Why do Republicans hate "innocent until proven guilty"?

[TheCrusader]

Does this mean we won't be hearing any more malarkey about George Bush committing war crimes or Karl Rove outing Valery Plame? Is this a Christmas miracle that democrats are going to stop claiming guilt without a conviction?

How about the "hands up, don't shoot" lie the Dims have been telling for over a year now?

The Medical Examiner said it is true, that Brown was shot in the back.

But you don't care for facts do you.

Those facts were presented by the Medical Examiner in the Grand Jury, but the Grand Jury still acquitted.

Brown was a gangbanger and he deserved what he got, your pussy still hurt'n. Huh

Was he proven a "gangbanger" in a court of law or is that just the new "******"?

What crimes do ******* have to commit to be executed in the street without a trial?

Again. There are a lot of very bad people, and people who do bad things, who have never been caught or convicted for their crimes. Does that mean they didn't commit crimes? Nope. We are allowed to evaluate people based on their merits (or lack of) and to respond accordingly. If you're doing stupid shit with stupid people, just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean that you didn't do it. And we are not compelled to treat thugs who aren't in prison right at this moment as if they pose no risk.

They do pose a risk, and we will continue to shun them, and they will continue to get shot by cops, and by people who are defending themselves from their stupid criminal asses.

Except the Medical Examiner testified that Brown was shot in the Back.

 

[Rustic]

How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.

Hillary Clinton said it herself victims of sexual assault should be believed. Unless it's Bill Clinton being accused those women are just bimbo's right?

Hillary Clinton: Women Should Be Believed When They Claim Rape; "Have To Increase Prevention"

They don't call Him slick Willy for nothing

 

[peach174]

How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.

As soon as the Democrats stop doing the same damn thing to the Republicans.
By the way, this is exactly why we have the 1st amendment.

 

[Rustic]

Does this mean we won't be hearing any more malarkey about George Bush committing war crimes or Karl Rove outing Valery Plame? Is this a Christmas miracle that democrats are going to stop claiming guilt without a conviction?

How about the "hands up, don't shoot" lie the Dims have been telling for over a year now?

The Medical Examiner said it is true, that Brown was shot in the back.

But you don't care for facts do you.

Those facts were presented by the Medical Examiner in the Grand Jury, but the Grand Jury still acquitted.

Brown was a gangbanger and he deserved what he got, your pussy still hurt'n. Huh

Was he proven a "gangbanger" in a court of law or is that just the new "******"?

What crimes do ******* have to commit to be executed in the street without a trial?

In his case, assaulting a police officer and attempting to steal his weapon, then charging said police officer when ordered to stop. That was really kind of dumb for him to do.

...and it's delusional for anyone to think what he did is right.
Mess with the bull you will get the horns...

 

[bripat9643]

How about the "hands up, don't shoot" lie the Dims have been telling for over a year now?

The Medical Examiner said it is true, that Brown was shot in the back.

But you don't care for facts do you.

Those facts were presented by the Medical Examiner in the Grand Jury, but the Grand Jury still acquitted.

Brown was a gangbanger and he deserved what he got, your pussy still hurt'n. Huh

Was he proven a "gangbanger" in a court of law or is that just the new "******"?

What crimes do ******* have to commit to be executed in the street without a trial?

Again. There are a lot of very bad people, and people who do bad things, who have never been caught or convicted for their crimes. Does that mean they didn't commit crimes? Nope. We are allowed to evaluate people based on their merits (or lack of) and to respond accordingly. If you're doing stupid shit with stupid people, just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean that you didn't do it. And we are not compelled to treat thugs who aren't in prison right at this moment as if they pose no risk.

They do pose a risk, and we will continue to shun them, and they will continue to get shot by cops, and by people who are defending themselves from their stupid criminal asses.

Except the Medical Examiner testified that Brown was shot in the Back.

Wrong, asshole:

Shooting of Michael Brown - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Three autopsies were performed on Brown's body, with all three noting that Brown had been shot at least six times, including twice in the head. He received no shots in his back.[85]​

 

[hadit]

Does this mean we won't be hearing any more malarkey about George Bush committing war crimes or Karl Rove outing Valery Plame? Is this a Christmas miracle that democrats are going to stop claiming guilt without a conviction?

How about the "hands up, don't shoot" lie the Dims have been telling for over a year now?

The Medical Examiner said it is true, that Brown was shot in the back.

