Why do Republicans hate "innocent until proven guilty"?

"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.

Ok, so you punish people based on perception and not the rule of law.

BEHOLD! The REPUBLICANS.
BTW, you didn't say anything about "punishing". You said we didn't believe in "innocent until proven guilty". Two different subjects, loon.

If you believe in the innocence until proven guilty standard of American justice, you wouldn't attack someone's political career based on UNFOUDNED LIES.
They aren't unfounded. They're quite well founded.
 
"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.

Ok, so you punish people based on perception and not the rule of law.

BEHOLD! The REPUBLICANS.
BTW, you didn't say anything about "punishing". You said we didn't believe in "innocent until proven guilty". Two different subjects, loon.

If you believe in the innocence until proven guilty standard of American justice, you wouldn't attack someone's political career based on UNFOUDNED LIES.
They aren't unfounded. They're quite well founded.

Sure, then so is the claim the Ferguson Grand Jury was not fully informed of all the facts of the Medical Examiner.
 
Don't care, Democrats aren't trying to murder millions in wars for oil, or steal health care away from the poor to pay for their retirements.
Wow, this has got to be a new record for the quickest attempt by an OP to go off topic in his/her own thread.... :eek:

Somebody call Guinness.
 
"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.

Ok, so you punish people based on perception and not the rule of law.

BEHOLD! The REPUBLICANS.
BTW, you didn't say anything about "punishing". You said we didn't believe in "innocent until proven guilty". Two different subjects, loon.

If you believe in the innocence until proven guilty standard of American justice, you wouldn't attack someone's political career based on UNFOUDNED LIES.
They aren't unfounded. They're quite well founded.

Sure, then so is the claim the Ferguson Grand Jury was not fully informed of all the facts of the Medical Examiner.
I think you must be under the influence, or insane. So I'm going to put you on ignore now. I thought you might be worthwhile to talk to, but you aren't. Bye.
 
How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.

No. If Hillary and Bill don't like it, let them drop out of the election.
 
"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.

Ok, so you punish people based on perception and not the rule of law.

BEHOLD! The REPUBLICANS.
BTW, you didn't say anything about "punishing". You said we didn't believe in "innocent until proven guilty". Two different subjects, loon.

If you believe in the innocence until proven guilty standard of American justice, you wouldn't attack someone's political career based on UNFOUDNED LIES.
The Clinton's are career politicians, with lots of puppet masters. If there was a picture of corruption in the dictionary it would have slick Willy and his Hildabeast pictured...
 
FACT : Corrupt cankles uses tax payer money to pay her charities employees salaries.
What is even more sad is, the slush fund lawyers do it legally.

Prove it. LOL. All you do is claim they do things, but you can't PROVE IT.
Yea, the GSA makes shit up, dummy
Could you hire this woman to work for your business? | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Is it illegal? Is there any proven facts or just statements?
 
  1. The same reason Dems do but then again they both hate innocent until proven guilty when it serves their respective agendas
 
How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.

Oh right, Republicans are the ones who convict people with a trial. Remember the Clarence Thomas hearings? Remember the Investigation into the theory that Bush made a secret deal to have Iran let the hostages go? What was the phrase the Dims used to justify these kangaroo courts? Oh yeah, "it's not the evidence, it's the seriousness of the charge."

The hypocrisy of Dims is utterly astounding.
...selective outrage
 
"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.

Ok, so you punish people based on perception and not the rule of law.

BEHOLD! The REPUBLICANS.
Wow, you're a rare fruitcake, arentcha now...

So why punish Bill Clinton for something a COURT could not PROVE?
People get away with stuff all the time especially the most corrupt of them, the country was forced into Obamacare By a court.
But you keep on orally pleasing the Clintons if it makes you feel better
 
"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.

Ok, so you punish people based on perception and not the rule of law.

BEHOLD! The REPUBLICANS.
Wow, you're a rare fruitcake, arentcha now...

