Why do Republicans hate "innocent until proven guilty"?

TheCrusader

Member
Dec 30, 2015
682
43
18
How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.
 
How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.
Both ends of the spectrum jump to conclusions when someone from "the other side" does something bad.

All. The. Time.
.
 
"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.
 
How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.
Cry me a river, they don't call him slick Willy for nothing dumbass
 
How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.
Both ends of the spectrum jump to conclusions when someone from "the other side" does something bad.

All. The. Time.
.

Don't care, Democrats aren't trying to murder millions in wars for oil, or steal health care away from the poor to pay for their retirements.
 
"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.

Ok, so you punish people based on perception and not the rule of law.

BEHOLD! The REPUBLICANS.
 
Bill Clinton and Joe Biden are perverted pieces of shit, they have raped screwed and molested their way into office
 
"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.

Ok, so you punish people based on perception and not the rule of law.

BEHOLD! The REPUBLICANS.
Wow, you're a rare fruitcake, arentcha now...

So why punish Bill Clinton for something a COURT could not PROVE?
 
"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.

Ok, so you punish people based on perception and not the rule of law.

BEHOLD! The REPUBLICANS.
BTW, you didn't say anything about "punishing". You said we didn't believe in "innocent until proven guilty". Two different subjects, loon.
 
How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.
Both ends of the spectrum jump to conclusions when someone from "the other side" does something bad.

All. The. Time.
.

Don't care, Democrats aren't trying to murder millions in wars for oil, or steal health care away from the poor to pay for their retirements.
:lol:
 
"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.

Ok, so you punish people based on perception and not the rule of law.

BEHOLD! The REPUBLICANS.
BTW, you didn't say anything about "punishing". You said we didn't believe in "innocent until proven guilty". Two different subjects, loon.

If you believe in the innocence until proven guilty standard of American justice, you wouldn't attack someone's political career based on UNFOUDNED LIES.
 
FACT : Corrupt cankles uses tax payer money to pay her charities employees salaries.
What is even more sad is, the slush fund lawyers do it legally.
 
FACT : Corrupt cankles uses tax payer money to pay her charities employees salaries.
What is even more sad is, the slush fund lawyers do it legally.

Prove it. LOL. All you do is claim they do things, but you can't PROVE IT.
 
How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.

Oh right, Republicans are the ones who convict people with a trial. Remember the Clarence Thomas hearings? Remember the Investigation into the theory that Bush made a secret deal to have Iran let the hostages go? What was the phrase the Dims used to justify these kangaroo courts? Oh yeah, "it's not the evidence, it's the seriousness of the charge."

The hypocrisy of Dims is utterly astounding.
 
"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.

Ok, so you punish people based on perception and not the rule of law.

BEHOLD! The REPUBLICANS.
Wow, you're a rare fruitcake, arentcha now...

So why punish Bill Clinton for something a COURT could not PROVE?
Who's punishing him?
 
How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.

I guess this explains why Democrats are good with preventing people on a no fly list (suspected, not charged, tried and convicted) with purchasing a firearm. Who needs that pesky old Constitution? Not the Democrats.
 

Forum List

Back
Top