But you don't care for facts do you.

Those facts were presented by the Medical Examiner in the Grand Jury, but the Grand Jury still acquitted.

Brown was a gangbanger and he deserved what he got, your pussy still hurt'n. Huh

Was he proven a "gangbanger" in a court of law or is that just the new "******"?

What crimes do ******* have to commit to be executed in the street without a trial?

Again. There are a lot of very bad people, and people who do bad things, who have never been caught or convicted for their crimes. Does that mean they didn't commit crimes? Nope. We are allowed to evaluate people based on their merits (or lack of) and to respond accordingly. If you're doing stupid shit with stupid people, just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean that you didn't do it. And we are not compelled to treat thugs who aren't in prison right at this moment as if they pose no risk.

They do pose a risk, and we will continue to shun them, and they will continue to get shot by cops, and by people who are defending themselves from their stupid criminal asses.

Classic case in point, OJ Simpson. We had a year long trial in which he was aquitted, then a civil trial in which he was found liable for the wrongful death of the two. Now, either he killed them or he did not kill them. In this case, the courts ruled differently because of the differing standards of evidence. Just noting that court proceedings do not necessarily answer all the questions.

 

[hadit]

How about the "hands up, don't shoot" lie the Dims have been telling for over a year now?

The Medical Examiner said it is true, that Brown was shot in the back.

But you don't care for facts do you.

Those facts were presented by the Medical Examiner in the Grand Jury, but the Grand Jury still acquitted.

Brown was a gangbanger and he deserved what he got, your pussy still hurt'n. Huh

Was he proven a "gangbanger" in a court of law or is that just the new "******"?

What crimes do ******* have to commit to be executed in the street without a trial?

Again. There are a lot of very bad people, and people who do bad things, who have never been caught or convicted for their crimes. Does that mean they didn't commit crimes? Nope. We are allowed to evaluate people based on their merits (or lack of) and to respond accordingly. If you're doing stupid shit with stupid people, just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean that you didn't do it. And we are not compelled to treat thugs who aren't in prison right at this moment as if they pose no risk.

They do pose a risk, and we will continue to shun them, and they will continue to get shot by cops, and by people who are defending themselves from their stupid criminal asses.

Except the Medical Examiner testified that Brown was shot in the Back.

Source?

 

[TheCrusader]

How about the "hands up, don't shoot" lie the Dims have been telling for over a year now?

The Medical Examiner said it is true, that Brown was shot in the back.

But you don't care for facts do you.

Those facts were presented by the Medical Examiner in the Grand Jury, but the Grand Jury still acquitted.

Brown was a gangbanger and he deserved what he got, your pussy still hurt'n. Huh

Was he proven a "gangbanger" in a court of law or is that just the new "******"?

What crimes do ******* have to commit to be executed in the street without a trial?

Again. There are a lot of very bad people, and people who do bad things, who have never been caught or convicted for their crimes. Does that mean they didn't commit crimes? Nope. We are allowed to evaluate people based on their merits (or lack of) and to respond accordingly. If you're doing stupid shit with stupid people, just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean that you didn't do it. And we are not compelled to treat thugs who aren't in prison right at this moment as if they pose no risk.

They do pose a risk, and we will continue to shun them, and they will continue to get shot by cops, and by people who are defending themselves from their stupid criminal asses.

Classic case in point, OJ Simpson. We had a year long trial in which he was aquitted, then a civil trial in which he was found liable for the wrongful death of the two. Now, either he killed them or he did not kill them. In this case, the courts ruled differently because of the differing standards of evidence. Just noting that court proceedings do not necessarily answer all the questions.

Precisely but I actually agree with that.

We aren't allowed to hang OJ Simpson for murder because a civil court found him "liable".

 

[hadit]

The Medical Examiner said it is true, that Brown was shot in the back.

But you don't care for facts do you.

Those facts were presented by the Medical Examiner in the Grand Jury, but the Grand Jury still acquitted.

Brown was a gangbanger and he deserved what he got, your pussy still hurt'n. Huh

Was he proven a "gangbanger" in a court of law or is that just the new "******"?

What crimes do ******* have to commit to be executed in the street without a trial?

Again. There are a lot of very bad people, and people who do bad things, who have never been caught or convicted for their crimes. Does that mean they didn't commit crimes? Nope. We are allowed to evaluate people based on their merits (or lack of) and to respond accordingly. If you're doing stupid shit with stupid people, just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean that you didn't do it. And we are not compelled to treat thugs who aren't in prison right at this moment as if they pose no risk.

