commerce related form of the free market.

And American Capitalism is what brings home the bacon. Admit it.

right wing tax cut economics are simple and socialized wealth redistribution on a national and international basis.

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

No they are not.

Tax cuts by definition distribute no wealth they leave wealth where it belongs in the hands of the people who earned it.

yes, they are. only the right wing is too dumb to read charts.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Here's one, but you may not get it right away.

Y'know how Rachel Maddow is on YOUR team, YOUR side, and she was gonna get President Trump's tax returns and absolutely, positively KILL HIS CHARACTER with it! She was gonna wipe him straight off the map of this planet with the revelations she and her partners at CNN were going to discover.

Turns out Maddow was played by the Master, President Trump, and here's how Gutfield rendered her true puerile pretentiousness in which she was going to ruin him with:

​

we have no problem with "our girl" doing an investigative, follow the money, report.

She will turn them over any day now.

Now, why have the left wing cities not been able to solve simple poverty and homeless in their cities and states? You claim the left has the solutions why have you not given any examples?

it may take more time to prepare an, expose of following the money trail.

Because, dear. The "social horror" of the Poor benefiting is sometimes more than the right wing can bear. Nothing but repeal is not better solutions at lower cost.

That is why some on the left have no problem with "echelon order until we can maneuver to hammer and anvil." Just stay in one place, right wingers.

The reason for extreme poverty in democrat run cities is because of the left wing not the right. Democrats hurt the poor they do not benefit the poor with their policies.

Socialism never works which is why the nation rejects it and we do not try it.

socialism works for government. in this case, it is about equal protection of the law.

"that is a public sector means of production": social justice.

It never works and it is never about equality in this or any other case it is always about power and always fails which is why do not have it.

Social justice is anti justice

 

[Soupnazi630]

Free markets and capitalism are not the same thing dumbass

Free markets can and have existed with government

Capitalism is just a commerce related form of the free market.

And American Capitalism is what brings home the bacon. Admit it.

right wing tax cut economics are simple and socialized wealth redistribution on a national and international basis.

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

No they are not.

Tax cuts by definition distribute no wealth they leave wealth where it belongs in the hands of the people who earned it.

yes, they are. only the right wing is too dumb to read charts.

No they are not

By definition one can only redistribute something after taking it. When one cuts taxes one takes LESS from its rightful owners.

Therefore it is less redistribution.

Your chart does not even address that fact much less dispute it. It has nothing to do with left or right wing but with the fact that you are stupid and a liar

 

[Kondor3]

Socialism is taxpayer funds being used collectively to benefit society as a whole, despite income, contribution, or ability.

Sounds horrible, huh?

Well I hate to be the one to tell you, but Socialism, which you have been told to fear all your life, is responsible for all this...

1. The Military/Defense - The United States military is the largest and most funded socialist program in the world. It operates thanks to our taxpayer dollars and protects the country as a whole. From the richest citizens to the homeless who sleep under the bridge. We are all protected by our military whether we pay taxes or not. This is complete socialism.

2. Highways/Roads - Those roads and highways you drive on every single day are completely taxpayer funded. Your tax dollars are used to maintain, expand, and preserve our highways and roads for every one's use. President Eisenhower was inspired by Germany's autobahn and implemented the idea right here in America. That's right, a republican president created our taxpayer funded, national highway system. This was a different time, before the republican party came down with a vicious case of rabies that never went away.

3. Public Libraries - Yes. That place where you go to check out books from conservative authors telling you how horrible socialism is, is in fact socialism. Libraries are taxpayer funded. You pay a few bucks to get a library card and you can read books for free for the rest of your life.

4. Police - Ever had a situation where you had to call the police? Then you have used a taxpayer funded socialist program. Anyone can call the police whether they pay taxes or not. They are there to protect and serve the community, not individuals. This is complete socialism on a state level, but still socialism all the same. Would you rather have to swipe your credit card before the police will help you?

5. Fire Dept. - Hopefully you have never had a fire in your home. But if you have, you probably called your local taxpayer-funded fire department to put the fire out. Like police, this is state socialism. You tax dollars are used to rescue your entire community in case of a fire. It use to be set up where you would pay a fee every month to the fire dept. for their service. If you didn't pay, they let your house burn down. Sadly, a man from Tennessee had this exact situation happen to him in 2011 because he didn't pay his $75.00 fee. I guess that small town in Tennessee would rather let people's houses burn down that resort to evil socialism. So don't take for granted the fact that you have a 24/7 fire dept. to put out your burning home thanks to socialism.


MORE: 75 Ways Socialism Has Improved America

What the hell is wrong with a little socialism? We live with it. It's all around us. It has made our lives better. It's called Democratic Socialism.


Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

There are things that are best done individually.

There are things that are best done collectively.

A healthy mix of the two is what sustains any vibrant developed society.

Preferably, leaving as much as possible to the individual, and resorting to collective effort only when truly appropriate.

Socialism is the opposite, resorting to collective effort by default, and only allowing individualism when something cannot be done collectively.

Big difference.

Libtards would have us believe that such a huge difference does not exist, and conflate mere 'collective efforts' with actual socialism.

As we see here.

Why?

In order to muddy the waters and to seduce voters into believing otherwise.

No Sale.

 

[danielpalos]

we have no problem with "our girl" doing an investigative, follow the money, report.

She will turn them over any day now.

Now, why have the left wing cities not been able to solve simple poverty and homeless in their cities and states? You claim the left has the solutions why have you not given any examples?

it may take more time to prepare an, expose of following the money trail.

Because, dear. The "social horror" of the Poor benefiting is sometimes more than the right wing can bear. Nothing but repeal is not better solutions at lower cost.

That is why some on the left have no problem with "echelon order until we can maneuver to hammer and anvil." Just stay in one place, right wingers.

The reason for extreme poverty in democrat run cities is because of the left wing not the right. Democrats hurt the poor they do not benefit the poor with their policies.

Socialism never works which is why the nation rejects it and we do not try it.

socialism works for government. in this case, it is about equal protection of the law.

"that is a public sector means of production": social justice.

It never works and it is never about equality in this or any other case it is always about power and always fails which is why do not have it.

Social justice is anti justice

you merely appeal to ignorance of our social laws.