So why punish Bill Clinton for something a COURT could not PROVE?
People get away with stuff all the time especially the most corrupt of them, the country was forced into Obamacare By a court.
But you keep on orally pleasing the Clintons if it makes you feel better

Unless you have proof you should just shut up.
 
FACT : Corrupt cankles uses tax payer money to pay her charities employees salaries.
What is even more sad is, the slush fund lawyers do it legally.

Prove it. LOL. All you do is claim they do things, but you can't PROVE IT.
Yea, the GSA makes shit up, dummy
Could you hire this woman to work for your business? | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Is it illegal? Is there any proven facts or just statements?
Read the link genius.
It is legal. They are lawyers. Its what they do(skirt around the law). The fact is, those RICH AS FUCK slush fund managers use TAX PAYER MONEY to pay their employees salaries.
Can you really not understand that simple concept?
 
"Innocent until proven guilty" is just a legal term. People can actually be guilty in reality, regardless of whether or not they're convicted, or even caught. It's a fine point that doesn't make sense to the people who seem to think that the court determines whether or not a person actually did something bad.

Ok, so you punish people based on perception and not the rule of law.

BEHOLD! The REPUBLICANS.
Wow, you're a rare fruitcake, arentcha now...

So why punish Bill Clinton for something a COURT could not PROVE?
People get away with stuff all the time especially the most corrupt of them, the country was forced into Obamacare By a court.
But you keep on orally pleasing the Clintons if it makes you feel better

Unless you have proof you should just shut up.
Sounds like your feelings are hurt, there is no lower life form on the planet than career politicians like the clintons...
This says everything you need to know about that piece of shit child molester/rapist perverted asswipe son of a bitch and his Hildabeast he called his wife along with their "made for politics" family...
Welcome to the wonderful world of career politicians, sorry sacks of shit.

 
FACT : Corrupt cankles uses tax payer money to pay her charities employees salaries.
What is even more sad is, the slush fund lawyers do it legally.

Prove it. LOL. All you do is claim they do things, but you can't PROVE IT.
Yea, the GSA makes shit up, dummy
Could you hire this woman to work for your business? | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Is it illegal? Is there any proven facts or just statements?
Read the link genius.
It is legal. They are lawyers. Its what they do(skirt around the law). The fact is, those RICH AS FUCK slush fund managers use TAX PAYER MONEY to pay their employees salaries.
Can you really not understand that simple concept?

If it's Legal then it is OK. Change the law if you don't like it.
 
How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.
Both ends of the spectrum jump to conclusions when someone from "the other side" does something bad.

All. The. Time.
.

Don't care, Democrats aren't trying to murder millions in wars for oil, or steal health care away from the poor to pay for their retirements.

No, they just murder millions of babies for the sake of personal convenience. This game is fun.
 
FACT : Corrupt cankles uses tax payer money to pay her charities employees salaries.
What is even more sad is, the slush fund lawyers do it legally.

Prove it. LOL. All you do is claim they do things, but you can't PROVE IT.
Yea, the GSA makes shit up, dummy
Could you hire this woman to work for your business? | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Is it illegal? Is there any proven facts or just statements?
Read the link genius.
It is legal. They are lawyers. Its what they do(skirt around the law). The fact is, those RICH AS FUCK slush fund managers use TAX PAYER MONEY to pay their employees salaries.
Can you really not understand that simple concept?

If it's Legal then it is OK. Change the law if you don't like it.
Just bend over and take it, sheep boi.
Pathetic. Absolutely PATHETIC
 
Does this mean we won't be hearing any more malarkey about George Bush committing war crimes or Karl Rove outing Valery Plame? Is this a Christmas miracle that democrats are going to stop claiming guilt without a conviction?
 
Does this mean we won't be hearing any more malarkey about George Bush committing war crimes or Karl Rove outing Valery Plame? Is this a Christmas miracle that democrats are going to stop claiming guilt without a conviction?

How about the "hands up, don't shoot" lie the Dims have been telling for over a year now?
 

Forum List

Back
Top