They do pose a risk, and we will continue to shun them, and they will continue to get shot by cops, and by people who are defending themselves from their stupid criminal asses.

Classic case in point, OJ Simpson. We had a year long trial in which he was aquitted, then a civil trial in which he was found liable for the wrongful death of the two. Now, either he killed them or he did not kill them. In this case, the courts ruled differently because of the differing standards of evidence. Just noting that court proceedings do not necessarily answer all the questions.

Precisely but I actually agree with that.

We aren't allowed to hang OJ Simpson for murder because a civil court found him "liable".

Yet the public cannot be condemned for stating that he killed his wife and her friend. IOW, we believe all sorts of things that are true or very likely to be true without a trial taking place, and sometimes in spite of a trial taking place. You seem to, for instance, believe that Michael Brown was murdered, despite a trial clearly stating that he was not.

 

[sealybobo]

How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.

Both ends of the spectrum jump to conclusions when someone from "the other side" does something bad.

All. The. Time.
.

Yea. Remember the pb oil spill Republicans blamed Obama for? How come they aren't blaming Rick Snyder and the GOP Michigan government for poisoning flint citizens with lead poisoning? Where's the liberal media on it?

If that would have happened to a democratic governor?

 

[TheCrusader]

The Medical Examiner said it is true, that Brown was shot in the back.

But you don't care for facts do you.

Those facts were presented by the Medical Examiner in the Grand Jury, but the Grand Jury still acquitted.

Brown was a gangbanger and he deserved what he got, your pussy still hurt'n. Huh

Was he proven a "gangbanger" in a court of law or is that just the new "******"?

What crimes do ******* have to commit to be executed in the street without a trial?

Again. There are a lot of very bad people, and people who do bad things, who have never been caught or convicted for their crimes. Does that mean they didn't commit crimes? Nope. We are allowed to evaluate people based on their merits (or lack of) and to respond accordingly. If you're doing stupid shit with stupid people, just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean that you didn't do it. And we are not compelled to treat thugs who aren't in prison right at this moment as if they pose no risk.

They do pose a risk, and we will continue to shun them, and they will continue to get shot by cops, and by people who are defending themselves from their stupid criminal asses.

Except the Medical Examiner testified that Brown was shot in the Back.

Source?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...e-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=3

 

[TheCrusader]

Brown was a gangbanger and he deserved what he got, your pussy still hurt'n. Huh

Was he proven a "gangbanger" in a court of law or is that just the new "******"?

What crimes do ******* have to commit to be executed in the street without a trial?

Again. There are a lot of very bad people, and people who do bad things, who have never been caught or convicted for their crimes. Does that mean they didn't commit crimes? Nope. We are allowed to evaluate people based on their merits (or lack of) and to respond accordingly. If you're doing stupid shit with stupid people, just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean that you didn't do it. And we are not compelled to treat thugs who aren't in prison right at this moment as if they pose no risk.

They do pose a risk, and we will continue to shun them, and they will continue to get shot by cops, and by people who are defending themselves from their stupid criminal asses.

Classic case in point, OJ Simpson. We had a year long trial in which he was aquitted, then a civil trial in which he was found liable for the wrongful death of the two. Now, either he killed them or he did not kill them. In this case, the courts ruled differently because of the differing standards of evidence. Just noting that court proceedings do not necessarily answer all the questions.

Precisely but I actually agree with that.

We aren't allowed to hang OJ Simpson for murder because a civil court found him "liable".

Yet the public cannot be condemned for stating that he killed his wife and her friend. IOW, we believe all sorts of things that are true or very likely to be true without a trial taking place, and sometimes in spite of a trial taking place. You seem to, for instance, believe that Michael Brown was murdered, despite a trial clearly stating that he was not.

If they are damaging his career based on NO conviction WHATSOEVER then that is LYING.

You agree Republicans are LIARS?

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.

Hillary Clinton said it herself victims of sexual assault should be believed. Unless it's Bill Clinton being accused those women are just bimbo's right?

Believed until a court of law examines their evidence and throws them out for being money-sucking political hacks.

After lying to everyone in the US Slick Willie finally had to admit his relationship with Lewinsky. The most powerful man in the world took advantage of a young intern and that wasn't the first time. Clinton is no different than Cosby but instead of drugging his victims Clinton used his position.

 

[Rustic]

How about the "hands up, don't shoot" lie the Dims have been telling for over a year now?

The Medical Examiner said it is true, that Brown was shot in the back.

But you don't care for facts do you.

Those facts were presented by the Medical Examiner in the Grand Jury, but the Grand Jury still acquitted.

Brown was a gangbanger and he deserved what he got, your pussy still hurt'n. Huh

Was he proven a "gangbanger" in a court of law or is that just the new "******"?

What crimes do ******* have to commit to be executed in the street without a trial?

Again. There are a lot of very bad people, and people who do bad things, who have never been caught or convicted for their crimes. Does that mean they didn't commit crimes? Nope. We are allowed to evaluate people based on their merits (or lack of) and to respond accordingly. If you're doing stupid shit with stupid people, just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean that you didn't do it. And we are not compelled to treat thugs who aren't in prison right at this moment as if they pose no risk.

They do pose a risk, and we will continue to shun them, and they will continue to get shot by cops, and by people who are defending themselves from their stupid criminal asses.

Except the Medical Examiner testified that Brown was shot in the Back.

You're wrong, that 300 pound sack of shit got what he deserved.
Apparently in your delusion you know more than the grand jury knows, Huh??

 

[Mac1958]

How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.

Both ends of the spectrum jump to conclusions when someone from "the other side" does something bad.

All. The. Time.
.

Yea. Remember the pb oil spill Republicans blamed Obama for? How come they aren't blaming Rick Snyder and the GOP Michigan government for poisoning flint citizens with lead poisoning? Where's the liberal media on it?

If that would have happened to a democratic governor?

Agreed.

That was my point.
.

 

[Rustic]

How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.

Hillary Clinton said it herself victims of sexual assault should be believed. Unless it's Bill Clinton being accused those women are just bimbo's right?

Believed until a court of law examines their evidence and throws them out for being money-sucking political hacks.

After lying to everyone in the US Slick Willie finally had to admit his relationship with Lewinsky. The most powerful man in the world took advantage of a young intern and that wasn't the first time. Clinton is no different than Cosby but instead of drugging his victims Clinton used his position.

Typical, a life of being Career politicians.
They have to do the bidding of their puppet masters, that is why they have the lowest of character.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yeah! Why does Bill Clinton take all those trips to his friend Epstein's Lolita Island where they hold 16 year old girls as sex slaves.

 

[Rustic]

How long do we have to listen to their hypocritical shameful, disgusting accusation that Bill Clinton is a rapist, or the Clintons are murderers or corrupt embezzlers?

Prove it in a court of law, or just shut the hell up.

Both ends of the spectrum jump to conclusions when someone from "the other side" does something bad.

All. The. Time.
.

Yea. Remember the pb oil spill Republicans blamed Obama for? How come they aren't blaming Rick Snyder and the GOP Michigan government for poisoning flint citizens with lead poisoning? Where's the liberal media on it?

If that would have happened to a democratic governor?

Agreed.

That was my point.
.

Typical of career politicians

 

[Rustic]

Yeah! Why does Bill Clinton take all those trips to his friend Epstein's Lolita Island where they hold 16 year old girls as sex slaves.

When will that be put in the Clinton library??
Lol

 

[hadit]

Brown was a gangbanger and he deserved what he got, your pussy still hurt'n. Huh

Was he proven a "gangbanger" in a court of law or is that just the new "******"?

What crimes do ******* have to commit to be executed in the street without a trial?

Again. There are a lot of very bad people, and people who do bad things, who have never been caught or convicted for their crimes. Does that mean they didn't commit crimes? Nope. We are allowed to evaluate people based on their merits (or lack of) and to respond accordingly. If you're doing stupid shit with stupid people, just because you haven't been caught doesn't mean that you didn't do it. And we are not compelled to treat thugs who aren't in prison right at this moment as if they pose no risk.

They do pose a risk, and we will continue to shun them, and they will continue to get shot by cops, and by people who are defending themselves from their stupid criminal asses.

Except the Medical Examiner testified that Brown was shot in the Back.

Source?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...e-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=3

You do understand, don't you, that the article you referenced includes the diagram from the autopsy that clearly shows all of Brown's wounds were in the front of his body, and that it doesn't state that "the Medical Examiner testified that Brown was shot in the Back"?